The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 361–376 | Cite as

HPE teachers’ negotiation of environmental health spaces: discursive positions, embodiment and materialism



A National Curriculum in Health and Physical Education (HPE) has recently been developed in Australia. This new curriculum reflects, among other educational priorities, both environmental sensitivities and a commitment to the enhancement of young people’s health and wellbeing. HPE is one of the key sites in the curriculum where a focused consideration of the relationship between the environment and health is possible. However, to date no research has considered the ways that HPE teachers might recognise and negotiate these spaces. The research described in this paper addresses this gap through an analysis of semi-structured interviews with generalist primary and specialist secondary HPE teachers, drawing on a ‘narrative ethnography’ approach derived from cultural geography. This analysis highlights the consequences of the absence of a knowledge tradition that explicitly links the fields of the environment and health in HPE. Participants who were able to conceptualise environmental health almost exclusively drew on dominant neoliberal and risk discourses. At the same time, teachers’ embodied histories and affective encounters with non-human nature helped them to rupture or challenge dominant assumptions about environmental health. We argue that corporeal knowledge developed through embodied experiences has the potential to assist teachers in formulating environmental health in ways that highlight how interactions with the environment might enhance health and wellbeing.


Health and Physical Education Socio-material Embodiment Environmental health 


  1. Australian Curriculum Assessment & Reporting Authority. (2015a). Health and Physical Education. The Australian Curriculum v7.3. Retrieved January 26, 2015, from
  2. Australian Curriculum Assessment & Reporting Authority. (2015b). Health and Physical Education: Glossary. The Australian Curriculum v7.3. Retrieved January 26, 2015, from
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway [electronic resource]: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baxter, J., & Eyles, J. (1997). Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: Establishing ‘rigour’ in interview analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(4), 505–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (2000). Risk society revisited: Theory, politics and research programmes. In B. Adam, U. Beck, & J. van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  6. Coutts, C., Forkink, A., & Weiner, J. (2014). The portrayal of natural environment in the evolution of the ecological public health paradigm. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(1), 1005–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawford, R. (1980). Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services, 10(3), 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, J. (2008). Education, disordered eating and obesity discourse: Fat fabrications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1989). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Frumkin, H. (2001). Beyond toxicity: Human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(3), 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gehle, K. S., Crawford, J. L., & Hatcher, M. T. (2011). Integrating environmental health into medical education. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(4, Supplement 3), S296–S301.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, T., & Birrell, C. (2015). Touched by the Earth: A place-based outdoor learning programme incorporating the Arts. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 15, 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green, D., & Minchin, L. (2014). Living on climate-changed country: Indigenous health, well-being and climate change in remote Australian communities. EcoHealth, 11(2), 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregory, R. (1991). Critical thinking for environmental health risk education. Health Education Quarterly, 18(3), 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gruenewald, D. A. (2004). A Foucauldian analysis of environmental education: Toward the socioecological challenge of the Earth Charter. Curriculum Inquiry, 34(1), 71–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hilgenkamp, K. (2006). Environmental health: Ecological perspectives. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Johansson, M., Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2011). Psychological benefits of walking: Moderation by company and outdoor environment. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(3), 261–280.Google Scholar
  21. Kingsley, J., Townsend, M., Henderson-Wilson, C., & Bolam, B. (2013). Developing an exploratory framework linking Australian Aboriginal peoples’ connection to country and concepts of wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 678–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Longhurst, R. (1997). (Dis)embodied geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 21(4), 486–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Madden, K. (1995). Householders’ experiences of ‘save the environment’ messages. Australian Journal of Communication, 22(3), 82–102.Google Scholar
  24. Maller, C., Townsend, M., Pryor, A., Brown, P., & St Leger, L. (2006). Healthy nature healthy people: ‘Contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International, 21(1), 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Petersen, A., & Lupton, D. (2000). The new public health: Health and self in the age of risk. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  26. Preston, L. (2012). Changing green subjectivities in outdoor and environmental education: A qualitative study. Discourse, 33(2), 235–249.Google Scholar
  27. Rodrigues, C. (2014). The environmentalization of physical education in higher education settings: Environmental dimensions of academic units in federal universities of Brazil. Paper presented at the 6th international conference on environmental education and sustainability: The best of both worlds, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  28. Rodrigues, C., & Payne, P. (2015). Environmentalization of the physical education curriculum in Brazilian universities: Culturally comparative lessons from critical outdoor education in Australia. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning. doi:10.1080/14729679.2015.1035294.Google Scholar
  29. Sauvé, L., & Godmaire, H. (2004). Environmental health education: A participatory holistic approach. EcoHealth, 1(2), SU35–SU46.Google Scholar
  30. Simovska, V., & Mannix-McNamara, P. (2015). Schools for health & sustainability: Theory, research and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. St Leger, L. (2006). Health promotion and health education in schools: Trends, effectiveness and possibilities: Research report. Noble Park North, Victoria: RACV.Google Scholar
  32. Strife, S. (2010). Reflecting on environmental education: Where is our place in the green movement? Journal of Environmental Education, 41(3), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Townsend, M. A., Maller, C., St Leger, L., & Brown, P. (2003). Using environmental interventions to create sustainable solutions to problems of health and wellbeing. Environmental Health, 3(1), 58.Google Scholar
  34. Waitt, G. (2010). Doing Foucauldian discourse analysis: Revealing social realities. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Waitt, G., & Frazer, R. (2012). “The vibe” and “the glide”: Surfing through the voices of longboarders. Journal of Australian Studies, 36(3), 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Welch, R., & Wright, J. (2011). Tracing discourses of health and the body: Exploring pre-service primary teachers’ constructions of ‘healthy’ bodies. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams, S. (2006). Medical sociology and the biological body: Where are we now and where do we go from here? Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 10(1), 5–30.Google Scholar
  38. Wright, J. (2003). Poststructural methodologies—The body, schooling and health. In J. Evans, B. Davies, & J. Wright (Eds.), Body knowledge and control: Studies in the sociology of physical education and health (pp. 34–59). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole Taylor
    • 1
  • Jan Wright
    • 1
  • Gabrielle O’Flynn
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations