Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Uncertainty Interval Analysis of Steel Moment Frame by Development of 3D-Fragility Curves Towards Optimized Fuzzy Method

  • Research Article-Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary stage in introducing significant uncertainties into the performance-based earthquake engineering technique of the next generation is the development of fragility curves. The technique of representing epistemic and aleatory uncertainties for moment-resisting steel frames is proposed in this manuscript. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) utilizes for considering aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty is taken into account through mass, damping, yielding stress, and a module of elasticity that is provided in four limit states of damage. The optimized fuzzy approach is applied to address this. Epistemic and aleatory uncertainties have been included in the 3D-fragility curves; epistemic’ input is fuzzy values, and fragility curves’ standard deviation and mean are estimated by using the optimized fuzzy approach, which is used PSO algorithm. The IDA approach is used to create scenarios that are used to train the FCMPSO algorithm. Verification was done by applying the Monte Carlo procedure results. The approach that has been used here is beneficial regarding to both accuracy and execution time in driving the 3D-fragility curves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7.
Fig.8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jough, F. K. G.; Veghar, M.; Beheshti-Aval, S. B.: Epistemic uncertainty treatment using group method of data handling algorithm in seismic collapse fragility. Latin Am J Solids Struct, 18 (2021)

  2. Jough, F.K.G.; Şensoy, S.: Prediction of seismic collapse risk of steel moment frame mid-rise structures by meta-heuristic algorithms. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 15(4), 743–757 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rahnama, M.; Krawinkler, H.: Effects of Soft Soil and Hysteresis Model on Seismic Demands. No. 108.John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sivaselvan, M.V.; Reinhorn, A.M.: Collapse analysis: Large inelastic deformations analysis of planar frames. J. Struct. Eng. 128(12), 1575–1583 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ibarra, L.F.; Krawinkler, H.: Global Collapse of Frame Structures Under Seismic Excitations. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burgan, H.I.: Numerical modeling of structural irregularities on unsymmetrical buildings. Tehnički vjesnik 28(3), 856–861 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, J.R.; Di Sarno, L.: A machine-learning method for deriving state-dependent fragility curves of existing steel moment frames with masonry infills. Eng. Struct. 276, 115345 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morfidis, K.; Kostinakis, K.: Seismic parameters’ combinations for the optimum prediction of the damage state of R/C buildings using neural networks. Adv. Eng. Softw. 106, 1–6 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moradi, S.; Burton, H.V.: Response surface analysis and optimization of controlled rocking steel braced frames. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 16(10), 4861–4892 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, Y.; Burton, H.V.; Sun, H.; Shokrabadi, M.: A machine learning framework for assessing post-earthquake structural safety. Struct. Saf. 72, 1–6 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiani, J.; Camp, C.; Pezeshk, S.: On the application of machine learning techniques to derive seismic fragility curves. Comput. Struct. 218, 108–122 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy, J.: ‘Particle Swarm Optimization. Encyclopaedia of Machine Learning, p. 760–766. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jough, F.K.G.; Aval, S.B.: Uncertainty analysis through development of seismic fragility curve for an SMRF structure using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based on fuzzy C-means algorithm. Sci. Iran. 25(6), 2938–2953 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, F.; Sun, T.;, Zhang, C.: An efficient hybrid data clustering method based on K-harmonic means and particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst. Appl. (2009)

  15. Mitropoulou, C.C.; Papadrakakis, M.: Developing fragility curves based on neural network IDA predictions. Eng. Struct. 33(12), 3409–3421 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vamvatsikos, D.; Cornell, C.A.: Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam. 31(3), 491–514 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellingwood, B.: Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment. Struct. Saf. 31, 179–187 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubinstein, R.Y.: Simulation and The Monte Carlo Method. Wiley, New York (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Pinto, P.; Giannini, R.; Franchin, P.: Seismic Reliability Analysis of Structures. IUSS Press, Pavia (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. HAZUS-MH MR1 2003. Advance engineering building module. Report by: Department of homeland security emergency preparedness and Response Directorate, FEMA Mitigation Division Washington, D.C., U.S.A

  21. Seo, J.; Linzell, D.G.: Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges. Eng. Struct. 52, 642–653 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Beer, M.: Fuzzy probability theory. Encycl. Complex. Syst. Sci. 6, 4047–4059 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Standard No. 2800: Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, Building and Housing Research Center, 3rd Edition, Iran (2007)

  24. Charney, F. A.; Downs, W. M. (2004). Modeling procedures for panel zone deformations in moment resisting frames. In: Proceedings of the Coference Connections in Steel Structures V, Amsterdam, pp. 121–130

  25. Foutch, D.A.; Yun, S.Y.: Modeling of steel moment frames for seismic loads. J. Constr. Steel Res. 58(5–8), 529–564 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cardoso, J.B.; de Almeida, J.R.; Dias, J.M.; Coelho, P.G.: Structural reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and neural networks. Adv. Eng. Softw. 39(6), 505–513 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Porter, K.A.; Beck, J.L.; Shaikhutdinov, R.V.: Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables. Earthq. Spectra 18(4), 719–743 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liel, A. B.; Haselton, C. B.; Deierlein, G. G.; Baker, J. W.: Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings. Struct. Saf., pp. 197–211 (2009)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Final International University, Via Mersin 10, AS 128, Kyrenia, North Cyprus, Turkey

    Fooad Karimi Ghaleh Jough & Borhan Ghasemzadeh

Authors
  1. Fooad Karimi Ghaleh Jough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Borhan Ghasemzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fooad Karimi Ghaleh Jough.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karimi Ghaleh Jough, F., Ghasemzadeh, B. Uncertainty Interval Analysis of Steel Moment Frame by Development of 3D-Fragility Curves Towards Optimized Fuzzy Method. Arab J Sci Eng 49, 4813–4830 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08223-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08223-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation