Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reservoir Geomechanics Parameters Estimation Using Well Logs and Seismic Reflection Data: Insight from Sinjhoro Field, Lower Indus Basin, Pakistan

  • Research Article - Earth Sciences
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, the failure to understand a hydrocarbon field’s geomechanics signifies an expensive risk in several complex drilling, well completion, and exploitation processes. Thus, the precise estimation of reservoir geomechanical parameters can lessen that risk and provide benefits all the way through oil and gas field’s lifespan. Several factors like compaction of sediments, lithology characteristics, overburden, hydrocarbon and capillary entry pressures add substantial effects to cause of abnormal pressure and resultantly affect the well design and stability. The aim of current study is to compute geomechanical properties such as overburden pressure and vertical effective stress and finally to define the lower and upper bounds (breakout and breakdown limits) of safe mud weight window by determining the pore pressure and fracture gradient for pre-drill planning in future exploration and real time monitoring in the Sinjhoro Field, the Lower Indus Basin of Pakistan. Current studies examined the wireline logs data of four wells drilled in the Cretaceous reservoir sands and seismic reflection data-based P wave velocity functions and describes a workflow for reliable estimation of geomechanical parameters. Our results revealed that high pore pressure (5000–7000 Psi) is predicated at reservoir zone and it increases in southeast directions. On the basis of pore pressure and fracture pressure, both lower (5388.89 Psi) and upper (6572 Psi) bounds for safe mud weight window are defined for safe drilling and well stability that will help future exploration and development in the Sinjhoro field. Both overburden pressure and vertical effective stress increase uniformly with depth but spatial variations are nonlinear and increasing in northwest directions. The present work will support the petroleum industry by reducing the borehole drilling cost with no compromising on environment and safety concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fjaer, E.; Horsrud, P.; Raaen, A.M.; Risnes, R.; Holt, R.M.: Petroleum Related Rock Mechanics. Developments in Petroleum Science, vol. 33. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schutjens, P.M.T.M.; Hanssen, T.H.; Hettema, M.H.H.; Merour, J.; De Bree, P.; Coremans, J.W.A.; Helliesen, G.: Compaction-induced porosity/permeability reduction in sandstone reservoirs. In: Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana. SPE-71337 MS, pp. 1–16 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2118/71337-MS

  3. Sayers, C.M.; Schutjens, P.M.T.M.: An introduction to reservoir geomechanics. Lead. Edge 26, 597–601 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smirnov, N.Y.; Lam, R.; Rau-III, W.E.: Process of integrating geomechanics with well design and drilling operation. In: American Association of Drilling Engineers Technical Conference, AADE-03-NTCE-28, pp. 1–5 (2003)

  5. Zoback, M.D.; Moos, D.; Mastin, L.; Anderson, R.N.: Wellbore breakouts and in-situ stress. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 5523–5530 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB07p05523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siggins, A.F.; Dewhurst, D.N.; Dodds, K.J: Effective stress and the elastic response of reservoir sandstones and shales. In: Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists 17th Geophysical conference and Exhibition, Sydney, pp. 1770–1773 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1845168

  7. Bachrach, R.; Banik, N.; Sengupta M.; Noelth, S.; Dai J.; Bunge G.; Flack B.; Utech R.: Effective-stress-based reservoir characterization in an offshore basin. In: SEG/New Orleans Annual Meeting, pp. 1620–1624 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2369831

  8. Gai, X.; Rungamornrat, J.; Klie, H.; Bangerth, W.; Wheeler, M.F.; Stoffa, P.L.; Sen, M.K.; Seifoullaev, R.: Fully integrated reservoir flow, geomechanics and seismic modeling: a tool for better reservoir characterization and geomechanical prediction using 4D seismic. In: SEG Annual Meeting Houston (2005)

  9. Holbrook, P.W.; Maggiori, D.A.; Hensley, R.: Real-time pore pressure and fracture gradient 762 evaluation in all sedimentary lithologies. Soc. Pet. Eng. Form. Eval. 10, 215–222 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moos, D.; Chang, C.: Relationships between porosity, pressure, and velocities in unconsolidated Sands. In: Proceeding Overpressure in Petroleum Exploration Workshop, Pau, France (1998)

  11. Zaigham, N.A.; Mallick, K.: Prospects of hydrocarbons associated with fossil rift structure of southern Indus basins, Pakistan. AAPG Bull. 84, 1833–1848 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hussain, M.; Chun, W.Y.; Khalid, P.; Ahmed, N.: Mahmood, A.: Improving petrophysical analysis and rock physics parameters estimation through statistical analysis of Basal sands, lower Indus Basin, Pakistan. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 42, 327–337 (2017a). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2128-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Killings, G.; Umer, M.; Kassi, A.M.: Geology of Badin area of Pakistan. PAPG, Bull. 9, (2002)

  14. Ahmed, N.; Khalid, P.; Shafi, H.M.B.; Connolly, P.: DHIs evaluation by combining rock physics simulation and statistical techniques for fluids identification of Cambrian to Cretaceous clastic reservoirs in Pakistan. Acta Geophys. 65, 991–1007 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-017-0070-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shah, S.M.I.: Stratigraphy of Pakistan. Mem. 12. Geological Survey of Pakistan, Quetta (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dix, C.H.: Seismic velocities from surface measurements. Geophysics 20, 68–86 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khan, K.A.; Akhtar, G.; Ahmed, Z.; Khan, M.A.; Ahmed, N.: Wavelets—a computer based training tool for seismic signal processing. Pak. J. Hydrocarb. Res. 16, 37–43 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khan, K.A.; Akhter, G.: Computer-based experiments for learning seismic signal processing concepts. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 23, 959–966 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pickett, G.R.: Acoustic character logs and their applications in formation evaluation. J. Pet. Technol. 15, 659–667 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Castagna, J.P.; Batzle, M.L.; Eastwood, R.L.: Relationship between compressional and shear wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks. Geophysics 50, 551–570 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krief, M.J.; Garat, J.; Stellingwerff, J.; Ventre, J.: A petrophysical interpretation using the velocities of P and S waves (full wave form sonic). Log Anal. 58, 355–369 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Freund, D.: Ultrasonic compressional and shear velocities in dry elastic rock as a function porosity, clay content, and confining pressure. Geophys. J. Int. 108, 125–135 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Greenberg, M.L.; Castagna, J.P.: Shear-wave velocity estimation in porous rocks: theoretical formulation, preliminary verification and applications. Geophys. Prospect. 40, 195–209 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gardner, G.H.F.; Gardner, L.W.; Gregory, A.R.: Formation velocity and density: the diagnostic for stratigraphic traps. Geophysics 39, 770–780 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brandt, H.: A study on the speed of sound in porous granular media. J. Appl. Phys. 22, 479–486 (1955)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Biot, M.A.; Willis, D.G.: The elastic coefficients of the theory of consolidation. J. Appl. Mech. 24, 594–560 (1957)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Todd, T.; Simmons, G.: Effect of pore pressure on velocity of compressional waves in low porosity rocks. J. Geophys. Res. 77, 3731–3743 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hottman, C.E.; Johnson, R.K.: Estimation of formation pressures from log-derived shale properties. J. Pet.Technol. 17, 717–722 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Siggins, A.F.; Dewhurst, D.N.; Tingate, P.R.: Stress path, pore pressure and microstructural influences on Q in Carnarvon Basin Sandstones. Proc. Offshore Technol. Conf. 1, 935–944 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Siggins, A.F.; Dewhurst, D.N.: Saturation, pore pressure and effective stress from sandstone acoustic properties. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1089–1092 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bowers, G.: Pore pressure estimation from velocity data: accounting for overpressure mechanisms besides under compaction. In: IADC/ SPE 27488, IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, pp. 515–530 (1994)

  32. Eaton, B.: The equation for geopressure prediction from well logs. Soc. Pet. Eng. AIME SPE 5544, 1–11 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Terzaghi, K.: Theoretical Soil Mechanics. Wiley, Hoboken (1943)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Khan, K.A.; Bangash, A.A.; Akhter, G.: Raw seismic velocities aid predictions in mud program designs. Oil Gas J. 115, 22–26 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mathew, W.R.; Kelly, J.: How to predict formation pressure and fracture gradient. Oil Gas J. 65, 92–106 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Khan, K.A.; Saqib, H.M.J.; Bangash, A.A.: Vel2Pore—a visual OIL program for computing overburden pressure, vertical effective stress and pore pressure from seismic velocities. Geophys. Res. J. 2, 1–6 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Khan, K.A.; Akhter, G.; Ahmad, Z.: OIL–output input language for data connectivity between geoscientific software applications. Comput. Geosci. 36, 687–697 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2009.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marine Geology, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water and Marine Sciences, Uthal, Lasbela, Balochistan, Pakistan

    Mureed Hussain

  2. Institute of Geology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, 54590, Pakistan

    Nisar Ahmed

Authors
  1. Mureed Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nisar Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nisar Ahmed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussain, M., Ahmed, N. Reservoir Geomechanics Parameters Estimation Using Well Logs and Seismic Reflection Data: Insight from Sinjhoro Field, Lower Indus Basin, Pakistan. Arab J Sci Eng 43, 3699–3715 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-3029-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-3029-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation