Advertisement

Afrika Matematika

, Volume 29, Issue 3–4, pp 349–356 | Cite as

Underlining some mathematical and physical aspects about the concept of motion in general relativity

  • Elmo Benedetto
  • Fabiano Feleppa
Article

Abstract

The Einstein initial foundations of general relativity have to do with his great intuition and they are not clear as it is for special relativity. As has been widely emphasized, for example, in the book of Ohanian and Ruffini, the very name of the theory indicates a misconception. Despite this, the high school textbooks (at least the Italian ones) and books of scientific divulgation introduce the Einstein gravitational theory still following the initial approach leading, in our opinion, to misinterpretations. A careful student, for example, immediately asks: it is not true that the Earth rotates because I can consider it at rest thanks to general relativity theory. The relativity of motion is trivial in mathematics while it has deep meaning in physics and it is not sufficiently analyzed. Similarly, the arbitrary choice of the origin and the perfect equivalence between all coordinate systems are mathematical properties satisfied by general relativity and students can confuse it with physical equivalence between reference systems that have a deeper meaning and the Einstein theory does not verify it. Gravitational force does not exist and this is the real core of Einsteinian revolution. As happens in Newtonian physics and Special Relativity, also in general relativity the relative motions are the geodesic motions with the difference that spacetime can be curved and geodesics may not be a straight line. Similarly, in general relativity forces cause non-geodesic motion. Geodesic and non-geodesic are tensorial properties and for this reason they are absolute.

Keywords

Mach principle Relativity principle General relativity 

Mathematics Subject Classification

00A35 00A79 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Prof. Antonio Feoli for comments and discussions. Thanks to the authors of [6, 12]. Their books are clear and very interesting and are also a useful source of references on this subject. This research was partially supported by FAR fund of the University of Sannio.

References

  1. 1.
    Galilei, G.: Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze attenenti alla mecanica & i movimenti locali. Edizione Nazionale delle Opere di Galilei, Barbera Ristampa del 1968, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences, Firenze, vol. VIII, pp. 153–160. Dover, New York (1954)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mach, E.: Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung Historisch-Kritisch Dargerstellt. Leipzig, Brockhaus (1883)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Licata, I., et al.: A machian request for the equivalence principle in extended gravity and nongeodesic motion. Gravit. Cosmol. 22, 48 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Einstein, A., Infeld, L.: The evolution of Physics Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1938)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Einstein, A.: Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitä tstheorie. Annalen der Physik 49, 769–822 (1916)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ohanian, H.C., Ruffini, R.: Gravitation and Spacetime Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gasperini, M.: Manuale di Relatività Ristretta. Springer, Milan (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Angel, R.B.: Relativity: The Theory and Its Philosophy. Pergamon Press, Oxford (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M.: The Classical Theory of Fields, 4th edn. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford (1975)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pauli, W.: Theory of Relativity. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1958)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benedetto, E., Feoli, A.: Underlining some aspects of the equivalence principle. Eur. J. Phys. 38(5) (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Capozziello, S., Funaro, M.: 2006 Introduzione alla Relatività Generale. Liguori Editore, Napoli (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eddington, A.S.: Space Time and Gravitation. University Press, Cambridge (1920)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kretschmann, E.: Uber den physikalischen Sinn der Relativitatspostulate. A. Einsteins neue und seine ursprüngliche Relativitatstheorie. Annalen der Physik 53, 575–614 (1917)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weinberg, S.: Gravitation and Cosmology. Wiley, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malament, D.: Discussion: a modest remark about Reichenbach, rotation. Philos. Sci. 52, 615–620 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maudlin, T.: Buckets of water and waves of space: why space-time is probably a substance. Philos. Sci. 60, 183–203 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rynasiewicz, R.: On the distinction between absolute and relative motion. Philos. Sci. 67, 70–93 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Benedetto, E.: Some remarks about general relativity principle. Adv. Stud. Theor. Phys. 8(12), 535–541 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hoyle, F.: Astronomy and Cosmology: a Modern Course. W.H. Freeman & Company, London (1975)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© African Mathematical Union and Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EngineeringUniversity of SannioBeneventoItaly
  2. 2.High School “De Luca”AvellinoItaly
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations