Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance of Relative Permeability and Two-Phase Flow Parameters Under Net Effective Stress in Water Wet Porous Media: A Comparative Study of Water–Oil Versus Silica Nanofluid–Oil

  • Research Article - Petroleum Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While studies on the stress sensitivity of relative permeability using conventional fluids have varying and inconclusive results, the effect of stress on relative permeability using nanofluids has not been reported. In this study, the effect of net effective stress on relative permeability and two-phase flow parameters using conventional and nanofluid was investigated. Nanoparticle retention in pores was examined by changes in nuclear magnetic resonance transverse relaxation time distribution. Nanoparticle deposition affected big pores more than small pores. As net effective stress was increased during water flooding, end-point oil and water saturations increased and end-point oil relative permeability decreased. Nanofluid–oil relative permeability showed contrasting results depending on whether the sample had adsorbed nanoparticles prior to relative permeability measurements. For the sample that had adsorbed nanoparticles prior to subsequent stress increments, the effect of stress was dominated by the effect of nanoparticle adsorption. However, the effect of stress took precedence over nanoparticle adsorption in samples that had no nanoparticle deposition prior to relative permeability experiments. A comparison of water–oil and nanofluid–oil relative permeabilities showed similar initial water saturations and end-point oil relative permeability changes but differing residual oil saturations and end-point water relative permeability. Mobility ratio increased in water flooding as stress increased but decreased after an initial increase in nanofluid flooding. Displacement efficiency decreased with increased stress for both water and nanofluid flooding. The results provide insights into the effect of stress on relative permeability using conventional fluids and silica nanofluid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ojha, S.P.; Misra, S.; Tinni, A.; Sondergeld, C.; Rai, C.: Relative permeability estimates for Wolfcamp and Eagle Ford shale samples from oil, gas and condensate windows using adsorption-desorption measurements. Fuel 208, 52–64 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bravo, M.C.; Araujo, M.: Analysis of the unconventional behavior of oil relative permeability during depletion tests of gas-saturated heavy oils. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 34, 447–460 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akhlaghinia, M.; Torabi, F.; Chan, C.W.: Experimental investigation of temperature effect on three-phase relative permeability isoperms in heavy oil systems. Fuel 118, 281–290 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, X.; Alvarado, V.: Analysis of capillary pressure and relative permeability hysteresis under low-salinity waterflooding conditions. Fuel 180, 228–243 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, C.; Lee, J.: Experimental study on the variation of relative permeability due to clay minerals in low salinity water-flooding. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 151, 292–304 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Babadagli, T.; Ren, X.; Develi, K.: Effects of fractal surface roughness and lithology on single and multiphase flow in a single fracture: an experimental investigation. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 68, 40–58 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fatt, I.: The effect of overburden pressure on relative permeability. J. Petrol. Technol. 5, 15–16 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson, J.: Determination of relative permeability under simulated reservoir conditions. AIChE J. 2, 94–100 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas, R.D.; Ward, D.C.: Effect of overburden pressure and water saturation on gas permeability of tight sandstone cores. J. Petrol. Technol. 24, 120–124 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ali, H.; Al-Marhoun, M.; Abu-Khamsin, S.; Celik,M.: The effect of overburden pressure on relative permeability. In: Fifth Middle East Oil Show, vol. 15730, pp. 338–340. SPE, Manama, Bahrain (1987)

  11. Jones, C.; Al-Quraishi, A.; Somerville, J.; Hamilton, S.: Stress Sensitivity of Saturation and End-Point Relative Permeabilities. Society of Core Analysts, Edinburgh (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Quraishi, A.; Khairy, M.: Pore pressure versus confining pressure and their effect on oil–water relative permeability curves. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 48, 120–126 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gawish, A.; Al-Homadhi, E.: Relative permeability curves for high pressure, high temperature reservoir conditions. Oil Gas Bus 2, 23 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khan, H.: Shear Induced Relative Permeability Change in Uncemented Sands. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oldakowski, K.: Stress Induced Permeability Changes of Athabasca Oil Sands. University of Alberta, Edmonton (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hamoud, M.; Chalaturnyk, R.; Leung, J.: Influence of geomechanical processes on relative permeability. In: Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Edmonton, Canada (2012)

  17. Cheraghian, G.: Effects of nanoparticles on wettability: a review on applications of nanotechnology in the enhanced oil recovery. Int. J. Nano Dimens. 6, 443 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cheraghian, G.; Hendraningrat, L.: A review on applications of nanotechnology in the enhanced oil recovery part A: effects of nanoparticles on interfacial tension. Int. Nano Lett. 6, 129–138 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheraghian, G.; Hendraningrat, L.: A review on applications of nanotechnology in the enhanced oil recovery part B: effects of nanoparticles on flooding. Int. Nano Lett. 6, 1–10 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, G.; Gai, Z.: Application of nanoparticles in enhanced oil recovery: a critical review of recent progress. Energies 10, 345 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giraldo, J.; Benjumea, P.; Lopera, S.; Cortés, F.B.; Ruiz, M.A.: Wettability alteration of sandstone cores by alumina-based nanofluids. Energy Fuels 27, 3659–3665 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Amedi, H.; Ahmadi, M.-A.: Experimental investigation the effect of nanoparticles on the oil–water relative permeability. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 1–8 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu, T.; Li, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, C.: Enhanced oil recovery of low-permeability cores by SiO\(_2\) nanofluid. Energy Fuels 31, 5612–5621 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parvazdavani, M.; Masihi, M.; Ghazanfari, M.H.: Monitoring the influence of dispersed nano-particles on oil–water relative permeability hysteresis. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 124, 222–231 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ju, B.; Dai, S.; Luan, Z.; Zhu, T.; Su, X.; Qiu, X.: A study of wettability and permeability change caused by adsorption of nanometer structured polysilicon on the surface of porous media. In: SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers (2002)

  26. Ju, B.; Fan, T.: Experimental study and mathematical model of nanoparticle transport in porous media. Powder Technol. 192, 195–202 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ju, B.; Fan, T.; Li, Z.: Improving water injectivity and enhancing oil recovery by wettability control using nanopowders. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 86, 206–216 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hassler, G.; Brunner, E.: Measurement of capillary pressures in small core samples. Trans. AIME 160, 114–123 (1945)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gupta, R.; Maloney, D.R.: Intercept method—a novel technique to correct steady-state relative permeability data for capillary end effects. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 19, 316–330 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Anderson, W.G.: Wettability literature survey part 5: the effects of wettability on relative permeability. J. Petrol. Technol. 39, 1,453–451,468 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Abdallah, W.; Buckley, J.S.; Carnegie, A.; Edwards, J.; Herold, B.; Fordham, E.; Graue, A.; Habashy, T.; Seleznev, N.; Signer, C.: Fundamentals of wettability. Technology 38, 268 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Peters, E.J.: Advanced Petrophysics: Dispersion, Interfacial Phenomena/Wettability, Capillarity/Capillary Pressure, Relative Permeability, vol. 2. Greenleaf Book Group, Austin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li, S.; Kaasa, A.T.; Hendraningrat, L.; Torsæter, O.: Effect of silica nanoparticles adsorption on the wettability index of Berea sandstone. Paper SCA2013-059 Presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts Held in Napa Valley, California, USA, pp. 16–19 (2013)

  34. Hendraningrat, L.; Torsæter, O.: Effects of the initial rock wettability on silica-based nanofluid-enhanced oil recovery processes at reservoir temperatures. Energy Fuels 28, 6228–6241 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Torsater, O.; Engeset, B.; Hendraningrat, L.; Suwarno, S.: Improved oil recovery by nanofluids flooding: an experimental study. In: SPE Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2012)

  36. Wasan, D.T.; Nikolov, A.D.: Spreading of nanofluids on solids. Nature 423, 156 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chengara, A.; Nikolov, A.D.; Wasan, D.T.; Trokhymchuk, A.; Henderson, D.: Spreading of nanofluids driven by the structural disjoining pressure gradient. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 280, 192–201 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 100083, People’s Republic of China

    Caspar Daniel Adenutsi, Zhiping Li & Bello Lawal Toro

  2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Geology Evaluation and Development Engineering, Beijing, 100083, People’s Republic of China

    Caspar Daniel Adenutsi, Zhiping Li & Bello Lawal Toro

  3. Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

    Wilberforce Nkrumah Aggrey

Authors
  1. Caspar Daniel Adenutsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhiping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wilberforce Nkrumah Aggrey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bello Lawal Toro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caspar Daniel Adenutsi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (docx 987 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adenutsi, C.D., Li, Z., Aggrey, W.N. et al. Performance of Relative Permeability and Two-Phase Flow Parameters Under Net Effective Stress in Water Wet Porous Media: A Comparative Study of Water–Oil Versus Silica Nanofluid–Oil. Arab J Sci Eng 43, 6555–6565 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3296-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3296-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation