Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determining Sustainability Assessment Indicators for the Holy City of Makkah, Saudi Arabia

  • Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of urban sustainability indicators has become one of the new topics explored around the world, while cities are growing uncontrollably. The different cities adopt their sustainability assessment indicators according to their local needs and conditions. The current state of sustainability assessment practices depicts that an assessment approach is hardly found in a comprehensive and integrated manner that can meet local conditions, as well as international norms. Historically and traditionally, the city of Makkah, Saudi Arabia, is one of the oldest and most sacred cities in the world where millions of Muslims gather in this city as a religious pilgrimage throughout the year. The unique form of the city and the gradual increase in the number of pilgrims pose enormous challenges for city dwellers, as well as management authorities. As a result, the development of a sustainability assessment approach has become inevitable to deal with these challenges. This study presents a comprehensive sustainability assessment indicator index for the Holy City of Makkah through the use of an expert opinion method to reach consensus among the experienced researchers in the city. A set of 92 indicators has been formulated among 115 primary sets, with five major aspects, including the physical, socioeconomic, environmental, institutional and spillover, which influence and shape the performance of the city.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UN Habitat: Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures, World Cities Report, HS Number: HS/038/16E ISBN Number(Series): 978-92-1-133395-4 ISBN Number:(Volume): 978-92-1-132708-3 (2016)

  2. UN Habitat: Un-Habitat global activities report, Increasing synergy for greater national ownership, HS/028/15E ISBN(Series): 978-92-1-133406-7 ISBN(Volume): 978-92-1-132652-9 (2015)

  3. Hardoy, J.E.; Satterthwaite, D.: Environmental problems of Third World cities: a global issue ignored? Public Adm. Dev. 11, 341–361 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adinyira, E.; Oteng-Seifah, S.; Adjei-Kumi, T.: A review of urban sustainability assessment methodologies. In: Horner, M.; Hardcastle, C.; Price, A.; Bebbington, J. (eds.) International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and Its Assessment, Glasgow (2007)

  5. Choguill, C.L.: Toward sustainability of human settlements. Habitat Int. 20(3), v–viii (1996)

  6. Turcu, C.: Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 56, 695–719 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, Y.; Huang, C.: Sustainability index for Taipei. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 27, 505–521 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shen, L.; Ochoa, J.J.; Shah, M.N.; Zhang, X.: The application of urban sustainability indicators—a comparison between various practices. Habitat Int. 35, 17–29 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pupphachai, U.; Zuidema, C.: Sustainability indicators: a tool to generate learning and adaptation in sustainable urban development. Ecol. Ind. 72, 784–793 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. George, C.; Kirkpatrick, C.: Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development: European Practice and Experience. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamilton, K.; Atkinson, G.: Air pollution and green accounts. Energy Policy 24(7), 675–684 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. United Nations (UN): United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (AGENDA 21). International Legal Materials, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spangenberg, J.H.: Environmental space and the prism of sustainability: frameworks for indicators measuring sustainable development. Ecol. Indic. 2(3), 259–309 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bell, S.; Morse, S.: Measuring Sustainability: Learning From Doing. Routledge, Abingdon (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, K.; He, X.; Wen, Z.: Study of indicators of urban environmentally sustainable development in china. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 6(2), 170–182 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ambiente Italia Research Institute: European common indicators (ECI): Towards a local sustainability profile. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Final Project Report, Luxemburg (2003)

  17. Parris, T.; Kates, R.: Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28, 559–86 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. The New York Times Magazine: Feature Article: Mecca Goes Mega. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/12/magazine/mecca-goes-mega.html (2016). Accessed 15 Sept 2018

  19. UN Habitat: Makkah CPI Profile, Report jointly published by Future Saudi Cities Programmme, UN-Habitat Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Municipal and Rural Affairs and Makkah Local Urban Observatory (2016)

  20. GaStat: Population Census 2010, General Authority for Statistics, Government of Saudi Arabia (2018)

  21. KSA-UN Habitat (III): The National Report for the Third UN conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (HABITAT III) for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Municipal and Rural Affairs and the National HABITAT III Consultation Group in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in collaboration with the United Nations Human Settlements Program (UN-HABITAT) (2016)

  22. Alafghani, A.S.: A study of the hajj to the holy city and a design of pilgrims accommodation center in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Unpublished Thesis, Texas Tech University, Lubbock (1987)

  23. Secretariat of the Holy city of Makkah: Statistics population centers (2009)

  24. Jeddah Chamber: Tourism in Saudi Arabia April 2016, Jeddah Chamber, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. http://www.jeg.org.sa/data/modules/contents/uploads/infopdf/2867.pdf (2016). Accessed 10 Aug 2016

  25. GaStat: General Authority for Statistics, Government of Saudi Arabia, 9\(^{th}\) Development Plan (2018)

  26. Saudi Gazette, Nearly 2.4 million pilgrims ascend Arafat for peak of Haj, Article published in August 20, 2018. http://saudigazette.com.sa/article/541626/SAUDI-ARABIA/Nearly-24-million-pilgrims-ascend-Arafat-for-peak-of-Haj) (2018). Accessed 24 Sept 2018

  27. Shafi, S.; Booy, R.; Haworth, E.; Rashid, H.; Memish, Z.A.: Hajj: health lessons for mass gatherings. J. Infect. Public Health 1, 27–32 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. GaStat: General Authority for Statistics, Government of Saudi Arabia, Hajj Statistics (2018)

  29. Ascoura, I.E.: Impact of Pilgrimage (Hajj) on the Urban Growth of the Mecca. J. Educ. Soc. Res. 3(2) (2013). ISSN 2239-978X

  30. Mori, K.; Christodoulou, A.: Review of sustainability indices and indicators: towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 32(1), 94–106 (2012). ISSN: 0195-9255

  31. Verma, P.; Raghubanshi, A.S.: Urban sustainability indicators: challenges and opportunities. Ecol. Indic. 93, 282–291 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Munier, N.: Methodology to select a set of urban sustainability indicators to measure the state of the city, and performance assessment. Ecol. Indic. 11, 1020–1026 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Salvati, L.; Carlucci, M.: A composite index of sustainable development at the local scale: Italy as a case study. Ecol. Indic. 43, 162–171 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Scipioni, A.; Mazzi, A.; Mason, M.; Manzardo, A.: The Dashboard of Sustainability to measure the local urban sustainability development: the case study of Padua Municipality. Ecol. Indic. 9, 364–380 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Panda, S.; Chakraborty, M.; Misra, S.K.: Assessment of social sustainable development in urban India by a composite index. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 5(2), 435–450 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Luan, W.; Lu, L.; Li, X.; Ma, C.: Weight determination of sustainable development indicators using a global sensitivity analysis method. Sustainability (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020303

  37. Choi, H.C.; Sirakaya, E.: Sustainability indictors for managing community tourism. Tour. Manag. 27, 1274–1289 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Woudenberg, F.: An evaluation of Delphi. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 40, 131–150 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yigitcanlar, T.; Dur, F.: Developing a sustainability assessment model: the sustainable infrastructure, land-use, environment and transport model. Sustainability 2, 321–340 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Singh, R.K.; Murty, H.R.; Gupta, S.K.; Dikshit, A.K.: An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol. Indicat. 9, 189–212 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. OECD: Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide, OECD, Paris (2008). ISBN 978-92-64-04345-9

  42. Zavadskas, E.; Kaklauskas, A.; Šaparauskas, J.; Kalibatas, D.: Vilnius urban sustainability assessment with an emphasis on pollution. EKOLOGIJA 53(Suppl.), 64–72 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) and all the expert panel members who participated in the questionnaire. The reviewers’ comments are also appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Anisurrahman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anisurrahman, M., Alshuwaikhat, H.M. Determining Sustainability Assessment Indicators for the Holy City of Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Sci Eng 44, 5165–5178 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03772-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03772-3

Keywords

Navigation