Distance travelled: outcomes and evidence in flexible learning options
- 660 Downloads
Flexible learning options (FLOs) provide individualised learning pathways for disengaged young people with strong emphasis on inclusivity and wellbeing support. Amidst a rapid expansion of Australia’s flexible learning sector, service providers are under increasing pressure to substantiate participant outcomes. This paper stems from a national study of the value of FLOs to young people and the broader Australian community. The study enumerates the outcomes valued by flexible learning practitioners, as well as the various evidence forms they cite to substantiate participant outcomes. Framing success as ‘distance travelled’ (i.e. an individual’s progress relative to his or her own starting point), practitioners demonstrate critical awareness of the social and structural mechanisms by which young people are marginalised from mainstream schooling. Holistic assessment practices also reveal practitioners’ efforts to expand the terms of reference by which educational outcomes may be validated in alternative education settings.
KeywordsAlternative education Educational outcomes Accountability Evidence Distance travelled
Research for this paper was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage Projects funding scheme for the project, Gauging the value of flexible learning options for disenfranchised youth and the Australian community (LP130100344). The ARC has had no involvement in the study design; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or the decision to submit this article for publication.
- Barrett, A. (2012). Building relationships for better outcomes - Peninsula Youth Connections evaluation Stage 2 report. Fitzroy: Brotherhood of St. Laurence. Retrieved from http://www.bsl.org.au/fileadmin/user_upload/files/research/reports/Barrett_Building_relationships_for_better_outcomes_PYC_Stage_2_evaluation_report_2012.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2017.
- Brooking, K., Gardiner, B., & Calvert, S. (2008). Background of students in alternative education: Interviews with a selected 2008 cohort. Report prepared for the Ministry of Education. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/background-students-adult-education-2008.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2017.
- Connell, R. (2015). Markets all around: Defending education in a Neoliberal time. In H. Proctor, P. Brownlee, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Controversies in education: Orthodoxy and heresy in policy and practice (pp. 181–197). London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2009). National partnership agreement on youth attainment and transitions. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
- Davies, M., Lamb, S., & Doecke, E. (2011). Strategic review of effective re-engagement models for disengaged learners. Melbourne: Centre for Research on Education Systems-University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Dewson, S., Eccles, J., Tackey, N., & Jackson, A. (2000). Measuring soft outcomes and distance travelled: A review of current practice. London: Department for Education and Employment.Google Scholar
- Edmund Rice Education Australia (EREA), Youth+. (2015). Young person profiling tool. Unpublished internal document.Google Scholar
- Evans, J., Meyer, D., Pinney, A., & Robinson, B. (2009). Second chances: Reengaging young people in education and training. Essex: Barnardos.Google Scholar
- Fox, S. & O’Connell, M. (2016) ‘If not Gonski funding, then what?’ The Conversation. 6 April, viewed 8 April, 2016. Retrieved online from https://theconversation.com/if-not-gonski-funding-then-what-57.
- Gannon, S. (2013). My school redux: re-storying schooling with the My School website. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 34(1), 17–30.Google Scholar
- Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011). Review of Funding for Schooling-Final Report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR).Google Scholar
- Grattan, M. (2010). My School criticism fails test, Political Opinion. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved Januray 29, 2010 from http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-opinion/my-school-criticism-fails-test-20100128-n1rm.html.
- Gutherson, P., Davies, H., & Daszkiewicz, T. (2011). Achieving successful outcomes through Alternative Education Provision: an international literature review. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.Google Scholar
- Lamb, S., Jackson, J., Walstab, A., & Huo, S. (2015). Educational opportunity in Australia 2015: Who succeeds and who misses out, Centre for International Research on Education Systems, Victoria University, for the Mitchell Institute. Melbourne: Mitchell Institute.Google Scholar
- McGinty, S., & Brader, A. (2005). Educational disengagement: A review of international, Australian and state policy responses. In A. Pandian, M. Kabilan, & S. Kaur (Eds.), Teachers’ practices and supportive cultures (pp. 25–35). Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.Google Scholar
- Mills, M., & McGregor, G. (2014). Re-engaging young people in education: Learning from alternative schools. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mills, M., McGregor, G., Hayes, D., & Te Riele, K. (2015). ‘Schools are for us’: The importance of distribution recognition and representation to creating socially just schools. In K. Trimmer, A. Black, & S. Riddle (Eds.), Mainstreams, margins and the spaces in-between: New possibilities for education research (Vol. 130, pp. 150–167). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, J. (2016). Out of sight, out of mind? The exclusion of students from Victorian schools - A preliminary discussion paper by the Youth Affairs Council of Victoria. Melbourne: Youth Affairs Council of Victoria. Retrieved from http://www.yacvic.org.au/policy-publications/publications-listed-by-policy-area/27-education-and-training/657-exclusion-of-students-from-victorian-schools. Accessed 21 June 2017.
- Morrissette, P. (1999). Phenomenological data analysis: A proposed model for counsellors. Guidance & Counseling, 15(1), 2–7.Google Scholar
- Myconos, G. (2011). A path to re-engagement: Evaluating the first year of a community VCAL education program for young people. Fitzroy: Brotherhood of St. Laurence.Google Scholar
- Myconos, G. (2012). Re-engagement, training and beyond. Evaluating the second year of a Community VCAL education program for young people. Fitzroy: Brotherhood of St. Laurence.Google Scholar
- Myconos, G. (2014). Lessons from a flexible learning program. The Brotherhood of St Laurence Community VCAL education program for young people 2010–2013. Fitzroy: Brotherhood of St. Laurence.Google Scholar
- NVivo qualitative data analysis software. QSR International Pty Ltd: Windows Version 10.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2016). Investing in youth: Australia. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/australia/investing-in-youth-australia-9789264257498-en.htm. Accessed 21 June 2017.
- Productivity Commission (2016). National Education Evidence Base, Draft Report, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2009). Globalizing education policy. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Te Riele, K. (2014). Putting the jigsaw together: flexible learning programs in Australia. Melbourne: The Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong Learning.Google Scholar
- Thomson, P. (2014). Literature review— What’s the alternative? Effective support for young people disengaging from the mainstream. Nottingham: The Prince’s Trust.Google Scholar
- Vickers, M. (2015). Neglecting the evidence: Are we expecting too much from quality teaching? In H. Proctor, P. Brownlee, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Controversies in education: Orthodoxy and heresy in policy and practice (pp. 81–90). London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Wilson-Ahlstrom, A., Yohalem, N., DuBois, D., Ji, P., Hillaker, B., & Weikart, D. (2014). From soft skills to hard data: Measuring youth program outcomes. Washington, DC: Forum for Youth Investment.Google Scholar