Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Non-gradient Robust Topology Optimization Method Considering Loading Uncertainty

  • Research Article-Mechanical Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To effectively tackle the robust topology optimization (RTO) problem of continuum structure considering the uncertainties of loading magnitude and direction under the premise of avoiding gaining the sensitivity information, a non-gradient RTO method was proposed by combining the improved proportional topology optimization (IPTO) algorithm with multiple methods (including the probabilistic approach, the superposition principle of linear theory, the Monte Carlo method and the weighted combination method). Among these, the probabilistic approach was used to describe the uncertainties of loading magnitude and direction. The weighted combination method was employed to establish the RTO model with the objective function of minimizing the weighted sum of the expectation and standard deviation of structural compliance. The calculation method of the expectation and standard deviation of structural compliance was given by applying the superposition principle of linear theory and the Monte Carlo method. Subsequently, the core equations of the IPTO algorithm (without requiring the sensitivity information) were redesigned to ensure that the structural RTO problem can be tackled. Finally, the numerical examples were used and other RTO methods were compared to demonstrate the effect of the RTO method proposed. The results show that the new RTO method not only can effectively address the structural RTO problem considering loading uncertainty, but also has advantages over other RTO methods in terms of some performance during solving the structural RTO problem. Moreover, the different values of control parameters in the new RTO method also have an effect on structural optimization results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheng, W.M.; Wang, H.; Zhang, M.; Du, R.: Improved proportional topology optimization algorithm for minimum volume problem with stress constraints. Eng. Comput. 38(1), 392–412 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-12-2019-0560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kogiso, N.; Ahn, W.J.; Nishiwaki, S.; Izui, K.; Yoshimura, M.: Robust topology optimization for compliance mechanisms considering uncertainty of applied loads. J. Adv. Mech. Des. Syst. 2(1), 96–107 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2.96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao, J.P.; Wang, C.J.: Robust topology optimization of structures under loading uncertainty. AIAA J. 52(2), 398–407 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, J.T.; Gea, H.C.: Robust topology optimization under multiple independent unknown-but-bounded loads. Comput. Method Appl. M. 329, 464–479 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.09.033

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Nishino, T.; Kato, J.: Robust topology optimization based on finite strain considering uncertain loading conditions. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 122(6), 1427–1455 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6584

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, D.; Gao, W.F.: Robust topology optimization under load position uncertainty. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 120(11), 1249–1272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6180

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, D.; Gao, W.F.: Robust topology optimization of continuum structures with load position uncertainty. Chin. J. Appl. Mech. 37(3), 969–974 (2020). https://doi.org/10.11776/cjam.37.03.B032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, D.; Gao, W.F.: Robust topology optimization under multiple independent uncertainties of loading positions. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 121(22), 4944–4970 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6503

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Csébfalvi, A.: A new compliance-function-shape-oriented robust approach for volume-constrained continuous topology optimization with uncertain loading directions. Period Polytech-Civ. 62(1), 219–225 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.11398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Csébfalvi, A.; Lógó, J.: A critical analysis of expected-compliance model in volume-constrained robust topology optimization with normally distributed loading directions, using a minimax-compliance approach alternatively. Adv. Eng. Softw. 120, 107–115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunning, P.D.; Kim, H.A.: Robust topology optimization: minimization of expected and variance of compliance. AIAA J. 51(11), 2656–2664 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao, J.P.; Wang, C.J.: Robust topology optimization under loading uncertainty based on linear elastic theory and orthogonal diagonalization of symmetric matrices. Comput. Method Appl. M. 273, 204–218 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.01.018

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, J.P.; Wang, C.J.: Algorithm of structural topology optimization under loading uncertainty. J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut. 40(7), 959–964 (2014). https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2013.0476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fu, Z.F.; Zhao, J.P.; Wang, C.J.: Robust topology optimization design of structures with multiple-uncertainty load cases. Chin. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 47(4), 642–650 (2015). https://doi.org/10.6052/0459-1879-15-072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng, X.; Li, J.Q.; Jiang, S.F.; Liu, Z.Y.: Robust topology optimization of continuum structures with loading uncertainty using a perturbation method. Eng. Optimiz. 50(4), 584–598 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2017.1337754

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, J.; Wen, G.L.; Qiang, Q.X.; Li, F.Y.; Xie, Y.: Robust topology optimization for continuum structures with random loads. Eng. Comput. 35(2), 710–732 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-10-2016-0369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, H.; Cheng, W.M.; Du, R.; Wang, S.B.; Wang, Y.P.: Improved proportional topology optimization algorithm for solving minimum compliance problem. Struct. Multidisc Optim. 62(2), 475–493 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02504-8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, S.: Topology optimization of continuum structures considering uncertainties in loading magnitude and direction. Dalian University of Technology, Dalian (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng, Y.F.: Research on robust bi-directional evolutionary topology optimization method. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fu, Z.F., Zhao, J.P., Wang, C.J.: Robust topology optimization under loading uncertainty with proportional topology optimization method. 2016 Eighth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMTMA.2016.143

  21. Biyikli, E.; To, A.C.: Proportional topology optimization: a new nonsensitivity method for solving stress constrained and minimum compliance problems and its implementation in MATLAB. PLoS ONE 10(12), 1–23 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guest, J.K.; Prévost, J.H.; Belytschko, T.: Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 61(2), 238–254 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1064

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Sigmund, O.: Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Struct. Multidisc Optim. 33(4–5), 401–424 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0087-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao, Q.H.: Study on vehicle structural topology optimization design under uncertainty. Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51675450) and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (No. 2020M673279). Moreover, we would like to thank the associate professor. Zhao Junpeng (from Beihang University, China) for providing help in writing the code of the new robust topology optimization method. Finally, we would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable suggestions to improve our paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 610031, China

    Hui Wang, Wenming Cheng, Min Zhang, Run Du & Wei Xiang

  2. Technology and Equipment of Rail Transit Operation and Maintenance Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 610031, China

    Hui Wang, Wenming Cheng, Min Zhang, Run Du & Wei Xiang

Authors
  1. Hui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenming Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Min Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Run Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wei Xiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenming Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Cheng, W., Zhang, M. et al. Non-gradient Robust Topology Optimization Method Considering Loading Uncertainty. Arab J Sci Eng 46, 12599–12611 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06010-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06010-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation