SWIM: An Effective Method to Perceive Cyberspace Situation from Honeynet

Research Article - Computer Engineering and Computer Science
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

As a traditional and impactful proactive defense technology, honeynet is used by network defender to imitate normal production process, which traps and captures the behavior of attackers in order to analyze the methods and tools, and also to forecast the attacking intention and situation. However, the data obtained from honeynet usually have problems such as multiple types, high redundancy and low semantics level, which make it difficult to indicate network security situation directly. Through studying biological immune mechanism, a honeynet security warning model based on Danger Theory (an “SWIM”) is proposed. By utilizing the dendritic cell algorithm, this article discusses in detail the definition and mapping for input signals, capture of honeynet antigens, fundamental analysis for output signals, as well as the security early warning. The simulation results show that, in the face of typical network attacks, SWIM accurately reflects the attacking strength, which is capable of implementing the efficient network early warning.

Keywords

Honeynet Danger Theory Dendritic cell algorithm Network attacks Security early warning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Spitzner, L.: The honeynet project: trapping the hackers. IEEE Secur. Priv. 1(2), 15–23 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olagunju A.O.; Samu F.: In search of effective honeypot and honeynet systems for real-time intrusion detection and prevention. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Research in Information Technology. Boston, pp. 41–46 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thonnarda, O.; Dacierb, M.: A framework for attack patterns’ discovery in honeynet data. Digital Investig. 5, 128–139 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaur, R.; Nagpal, E.S.; Chamotra, S.: Malicious traffic detection in a private organizational network using honeynet system. In: 2015 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON), 176–182. IEEE Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jiang, C.B.; Liu, I.; Chung, Y.N.: Novel intrusion prediction mechanism based on honeypot log similarity. Int. J. Netw. Manag. 26(3), 156–175 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pan, X.; Yegneswaran. V.; Chen Y.; et. al.: HogMap: using sdns to incentivize collaborative security monitoring. In: 2016 ACM International Workshop on Security in Software Defined Networks & Network Function Virtualization, pp. 7-12. ACM Press (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barford, P.; Chen, Y.; Goyal, A.; et al.: Employing honeynets for network situational awareness. Adv. Inf. Secur. 46, 71–102 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pham, V.; Dacier, M.: Honeypot trace forensics: the observation viewpoint matters. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 27(5), 539–546 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Polly, M.: The danger model: a renewed sense of self. Science 296(12), 301–305 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seresht, N.A.; Azmi, R.: MAIS-IDS: a distributed intrusion detection system using multi-agent AIS approach. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 35(10), 286–298 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oliveira, D.; Navarro, J.; Wetzel, N.; Bucci, M.: Ianus: secure and holistic coexistence with kernel extensions—an immune system-inspired approach. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1672–1679 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    John C.; Hala E.: Malware detection inspired by the human immune system and making use of honeytokens. In: Proceedings of the 18th Symposium on Communications & Networking, pp. 37–43 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun, F.X.: Artificial immune danger theory based model for network security evaluation. J. Netw. 6(2), 255–262 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fan, W.; Fernández, D.; Du, Z.: Versatile virtual honeynet management framework. IET Inf. Secur. 11(1), 38–45 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Han, W.; Zhao, Z.; Doupé, A.; Ahn, G.: HoneyMix: Toward SDN-based Intelligent Honeynet. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Workshop on Security in Software Defined Networks & Network Function Virtualization. ACM Press (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nurmi, J.; Kannisto, J.; Vajaranta, M.: Observing hidden service directory spying with a private hidden service honeynet. In: 2016 11th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS), pp. 55–59 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Greensmith, J.; Aickelin, U.; Cayzer, S.: Introducing Dendritic Cells as a Novel Immune-Inspired Algorithm for Anomaly Detection. In: 4th International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems, pp. 15–167. Springer-Verlag (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lokesh, M.R.; Kumaraswamy, Y.S.: State awareness towards resiliency in cyber-physical system: a modified danger theory based deterministic Dendritic Cell Algorithm approach. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Graphics, Vision and Information Security, pp. 201–208 (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; et al.: Situation assessment model for inter-domain routing system. IET Softw. 8, 53–61 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suhair, A.; Joshua, L.: Danger theory concepts improving malware detection of intrusion detection systems that uses exact graphs. In: International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), pp. 232–237 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mihai-Gabriel, I.; Victor-Valeriu, P.: Achieving DDoS resiliency in a software defined network by intelligent risk assessment based on neural networks and danger theory. In: 2014 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI), pp. 319–324 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aickelin, U.; Bentley, P.; Cayzer, S.; Kim, J.; McLeod, J.: Danger theory: the link between AIS and IDS? In: Proceedings ICARIS-2003, 2nd International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems, pp. 147–155 (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williams, C.A.; Harry, R.A.; Mcleod, J.D.: Apoptotic cells induce dendritic cell-mediated suppression via interferon-Y-induced IDO[J]. Immunology 124(1), 89–101 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Computer ScienceHenan University of EngineeringZhengzhouChina
  2. 2.Institute for Network Science and CyberspaceTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced ComputingZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations