Skip to main content
Log in

Flood Risk Analysis of Cultural Heritage Sites: Changgyeong Palace, Korea

  • Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Floods are recognized as one of the main risk factors to cultural heritage sites. However, flood risks in these areas are mainly considered in flood protection schemes from a civil engineering point of view. Changgyeong Palace is one of the major palaces of Seoul, Korea, and is home to the national architectural heritage. It experienced a flood on July 28, 2011, when extreme rainfall struck Seoul. This study examined the flood events at Changgyeong and analyzed the flood risk based on flood risk analysis models, using a map of the observed inundation. Flood risk analysis models, including Hydrologic Engineering Centre–Hydrologic Modeling System, Storm Water Management Model, and Geographic Information System, were used for further analysis of flood risk scenarios (100-, 200-, and 500-year return periods). The flood risk analysis carried out in this study revealed that flooding which occurred at Changgyeong Palace was due to an insufficient urban drainage network enclosing the site. The flood risk model was used to simulate possible flooding areas based on flood risk scenarios. Although the architectural heritage would be safe from inundation in all flood risk scenarios, the lower part of Changgyeong Palace has a high risk of flooding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apel H., Thieken A.H., Merz B., Bloschl G.: Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 4, 295–308 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cho, W.; Han, K.; Ha, C.; Kim, Y.: Establishment of 2-Dimensional Flood Inundation Analysis Method Considering Building Effects. Korea Water Resources Association (2010)

  3. Benito G., Lang M., Barriendos M., Llasat M.C., Francés F., Ouarda T., Thorndycraft V., Enzel Y., Bardossy A., Coeur D., Bobée B.: Use of systematic, Palaeoflood and historical data for the improvement of flood risk estimation. Review of scientific methods. Nat. Hazards 31(3): 623–643 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Defra: Making Space for Water (2007)

  5. Han, K.; Kim, K.; Lee, Y.; Park, J.: Methods for developing flood inundation risk map. Annual Symposium of Korean Society of Civil Engineers (2006)

  6. Heo: Rainfall Frequency analysis using FARD 2006, Korea Water Resources Association 2007 Workshop Textbook, pp. 95–176 (2007)

  7. Hong S., Jung K., Choi C., Jang M., Kim Y., Sonn Y., Ha S.: Estimation of SCS runoff curve number and hydrograph by using highly detailed soil map (1:5,000) in a small watershed, Sosu-myeon. Goesan-gun, Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 43(3): 363–373 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, Y: Analysis of Runoff Characteristics in Urbanized Areas Using SWMM Model. Master’s Thesis at Honam University (2007)

  9. Lanza G.S.: Flood hazard threat on cultural heritage in the town of Genoa (Italy). J. Cult. Herit. 4, 159–167 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, H.; Jang, C.; Jeon, G.: Numerical simulations of inundation area using XP-SWMM. J. Crisis Emerg. Manag. Theory Praxis 7(2), 75–86. ISSN:1738-8368 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. MLTM: The Estimation Method of Design Floods in Korea (2012)

  12. Pistrika, A.; Tsakiris, G.: Flood Risk Assessment: A Methodological Framework. European Water Resources Association, pp. 14–16 (2007)

  13. Reutebuch S.E., McGaughey R.J., Andersen H.E., Carson W.W.: Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain modelunder a conifer forest canopy. Can. J. Remote Sens. 29(5): 527–535 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosso R., Rulli M.C.: An integrated simulation method for flash-flood risk assessment: 2. Effects of changes in land-use under a historical perspective. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 6(3): 285–294 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siddiqui T.Q., Hashmi R.A., Ghumman R.A., Mughal R.H.: Flood Inundation Modeling for a Watershed in the Pothowar Region of Pakistan. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 36(7): 1203–1220 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. UNESCO: Cultural Heritage Protection Handbook—Volume 4 Disaster Risk Management for Museums (2008)

  17. http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm/. European Commission. Accessed June 2012 (2007)

  18. http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/wq/models/swmm/. Environment Protection Agency, 1971. Accessed June 2012 (1971)

  19. http://www.esri.com/. Environmental System Research Institute, Accessed June 2012 (1996)

  20. http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/fhm/en_hydro.shtm/. FEMA. Accessed June (2012)

  21. http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/. Hydrologic Engineering Center, HEC. Accessed June 2012 (2006)

  22. http://www.kma.go.kr/. Korea Meteorological Administration. Accessed June (2012)

  23. http://www.nidp.go.kr/. National Disaster Management Institute. Accessed June 2012 (2006)

  24. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/national/water/?cid=stelprdb1043063/.  National Engineering Handbo-ok. Accessed June 2012 (1965)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyosang Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, H., Kim, Js. & Jung, S. Flood Risk Analysis of Cultural Heritage Sites: Changgyeong Palace, Korea. Arab J Sci Eng 39, 3617–3631 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1009-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1009-7

Keywords

Navigation