Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Investigations on Behaviour of Strip Footing Placed on Chemically Stabilised Backfills and Flexible Retaining Walls

  • Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The gradual increase in population, as well as rapid development in the construction industry in recent years, has made it more urgent than ever to gain the sufficient knowledge and information needed to improve existing soil for geotechnical engineering purposes. This study focuses on the experimental investigations of small-scale physical model tests to evaluate the performance of selected locally manufactured non-traditional additives (SH-85 and TX-85) in field applications, particularly as the backfill of retaining walls. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests, a set of physical model tests and a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) were conducted. The physical models were different in terms of parameters such as the type of additive and the strip footing distance from the wall. The UCS test results showed that the addition of 9 % (as the optimum amount) of both additives increased more than 80 % of the compressive strength after 7-day curing periods. The results from the physical model tests showed that the ultimate capacity of the footing placed on the stabilised backfill soil increased greatly while the settlement reduced noticeably compared to the untreated backfill. Additionally, by increasing the distance of the strip footing from the wall, it increased the ultimate capacity of the footing. Besides that, the addition of additives in either powder or liquid form to the backfill led to a reduction in wall horizontal displacement and the strain distribution on the wall. Furthermore, less porous and denser soil fabric was observed on the surface of clay particles from FESEM images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmadi H., Hajialilue-Bonab M.: Experimental and analytical investigations on bearing capacity of strip footing in reinforced sand backfills and flexible retaining wall. Acta Geotech. 7(4), 357–373 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Georgiadis M., Anagnostopoulos C.: Lateral pressure on sheet pile walls due to strip load. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124(1), 95–98 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bourgeois E., Soyez L., Le Kouby A.: Experimental and numerical study of the behavior of a reinforced-Earth wall subjected to a local load. Comput. Geotech. 38(4), 515–525 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tawfik, E.F.; Hamid, T.B.; Aggour, M.S.: Design of cantilever retaining walls in unsaturated soils using AASHTO load and resistance factor design (LRFD) method. In: Probabilistic Applications in Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 1–10. ASCE (2007)

  5. Latifi, N.; Marto, A.; Eisazadeh, A.: Physicochemical behavior of tropical laterite soil stabilized with non-traditional additive. Acta Geotech. (2015). doi:10.1007/s11440-015-0370-3

  6. Latifi N., Eisazadeh A., Marto A.: Strength behavior and microstructural characteristics of tropical laterite soil treated with sodium silicate-based liquid stabilizer. Environ. Earth Sci. 72(1), 91–98 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smoltczyk U., Malcharek K.: Slope protection by membrane structures. Geotext. Geomembr. 2(4), 323–336 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Agassi M., Ben H.M.: Stabilizing steep slopes with soil conditioners and plants. Soil Technol. 5(3), 249–256 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen H.T., Hung W.Y., Chang C.C., Chen Y.J., Lee C.J.: Centrifuge modeling test of a geotextile-reinforced wall with a very wet clayey backfill. Geotext. Geomembr. 25(6), 346–359 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shu S., Muhunthan B., Badger T.C., Grandorff R.: Load testing of anchors for wire mesh and cable net rockfall slope protection systems. Eng. Geol. 79(3–4), 162–176 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hatami K., Bathurst R.J.: Numerical model for reinforced soil segmental walls under surcharge loading. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132(6), 673–684 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shinde A.L., Mandal J.N.: Behavior of reinforced soil retaining wall with limited fill zone parameter. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 25, 657–672 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahmood, T.: Failure Analysis of a Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall Using Finite Element Program Plaxis. The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment. Master Thesis (2009)

  14. Kandolkar S.S., Mandal J.N.: Behaviour of reinforced mine waste model walls under uniformly distributed loading. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 18, 1351–1365 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Damians, I.P.; Bathurst, R.J.; Josa, A.; Lloret, A.: Numerical analysis of an instrumented steel reinforced soil wall. Int. J. Geomech. (2014). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000394

  16. Liu J., Shi B., Jiang H., Huang H., Wang G., Kamai T.: Research on the stabilization treatment of clay slope topsoil by organic polymer soil stabilizer. Eng. Geol. 117(1), 114–120 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Latifi N., Marto A., Eisazadeh A.: Analysis of strength development in non-traditional liquid additive-stabilized laterite soil from macro-and micro-structural considerations. Environ. Earth Sci. 73(3), 1133–1141 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Obuzor G.N., Kinuthia J.M., Robinson R.B.: Soil stabilization with lime-activated-GGBS—a mitigation to flooding effects on road structural layers/embankments constructed on floodplains. Eng. Geol. 151, 112–119 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tingle J.S., Newman J.K., Larson S.L., Weiss C.A., Rushing J.F.: Stabilization mechanisms of nontraditional additives. Transp. Res. Rec: J. Transp. Res. Board. 1989(1), 59–67 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hafez M.A., Sidek N., Md. Noor M.J.: Effect of pozzolanic process on the strength of stabilized lime clay. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 13, 1–19 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eisazadeh A., Kassim K.A., Nur H.: Characterization of phosphoric acid—and lime-stabilized tropical lateritic clay. Environ. Earth Sci. 63(5), 1057–1066 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gidigasu M.D.: Mode of formation and geotechnical characteristics of laterite materials of Ghana in relation to soil forming factors. Eng. Geol. 6(2), 79–150 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zelalem, A.: Basic Engineering Properties of Lateritic Soils Found in Nejo–Mendi Road Construction Area, Welega. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia (2005)

  24. Latifi N., Marto A., Eisazadeh A.: Structural characteristics of laterite soil treated by SH-85 and TX-85 (non-traditional) stabilizers. EJGE 18, 1707–1718 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marto A., Latifi N., Sohaei H.: Stabilization of laterite soil using GKS soil stabilizer. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 18, 521–532 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Latifi N., Rashid A.S.A., Siddiqua S., Horpibulsuk S.: Micro-structural analysis of strength development in low-and high swelling clays stabilized with magnesium chloride solution—a green soil stabilizer. Appl. Clay Sci. 118, 195–206 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. El Sawwaf M., Nazir A.K.: The effect of deep excavation-induced lateral soil movements on the behavior of strip footing supported on reinforced sand. J. Adv. Res. 3(4), 337–344 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Latifi, N.; Rashid, A.; Marto, A.; Tahir, M.: Effect of magnesium chloride solution on the physico-chemical characteristics of tropical peat. Environ. Earth Sci. (2015). doi:10.1007/s12665-015-4788-6

  29. Latifi, N.; Rashid, A.; Ecemis, N.; Tahir, M.; Marto, A.: Time-dependent physicochemical characteristics of Malaysian residual soil stabilized with magnesium chloride solution. Arab. J. Geosci. (2015). doi:10.1007/s12517-015-2100-4

  30. Jarquio R.: Total lateral surcharge pressure due to a strip load. ASCE J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 107(10), 1424–1428 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Choobbasti A.J., Zahmatkesh A., Noorzad R.: Performance of stone columns in soft clay: numerical evaluation. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 29(5), 675–684 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shinde A.L., Mandal J.N.: Behavior of reinforced soil retaining wall with limited fill zone paramete. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 25(6), 657–672 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoo C., Kim S.B.: Performance of a two-tier geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining wall under a surcharge load: full-scale load test and 3D finite element analysis. Geotext. Geomembr. 26(6), 460–472 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen R.H., Chiu Y.M.: Model tests of geocell retaining structures. Geotext. Geomembr. 26(1), 56–70 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mittal S., Garg K.G., Saran S.: Analysis and design of retaining wall having reinforced cohesive frictional backfill. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 24(3), 499–522 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jie, Y.X.; Li, G.X.; Tang, F.; Jin, Y.; Hua, J.X.: Soil Stabilization in the Fill Project of the Olympic Rowing-Canoeing Park in Beijing. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25(4), 462–471 (2012)

  37. Davidson J.S., Fisher J.W., Hammons M.I., Porter J.R., Dinan R.J.: Failure mechanisms of polymer-reinforced concrete masonry walls subjected to blast. J. Struct. Eng. 131(8), 1194–1205 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nima Latifi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Latifi, N., Marto, A. & Eisazadeh, A. Experimental Investigations on Behaviour of Strip Footing Placed on Chemically Stabilised Backfills and Flexible Retaining Walls. Arab J Sci Eng 41, 4115–4126 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2104-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2104-8

Keywords

Navigation