Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of Traffic Incident Duration: A Comparative Study of Decision Tree Models

  • Research Article-Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unexpected events such as crashes, disabled vehicles, flat tires and spilled loads cause traffic congestion or extend the duration of the traffic congestion on the roadways. It is possible to reduce the effects of such incidents by implementing intelligent transportation systems solutions that require the estimation of the incident duration to identify well-fitted strategies. This paper presents a methodology to establish incident duration estimation models by utilizing decision tree models of CHAID, CART, C4.5 and LMT. For this study, the data contained traffic incidents that occurred on the Istanbul Trans European Motorway were obtained and separated into three groups according to duration by utilizing some studies about classification of traffic incidents. By using classified data, decision tree models of CHAID, CART, C4.5 and LMT were established and validated to estimate the incident duration. According to the results, although the models used different variables, the decision tree models of CHAID, CART and C4.5 have nearly the same prediction accuracy which is approximately 74%. On the other hand, the prediction accuracy of decision tree model of LMT is 75.4% which is somewhat better than the others. However, C4.5 model required less number of parameters than the others, while its accuracy is the same with others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chang, H.-L.; Chang, T.-P.: Prediction of freeway incident duration based on classification tree analysis. In: 10th EASTS Conference, 9–12 Sept 2013, Taipei (2013)

  2. Nam, D.; Mannering, F.: An exploratory hazard-based analysis of highway incident duration. Transp. Res. A 34, 85–102 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chung, Y.: Development of an accident duration prediction model on the korean freeway systems. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42, 282–289 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wei, C.-H.; Lee, Y.: Sequential forecast of incident duration using artificial neural network models. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39, 944–954 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shin, C.-H.: Development of freeway incident duration prediction models. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud 5, 1734–1744 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lopes, J.; Bento, J.; Pereira, F.C.; Ben-Akiva, M.: Dynamic forecast of incident clearance time using adaptive artificial neural network models. TRB 2013 Annual Meeting, 13–17 Jan 2013, Washington (2012)

  7. Wang, X.; Chen, S.; Zheng,W.: Analysis of regression method on traffic incident duration. In: ASCE 2013 International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety, 29 June–2 July 2013, Wuhan (2013)

  8. Garib, A.; Radwan, E.; Al-Deek, H.: Estimating magnitude and duration of incident delays. J Transp Eng 123, 459–466 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sullivan, E.C.: New model for predicting freeway incidents and incident delays. J Transp Eng 123, 267–275 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hojati, A.T.; Ferreira, L.; Washington, S.; Charles, P.; Shobeirinejad, A.: Modelling total duration of traffic incidents including incident detection and recovery time. Accid. Anal. Prev. 71, 296–305 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin, L.; Wang, Q.; Sadek, A.W.: A combined M5P tree and hazard-based duration model for predicting urban freeway traffic accident durations. Accid. Anal. Prev. 91(2016), 114–126 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chimba, D.; Kutela, B.; Ogletree, G.; Horne, H.; Tugwell, M.: Impact of abandoned and disabled vehicles on freeway incident duration. J Transp Eng 140(3), 04013013(8) (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, X.; Chen, S.; Gu, J.; Zhen, W.:. Traffic incident duration analysis based on cyclic subspace regression. In: ASCE 2013 Fourth International Conference on Transportation Engineering, 19–20 Oct 2013, Chengdu (2013)

  14. Wu, W.; Chen, S.; Zheng, C.: Traffic incident duration prediction based on support vector regression. In: ASCE 2011 Eleventh International Conference of Chinese Transportation Professionals, 14–17 Aug 2011, Nanjing (2011)

  15. Wanga, X.; Chena, S.; Zheng, W.: Traffic incident duration prediction based on partial least squares regression. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 96, 425–432 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khattak, A.J.; Schofer, J.L.; Wang, M.-H.: A simple time sequential procedure for predicting freeway incident duration. IVHS J 2(2), 113–138 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, W.; Chen, H.; Bell, M.: A study of the characteristics of traffic incident duration on motorways. In: International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies (ICTTS), 23–25 July 2002, Guilin (2002)

  18. Ozbay, K.; Noyan, N.: Estimation of incident clearance times using Bayesian networks approach. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38, 542–555 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park, H.; Zhang, X.; Haghani, A.: ATIS: interpretation of Bayesian neural network for predicting the duration of detected incidents. In: TRB 2013 Annual Meeting, 13–17 Jan 2013, Washington (2013)

  20. Yang, B.J.; Zhang, X.; Sun, L.: Traffic incident duration prediction based on the Bayesian decision tree method. In: First International Symposium on Transportation and Development Innovative Best Practices, 24–26 Apr 2008, Beijing (2008)

  21. Li, R.; Pereira, F.C.; Ben-Akiva, M.E.: Competing risks mixture model for traffic incident duration prediction. Accid. Anal. Prev. 75(2015), 192–201 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, R.; Pereira, F.C.; Ben-Akiva, M.E.: Competing risk mixture model and text analysis for sequential incident duration prediction. Transp. Res. C 54(2015), 74–85 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ozen, H.; Saracoglu, A.: Multi-step approach to improving accuracy of incident duration estimation: case study of Istanbul. Tehnički vjesnik 26(6), 1777–1783 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Al-Ruzouq, R.; Hamad, K.; Dabous, S.A.; Zeiada, W.; Khalil, M.A.; Voigt, T.: Weighted multi-attribute framework to identify freeway incident hot spots in a spatiotemporal context. Arab J Sci Eng 44, 8205–8223 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Khattak, A.: Analysis of large-scale incidents on urban freeways. TRB 2012 Annual Meeting, 22-26 January 2012, Washington (2012)

  26. Smith, K.W.; Smith, B.L.: Forecasting the clearance time of freeway accidents. Report No. UVACTS-15-0-35. Center for Transportation Studies. University of Virginia (2001)

  27. Lin, P.; Zou, N.; Chang, G.: Integration of a discrete choice model and a rule-based system for estimation for incident duration: a case study in MaryLand. In: TRB 83rd Annual Meeting, 11–15 Jan 2004, Washington (2004)

  28. Texas Department of Transportation: Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD), 2006 Edition, Revision 1, Texas (2006)

  29. Federal Highway Administration (FWHA): Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) for Streets and Highways, 2009 Edition, Washington (2009)

  30. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Regional Planning Agency and Transportation Planning Division: Chattanooga urban area highway incident management plan, Tennessee (2010)

  31. Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Transportation Coordination Center (UKOME): Regulation#2005/2-5, Istanbul (2005)

  32. Arguden, Y.; Ersahin, B.: Veri Madenciliği: Veriden Bilgiye, Masraftan Değere. ARGE Consulting Publications, Istanbul (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tomei, L.A.: Encyclopedia of Information Technology Curriculum Integration”. IGI Global Information Science Reference, Hershey (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Shmueli, G.; Patel, N.R.; Bruce, P.C.: Data Mining for Business Intelligence: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications in Microsoft Office Excel with XLMiner, 2nd edn. Wiley, New Jersey (2010)

  35. Chang, L.-Y.; Wang, H.-W.: Analysis of traffic injury severity: an application of non-parametric classification tree techniques. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38(5), 1019–1027 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruggieri, S.: Efficient C4.5 [classification algorithm]. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data eng. 14(2), 438–444 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Landwehr, N.; Hall, M.; Frank, E.: Logistic model trees. Mach. Learn. 59(1–2), 161–205 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Abdulsamet Saracoglu & Halit Ozen

Authors
  1. Abdulsamet Saracoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Halit Ozen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulsamet Saracoglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saracoglu, A., Ozen, H. Estimation of Traffic Incident Duration: A Comparative Study of Decision Tree Models. Arab J Sci Eng 45, 8099–8110 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04615-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04615-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation