Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

, Volume 43, Issue 10, pp 5559–5572 | Cite as

Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing on Clay Slope Reinforced with Stone Columns

  • Erfan Naderi
  • Adel Asakereh
  • Masoud Dehghani
Research Article - Civil Engineering


Bearing capacity is very important in geotechnical engineering, which depends on factors such as footing shape, stress distribution under footing and failure mechanism of soil. One of the methods for improving the bearing capacity and reducing settlement in soft and fine soils is adding column like elements to soil which called stone column. In this research using model tests and numerical modeling, the effect of existence and location of stone column on bearing capacity of strip footing near soft clay slope is studied. In fact, reinforced and unreinforced stone columns in different locations are added to slope and the effect of them on load-settlement behavior of strip footing rested on top of the slope was investigated. Group stone columns are also studied, and efficiency of them is investigated. Also numerical modeling is carried out with Plaxis 3D Foundation program, and finally the results of experimental and numerical modeling were compared. Results show that reinforcing clay slope with stone column in all situations leads to increase in bearing capacity of strip footing. Moreover, reinforcing stone columns with encasing cause better performance of stone columns and increase in bearing capacity of footing compared with the same unreinforced stone columns. The maximum effect of stone column on bearing capacity of strip footing occurs when the stone column is located beneath the footing, and with increase in distance between the column and footing, the bearing capacity of footing is decreased.


Stone column Bearing capacity Strip footing Slope Clay 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barksdale, R.; Bachus, R.: Design and Construction of Stone Columns. Federal Highway Administration, Washington (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ambily, A.P.; Gandhi, S.R.: Behavior of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133(4), 405–415 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guetif, Z.; Bouassida, M.; Debats, J.M.: Improved soft clay characteristics due to stone column installation. Comput. Geotech. 34(2), 104–111 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zahmatkesh, A.; Choobbasti, A.J.: Settlement evaluation of soft clay reinforced with stone columns using the equivalent secant modulus. Arab. J. Geosci. 5(1), 103–109 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fattah, M.Y.; Al-Neami, M.A.; Al-Suhaily, A.S.: Estimation of bearing capacity of floating group of stone columns. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 20(3), 1166–1172 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choobbasti, A.J.; Pichka, H.: Improvement of soft clay using installation of geosynthetic-encased stone columns: numerical study. Arab. J. Geosci. 7(2), 597–607 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malarvizhi, S.; Ilamparuthi, K.: Load versus settlement of clay bed stabilized with stone and reinforced stone columns. In: Proceedingns of GeoAsia–2004, Seoul, Korea, pp. 322–329 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Black, J.A.; Sivakumar, V.; Madhav, M.R.; Hamill, G.A.: Reinforced stone columns in weak deposits: laboratory model study. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133(9), 1154–1161 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gniel, J.; Bouazza, A.: Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns. Geotext. Geomembr. 27(3), 167–175 (2009). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lo, S.R.; Zhang, R.; Mak, J.: Geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft clay: a numerical study. Geotext. Geomembr. 28(3), 292–302 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deb, K.; Samadhiya, N.K.; Namdeo, J.B.: Laboratory model studies on unreinforced and geogrid-reinforced sand bed over stone column-improved soft clay. Geotext. Geomembr. 29(2), 190–196 (2011). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghazavi, M.; Afshar, J.N.: Bearing capacity of geosynthetic encased stone columns. Geotext. Geomembr. 38, 26–36 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ali, K.; Shahu, J.; Sharma, K.: Geosynthetic reinforced stone column in soft soils: an experimental and analytical study. In: 9th international symposium on Lowland Technology, Saga, Japan, (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nazari Afshar, J.; Ghazavi, M.: Experimental studies on bearing capacity of geosynthetic reinforced stone columns. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39(3), 1559–1571 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yoo, C.; Lee, D.: Performance of geogrid-encased stone columns in soft ground: full-scale load tests. Geosynth. Int. 19(6), 480–490 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dash, S.K.; Bora, M.C.: Influence of geosynthetic encasement on the performance of stone columns floating in soft clay. Can. Geotech. J. 50(7), 754–765 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miranda, M.; Da Costa, A.: Laboratory analysis of encased stone columns. Geotext. Geomembr. 44(3), 269–277 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miranda, M.; Da Costa, A.; Castro, J.; Sagaseta, C.: Influence of geotextile encasement on the behaviour of stone columns: laboratory study. Geotext. Geomembr. 45(1), 14–22 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Castro, J.: Groups of encased stone columns: influence of column length and arrangement. Geotext. Geomembr. 45(2), 68–80 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goughnour, R.R.; Sung, J.T.; Ramsey, J.S.: Slide correction by stone columns. In: Deep foundation improvements: design, construction, and testing. ASTM International, ASTM STP-1089 (1991)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yaeger, S.: Slope stability and methods of increasing the factor of safety. ECI 281a, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ghazavi, M.; Shahmandi, A.: Analytical static stability analysis of slopes reinforced by Stone columns. International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), India, pp. 3530–3537 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Abusharar, S.W.; Han, J.: Two-dimensional deep-seated slope stability analysis of embankments over stone column-improved soft clay. Eng. Geol. 120(1), 103–110 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vekli, M.; Aytekin, M.; Ikizler, S.B.; Çalik, Ü.: Experimental and numerical investigation of slope stabilization by stone columns. Nat. Hazards 64(1), 797–820 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, Z.; Han, J.; Ye, G.: Numerical investigation on factors for deep-seated slope stability of stone column-supported embankments over soft clay. Eng. Geol. 168, 104–113 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen, J.-F.; Li, L.-Y.; Xue, J.-F.; Feng, S.-Z.: Failure mechanism of geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft soils under embankment. Geotext. Geomembr. 43(5), 424–431 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Iai, S.: Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure-fluid model in 1g gravitational field. Soils Found. 29(1), 105–118 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    American Society for Testing and Materials,. ASTM, American Society for Testing (1984)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Trautmann, C.H.; Kulhawy, F.H.: Uplift load-displacement behavior of spread foundations. J. Geotech. Eng. 114(2), 168–184 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of HormozganBandar AbbasIran

Personalised recommendations