Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and Statistical Investigation of the Machinability of Al-10% SiC MMC Produced by Hot Pressing Method

  • Research Article - Mechanical Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, during the machining of metal matrix composites produced by a hot pressing method in CNC milling, the effects of cutting parameters and coating type on the surface roughness were experimentally and statistically investigated. The production of composite samples was accomplished by hot pressing, in which Al was used as the matrix element and 10 % SiC particles were chosen for the reinforcing phase. In the machining of samples, three different cutting tools (uncoated, multi-layered and Nano TiAlN coated), three different cutting speeds (60, 78, 101 m/min) and three different feed rates (0.04, 0.08 and 0.12 mm/rev) were employed. Full factorial (33) experimental design was chosen for the statistical investigation of the cutting parameters and parameter interactions. The response surface method was used in the mathematical modelling of the surface roughness obtained from the experiments and in the optimisation of cutting parameters. At the end of the study, the cutting tool’s wear was evaluated and the wear was discussed by comparison with similar studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee, J.C.; Byun, J.Y.; Oh, C.S.; Seok, H.K.; Lee, H.I.: Effect of various processing methods on the interfacial reactions in SiCp/2024 Al composites. Acta Materialia. 45, 5303–5315 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharya, A.K.; Petrovic, J.J.: Hardness and fracture toughness of SiC-particle-reinforced MoSi2 composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90, 2700–2703 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, J.S.; Imai, M.; Yano, T.: 2003, Fabrication and mechanical properties of oriented SiC short fiber reinforced SiC composite by tape casting. Mater. Sci. Eng. 339, 90–95 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biasini, V.; Parasporo, M.; Bellosi, A.: Fabrication and characterization of Al2O3 porous bodies by hot isostatic pressing. Thin Solid Films 297, 207–211 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lu, H.; Sun, H.; Chen, C.; Zhang, R.; Yang, D.; Hu, X.: Coating Cu nano-sized particles on Al2O3 powders by a wet-chemical method and its mechanical properties after hot press sintering. Mater. Sci. Eng. 426, 181–186 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sood, P.K.; Sehga, R.; Dwivedi, D.K.: Investigating the influence of approach angle for ceramic cutting tools on chip formation during turning. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 37, 793–802 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Song, G.M.; Li, Q.; Wen, G.W.; Zhou, Y.: Mechanical properties of short carbon fiber-reinforced TiC composites produced by hot pressing. Mater. Sci. Eng. 326, 240–248 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wan-li, G.U.: Bulk AVSiC nanocomposite prepared by ball milling and hot pressing method. Trans. Nonferr. Met. 16, 398–401 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. LLorca, L.J.; Singh, R.N.: Influence of fiber and interfacial properties on fracture behavior of fiber-reinforced ceramic composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 2882–2890 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, Y.W.; Lee, J.G.: Effect of polycarbosilane addition on mechanical properties of hot-pressed silicon carbide. J. Mater. Sci. 27, 4746–4750 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bedir, F.: Characteristic properties of Al–Cu–SiCp and Al–Cu–B4Cp composites produced by hot pressing method under nitrogen atmosphere. Mater. Des. 28, 1238–1244 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klinger, L.; Gotman, I.; Horvitz, D.: In situ processing of TiB2/TiC ceramic composites by thermal explosion under pressure: Experimental study and modeling. Mater. Sci. Eng. 302, 92–99 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kök, M.: Modeling and assessment of some factors that influence surface roughness for the machining of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 36, 1347–1365 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dhanasekar, B.; Ramamoorthy, B.: Restoration of blurred images for surface roughness evaluation using machine vision. Tribol. Int. 43, 268–276 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Çakan, A.; Özkaner, M.; Yıldırım, M.M.: TiCN kaplamalı AISI 1070 çeliği kesici takımlarda farklı kesme koþullarında oluþan değiþimlerinin incelenmesi. Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Araştırmaları. 61–66 (2007)

  16. Tetal, K.: Machining of Stainless Steels Handbook, 9th edn, p. 681. ASM International, USA (1989)

  17. Zhu, Y.; Kishawy, H.A.: Influence of alumina particles on the mechanics of machining metal matrix composites. Inter. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 45, 389–398 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ubeyli, M.; Acir, A.; Keleş, Ö.; Akçay, C.E.: Effect of cutting parameters on cutting force and surface roughness in milling alumina reinforced Al-6Zn-2Mg-2Cu composites. Powder Metall. 54(2), 172–176 (2011)

  19. Sun, F.H.; Wu, Z.Y.; Zhong, J.W.; Chen, M.: High speed milling of SiC particle reinforced aluminum-based MMC with coated carbide inserts. Key Eng. Mater. 274–276, 457–462 (2004)

  20. Turgut, Y.; Çinici, H.; Şahin, I.; Findik, T.: Study of cutting force and surface roughness in milling of Al/Sic metal matrix composites. Sci. Res. Essays 6(10), 2056-2062 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Choudhury, I.A.; El-Baradie, M.A.: Surface roughness in the turning of high-strength steel by factorial design of experiment. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 67, 55–61 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Öktem, H.; Erzurumlu, T.; Kurtaran, H.: Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of cutting conditions for surface roughness. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 170, 11–16 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grum, J.; Slabe, J.M.: The use of factorial design and response surface methodology for fast determination of optimal heat treatment conditions of different Ni–Co–Mo surfaced layers. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 155–156, 2026–2032 (2006)

  24. Sagbas, A.: Analysis and optimization of surface roughness in the ball burnishing process using response surface methodology and desirability function. Adv. Eng. Softw. 42, 992–998 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rao, R.V.: Advanced Modeling and Optimization of Manufacturing Processes. Springer, London (2011)

  26. Czitrom, V.; Spagon, P.D.: Statistical Case Studies for Industrial Process Improvement. ASASIAM, Philadelphia (1997)

  27. Myers, H.R.; Montgomery, D.C.; Anderson-Cook, C.M.: Response Surface Methodology Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 3rd edn. Wiley, Canada (2009)

  28. Habib, S.S.: Study of the parameters in electrical discharge machining through response surface methodology approach. Appl. Math. Mod. 33, 4397–4407 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bramley, A.; Brissaud, D.; Coutellier, D.; McMahon, C.: Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Netherlands (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Bouacha, K.; Yallese, M.A.; Mabrouki, T.; Rigal, J.F.: Statistical analysis of surface roughness and cutting forces using response surface methodology in hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel with CBN tool. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 28, 349–361 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Neşeli, S.; Yaldız, S.; Türkeş, E.: Optimization of tool geometry parameters for turning operations based on the response surface methodology. Measurement 44, 580-587 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Noordin, M.Y.; Venkatesh, V.C.; Sharif, S.; Elting, S.; Abdullah, A.: Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 145, 46–58 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Palanikumar, K.: Application of Taguchi and response surface methodologies for surface roughness in machining glass fiber reinforced plastics by PCD tooling. Int. J. Adv. Man. Technol. 36, 19–27 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Taghizadegan, S.: Essential of Lean Six Sigma. Elsevier Inc., London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kılıçkap, E.; Çakır, O.; Aksoy, M.;  Inan, A.: Study of tool wear and surface roughness in machining of homogenised SiC-p reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 164–165, 862–867 (2005)

  36. Ozben, T.; Kilickap, E.; Çakır, O.: Investigation of mechanical and machinability properties of SiC particle reinforced Al-MMC. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 198, 220–225 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ding, X.; Liew, W.Y.H.; Liu, X.D.: Evaluation of machining performance of MMC with PCBN and PCD tools. Wear 259, 1225–1234 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. El-Gallab, M.; Sklad, M.: Machining of Al/SiC particulate metal-matrix composites, Part III: Comprehensive tool wear models. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 48, 291–297 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Çifçi,  I.; Türker, M.; şeker, U.: Evaluation of tool wear when machining SiCp-reinforced Al-2014 alloy matrix composites. Mater. Des. 25, 251–255 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ducros, C.; Benevent, F.; Sanchette, F.: Deposition, characterization and machining performance of multilayer PVD coatings on cemented carbide cutting tools. Surf. Coat. Tech. 163–164, 681–688 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Krain, H.R.; Sharman, A.R.C.; Ridgway, K.: Optimization of tool life and productivity when end milling Inconel 718TM. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 189, 153–161 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gürcan Samtaş.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekici, E., Samtaş, G. & Gülesin, M. Experimental and Statistical Investigation of the Machinability of Al-10% SiC MMC Produced by Hot Pressing Method. Arab J Sci Eng 39, 3289–3298 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-0951-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-0951-8

Keywords

Navigation