Skip to main content

Ethical decision-making in academic administration: A qualitative study of college deans’ ethical frameworks

Abstract

Ethical decision-making in school administration has received considerable attention in educational leadership literature. However, most research has focused on principals working in secondary school settings while studies that explore ethical reasoning processes of academic deans have been significantly few. This qualitative study aims to describe the ethical decision-making processes employed by a select group of Filipino college deans in solving ethical dilemmas using the ethical paradigms proposed in the works of Starratt (Educ Adm Q 27:185–202, 1991) and Shapiro and Stefkovich (Ethical leadership and decision-making in education: applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas, 2005) as frameworks for the analysis. Data was gathered using semi-structured interviews and field text was analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. Findings of this study show that majority of the deans chose to share ethical dilemmas involving students and teachers. The findings also show the ethical frameworks of care, justice, and profession as the dominant paradigms utilized by Filipino deans and their preference for adopting multiple ethical frameworks when making their decisions. Most of the ethical dilemmas which the deans narrated relate to their tasks of academic administration such as monitoring student performance, faculty evaluation and maintaining school discipline. Interestingly, only a few dilemmas involving university administrators were expressed, and dilemmas that refer to broader societal issues usually associated with school administrators’ utilization of the ethic of critique were also significantly left out in the narratives of this study. This paper intends to contribute to current literature by expanding research to administrators working in the context of higher education in the Philippine setting. The findings of this study could serve as knowledge base in designing ethics courses to enhance educational leaders’ ethical decision-making skills. The study also provides useful insights of ethical decisions and reasoning processes employed by academic administrators in resolving real life ethical dilemmas that could be useful at the practical level for aspiring and practicing deans.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Andrade, J. (2014, July 3). CHED orders colleges, universities to tighten regulation of frats. The Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved from http://newsinfo.inquirer.net.

  2. Aning, J. (2008, May 24). SC upholds suspension of state university head. The Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved from http://newsinfo.inquirer.net.

  3. Arcelo, A. (2003). In pursuit of quality in higher education through accreditation: The Philippine experience. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org.

  4. Ayres, L. (2008). Thematic coding and analysis. In L. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 867–868). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barrow, R. (2006). Academic ethics: Towards a coherent concept. In R. Barrow & P. Keeny (Eds.), Academic ethics (pp. 611–624). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bebeau, M., Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1999). Beyond the promise: A perspective on research in moral education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Begley, P. T. (2005). The dilemmas of leadership: Perspectives on the moral literacy of principals from Ontario and Pennsylvania. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, 11–15 April.

  8. Begley, P. (2010). Leading with moral purpose: The place of ethics. In T. Bush, L. Bell, & D. Middlewood (Eds.), The principles of educational leadership and management (pp. 31–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bray, N. (2008). Proscriptive norms for academic deans: Comparing faculty expectations across institutional and disciplinary boundaries. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(6), 692–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell, E. (1997). Administrators’ decisions and teachers’ ethical dilemmas: Implications for moral agency. Leading & Managing, 3(4), 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carson, A., & Banuazzi, A. (2008). “That’s not fair”: Similarities and differences in distributive justice reasoning between American and Filipino children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 493–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Catacutan, R., & de Guzman, A. (2015). Bridge over troubled water: Phenomenologizing Filipino college deans’ ethical dilemmas in academic administration. Educational Management Administration and Leadership,. doi:10.1177/1741143214558579.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chao, R. (2012). Democracy, decentralization and higher education: The Philippine case. Asia Pacific Social Science Review, 12(1), 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Church, T., & Katigbak, M. (2000). Trait psychology in the Philippines. American Behavior Scientist, 44(1), 73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Commission on Higher Education. (2008). Manual of regulations for private higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ched.gov.ph.

  16. Commission on Higher Education. (2014). Higher education in numbers. Retrieved from http://www.ched.gov.ph.

  17. Cranston, N., Ehrich, L., & Kimber, M. (2006). Ethical dilemmas: The “bread and butter” of educational leaders’ lives. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(2), 106–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Creswell, J. (2008). Mixed methods research. In L. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 526–529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. De Boer, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2009). The changing nature of academic deanship. Leadership, 5(3), 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Guzman, A. (2003). The dynamics of educational reforms in the Philippine basic and higher education sectors. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. de Guzman, A. (2013). Quality and political reality: Complementary or contradictory? In J. Sim (Ed.), QS Showcase-AMEA (pp. 124–125). Singapore: QS Asia Quacquarelli Symonds.

    Google Scholar 

  23. de Guzman, A., & Hapan, M. (2013). It takes two to tango: Phenomenologizing collaborative mindset of Filipino academic deans. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(3), 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. de Guzman, A., & Hapan, M. (2014). Understanding the twists and turns of academic deanship: A phenomenology of Filipino medical technology deans’ struggles as organizational managers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(2), 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  25. de Guzman, A., Uy, M., Siy, E., Torres, R., Tancioco, J., & Hernandez, J. (2008). From teaching from the heart to teaching with a heart: Segmenting Filipino college students’ views of their teachers’ caring behavior and their orientations as cared- for individuals. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(4), 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dedace, S. & See, A. (2009, February 2). Random drug test: A necessary lesser evil in narcotics-plagued RP. The GMA News. Retrieved from http://www.gmanetwork.com.

  27. Dempster, N., & Berry, V. (2003). Blindfolded in a minefield: Principals’ ethical decision-making. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 457–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dempster, N., Carter, L., Freakley, M., & Parry, L. (2004). Conflicts, confusions and contradictions in principals’ ethical decision-making. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(4), 450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Diola, C. (2008, April 14). Amendments to anti-sexual harassment law pushed. The Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved from http://newsinfo.inquirer.net.

  30. Dockery, C. (2009). Ethical decision-making and the elementary principal: A mixed methods study (Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University). Retrieved December 26, 2011 from http://dspace.lib.ttu.edu.

  31. Durban, J., & Catalan, R. (2012). Issues and concerns of Philippine education through the years. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Englehardt, E. E., Pritchard, M. S., Romesburg, K. D., & Schrag, B. E. (Eds.). (2010). The ethical challenges of academic administration. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Enomoto, E. (1997). Negotiating the ethics of care and justice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Esmaquel, P. (2011, March 6). Females still discriminated against in PHL schools-CHED chair. GMA News Online. Retrieved from http://www.gmanetwork.com.

  35. Esplanada, J. (2009, May 25). State-run college president axed for nepotism. The Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved from http://www.inquirer.net.

  36. Eyal, O., Berkovich, I., & Schwartz, T. (2011). Making the right choices: Ethical judgments among educational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(4), 396–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Flores, H. (2015, March 5). CHED orders probe on suicide of Cagayan coed over unpaid fees. The Philippine Star. Retrieved from http://www.philstar.com.

  38. Frick, W. (2008). Principals’ value informed decision-making, intrapersonal moral discord, and pathways to resolution: The complexities of moral leadership praxis. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1), 50–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Greenfield, W. D. (2004). Moral leadership in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(2), 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hallak, J., & Poisson, M. (2007). Corrupt schools, corrupt universities: What can be done?. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hatier, C. (2014). The morality of university decision-makers. Studies in Higher Education, 39(6), 1085–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hayes, N. (1997). Theory-led thematic analysis: Social identification in small companies. In N. Hayes (Ed.), Doing qualitative analysis in pscyhology (pp. 93–114). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium. (1996). Standards for school leaders. Washington DC: ISLLC.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jimenez, J. (2014, October 13) Supreme court rulings on managing HR in universities. The Freeman. Retrieved from http://www.philstar.com.

  45. Jocano, F. (2000). Work values of successful Filipinos. Quezon City: Punlad Research House.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. The Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Keys, M. (2001). Aquinas’ two pedagogies: A reconsideration of the relation between law and moral virtue. American Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 519–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kirby, P., Paradise, L., & Protti, R. (1992). Ethical reasoning of educational administrators: Structuring inquiry around the problems of practice. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(4), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kirkman, B., & Shapiro, D. (2001). The impact of team members’ cultural values on productivity, cooperation, and empowerment in self-managing work teams. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 597–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kohlberg, L. (1984). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In Essays on moral development: The psychology of moral development (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Harper & Row Publishers.

  51. Lacar, L. (1995). Familism among Muslims and Christians in the Philippines. Philippine Studies, 43(1), 42–65.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Langlois, L. (2004). Responding ethically: Complex decision-making by school district superintendents. International Studies in Educational Administration, 32(2), 78–93.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Malipot, I. (2014, July 7). DepEd: School officials are liable for violation of anti-bullying law. The Manila Bulletin. Retrieved from http://www.mb.com.ph.

  54. Malipot, I. (2014, August 21). Task force to probe Bulacan schools’ liability on death of students. The Manila Bulletin. Retrieved from http://www.mb.com.ph.

  55. Marshall, C. (1992). School administrators’ values: A focus on atypicals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 368–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. McWilliams, V., & Nahavandi, A. (2006). Using live cases to teach ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mele, D. (2005). Ethical education in accounting: Integrating rules, values and virtues. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(1), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Minnis, J. (2011). Ethical and moral decision-making: Praxis and hermeneutics for school leaders (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida). Retrieved December 26, 2011 from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu.

  59. Murphy, J. (2005). Unpacking the foundations of ISLLC standards and addressing concerns in the academic community. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 154–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Myyry, L. (2003). Components of morality: A professional ethics perspective on moral motivation, moral sensitivity, moral reasoning and related constructs among university students (Academic dissertation, University of Helsinki). Retrieved February 28, 2012 from http://ethesis.helsinki.fi.

  61. Norberg, K., & Johansson, O. (2007). Ethical dilemmas of Swedish school leaders: Contrasts and common themes. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 35(2), 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Northway, R. (2000). Disability, nursing research and the importance of reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(2), 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ordonez, R., & Gandeza, N. (2004). Integrating traditional beliefs and modern medicine: Filipino nurses’ health beliefs, behaviors, and practices. Home Health Care Management and Practice, 17(1), 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ornstein, A., & Hunkins, F. (2009). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ozaeta, A. (2013, April 8). 2 students commit suicide over failing grades. The Philippine Star. Retrieved from http://www.philstar.com.

  66. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Pazzibugan, D. (2014, July 12). CHED: Tertiary schools with substandard courses resorting to courts to avoid closure. The Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved from http://newsinfo.inquirer.net.

  68. Pieper, J. (1990). The four cardinal virtues. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Poocharoen, O., & Brillantes, A. (2013). Meritocracy in Asia Pacific: Status, issues and challenges. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(2), 140–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Punay, E. (2013, March 16). UP student kills self over tuition. The Philippine Star. Retrieved from http://www.philstar.com.

  71. QS World University Rankings (2013). Top Universities. Retrieved March 1, 2014 from http://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings.

  72. Reidenbach, R., & Robin, D. (1988). Some initial steps toward improving the measurement of ethical evaluations of marketing activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(11), 871–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Rest, J. R. (1980). Moral judgment research and the cognitive-developmental approach to moral education. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 58(9), 602–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Rest, J., & Narvaez, D. (1991). The college experience and moral development. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 229–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (2000). A neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT and schema theory. Educational Psychology Review, 11(4), 291–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Reyes, V. (2009). Systemic corruption and the programme on basic education in the Philippine Department of Education. Journal of Developing Societies, 25(4), 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Reynolds, S., & Ceranic, T. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610–1624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Richmon, M. J. (2003). Persistent difficulties with values in educational administration: Mapping the terrain. In P. T. Begley & O. Johansson (Eds.), The ethical dimensions of school leadership (pp. 33–47). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  79. Roche, K. (1999). Moral and ethical dilemmas in Catholic school settings. In P. T. Begley (Ed.), Values and educational leadership (pp. 255–272). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ryan, J. (2003). Beyond the veil: Moral educational administration and inquiry in a postmodern world. In P. T. Begley & O. Johansson (Eds.), The ethical dimensions of school leadership (pp. 73–95). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ryan, G., & Bernard, H. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Shapiro, J., & Hassinger, R. (2007). Using case studies of ethical dilemmas for the development of moral literacy: Towards educating for social justice. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(4), 451–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Shapiro, J., & Stefkovich, J. (2005). Ethical leadership and decision-making in education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Sherblom, S., Shipps, T., & Shreblom, J. (1993). Justice, care, and integrated concerns in the ethical decision-making of nurses. Qualitative Health Research, 3(4), 442–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Spratlen, L. (1995). Interpersonal conflict which includes mistreatment in a university workplace. Violence and Victims, 10(4), 285–297.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Sprouse, F. S. (2009). School district superintendents’ response to ethical dilemmas: A grounded theory (Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University). Retrieved April 30, 2012, from http://tigerprints.clemson.edu.

  87. Starratt, R. J. (1991). Building an ethical school: A theory for practice in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Strike, K. A., Haller, E. J., & Soltis, J. F. (1998). The ethics of school administration. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Troy, B. (2009). Elementary school assistant principals’ decision-making analyzed through four ethical frameworks of justice, critique, care, and the profession (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida). Retrieved December 26, 2011 from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu.

  91. Undung, Y., & de Guzman, A. (2009). Understanding the elements of empathy as a component of care-driven leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1), 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Viernes, R. M., & de Guzman, A. B. (2005). Filipino teachers’ experiences of supportive relationships with colleagues: A narrative biographical inquiry. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(2), 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Wagner, P. A., & Simpson, D. J. (2009). Ethical decision-making in school administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Weingartner, R. H. (2000). The moral dimensions of academic administration. In R. Barrow & P. Keeny (Eds.), Academic ethics (pp. 314–318). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W., Montez, J. & Nies, C. (2001). The changing nature of academic deanship. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 28 (1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan B. de Guzman.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Ethical dilemmas and ethical frameworks reported by deans

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Catacutan, M.R.G., de Guzman, A.B. Ethical decision-making in academic administration: A qualitative study of college deans’ ethical frameworks. Aust. Educ. Res. 42, 483–514 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0179-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ethical framework
  • Decision making
  • Academic administration
  • Deans