Skip to main content
Log in

Interacting Footings on Geo-Reinforced Soils: A State-of-the-Art Review

  • Review Article-Earth Sciences
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil reinforcement is increasingly applied in many geotechnical applications due to its high performance and justified costs than other alternatives. Footings are frequently located close to each other leading to interference with one another's efficiency. Closely constructed shallow footings on geo-reinforced soils (GRS) have a markedly significant effect on bearing capacity (BC) combined with more complex interaction behaviors than individual footings requiring further research. This research aims to investigate in more detail than hitherto done with attention paid to the BC, tilt and efficiency factors of interfering footings. The potential BC failure and resistance mechanisms are discussed in detail. Optimal reinforcement variables and new relationships are proposed for various footing geometries using new dimensionless interference factors to achieve more accurate analysis and design of twin footings on GRS. Based on shortcomings of the cited studies, design guidelines and future research recommendations are made. Results reveal that maximum interference factors of the interacting footings on GRS appear when the ratio of the center-to-center distance of footings to a footing width Δ/B is almost 1.5–2 depending on the footing geometry, underlying soil and reinforcement characteristics. However, at the range of Δ/B = 3–5 the interference factors disappear. Optimizing reinforcement parameters, the combined influence of reinforcement and interference led to increasing the magnitude of BC by 1.35 to 3.6 times. Reinforcement below interfering footings reduces the depth of influenced stress significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stuart, J.G.: Interference between foundations, with special reference to surface footings in sand. Géotechnique 12(1), 15–22 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Das, B.M.; Larbi-Cherif, S.: Bearing capacity two closely spaced shallow foundation on sand. Soil Found. 23(1), 1–7 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar, J.; Ghosh, P.: Ultimate bearing capacity of two interfering rough strip footings. Int. J. Geomech. 7(1), 53–62 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gourvenec, S.; Jensen, K.: Effect of embedment and spacing of cojoined skirted foundation systems on undrained limit states under general loading. Int. J. Geomech. 9(6), 267–279 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, J.; Eun, J.: Estimation of bearing capacity for multiple footings in sand. Comput. Geotech. 36(6), 1000–1008 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ghosh, P.; Sharma, A.: Interference effect of two nearby strip footings on layered soil: theory of elasticity approach. Acta Geotech. 5(3), 189–198 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mabrouki, A., et al.: Numerical study of the bearing capacity for two interfering strip footings on sands. Comput. Geotech. 37(4), 431–439 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nainegali, L.S.; Basudhar, P.K.; Ghosh, P.: Interference of two asymmetric closely spaced strip footings resting on nonhomogeneous and linearly elastic soil bed. Int. J. Geomech. 13(6), 840–851 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ghosh, P., et al.: Experimental studies on interference of two angular footings resting on surface of two-layer cohesionless soil deposit. Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 9(4), 422–433 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghosh, P.; Rajesh, S.; Sai Chand, J.: Linear and nonlinear elastic analysis of closely spaced strip foundations using Pasternak model. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 11(2), 228–243 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pal, A.; Ghosh, P.; Majumder, M.: Interaction effect of two closely spaced skirted strip foundations in cohesionless soil using upper-bound limit analysis. Int. J. Geomech. 17(2), 06016022 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lavasan, A.A., et al.: Bearing capacity of interfering strip footings. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144(3), 04018003 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fazeli Dehkordi, P., et al.: Stochastic analysis of the capacity of two parallel footings on a thin sand layer. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 172, 355–364 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ekbote, A.G.; Nainegali, L.: Finite element analysis of two nearby interfering asymmetric footings embedded in cohesionless foundation medium. Geomech. Geoeng. 16(4), 263–276 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmüdderich, C., et al.: Behavior of nonidentical differently loaded interfering rough footings. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146(6), 04020041 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ghosh, P.: Seismic interference effect of two nearby square footings, in Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering. 352–361 (2011).

  17. Ghosh, P.: FLAC based numerical studies on dynamic interference of two nearby embedded machine foundations. Geotech. Geolog. Eng. 30(5), 1161–1181 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Islam, M.; Gnanendran, C.: Behaviour of two closely spaced strip footings placed on a stiff clay bed under cyclic loading. Geotech. Test. J. 36(2), 242–247 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yadav, R.; Saran, S.; Shankar, D.: Interference between two adjacent footings located in seismic region. Geosci. 7(4), 129–140 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khazaei, A.; Soufi, G.R.; Chenari, R.J.: Lower-bound seismic bearing capacity of a strip footing adjacent to an existing footing on sand. Int. J. Geomech. 21(8), 04021128 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zeolla, E.; De Silva, F.; Sica, S.: Dynamic cross-interaction between two closely-spaced shallow foundations, in COMPDYN Proceedings. 2021, National Technical University of Athens.

  22. Zeolla, E.; de Silva, F.; Sica. S.: Dynamic interaction between adjacent shallow footings in homogeneous or layered soils. in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022). 2022. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  23. Zeolla, E.; Sica, S.; De Silva, F.: Dynamic impedance functions for neighbouring shallow footings, in Geotechnical Engineering for the Preservation of Monuments and Historic Sites III. 2022, CRC Press. p. 883–892.

  24. Binquet, J.; Lee, K.L.: Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 101(12), 1241–1255 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Binquet, J.; Lee, K.L.: Bearing capacity analysis of reinforced earth slabs. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 101(12), 1257–1276 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rea, C.: Sand reinforcement using paper grid cells. In Symposium on earth reinforcement. ASCE Spring Convention and Exhibit, Preprint 3130, Pittsburgh, PA, Vol. 644, 24–28 (1978)

  27. Fazeli Dehkordi, P.; Karim, U.F.A.: Behaviour of circular footings confined by rigid base and geocell reinforcement. Arab. J. Geosci. 13(20), 1–12 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fazeli Dehkordi, P.; Ghazavi, M.; Karim, U.F.A.: Bearing capacity-relative density behavior of circular footings resting on geocell-reinforced sand. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 26(11), 5088–5112 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fazeli Dehkordi, P.; Ghazavi, M.; Ganjian, N.: Evaluation behavior of circular footings located on sand bed reinforced with geocell. Amirkabir J. Civil Eng. 53(5), 411–414 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Khing, K.H., et al.: Interference effect of two closely-spaced shallow strip foundations on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotech. Geolog. Eng. 10(4), 257–271 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Al-Ashou, M.; Sulaiman, R.; Mandal, J.: Effect of number of reinforcing layers on the interference between footings on reinforced sand. Indian Geotech. J. 24(3), 285–301 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar, A.; Saran, S.: Closely spaced footings on geogrid-reinforced sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129(7), 660–664 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ghosh, P.; Kumar, P.: Interference effect of two nearby strip footings on reinforced sand. Contemp. Eng. Sci. 2(12), 577–592 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Srinivasan, V.; Ghosh, P.: Interaction problem of circular footings on homogeneous soil deposit. in Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference. pp. 823–826, (2011).

  35. Javdanian, H.; Haddad, A.; Mehrzad, B.: Experimental and numerical investigation of the bearing capacity of adjacent footings on reinforced soil. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 17, 2597–2617 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pusadkar, S.; Saraf, S.S.: Interference of adjoining rectangular footings on reinforced sand. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 3(2), 447–452 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Eltohamy, A.M.; Zidan, A.F.: Performance of interfering strip footings resting on reinforced sand under uniform and nonuniform load-experimental and numerical study. J. Ame. Sci. 9(1), 421–430 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Naderi, E.; Hataf, N.: Model testing and numerical investigation of interference effect of closely spaced ring and circular footings on reinforced sand. Geotext. Geomembr. 42(3), 191–200 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gupta, A.; Lakshman, G.K.; Sitharam, T.G.: Interference of square footings on geocell reinforced clay bed: Experimental and numerical studies. In 3th World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering. CSEE, Budapest. Avestia Publishing (2018).

  40. Saha Roy, S.; Deb, K.: Closely spaced rectangular footings on sand over soft clay with geogrid at the interface. Geosynth. Int. 25(4), 412–426 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Paikaray, B.; Das, S.K.; Mohapatra. B.G.: Interference of two shallow square footings on geogrid reinforced crusher dust. Sustainable Construction and Building Materials: Select Proceedings of ICSCBM 2018. Springer Singapore, pp. 41–60 (2019).

  42. Paikaray, B.; Das, S.K.; Mohapatra, B.G.: Effect of reinforcement layout on interference effect of square footings on reinforced crusher dust. Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 15, 1268–1277 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sitharam, T.G.; Gupta, A.: Interference effect of footings on geocell and geogrid-reinforced clay beds, in Geocells: Advances and Applications, Springer Singapore: pp. 173–198 (2020).

  44. Saraf, S.S.; Pusadkar. S.S.: Interference behavior of four adjacent footings on geosynthetic reinforced sand. In Advances in Computer Methods and Geomechanics: IACMAG Symposium 2019, Vol. 1, pp. 277–289. Springer Singapore (2020).

  45. Anaswara, S.; Lakshmy, G.S.; Shivashankar, R.: Interference studies of adjacent strip footings on unreinforced and reinforced sands. Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 7, 535–561 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Saha Roy, S.; Deb, K.: Effect of aspect ratio of footing on behavior of two closely-spaced footings on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotext. Geomembr. 48(4), 443–453 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ghazavi, M.; Lavasan, A.A.: Interference effect of shallow foundations constructed on sand reinforced with geosynthetics. Geotext. Geomembr. 26(5), 404–415 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ghazavi, M.; Lavasan A.A.: Influence of interference on bearing capacity of strip footing on reinforced sand. in 5th International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement, Fukuoka, Japan. pp. 431–436 (2007).

  49. Lavasan, A.A.; Ghazavi. M.: Influence of interference on failure mechanism of closely constructed circular footings on reinforced sand. Geosynthetics in Civil and Environmental Engineering: Geosynthetics Asia 2008 Proceedings of the 4th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics in Shanghai, China. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 311–317 (2009).

  50. Noorzad, R.; Manavirad, E.: Bearing capacity of two close strip footings on soft clay reinforced with geotextile. Arab. J. Geosci. 7(2), 623–639 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Abbas, J.K.; Hussain, I.S.: Bearing capacity of two closely spaced strip footings on geogrid reinforced sand. Tikrit J. Eng. Sci. 20(5), 8–18 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lavasan, A.A.; Ghazavi, M.; Schanz, T.: Analysis of interfering circular footings on reinforced soil by physical and numerical approaches considering strain-dependent stiffness. Int. J. Geomech. 17(11), 04017096 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ekbote, A.G.; Nainegali, L.: Interference of two closely spaced footings embedded in unreinforced and reinforced soil medium: a finite element approach using ABAQUS. Arab. J. Geosci. 12(22), 1–21 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sekhar, J.C.; Sasmal, S.K.; Behera, R.N.: Effect of interference on ultimate bearing capacity of strip footings resting over multi-layered-reinforced soil. Aust. J. Multi-Discip. Eng. 16(1), 31–42 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ghazavi, M.; Valinezhad Torghabeh, N.; Fazeli Dehkordi, P.: Analysis of twin large circular footings on geocell-reinforced bed using response surface method. Int. J. Geomech. (2023, accepted)

  56. Kumar, A.; Saran, S.: Closely spaced strip footings on reinforced sand. Geotech. Eng. 34(3), 177–186 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kumar, A.; Saran, S.: Bearing capacity of rectangular footing on reinforced soil. Geotech. Geolog. Eng. 21(3), 201–224 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kumar, A.; Saran, S.: Closely spaced rectangular footings on reinforced sand. Geotech. Geolog. Eng. 22, 497–524 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Biswas, N.; Ghosh, P.: Interaction of adjacent strip footings on reinforced soil using upper-bound limit analysis. Geosynth. Int. 25(6), 599–611 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lavasan, A.A.; Ghazavi, M.: Behavior of closely spaced square and circular footings on reinforced sand. Soils Found. 52(1), 160–167 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Fazeli Dehkordi, P., et al.: Effect of geocell-reinforced sand base on bearing capacity of twin circular footings. Geosynth. Int. 26, 224–236 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hegde, A.: Geocell reinforced foundation beds-past findings, present trends and future prospects: a state-of-the-art review. Constr. Build. Mater. 154, 658–674 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Biswas, A.; Krishna, A.M.: Geocell-reinforced foundation systems: a critical review. Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 3(2), 1–18 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Guo, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, L.: Planar geosynthetic-reinforced soil foundations: a review. SN Appl. Sci. 2(12), 1–18 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Fakher, A.; Jones, C.J.: Discussion on: Bearing capacity of rectangular footings on geogrid reinforced sand. by Yetimoglu, T., Wu, J.T.H., Saglamer, A., 1994. J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE, 122(4), 326–327 (1996)

  66. Viswanadham, B.V.S.; König, D.: Studies on scaling and instrumentation of a geogrid. Geotext. Geomembr. 22(5), 307–328 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Brown, S.F.; Kwan, J.; Thom, N.H.: Identifying the key parameters that influence geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast. Geotext. Geomembr. 25(6), 326–335 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Góngora, I.A.; Palmeira, E.M.: Assessing the influence of soil-reinforcement interaction parameters on the performance of a low fill on compressible subgrade. Part II: influence of surface maintenance. Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 2, 1–17 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  69. ASTM D6637–15, Standard Test Method for Determining Tensile Properties of Geogrids by the Single or Multi-Rib Tensile Method, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. (2015).

  70. ASTM D5321–14, Standard Test Method for Determining the Shear Strength of Soil-Geosynthetic and Geosynthetic-Geosynthetic Interfaces by Direct Shear, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. (2014).

  71. ASTM D6992–16, Standard Test Method for Accelerated Tensile Creep and Creep-Rupture of Geosynthetic Materials Based on Time-Temperature Superposition Using the Stepped Isothermal Method, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. (2016).

  72. ASTM D1505–18, Standard Test Method for Density of Plastics by the Density-Gradient Technique, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. (2018).

  73. ASTM D5199–12, Standard Test Method for Measuring the Nominal Thickness of Geosynthetics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. (2012).

  74. ASTM D4885–11. Standard Test Method for Determining Performance Strength of Geomembranes by Wide Strip Tensile Method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. (2011).

  75. ASTM E2254–18, Standard Test Method for Storage Modulus Calibration of Dynamic Mechanical Analyzers, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. (2018).

  76. ASTM E831–19, Standard Test Method for Linear Thermal Expansion of Solid Materials by Thermomechanical Analysis, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. (2019).

  77. ASTM D5885–15, Standard Test Method for Oxidative Induction Time of Polyolefin Geosynthetics by High-Pressure Differential Scanning Calorimetry, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. (2015).

  78. Fazeli Dehkordi, P., et al.: Parametric study from laboratory tests on twin circular footings on geocell-reinforced sand. Sci. Iran. 28(1), 96–108 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Valinezhad Torghabe N.; Ghazavi, M.: Behavior of Two Shallow Footing on Geocell-Reinforced Sand: Ph.D thesis, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, (2020)

  80. Huang, C.C.; Tatsuoka, F.: Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotext. Geomembr. 9(1), 51–82 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Wayne, M.H.; Han, J.; Akins, K.: The design of geosynthetic reinforced foundations. in Geosynthetics in foundation reinforcement and erosion control systems. pp. 1–18, (1998). ASCE.

  82. Sitharam, T.G.; Hegde, A.: Design and construction of geocell foundation to support the embankment on settled red mud. Geotext. Geomembr. 41, 55–63 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Koerner, R.M.: Designing with Geosynthetics, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Presto: Geoweb load support system-Technical overview. Presto Products Appleton, WI. (2008).

  85. Avesani Neto, J.; Bueno, B.; Futai, M.: A bearing capacity calculation method for soil reinforced with a geocell. Geosynth. Int. 20(3), 129–142 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Hegde, A.; Sitharam, T.G.: Joint strength and wall deformation characteristics of a single-cell geocell subjected to uniaxial compression. Int. J. Geomech. 15(5), 04014080 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  87. Venkateswarlu, H.; Hegde, A.: Effect of infill materials on vibration isolation efficacy of geocell-reinforced soil beds. Can. Geotech. J. 57(9), 1304–1319 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Schlosser, F.; Juran, I.; Jacobsen, H.M.: Soil Reinforcement: general report: session no. 5. Proc. of Viii Ecsmfe, pp. 1159–1180 (1983).

  89. Dash, S.K.; Krishnaswamy, N.R.; Rajagopal, K.: Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotext. Geomembr. 19(4), 235–256 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  90. Dash, S.K.; Krishnaswamy, N.R.; Rajagopal, K.: Strip footing on geocell reinforced sand beds with additional planar reinforcement. Geotext. Geomembr. 19(8), 529–538 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Dash, S.K.; Rajagopal, K.; Krishnaswamy, N.R.: Behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under strip loading. Can. Geotech. J. 44(7), 905–916 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  92. Dash, S.K.: Influence of relative density of soil on performance of geocell-reinforced sand foundations. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 22(5), 533–538 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  93. Zhang, L., et al.: Nonlinear analysis of a geocell mattress on an elastic-plastic foundation. Comput. Geotech. 42, 204–211 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Zhou, H.; Wen, X.: Model studies on geogrid- or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil. Geotext. Geomembr. 26(3), 231–238 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  95. Zhang, L., et al.: Bearing capacity of geocell reinforcement in embankment engineering. Geotext. Geomembr. 28(5), 475–482 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  96. Pokharel, S.K., et al.: Investigation of factors influencing behavior of single geocell-reinforced bases under static loading. Geotext. Geomembr. 28(6), 570–578 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  97. Mehdipour, I.; Ghazavi, M.; Moayed, R.Z.: Stability analysis of geocell-reinforced slopes using the limit equilibrium horizontal slice method. Int. J. Geomech. 17(9), 06017007 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  98. Meyerhof, G.G.: Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations. Can. Geotech. J. 1(1), 16–26 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  99. Huang, C.C.; Menq, F.Y.: Deep-footing and wide-slab effects in reinforced sandy ground. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123(1), 30–36 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  100. Huang, C.C.; Hong, L.L.: Ultimate bearing capacity and settlement of footings on reinforced sandy ground. Soils Found. 40(5), 65–73 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  101. Mandal, J.N.; Sah, H.S.: Bearing capacity tests on geogrid-reinforced clay. Geotext. Geomembr. 11(3), 327–333 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Khing, K.H., et al.: The bearing-capacity of a strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotext. Geomembr. 12(4), 351–361 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Omar, M.T., et al.: Ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on sand with geogrid reinforcement. Can. Geotech. J. 30(3), 545–549 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  104. Ghosh, A.; Ghosh, A.; Bera, A.K.: Bearing capacity of square footing on pond ash reinforced with jute-geotextile. Geotext. Geomembr. 23(2), 144–173 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  105. Meyerhof, G.G.; Hanna, A.M.: Ultimate bearing capacity of foundations on layered soils under inclined load. Can. Geotech. J. 15(4), 565–572 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  106. Michalowski, R.L.: Limit Loads on reinforced foundation soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130(4), 381–390 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  107. Chen, Q.; Abu-Farsakh, M.: Ultimate bearing capacity analysis of strip footings on reinforced soil foundation. Soils Found. 55(1), 74–85 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  108. MATLAB R2015b [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks

  109. Ghazavi, M.; Norouzi, M.; Fazeli Dehkordi, P.F.: Failure pattern of twin strip footings on geo-reinforced sand: experimental and numerical study. Geomech. Eng. 32(6), 653–671 (2023). https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2023.32.6.653

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Pezhman Fazeli Dehkordi. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Pezhman Fazeli Dehkordi, and all authors reviewed and commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Mahmoud Ghazavi, Usama F.A. Karim and Nasser Valinezhad Torghabeh worked on conceptualization, review editing and project administration. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pezhman Fazeli Dehkordi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fazeli Dehkordi, P., Ghazavi, M., Karim, U.F.A. et al. Interacting Footings on Geo-Reinforced Soils: A State-of-the-Art Review. Arab J Sci Eng 49, 1–25 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-07979-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-07979-3

Keywords

Navigation