Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of External Perimeter on Flexural Strength of FDM Build Parts

  • Research Article - Mechanical Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current manufacturing trend adopts newer technology that can reduce both the design and manufacturing lead time in order to face the challenging demands of the customer in an effective manner. In this regard, rapid prototyping technology, among all newly developed technologies, is reliable one because it is capable of manufacturing accurate and durable parts with 3D complex geometry within a stipulated time with less material waste. In this research work, effect of six relevant controllable input parameters (contour number or external perimeter, layer thickness, raster width, part orientation, air gap and raster angle) on flexural strength of the fused deposition modelling (FDM) build parts is analysed. Experimentation has been carried out using face-centred central composite design to reduce the number of experimentation. Contour number appears to be more influencing parameter because it helps to move the stress concentration zone from outer edge to the centre avoiding premature failure of the specimen. The study develops a statistically valid empirical model relating flexural strength with process parameters to ease prediction of flexural strength by tool engineers. Scanning electron microscope micrographs are used to explain the microstructure behaviour of FDM build parts when subjected to three point bend test. Finally, one nature-inspired metaheuristic approach known as Firefly algorithm is adopted to obtain optimal parameter setting for improving the flexural strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee, B.H.; Khan, Z.A.; Abdullah, J.: Optimization of rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible ABS object. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 169, 54–61 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellehumeur, C.T.; Gu, P.; Sun, Q.; Rizvi, G.M.: Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp. J. 14(2), 72–80 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Croccolo, D.; Agostinis, M.D.; Olmi, G.: Experimental characterisation and analytical modelling of the mechanical behaviour of fused deposition modelling processed parts made of ABS-M30. Comput. Mater. Sci. 79, 506–518 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahn, S.H.; Montero, M.; Odell, D.; Roundy, S.; Wright, P.K.: Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modelling ABS. Rapid Prototyp. J. 8(4), 248–257 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, W.C.; Dean, R.W.: Structural characteristics of fused deposition modelling polycarbonate material. Polym. Test. 32, 1306–1312 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mishra, S.B.; Mahapatra, S.S.: Improvement in tensile strength of FDM built parts by parametric control. Appl. Mech. Mater. 592, 1075–1079 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anitha, R.; Arunachalam, S.; Radhakrishnan, P.: Critical parameter influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 118, 385–388 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sood, A.K.; Ohdhar, R.K.; Mahapatra, S.S.: Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater. Des. 31, 287–295 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, T.M.; Xi, J.T.; Jin, Y.: A model research for prototype warp deformation in the FDM process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 33(11–12), 1087–1096 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang, D.Y.; Huang, B.H.: Studies on profile error and extruding aperture for the RP parts using the fused deposition modelling process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 53, 1027–1037 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Phatak, A.M.; Pande, S.S.: Optimum part orientation in rapid prototyping using genetic algorithm. J. Manuf. Syst. 31, 395–402 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rezaie, R.; Badrossamay, M.; Ghaie, A.; Moosavi, H.: Topology optimisation for fused deposition modelling process. Procedia CIRP 6, 521–526 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peng, A.; Xiao, X.; Yue, R.: Process parameter optimisation for fused deposition modelling using response surface methodology combined using fuzzy interference system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 73(1–14), 87–100 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kantaros, A.; Karalekas, D.: Fiber Bragg grating based investigation of residual strain in ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling process. Mater. Des. 50, 44–50 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, X.-S.: Engineering Optimisation: An Introduction with Metaheuristic Application. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Montgomery, D.C.: Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley, Singapore (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Noorani, R.: Rapid Prototyping: Principles and Application. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ASTM D790-10. Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulation Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, USA

  19. ATM D618-05. Standard Practice for Conditioning Plastics for Testing. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. S. Mahapatra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, S.B., Malik, R. & Mahapatra, S.S. Effect of External Perimeter on Flexural Strength of FDM Build Parts. Arab J Sci Eng 42, 4587–4595 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2598-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2598-8

Keywords

Navigation