The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 15–33 | Cite as

Think Tanks, ‘policy experts’ and ‘ideas for’ education policy making in Australia

Article

Abstract

This paper provides a case study of the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS) in Australia with a focus on its education policy work, specifically the report, School funding on a budget (SFoB). CIS is a conservative right wing advocacy think tank, established in 1976 in the aftermath of the Whitlam government’s policy activism, framed by classical liberalism or neoliberalism with a provenance in the political economy of Hayek and Friedman. As such, it is committed to smaller government, individual responsibility and more market driven solutions to social problems. CIS gives more emphasis to academic research than other think tanks of its kind. This paper theorises think tanks as hybrid, boundary spanning organisations that work across academic, media, political and economic fields. An argument is proffered that it is the restructured state, with its loss of research capacity and fast policy making, which has strengthened opportunities for think tank influence across the policy cycle in education. With SFoB, CIS used a political moment, the first Abbott federal government budget focused on ‘budget repair’, to argue a case for reducing government educational expenditure as a percentage of GDP in the long term. That policy moment was used for recommending the abolition of the federal department of education and further dismantling of public schooling. SFoB is shown to be exemplary of the conservative advocacy think tank report genre in its usage of ‘mediatized’ language, surface accoutrements of academic research, and user focus. SFoB is a manifestation of what can be seen as the ideas for policy work of CIS, dressed up as research.

Keywords

Think tanks Advocacy Ideas for policy Hybrid organisations Restructured state Centre for Independent Studies 

References

  1. Auld, E., & Morris, P. (2014). Comparative education, the ‘new paradigm’ and policy borrowing: constructing knowledge for educational reform. Comparative Education, 50(2), 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, S. J. (2012). Global education Inc. London: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. (2013). The education debate (2nd ed.). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J., & Exley, S. (2010). Making policy with ‘good ideas’: policy networks and the ‘intellectuals’ of New Labour. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball, S. J. & Youdell, D. (2008). Hidden privatization in public education. Brussels: Education International.Google Scholar
  7. Biddle, B., & Berliner, D. (2002). Small class size and its effects. Educational Leadership, 59(5), 12–23.Google Scholar
  8. Buckingham, J. (2014). School funding on a budget. Sydney: The Centre for Independent Studies.Google Scholar
  9. Case, T., & Rowell, A. (2015). A Quiet word: lobbying, crony capitalism and broken politics in Britain. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  10. Chingos, M. & Whitehurst, G. (2011). Class size: what the research says and what it means for state policy. Brookings Institute. May 11.Google Scholar
  11. Cibulka, J. G. (1994). Policy analysis and the study of education. Journal of Education Policy, 9, (5/6), 105–125.Google Scholar
  12. Coffield, F. (2012). Why the McKinsey reports will not improve school systems. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Condron, D. (2011). Egalitarianism and educational excellence: compatible goals for affluent societies? Educational Researcher, 40, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellis, V., Maguire, M., Trippestad, T. A., Liu, Y., Yang, X., & Zeichner, K. (2015). Teaching other people’s children, elsewhere, for a while: the rhetoric of a travelling educational reform. Journal of Education Policy,. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1066871.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, M. (1982). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011) Review of funding for schooling. Final Report.Google Scholar
  17. Gordon, I., Lewis, J., & Young, R. (1977). Perspective on policy analysis. Public Administration Bulletin, 25, 26–35.Google Scholar
  18. Hart, P., & Vromen, A. (2008). A new era for think tanks in public policy? International trends, Australian realities. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(2), 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hayek, F. (2007). The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hursh, D. (2016). The end of public schools: the corporate reform agenda to privatize education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Kenway, J. (2013). Challenging inequality in Australian schools: Gonski and beyond. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 286–308.Google Scholar
  23. Lingard, B. (2013). The impact of research on policy in an era of evidence-based policy. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2004). Mediatizing educational policy: The journalistic field, science policy, and cross-field effects. Journal of Education Policy, 19(3), 361–380.Google Scholar
  25. Lingard, B., Baroutsis, A., & Sellar, S. (2014). Learning commission report: connecting schools with communities. Brisbane: The University of Queensland. doi:10.13140/2.1.3154.7683.Google Scholar
  26. Lubienski, C., Scott, J. & DeBary, E. (2011) The rise of intermediary organizations in knowledge production, advocacy, and educational policy. Teachers College RecordGoogle Scholar
  27. Mahony, P., Hextall, I., & Menter, I. (2004). Building dams in Jordan, assessing teachers in England: a case-study in edu-business. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2(2), 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McDonald, L. (2014). Think tanks and the media: how the conservative movement gained entry into the education policy arena. Educational Policy, 28(6), 845–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Medvetz, T. (2008) Think tanks as an emergent field. The Social Science Research Council, October: 1–10.Google Scholar
  30. Medvetz, T. (2012). Murky power: ‘think tanks’ as boundary organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations., 34, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mendes, P. (2003). Australian neoliberal think tanks and the backlash against the welfare state. Journal of Australian Political Economy., 51, 29–56.Google Scholar
  32. Novak, J. (2009). A real education revolution will need (yes, you guessed it...) vouchers. Institute of Public Affairs Review, 61(2), 37.Google Scholar
  33. Ozga, J. (2000). Policy research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast policy: experimental statecraft at the thresholds of neoliberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.Google Scholar
  36. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
  37. Rich, A. (2004). Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sellar, B., & Lingard, B. (2014). Equity in Australian schooling: the absent presence of socioeconomic context. In S. Gannon & W. Sawyer (Eds.), Contemporary issues of equity in education. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, M., & Marden, P. (2008). Conservative think tanks and public politics. Australian Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 699–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thunert, M. W. (2006). The development and significance of think tanks in Germany. German Policy Studies, 3(2), 185–221.Google Scholar
  44. Whitlam, G. (1985). The Whitlam government. Ringwood: Penguin.Google Scholar
  45. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  46. Wiseman, A. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policy-making: global contexts and international trends. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations