Abstract
In this paper, the localization issue associated with distance relay protecting a transmission line with static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) is discussed. Generally, distance relay is mal-operated due to the dynamic behaviour of STATCOM during its inductive and capacitive modes of operation. Because, STATCOM operation creates the problem of correct measurement of fault distance and is responsible of under-reach and over-reach of distance relay. Furthermore, high fault resistance is also the reason of under-reach along with STATCOM operation. To overcome aforementioned challenges, an adaptive wide-area backup protection scheme (WABPS) is addressed which compares the calculated impedance and referenced impedance. Calculated impedance is the difference between impedance measured by relay and impedance contributed by fault resistance. Referenced impedance is the sum of fault impedance and impedance contributed by STATCOM. If calculated impedance is less than referenced impedance, then the relay will generate a trip signal. Proposed WABPS is inherent directional and provides information about fault detection, fault distance, and fault resistance during dynamic operation of STATCOM. The performance of the proposed WABPS is evaluated using technology of synchronize phasor measurement and communication channel. A 230 kV, 50 Hz system with a 24-pulse STATCOM is simulated and validated using PSCAD/EMTDC software package.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hingorani, N.G.; Gyugyi, L.: Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems. Wiley, New York (1999)
Shahnia, F.; Rajakaruna, S.; Ghosh, A.: Static compensators (STATCOMs) in power systems. In: Power Systems. Springer, Berlin (2014)
Ramirez, D.; Martinez, S.; Blazquez, F.; Carrero, C.: Use of STATCOM in wind farms with fixed-speed generators for grid code compliance. Renew. Energy 37, 202–212 (2012)
Laouer, M.; Mekkaoui, A.; Younes, M.: STATCOM and Capacitor Banks in a fixed-speed wind farm. TMREES14. Energy Proc. 50, 882–892 (2014)
Gupta, O.H.; Tripathy, M.: An innovative pilot relaying scheme for shunt-compensated line. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 30(3), 1439–1448 (2015)
Arroudi, K.E.; Joos, G.; McGillis, D.T.: Operation of impedance protection relays with the STATCOM. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 17(2), 381–387 (2002)
Singh, A.R.; Patne, N.R.; Kale, V.S.: Adaptive distance protection setting in presence of mid-point STATCOM using synchronized measurement. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 67, 252–260 (2015)
Manori, A.; Tripathy, M.; Gupta, H.O.: SVM based zonal setting of Mho relay for shunt compensated transmission line. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 78, 422–428 (2016)
Kazemi, A.; Jamali, S.; Shateri, H.: Effects of STATCOM on distance relay tripping characteristic. In: IEEE/PES Transactions and Distribution Conference and Exhibition: Asia and Pacific, pp. 1–6 (2005)
Bo, Z.Q.: Adaptive non-communication protection for power lines bo scheme 1—the delayed operation approach. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 17(1), 85–91 (2002)
Albasri, F.A.; Sidhu, T.S.; Varma, R.K.: Impact of shunt-FACTS on distance protection of transmission lines. In: IEEE Conference on Power System, Clemson, SC, USA, 14–17 March 2006, pp. 249–256 (2006)
Sidhu, T.S.; Varma, R.K.; Gangadharan, P.K.; Albasri, F.A.; Ortiz, G.R.: Performance of distance relays on shunt—FACTS compensated transmission lines. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 20(3), 1837–1845 (2005)
Albasri, F.A.; Sidhu, T.S.; Varma, R.K.: Performance comparison of distance protection schemes for shunt-FACTS compensated transmission lines. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 22(4), 2116–2125 (2007)
Ree, J.D.L.; Centeno, V.; Thorp, J.S.; Phadke, A.G.: Synchronized phasor measurement applications in power systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 1(1), 20–27 (2010)
Phadke, A.G.; Thorp, J.S.: Synchronized Phasor Measurements and Their Applications. Springer, New York (2008)
Sarangi, S.; Pradhan, A.K.: Synchronised data-based adaptive backup protection for series compensated line. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 8(12), 1979–1986 (2014)
Kundu, P.; Pradhan, A.K.: Online identification of protection element failure using wide area measurements. IETGener. Transm. Distrib. 9(2), 115–123 (2015)
Guzman, A.; Samineni, S.; Bryson, M.: Protective Relay Synchrophasor Measurements During Fault Conditions. Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories (2005) [Available online]. https://cdn.selinc.com/assets/Literature/Publications/Technical%20Papers/6214_ProtectiveRelay_AG_20050920.pdf
Eissa, M.M.; Masoud, M.E.; Elanwar, M.M.M.: A novel back up wide area protection technique for power transmission grids using phasor measurement unit. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 25(1), 270–278 (2010)
Dash, P.K.; Moirangthem, J.; Das, S.: A new time–frequency approach for distance protection in parallel transmission lines operating with STATCOM. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 61, 606–619 (2014)
Khederzadeh, M.; Ghorbani, A.: STATCOM modeling impacts on performance evaluation of distance protection of transmission lines. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 21, 2063–2079 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.541
Khederzadeh, M.; Ghorbani, A.: STATCOM/SVC impact on the performance of transmission line distance protection. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 6, 525–533 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/tee.20691
Ma, J.; Xiang, X.; Li, P.; Deng, Z.; Thorp, J.S.: Adaptive distance protection scheme with quadrilateral characteristic for extremely high-voltage/ultra-high-voltage transmission line. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 11(7), 1624–1633 (2017)
Navalkar, P.V.; Soman, S.A.: Secure remote backup protection of transmission lines using synchrophasors. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 26(1), 87–96 (2011)
Ma, J.; Li, J.; Thorp, J.S.; Arana, A.J.; Yang, Q.; Phadke, A.G.: A fault steady state component-based wide area backup protection algorithm. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid. 2(3), 468–475 (2011)
He, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, W.; Malik, O.P.; Yin, X.: Wide-area backup protection algorithm based on fault component voltage distribution. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 26(4), 2752–2760 (2011)
Schweitzer, E.O.; Whitehead, D.E.: Real-time power system control using synchrophasors. In: IEEE 61st Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers, 2008, College Station, TX, USA, pp. 1–11 (2008)
Espinoza, J.V.; Guzmán, A.; Calero, F.; Mynam, M.V.; Palma, E.: Wide-area measurement and control scheme maintains central america’s power system stability. In: Wide-Area Protection and Control Systems: A Collection of Technical Papers Representing Modern Solutions (2017)
Singh, A.R.; Patne, N.R.; Kale, V.S.; Khadke, P.: Digital impedance pilot relaying scheme for STATCOM compensated TL for fault phase classification with fault location. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 11(10), 2586–2598 (2017)
Guan, R.; Xue, Y.; Zhang, X.-P.: Advanced RTDS-based studies of the impact of STATCOM on feeder distance protection. J. Eng. 2018(15), 1038–1042 (2018)
Power System Relaying Committee, IEEE Guide for Breaker Failure Protection of Power Circuit Breakers, IEEE Std C37.119™-2016 (Revision of IEEE Std C37.119-2005). [Available online]. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=7509575
Werstiuk, C.: Testing breaker failure schemes: valence electrical training services. In: 36 Annual Hands-On Relay School, Pullman, Washington, 2019. [Available online]. https://www.eiseverywhere.com/file_uploads/1b859c9e3ffa064bfe2de78b83d380f0_TestingBreakerFailureSchemes-ChrisWerstiuk.pdf
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.: A report on unified real time dynamic state measurement (URTDSM), Gurgaon, India, 200/5/2012/SP&PA (2012). [Online]. Available: www.cea.nic.in
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Source Parameter
ZS1 = 2ej88 Ω and ZS0 = 6ej88 Ω.
1.2 System Parameters
Z1L = 0.03293 + 0.3184 Ω/km, Shunt Xc1 = 0.2802 MΩ km.
Z0L = 0.2587 + 1.174 Ω/km, Shunt Xc0 = 0.40809 MΩ km.
Line length of Line PS and Line SR = 300 km, and Line-RT = 200 km.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, J., Jena, P. Wide-Area Measurement-Based Adaptive Backup Protection for Shunt Compensation Environment. Arab J Sci Eng 46, 843–855 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04762-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04762-6