Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Modelling for the Optimum Design of Horizontal Well Completions with PSCs in Water Drive Reservoirs

  • Review - Petroleum Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of water coning is a key factor in the development of horizontal wells in water drive reservoirs, and the autonomous phase selection controller (PSC) is a new water control tool for controlling bottom water coning. A PSC is based only on the fluid properties and flow paths to distinguish fluids and limit water production without any moving parts. This paper discusses the problem of water coning and offers a potential solution for horizontal wells completed with PSCs. A 3D dynamic simulation model of two-phase flow for a horizontal well with a PSC completion has been developed and solved by coupling the reservoir heterogeneity, anisotropy, drilling damage, well trajectory, tubing flow and annular flow. The simulation results indicate that horizontal wells with PSC completions can experience improved production performances compared to those of open hole completions. In addition, a large number of sensitivity analyses have also been performed, including the number of PSCs, packers and different locations of the PSCs. Finally, an optimization design methodology of a PSC completion in a horizontal well has been proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(S_\mathrm{o},~S_\mathrm{w}\) :

The saturation of oil and water, respectively (%)

\(\rho _\mathrm{o},~\rho _\mathrm{w}\) :

The density of oil and water, respectively (kg/\(\hbox {m}^{3}\))

\(k_{\mathrm{ro}},~k_{\mathrm{rw}}\) :

The relative permeability of oil and water, respectively, mD

k :

The permeability, respectively (mD)

\(\mu _\mathrm{o},~\mu _\mathrm{w}\) :

The viscosity of oil and water, respectively (mPa s)

\(p_\mathrm{o},~p_\mathrm{w}\) :

The pressure of oil and water, respectively (Pa)

\(q_\mathrm{o},~q_\mathrm{w}\) :

The mass flow rate of oil and water in the reservoir, respectively (kg/d)

\(p_{\mathrm{oi}}\) :

The initial oil pressure (Pa)

\(S_{\mathrm{wi}}\) :

The initial water saturation (%)

\(p_{\mathrm{li},j,k} \) :

The pressure of the grid block of the well (Pa)

\(p_{\mathrm{wf}}\) :

The bottom hole flowing pressure (Pa)

\(\hbox {PI}_l\) :

The production index (\(\hbox {m}^{3}\)/d/Pa)

\(\rho _{\mathrm{mix}}\) :

The mixture density (kg/\(\hbox {m}^{3}\))

g :

The acceleration of gravity (m/\(\hbox {s}^{2}\))

\(\theta _i\) :

The inclined angle of section i of the horizontal well (rad)

\(C_{\mathrm{ann}}\) :

The correction coefficient of the friction coefficient of section i of the annulus flow of the horizontal well, dimensionless

\(f_{\mathrm{ann}}\) :

The friction coefficient of section i of the annulus flow of the horizontal well, dimensionless

\(Q_{\mathrm{ann}}\) :

The flow rate of section i of the annulus flow of the horizontal well (\(\hbox {m}^{3}\)/d)

\(q_i\) :

The reservoir inflow of section i of the annulus flow of the horizontal well (\(\hbox {m}^{3}\)/d)

\(D_{\mathrm{well}}\) :

The wellbore diameter of the horizontal well (m)

\(D_{\mathrm{tube},\mathrm{o}}\) :

The tubing diameter of the horizontal well (m)

Re:

The Reynolds number of the oil and water mixture, dimensionless

\(\mu _{\mathrm{mix}}\) :

The mixture viscosity (mPa s)

\(v_{\mathrm{mix}}\) :

The mixture flow rate (m/s)

D :

The annulus hydraulic diameter (m)

\(\varepsilon \) :

The average absolute roughness of the pipe wall

\(Q_{\mathrm{tube},i}\) :

The flow rate of section i of the tubing of the horizontal well (\(\hbox {m}^{3}\)/d)

\(D_{\mathrm{tube},\mathrm{in}}\) :

The inner diameter of the tubing of the horizontal well (m)

\(f_{\mathrm{tube}}\) :

The friction coefficient of the tubing of the horizontal well, dimensionless

\(Q_{\mathrm{psc}}\) :

The flow rate of the PSC (\(\hbox {m}^{3}\)/d)

\(\lambda _L\) :

The frictional pressure loss coefficient of annular channels, dimensionless

\(\zeta \) :

The local pressure loss coefficient, dimensionless

\(C_{\mathrm{DN}}\) :

The pressure loss coefficient of nozzles, dimensionless

e :

The pressure loss coefficient of the control chamber, dimensionless

\(C_{\mathrm{DS}}\) :

The pressure loss coefficient of flow slots, dimensionless

References

  1. Bruining, J.; Van Dujin, C.J.; Schotting, R.J.: Simulation of coning in bottom water-driven reservoirs. Transp. Porous Media 6(1), 35–69 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang, Q.; Butler, R.M.: Experimental and numerical modeling of bottom water coning to a horizontal well. J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 37(10), 82–91 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2118/98-10-02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, Y.H.; Li, H.T.; Li, Y.: Prediction method of bottom water coning profile and water breakthrough time in bottom water reservoir without barrier. Math. Probl. Eng. 2015, 1–6 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/149490

    Google Scholar 

  4. Landman, M.J.; Goldthorpe, W.H.: Optimization of perforation distribution for horizontal wells. In: SPE Asia-Pacific Conference, Perth, Australia (1991). https://doi.org/10.2118/23005-MS

  5. Stalder, J.: Test of SAGD flow-distribution-control liner system in the surmont field, Alberta, Canada. J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 52(2), 95–100 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2118/153706-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iqbal, F.; Iskandar, R.; Radwan, E.: Autonomous inflow control device: a case study of first successful field trial in GCC for water conformance. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE (2015). https://doi.org/10.2118/177927-MS

  7. Wang, J.L.; Zhang, N.S.; Wang, Y.L.; et al.: Development of a downhole incharge inflow control valve in intelligent wells. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 29, 559–569 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kapr, J.C.: Horizontal barriers for controlling water coning. J. Petrol. Technol. 14(7), 783–790 (1962). https://doi.org/10.2118/153-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, B.; Lee, R.L.: Determination of the maximum water-free production rate of a horizontal well with water/oil/interface cresting. In: SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, Wyoming (1992). https://doi.org/10.2118/24324-MS

  10. Li, H.T.; Jiang, B.B.; Wang, Y.Q.; Wang, J.C.: A semianalytical model for horizontal wells with improved stinger completion in heterogeneous bottomwater reservoir. J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 3, 151–160 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2118/170251-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Willhite, G.P.; Pancake, R.E.: Controlling water production using gelled polymer systems. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 11(3), 454–465 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2118/89464-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pang, Z.X.; Cheng, L.S.; Xu, J.F.; Feng, R.Y.: Application of material balance method to nitrogen anti-water-coning technology. Petrol. Explor. Dev. 35(2), 234–238 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(08)60033-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crow, S.L.; Coronado, M.P.; Mody, R.K.: Means for passive inflow control device upon gas breakthrough. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA (2006). https://doi.org/10.2118/102208-MS

  14. Garcia, G.A.; Coronado, M.P.; Gavioli, P.: Identiying well completion application for passive inflow control devices. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana (2009). https://doi.org/10.2118/124349-MS

  15. Banerjee, S.; Jobling, R.; Abdelfattah, T.: The role of autonomous flow control in SAGD well design. J. Petrol. Technol. 66(03), 136–139 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2118/166266-MS

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elverhøy, A.B.; Aakre, H.; Mathiesen, V.: Autonomous inflow control for reduced water cut and/or gas oil ratio. In: Offshore Technology Conference (2018). https://doi.org/10.4043/28860-MS

  17. Halvorsen, M.; Elseth, G.; Naevdal, O.M.: Increased oil production at troll by autonomous inflow control with RCP valves. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA (2012). https://doi.org/10.2118/159634-MS

  18. Zhao, L.; Least, B.; Greci, S.: Fluidic diode autonomous ICD range 2A single-phase testing. In: SPE Oilfield Water Management Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City, Kuwait (2014). https://doi.org/10.2118/170993-MS

  19. Fripp, M.; Zhao, L.; Least, B.: The theory of a fluidic diode autonomous inflow control device. In: SPE Middle East Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Manama, Bahrain (2013). https://doi.org/10.2118/167415-MS

  20. Wang, X.Q.; Wang, Z.M.; Zeng, Q.S.: A novel autonomous inflow control device: design, structure optimization and fluid sensitivity analysis. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2014). https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-17758-MS

  21. Sang, G.S.; Jiang, Z.H.; Zhang, Q.J.; et al.: A novel autonomous inflow control device design based on water swelling rubber. In: IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference, Bangkok, Thailand (2014). https://doi.org/10.2118/170506-MS

  22. Zeng, Q.S.; Wang, Z.M.; Wang, X.Q.: A novel autonomous inflow control devices design: improvements to hybrid ICD. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2014). https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-17776-MS

  23. Freyer, R.; Fejerskov, M.; Huse, A.: An oil selective inflow control system. In: European Petroleum Conference, Aberdeen, United Kingdom (2002). https://doi.org/10.2118/78272-MS

  24. Volkov, Vasily Y.; Skibin, Alexander P.; Zhuravlev, Oleg N.; et al.: Adaptive inflow control system. Cornell University Library (2014). https://doi.org/10.1163/156920903763835652

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kuvakina, M.; Makarov, Y.; Zhuravlev, O.: Well completion selection to increase the efficiency of contact reserves development on example of Van-Yoganskoye field. In: SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, Moscow, Russia (2015). https://doi.org/10.2118/176525-MS

  26. Yang, M.J.; Li, H.T.; Xie, J.; Wang, Y.Q.; et al.: The theory of the automatic phase selection controller and its performance analysis. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 144(2016), 28–38 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ouyang, L.B.; Arbabi, S.; Aziz, K.: General wellbore flow model for horizontal, vertical, and slanted well completions. SPE J. 3(2), 124–133 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2118/36608-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (Nos. 2016ZX05021005, 2016ZX05009003-011-002 and 2016ZX05017005-003) and the Talent Introduction Project of the Sichuan University of Science and Engineering (No. 2017RCL40).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingjun Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, M., Li, H., Wang, Y. et al. Numerical Modelling for the Optimum Design of Horizontal Well Completions with PSCs in Water Drive Reservoirs. Arab J Sci Eng 44, 5215–5232 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03790-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03790-1

Keywords

Navigation