Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perceptions of Autonomous Vehicles: A Survey Study in Türkiye

  • Research Article-Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The automotive industry continues to grow rapidly with technological developments. Vehicles are being equipped with new software and sensors which assist drivers. People have become familiar with the L1 and L2 vehicles with advanced driver assistance systems. However, the idea of full automation is still new to most people. In Türkiye, AVs are not present on roads. Thus, neither pedestrians nor drivers have been in interaction with AVs yet. This study investigates the preliminary perception of AVs among road users in Türkiye. The data were collected via a face-to-face survey. A binary logit and a random forest model were used to identify the critical factors in the positive attitudes toward AVs. Binary logit and random forest models resulted in similar findings. Age, education level, people who would feel safe driving in an AV, and who believed that urban traffic congestion would decrease were positive about AVs. The random forest model showed the same accuracy when the two models were compared. Most public opinion studies about AVs have been investigated in developed countries. It is believed that this study will help to understand the perception of AVs in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Highways, G.D.: Summary of traffic accidents. https://www.kgm.gov.tr/ (2021). Accessed 18 July 2022.

  2. Penmetsa, P.; Adanu, E.K.; Wood, D.; Wang, T.; Jones, S.L.: Perceptions and expectations of autonomous vehicles-a snapshot of vulnerable road user opinion. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 143, 9–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hilgarter, K.; Granig, P.: Public perception of autonomous vehicles: A qualitative study based on interviews after riding an autonomous shuttle. Transp. Res. Part F: Traff. Psychol. Behav. 72, 226–243 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fagnant, D.J.; Kockelman, K.: Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 77, 167–181 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ondruˇs, J.; Kolla, E.; Vertaľ, P.; Šarić, Ž: How do autonomous cars work? Transp. Res. Procedia. 44, 226–233 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.02.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ogutcu, H.: Autonomous vehicles developed by Turkish entrepreneurs started test drives in Istanbul traffic. url{https://egirisim.com/2020/03/17/turk-girisimcilerin-gelistirdigi-surucusuz-arac-istanbul-trafiginde-test-calismalarına-basladi/ (2020). Accessed 15 June 2022.

  7. Skeete, J.P.: Level 5autonomy: the new face of disruption in road transport. Tech- nol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 134, 22–34 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. International, S.: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles, (2018)

  9. Litman, T. (ed.): Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (2021)

  10. Hudson, J.; Orviska, M.; Hunady, J.: People’s attitudes to autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 121, 164–176 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liljamo, T.; Liimatainen, H.; Pöllänen, M.: Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part F: Traff. Psychol. Behav. 59, 24–44 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Payre, W.; Cestac, J.; Delhomme, P.: Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transp. Res. Part F: Traff. Psychol. Behav. 27, 252–263 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schoettle, B.; Sivak, M.: A survey of pub- lic opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. Paper presented at International conference on connected vehicles and expo, Vienna, Austria (2014)

  14. Kyriakidis, M.R.; Happee, R.; Winter, J.C.F.: Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transp. Res. Part F: Traff. Psychol. Behav. 32, 127–140 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bansal, P.; Kockelman, K.M.; Singh, A.: Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: an austin perspective. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 67, 1–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haboucha, C.J.; Ishaq, R.; Shiftan, Y.: User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 78, 37–49 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hulse, L.M.; Xie, H.; Galea, E.R.: Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Saf. Sci. 102, 1–13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Montoro, L.; Useche, S.A.; Alonso, F.; Lijarcio, I.; Bosó-Seguí, P.; Martí-Belda, A.: Perceived safety and attributed value as predictors of the intention to use autonomous vehicles: a national study with spanish drivers. Saf. Sci. 120, 865–876 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, Y.C.; Hand, S.H.; Lilly, H.: Are parents ready to use autonomous vehicles to trans- port children? Concerns and safety features. J. Saf. Res. 72, 287–297 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, S.; Jiang, Z.; Noland, R.B.; Mondschein, A.S.: Attitudes towards privately-owned and shared autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part F: Traff. Psychol. Behav. 72, 297–306 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, P.; Yang, R.; Xu, Z.: Public acceptance of fully automated driving: effects of social trust and risk/benefit perceptions. Risk Anal. 39, 326–341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Islam, M.R.; Abdel-Aty, M.; Lee, J.; Wu, Y.; Yue, L.; Cai, Q.: Perception of people from educational institution regarding autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 14, 100620 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hibberts, M.; Johnson, R.B.; Hudson, K.: Common survey sampling techniques. In: Gideon, L. (Ed.) Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences, pp. 53–75. Springer, New York (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Krejcie, R.V.; Morgan, D.W.: Determining sample size for research activities. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 30, 607–610 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164470030000308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hill, R.: What sample size is enough in internet survey research? Interpers. Comput. Technol. 6, 1–10 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Butler, L.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Paz, A.: Factors influencing public awareness of autonomous vehicles: empirical evidence from brisbane. Transp. Res. Part F: Traff. Psychol. Behav. 82, 256–267 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. ESHOT, G.D.: Annual report. https://www.eshot.gov.tr/en/Home. Accessed 30 June 2023

  28. Metro, I.: Transportation network. https://www.izmirmetro.com.tr/. Accessed 30 June 2023

  29. Izban: Transportation network. http://www.izban.com.tr/. Accessed 30 June 2023

  30. Izmir, T.: Transportation network. https://www.tramizmir.com/. Accessed 30 June 2023

  31. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kang, K.; Ryu, H.: Predicting types of occupational accidents at construction sites in Korea using random forest model. Saf. Sci. 120, 226–236 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xue, F.; Yao, E.: Adopting a random forest approach to model household residential relocation behavior. Cities 125, 103625 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jarmulska, B.: Random forest versus logit models: which offers better early warning of fiscal stress? Random forest versus logit models: which offers better early warning of fiscal stress? (europa.eu) (2023). Accessed 29 Aug 2023

  35. Dresner, K.; Stone, P.: A multiagent approach to autonomous intersection management. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 31, 591–656 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Spence, J.C.; Kim, Y.B.; Lamboglia, C.G.; Lindeman, C.; Mangan, A.J.; McCurdy, A.P.; Stearns, J.A.; Wohlers, B.; Sivak, A.; Clark, M.I.: Potential impact of autonomous vehicles on movement behavior: a scoping review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 58, 191–199 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jing, P.; Huang, H.; Ran, B.; Zhan, F.; Shi, Y.: Exploring the factors affecting mode choice intention of autonomous vehicle based on an extended theory of planned behavior-a case study in china. Sustainability (Switzer-land) 11, 1155 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Harper, C.D.; Hendrickson, C.T.; Mangones, S.; Samaras, C.: Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 72, 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the students of Ege University who conducted the face-to-face surveys.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Ege University, 35040, Izmir, Turkey

    Yalcin Alver, Pelin Onelcin & Mervegul Uysal

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey

    Yalcin Alver, Pelin Onelcin & Mervegul Uysal

Authors
  1. Yalcin Alver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pelin Onelcin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mervegul Uysal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yalcin Alver.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alver, Y., Onelcin, P. & Uysal, M. Perceptions of Autonomous Vehicles: A Survey Study in Türkiye. Arab J Sci Eng 49, 5171–5178 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08339-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08339-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation