Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Inherent Soil Variability on Seismic Response of Structure Supported on Pile Foundation

  • Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional seismic design is limited to fixed base assumption of superstructure. Such perception proved to be misleading from the post facto analysis of different failure case studies. In addition, inherent variability of soil parameters may lead to a considerable effect on seismic response of foundation and superstructure elements. Incorporation of shear strength variability of soil along with dynamic soil structure interaction phenomenon may result in increased or decreased transmitted shear to the pile as compared to fixed base shear which may lead to unsafe or over-safe pile design. The present study assesses the influence of shear strength variability of soil on seismic response of pile foundation considering soil nonlinearity. Probabilistic analysis is performed by Monte Carlo simulation technique. The study infers that variability of shear strength parameters of soil has significant effect on response of pile embedded in clay, while such effect is marginal in sandy soil. However, it is also observed that adoption of different pile–soil interaction modeling contributes variability in probabilistic response of pile. Finally, a case study shows the importance of shear strength variability of soil on increase in percentage of steel requirement in pile foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Applied Technology Council: Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations of Buildings: A Cooperative Effort with the Design Profession, Building Code Interests and the Research Community. National Bureau of Standards, Supt. of Docs, Washington (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  2. FEMA 356: Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Washington, DC (2000)

  3. Eurocode 8-Part 1: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Commission of the European Communities and the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), UK (1998)

  4. Japan Road Association (JSCE): Earthquake resistant design codes in Japan—1996 Seismic Design Specifications of Highway Bridges, Japan (2000)

  5. Saha, R.; Dutta, S.C.; Haldar, S.: Seismic response of soil–pile foundation–structure system. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 21(2), 144–164 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Phoon, K.K.; Kulhawy, F.H.: Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can. Geotech. J. 36, 210–238 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Papaioannou, I.; Straub, D.: Reliability updating in geotechnical engineering including spatial variability of soil. Comput. Geotech. 42, 44–51 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Y.; Cao, Z.: Expanded reliability-based design of piles in spatially variable soil using efficient Monte Carlo simulations. Soils Found. 53(6), 820–834 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Das, B.; Saha, R.; Haldar, S.: Effect of in-situ variability of soil on seismic design of piled raft supported structure incorporating dynamic soil–structure–interaction. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 84, 251–68 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Das, B.; Saha, R.; Haldar, S.: Probabilistic Seismic Design of Soil–Pile Raft–Superstructure System. Geotechnical Special Publication, IFCEE (2015)

  11. Pender, M.J.: A seismic Pile Foundation Design Analysis. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 26, No.1 (1993)

  12. Boulanger, R.W.; Curras, C.J.; Kutter, B.L.; Wilson, W.D.; Abghari, A.A.: Seismic soil–pile–structure interaction experiments and analyses. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 125(9), 750–759 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Curras, J.C.; Boulanger, W.R.; Kutter, B.L.; Wilson, D.W.: Dynamic experiments and analysis of a pile-group-supported structure. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 127(7), 585–596 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. API: Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design, pp. 75–81 (2005)

  15. Evans, Jr. L.T.; Duncan, G.M.: Simplified analysis of laterally loaded piles. Rep.No.UCB/GT/82-04, University of California, Berkeley, California (1982)

  16. Matlock, H.: Correlations for design of laterally loaded piles in soft clay. In: Proceedings of 2nd Annual Offshore Technology Conference, vol. 1, pp. 577-594 (1970)

  17. Offshore Standard: DNV-OS-J101. Design of offshore wind turbine (2010)

  18. Yashinsky, M.: The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989—Highway Systems. Professional Paper 1552-B, USGS, Washington (1998)

  19. Ghosh, B.; Lubkowski, Z.: Modeling dynamic soil structure interaction under seismic loads. In: S. Bhattacharjee (ed.) Design of Foundations in Seismic Areas: Principles and Applications, pp. 118–198. IIT Kanpur, NICEE, India (2007)

  20. Haldar, S.; Babu, G.L.S.: Effect of soil spatial variability on the response of laterally loaded pile in undrained clay. Comput. Geotech. 35, 537–547 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazzoni, S.; Mckenna, F.; Scott, M.H.; Gregory, L.; Fenvas.: OpenSees, Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation User Command-Language Manual. http://opensees.berkeley.edu (2007)

  22. Chopra, A.K.: Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Clough, W.R.; Penzien, J.: Dynamics of Structures, vol. 3. Computers & Structures, Berkeley (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Dutta, S.C.; Bhattacharya, K.; Roy, R.: Effect of flexibility of foundations on its seismic stress distribution. J. Earthq. Eng. 13, 22–49 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haldar, S.; Basu, D.: Response of Euler–Bernoulli beam on spatially random elastic soil. Comput. Geotech. 50, 110–128 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. SP 16: Design Aids for reinforced concrete to IS: 456-1978, Bureau of Indian Standards (1980)

  27. National Institute of Standards and Technology: Soil–Structure Interaction for Building Structures. U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. IS: Part I, 2016. Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of structures. Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, India (1893)

  29. IS: 2911 (Part 1/Sec 2): Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Pile Foundation: Part 1: Concrete Piles, Section 2 Bored Cast In-Situ Concrete Piles. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India (2010)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajib Saha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chanda, D., Saha, R. & Haldar, S. Influence of Inherent Soil Variability on Seismic Response of Structure Supported on Pile Foundation. Arab J Sci Eng 44, 5009–5025 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-03699-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-03699-1

Keywords

Navigation