School leaders’ identification of school level and teacher practices that influence school improvement in national numeracy testing outcomes
Since 2008, all Australian students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 have been assessed in literacy and numeracy through an annual National Assessment Program—Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) test. In 2015, a team of mathematics education researchers across Australia conducted a nationwide research project to identify school practices and policies that were consistent between schools that showed growth and/or improvement in their NAPLAN numeracy results. This paper reports findings from three case study schools, using a school improvement framework to interpret evidence gathered from the schools’ principals and school leaders. The study has particular implications for policy makers and school leaders who may be seeking ways to improve mathematical practices in their own jurisdictions and schools.
KeywordsSchool improvement NAPLAN Effective practices Data
Funding was provided by Office of the Chief Scientist.
- Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Wiliam, D., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy: Report of a study carried out for the Teacher Training Agency. London: King’s College, University of London.Google Scholar
- Association, Australian Primary Principals' (APPA). (2013). Primary principals: Perspectives on NAPLAN testing and assessment. Sydney, NSW: Canvass.Google Scholar
- Australian Academy of Sciences. (2016). The mathematical sciences in Australia: A vision for 2015. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
- Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (1997). Policy on numeracy education in schools. http://www.aamt.edu.au/About-AAMT/Position-statements/Numeracy-education.
- Australian Council for Educational Research [ACER]. (2017). Progressive achievement. Retrieved from https://www.acer.org/pat.
- Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2016a). Information for Parents. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/_resources/NAPLAN_2016_information_for_parents_web.pdf.
- Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2016b). MySchool. Retrieved from https://www.myschool.edu.au/.
- Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2016c). The Australian curriculum mathematics V8.3. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/curriculum/f-10?layout=1.
- Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.Google Scholar
- Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation. (2015). High value-add schools: Key drivers of school improvement. Sydney, NSW: Department of Education and Communities.Google Scholar
- Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2002). Challenging and effective teaching in junior primary mathematics: What does it look like? In M. Goos & T. Spencer (Eds.), Mathematics making waves (Proceedings of the 19th Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, pp. 309–318). Adelaide, SA: AAMT.Google Scholar
- Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2000). Habits of mind. http://www.chsvt.org/wdp/Habits_of_Mind.pdf.
- Dulfer, N., Polesel, J., & Rice, S. (2012). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families: An educator’s perspective. https://www.whitlam.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/409735/High_Stakes_Testing_An_Educators_Perspective.pdf.
- Goss, P., Hunter, J., Romanes, D., & Parsonage, H. (2015). Targeted teaching: How better use of data can improve student learning. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.Google Scholar
- Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, OXON: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximising impact on learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Howell, A. (2012). The silent voice in the NAPLAN debate: Exploring children’s lived experiences of the tests. Paper presented at the joint AARE/APERA International Conference, Sydney.Google Scholar
- Marzano Research Laboratory. (2012). Marzano levels of school effectiveness. http://legisweb.state.wy.us/InterimCommittee/2012/Z02MarzanoLevels.pdf.
- Masters, G. N. (2010). Teaching and learning school improvement framework. http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=monitoring_learning.
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook and the coding manual foor qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Wyn, J., Turnbull, M., & Grimshaw, L. (2014). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families. A qualitative study. Sydney: The Whitlam Institute, University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar