Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Think Tanks, ‘policy experts’ and ‘ideas for’ education policy making in Australia

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a case study of the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS) in Australia with a focus on its education policy work, specifically the report, School funding on a budget (SFoB). CIS is a conservative right wing advocacy think tank, established in 1976 in the aftermath of the Whitlam government’s policy activism, framed by classical liberalism or neoliberalism with a provenance in the political economy of Hayek and Friedman. As such, it is committed to smaller government, individual responsibility and more market driven solutions to social problems. CIS gives more emphasis to academic research than other think tanks of its kind. This paper theorises think tanks as hybrid, boundary spanning organisations that work across academic, media, political and economic fields. An argument is proffered that it is the restructured state, with its loss of research capacity and fast policy making, which has strengthened opportunities for think tank influence across the policy cycle in education. With SFoB, CIS used a political moment, the first Abbott federal government budget focused on ‘budget repair’, to argue a case for reducing government educational expenditure as a percentage of GDP in the long term. That policy moment was used for recommending the abolition of the federal department of education and further dismantling of public schooling. SFoB is shown to be exemplary of the conservative advocacy think tank report genre in its usage of ‘mediatized’ language, surface accoutrements of academic research, and user focus. SFoB is a manifestation of what can be seen as the ideas for policy work of CIS, dressed up as research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Bob would like to thank the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. He would also like to thank Greg Thompson, Glenn Savage and Sam Sellar for their constructive comments on the paper as well.

  2. I debated this report with Dr Buckingham on Radio National’s Life Matters Program anchored by Natasha Mitchell, shortly after its release on 30 April, 2014, just prior to the ‘tough’, ‘deficit-reducing’ and widely criticised May, 2014 Abbott/Hockey federal budget.

  3. Dr Buckingham has a PhD from Macquarie University Special Education Centre on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading.

  4. The new Coalition Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull, has indicated the government might rethink this rejection of the full Gonski funding package.

References

  • Auld, E., & Morris, P. (2014). Comparative education, the ‘new paradigm’ and policy borrowing: constructing knowledge for educational reform. Comparative Education, 50(2), 129–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2012). Global education Inc. London: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2013). The education debate (2nd ed.). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., & Exley, S. (2010). Making policy with ‘good ideas’: policy networks and the ‘intellectuals’ of New Labour. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. & Youdell, D. (2008). Hidden privatization in public education. Brussels: Education International.

  • Biddle, B., & Berliner, D. (2002). Small class size and its effects. Educational Leadership, 59(5), 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, J. (2014). School funding on a budget. Sydney: The Centre for Independent Studies.

  • Case, T., & Rowell, A. (2015). A Quiet word: lobbying, crony capitalism and broken politics in Britain. London: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chingos, M. & Whitehurst, G. (2011). Class size: what the research says and what it means for state policy. Brookings Institute. May 11.

  • Cibulka, J. G. (1994). Policy analysis and the study of education. Journal of Education Policy, 9, (5/6), 105–125.

  • Coffield, F. (2012). Why the McKinsey reports will not improve school systems. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condron, D. (2011). Egalitarianism and educational excellence: compatible goals for affluent societies? Educational Researcher, 40, 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, V., Maguire, M., Trippestad, T. A., Liu, Y., Yang, X., & Zeichner, K. (2015). Teaching other people’s children, elsewhere, for a while: the rhetoric of a travelling educational reform. Journal of Education Policy,. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1066871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1982). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011) Review of funding for schooling. Final Report.

  • Gordon, I., Lewis, J., & Young, R. (1977). Perspective on policy analysis. Public Administration Bulletin, 25, 26–35.

  • Hart, P., & Vromen, A. (2008). A new era for think tanks in public policy? International trends, Australian realities. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(2), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (2007). The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, D. (2016). The end of public schools: the corporate reform agenda to privatize education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J. (2013). Challenging inequality in Australian schools: Gonski and beyond. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 286–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2013). The impact of research on policy in an era of evidence-based policy. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2004). Mediatizing educational policy: The journalistic field, science policy, and cross-field effects. Journal of Education Policy, 19(3), 361–380.

  • Lingard, B., Baroutsis, A., & Sellar, S. (2014). Learning commission report: connecting schools with communities. Brisbane: The University of Queensland. doi:10.13140/2.1.3154.7683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, C., Scott, J. & DeBary, E. (2011) The rise of intermediary organizations in knowledge production, advocacy, and educational policy. Teachers College Record

  • Mahony, P., Hextall, I., & Menter, I. (2004). Building dams in Jordan, assessing teachers in England: a case-study in edu-business. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2(2), 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, L. (2014). Think tanks and the media: how the conservative movement gained entry into the education policy arena. Educational Policy, 28(6), 845–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medvetz, T. (2008) Think tanks as an emergent field. The Social Science Research Council, October: 1–10.

  • Medvetz, T. (2012). Murky power: ‘think tanks’ as boundary organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations., 34, 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, P. (2003). Australian neoliberal think tanks and the backlash against the welfare state. Journal of Australian Political Economy., 51, 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. (2009). A real education revolution will need (yes, you guessed it...) vouchers. Institute of Public Affairs Review, 61(2), 37.

  • Ozga, J. (2000). Policy research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast policy: experimental statecraft at the thresholds of neoliberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.

  • Rich, A. (2004). Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellar, B., & Lingard, B. (2014). Equity in Australian schooling: the absent presence of socioeconomic context. In S. Gannon & W. Sawyer (Eds.), Contemporary issues of equity in education. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., & Marden, P. (2008). Conservative think tanks and public politics. Australian Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 699–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thunert, M. W. (2006). The development and significance of think tanks in Germany. German Policy Studies, 3(2), 185–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlam, G. (1985). The Whitlam government. Ringwood: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, A. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policy-making: global contexts and international trends. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bob Lingard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lingard, B. Think Tanks, ‘policy experts’ and ‘ideas for’ education policy making in Australia. Aust. Educ. Res. 43, 15–33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0193-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0193-0

Keywords

Navigation