Skip to main content
Log in

Creep Compliance: A Parameter to Predict Rut Performance of Asphalt Binders and Mixtures

  • Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Highway agencies have been using polymers in asphalt binders to reduce rutting-associated distresses in asphalt pavements. Rheological parameters like complex shear modulus (G*) and phase angle (δ) in the form of G*/Sinδ were used to predict rut resistance of asphalt binders, which have been replaced by a new parameter called non-recoverable creep compliance. The present study investigates the creep compliance of straight run (neat) and polymer-modified asphalt binders, at their high performance grade temperature (58, 64, 70, and 76 °C), using a multi-stress creep recovery test. The test data are used to assess the temperature and stress sensitivity of asphalt binders at different percentages of polymer. Asphalt mixtures, prepared using four asphalt binders, are tested in a wheel tracker to arrive at a relationship between creep compliance and rut resistance of asphalt mixtures. This study has revealed that creep compliance depicts the temperature and stress sensitivity of asphalt binders and asphalt binders’ polymer modification. Based on the stress sensitivity and creep compliance data, the suitability of asphalt binders for different traffic loadings is suggested. The present study proposes a reasonable relationship between creep compliance at 3.2 kPa and rut depth of asphalt mixtures, obtained from a wheel tracker test. This laboratory study may be extended in the future for field validation and development of asphalt mixtures performance-related specifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, D.A.; Christensen, D.W.; Bahia, H.U.; Dongre, R.; Sharma, M.G.; Antle, C.E.; Button, J.: “Binder Characterization and Evaluation: Physical Characterization).” SHRP Report No. A–369. National Research Council, Washington, DC, (1994)

  2. Leahy, R.B.; Cramer, S.B.: “Superpave Binder Implementation–Oregon DOT.” Report No. FHWA-OR-RD-99-16, Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon (1999)

  3. Yusoff N., Hainin M., Airey G.: “A comparative study of phase angle predictive equations using bituminous binder data.” Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 37(6), 1571–1583 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mohammad, A.A.; Omar, H.: “Rheological properties of crumb rubber-modified bitumen containing antioxidant.” Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 34(1), 3–12 (2009)

  5. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, “Standard Specification for Performance Graded Asphalt Binder.” AASHTO designation: M 320, Washington, DC, (2008)

  6. ASTM D2872. “Standard Test Method for Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt (Rolling thing film oven test).” American Society for Testing Materials, Washington, DC, (2012)

  7. Jahromi S.G., Khodaii A.: “Empirical model for determining rutting parameter in rubber modified bitumen.” Int. J. Civil Eng. 6(4), 246–254 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shenoy, A.: “Refinement of the superpave specification parameter for performance grading of asphalt.” J. Transp. Eng. 127(5), 357–362 (2001)

  9. D’Angelo, J.; Dongre, R.: “Superpave binder specifications and their performance relationship to modified binders.” In: Proceedings of Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, pp. 91–103 (2002)

  10. Bahia, H.U.; Hanson, D.I.; Zeng, M.; Zhai, H.; Khatri, M.A.; Anderson, R.M.: “Characterization of modified asphalt binders in superpave mix design.” NCHRP Report 459, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, (2001)

  11. Marasteanu, M.O.; Clyne, T.; McGraw, J.; Li, XJ.; Velasquez, R.: “High-temperature rheological properties of asphalt binders.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1901, 52–59 (2005)

  12. Hrdlicka, G.M.; Tandon, V.; Prozzi, J.; Smit, A.; Yildrim, Y.: “Evaluation of binder tests for identifying rutting and cracking potential of modified asphalt binders.” Guidelines for selecting asphalt mixtures and evaluation of polymer-modified mixes. Research Report 0–4824–1, Center for Transportation Infrastructure Systems. The University of Texas at El Paso, Texas, (2007)

  13. Bahia, H.; Tabatabaee, N.; Clopotel, C.; Golalipour, A.: “Evaluation of the MSCR test for modified binders’ specification.” In: 56th Annual Conference of Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, Quebec, (2011)

  14. Clopotel C.S., Bahia H.U.: “Importance of elastic recovery in the DSR for binders and mastics.” Eng. J. 16(4), 99–106 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen, D.T.; Nedjar, B.E.; Tamagny, P.: “Cyclic elasto-visco-plastic model for asphalt concrete materials.” J. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 8(2), 239–255 (2007)

  16. Huang, X.; Zhang, Y.: “A new creep test method for asphalt mixtures.” J. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 11(4), 969–991 (2010)

  17. Wasage, T.L.J.; Stastna, J.; Zanzotto, L.: “Rheological analysis of multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 12(6), 561–568 (2011)

  18. Hafeez, I.; Kamal, M.A.; Mirza, M.W.; Khanzada S.: “Investigating the effects of maximum size of aggregate on rutting potential of stone mastic asphalt.” Pak. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 10, 89–96 (2012)

  19. Stuart, K.D.; Mogawer, W.S.: “Modified asphalt binder in mixtures topical report: permanent deformation of mixes with Diabase aggregate.” NCHRP Report No. FHWA-RD-02-042, Federal Highway Administration, (2002)

  20. AASHTO T49. “Standard Method of Test for Penetration of Bituminous Materials.” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC, (2007)

  21. Ahmed, M.I.: “An experimental study on linear visco elastic behavior of asphalt binders under creep test.” M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan, (2012)

  22. AASHTO TP70. “Standard Practice for Multiple Stress Creep Recovery Test of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer.” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC, (2010)

  23. Marasteanu, M.O.; Anderson, D.A.: “Establishing linear viscoelastic conditions for asphalt binders.” Transportation Research Record; J. Transp. Res. Board. 1728, 1–6 (2000)

  24. Lakes, R.S.: “Viscoelastic Materials.” Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition, New York, (2009)

  25. Wasage, T.L.J.; Statsna, J.; Zhonzott, L.: “Repeated loading and unloading tests of asphalt binders and mixes.” J. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 11(3), 725–744 (2010)

  26. D’Angelo, J.: “Development in Asphalt Binder Specifications, Research Circular E-C147.” Characteristics of Bituminous Materials Committee, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, (2010)

  27. Asphalt Institute. “Superpave Mix Design”. Superpave Series No. 2, Asphalt Institute. Lexington, KY, (2001)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imran Hafeez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hafeez, I., Kamal, M.A. Creep Compliance: A Parameter to Predict Rut Performance of Asphalt Binders and Mixtures. Arab J Sci Eng 39, 5971–5978 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1216-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1216-2

Keywords

Navigation