Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Technique for Metamodeling Diagram Types with Tool Support

  • Research Article - Computer Engineering and Computer Science
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some domain-specific modeling languages (DSMLs) use different diagram types but these are not explicitly included in metamodels. The definition of diagram types is an increasing demand for some computer-aided software engineering tools for DSMLs. The current work presents a technique that allows designers to define diagram types of DSMLs with metamodels in a straightforward and tool-supported way. This technique also facilitates the processing of models when some elements appear in several diagrams, by including a single dictionary of all the entities and their relationships. The presented technique is supported with a novel tool called diagram-type editor tool (DTET). DTET receives input from a DSML metamodel and allows designers to define a set of diagram types with a graphical user interface. Then, DTET generates a metamodel with these diagram-type definitions. For the evaluation, 39 testers from five different countries (Spain, Dominican Republic, Colombia, Ecuador and France) experienced the presented approach and other alternatives, measuring the times of definition and the numbers of mistakes. The results show that the presented technique and DTET are faster and less error-prone for the definition of diagram types than the alternatives with statistically significant differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tayan O.; Al BinAli A.M.; Kabir M.N.: Analytical and computer modelling of transportation systems for traffic bottleneck resolution: a Hajj case study. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39(10), 7013–7037 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hassan A.; Kassem A.M.: Modeling, simulation and performance improvements of a PMSM based on functional model predictive control. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 38(11), 3071–3079 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Memon R.N.; Salim S.S.; Ahmad R.: Analysis and classification of problems associated with requirements engineering education: Towards an integrated view. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39(3), 1923–1935 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. OMG:UML Diagram Interchange Specification. Tech. rep.; Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/ (Last Accessed 18 Dec 2014), (2006-04-04)

  5. Rasool G.; Mäder P.: A customizable approach to design patterns recognition based on feature types. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39(12), 8851–8873 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alshayeb M.; Eisa Y.; Ahmed M.A.: Object-oriented class stability prediction: a comparison between artificial neural network and support vector machine. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39(11), 7865–7876 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Costagliola G.; Delucia A.; Orefice S.; Polese G.: A classification framework to support the design of visual languages. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 13(6), 573–600 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ingenias.: INGENIAS Development Kit. http://ingenias.sourceforge.net/ (Last Accessed 18 Dec 2014), (2014)

  9. OMG.: Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification. Version 1.4. Tech. rep.; Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/ (Last Accessed 18 Dec 2014), (2002-04-03)

  10. Budinsky F.: Eclipse Modelling Framework: Developer’s Guide. Addison Wesley, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moore, B.; Dean, D.; Gerber, A.; Wagenknecht, G.; Vanderheyden, P.: Eclipse Development Using Graphical Editing Framework and the Eclipse Modelling Framework. IBM Redbooks, New York, (2004)

  12. García-Magariño I.; Fuentes-Fernández F.; Gómez-Sanz J.J.: Guideline for the definition of EMF metamodels using an entity-relationship approach. Inform. Softw. Technol. 51(8), 1217–1230 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2009.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelly S.: GOPRR Description. PhD dissertation Appendix 1 (1997)

  14. García-Magariño I.; Fuentes-Fernández R.: A technique for defining metamodel translations. IEICE Trans. Inform. Syst. 92(10), 2043–2052 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pavón J.; Gómez-Sanz J.J.: Agent oriented software engineering with INGENIAS. Multi-Agent Syst. Appl. III 2691, 394–403 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alanen M.; Lundkvist T.; Porres I.: Creating and reconciling diagrams after executing model transformations. Sci. Comput. Progr. 68(3), 128–151 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Apes: APES2: A Process Engineering Software. http://apes2.berlios.de/en/links.html (last accessed 12/18/2014), (2014)

  18. Boronat A.; Carsí J.; Ramos I.; Letelier P.: Formal model merging applied to class diagram integration. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 166, 5–26 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bouml.: BOUML: An UML Tool Box. http://www.bouml.fr (last Accessed 18 Dec 2014), (2014)

  20. Celms, E.; Kalnins, A.; Lace, L.: Diagram definition facilities based on metamodel mappings. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference, OOPSLA, pp. 23–32 (2003)

  21. Heuer A.; Stricker V.; Budnik C.J.; Konrad S.; Lauenroth K.; Pohl K.: Defining variability in activity diagrams and petri nets. Sci. Comput. Progr. 78(12), 2414–2432 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalnins A.; Barzdins J.; Celms E.; Lace L.; Opmanis M.; Podnieks K.; Zarins A.: The first step towards generic modelling tool. Proc. Baltic DB&IS 2, 167–180 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Koskinen, J.; Peltonen, J.; Selonen P.; Systä, T.; Koskimies, K.: Model processing tools in UML. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE-01), pp. 819–820 (2001)

  24. Lace, L.; Celms, E.; Kalnins, A.: Diagram definition facilities in a generic modeling tool. In: Proceedings of International Conference Modelling and Simulation of Business Systems, Vilnius, pp. 220–224 (2003)

  25. Laleau R.; Polack F.: Using formal metamodels to check consistency of functional views in information systems specification. Inform. Softw. Technol. 50(7), 797–814 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Molina A.I.; Gallardo J.; Redondo M.A.; Ortega M.; Giraldo W.J.: Metamodel-driven definition of a visual modeling language for specifying interactive groupware applications: an empirical study. J. Syst. Softw. 86(7), 1772–1789 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. OMG.: Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure. Tech. rep.; Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/ (Last Accessed 18 Dec 2014), (2007-11-02)

  28. OMG.:Unified Modeling Language: Infrastructure. Tech. rep.; Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/ (Last Accessed 18 Dec 2014), (2007-11-04)

  29. OMG: Software & Systems Process Engineering Metamodel Specification (SPEM) Version 2.0. Tech. rep.; Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/ (Last Accessed 18 Dec 2014), (2008-04-01)

  30. Rational-Rose.: IBM Rational Software: Rational Rose Family. http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/ratirosefami/ (Last Accessed 18 Dec 2014), (2014)

  31. Vroom R.: A general example model for automotive suppliers of the development process and its related information. Comput. Indust. 31(3), 255–280 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wagner G.: The agent–object-relationship metamodel: towards a unified view of state and behavior. Inform. Syst. 28(5), 475–504 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Wohlin C.; Runeson P.; Höst M.; Ohlsson M.C.; Regnell B.; Wesslén A.: Experimentation in software engineering. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering of Systems, University of Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain

    Iván García-Magariño

  2. Department of Electronic Engineering and Communications, University of Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain

    Guillermo Palacios-Navarro

Authors
  1. Iván García-Magariño
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guillermo Palacios-Navarro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iván García-Magariño.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García-Magariño, I., Palacios-Navarro, G. A Technique for Metamodeling Diagram Types with Tool Support. Arab J Sci Eng 40, 1359–1373 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1607-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1607-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation