Abstract
Humans have negatively impacted most ecosystems on Earth, altering how species use habitats and resources available to them, but also their circadian rhythms. Among many factors affecting animal activity patterns, conversion of native habitat into production forests and hunting are critical, and their impacts may be exacerbated by seasonal weather conditions. Both these factors are issues in Mediterranean Europe, especially in Portugal. Nevertheless, their impact on native species behavior remains largely unknown, even for generalist species often resilient to human disturbance such as wild boar (Sus scrofa). Therefore, we assessed temporal activity patterns of wild boar in Portugal to explore differences between habitats (native forest versus Eucalyptus plantations), hunting and non-hunting periods, or between seasons. We found that wild boars were primarily nocturnal, with greater nighttime activity more evident during the dry season and within plantations. Furthermore, they appeared to avoid dusk during the hunting season. Together, these patterns indicate that even a species typically resilient to disturbance and environmental change, such as wild boar, tends to avoid adverse weather conditions and disturbance factors, namely high daytime temperatures in summer and probability of encountering forestry workers or hunters. Accordingly, other more sensitive or resource-demanding mammals may also be affected, so evaluating the impacts of the studied anthropic drivers on other mammals should be prioritized to provide information for sustainable plantation management and hunting.
This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.


Data availability
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Change history
09 April 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-022-00633-7
References
Afonso BC, Swanepoel LH, Rosa BP, Marques TA, Rosalino LM, Santos-Reis M, Curveira-Santos G (2021) Patterns and drivers of rodent abundance across a South African multi-use landscape. Animals 11(9):2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092618
Agostinelli C, Lund U (2017) R package 'circular': circular statistics. URL https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/circular/ Accessed 15 July 2020
Allwin B, Swaminathan R, Mohanraj A et al (2016) The wild pig (Sus scrofa) behavior – a retrospective study. J Vet Sci Technol 7:333–333
Blondel J (2006) The "design" of Mediterranean landscapes: a millennial story of humans and ecological systems during the historic period. Hum Ecol 34:713–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9030-4
Blondel J, Aronson J, Bodiou J-Y, Boeuf G (2010) The Mediterranean region. Biological diversity in space and time. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bosch J, Iglesias I, Martıínez M, de la Torre A (2020) Climatic and topographic tolerance limits of wild boar in Eurasia: implications for their expansion. Geogr Environ Sustain 13:107–114. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2019-52
Braun AC, Troeger D, Garcia R et al (2017) Assessing the impact of plantation forestry on plant biodiversity. Glob Ecol Conserv 10:159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.03.006
Brivio F, Grignolio S, Brogi R, Benazzi M, Bertolucci C, Apollonio (2017) An analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting the activity of a nocturnal species: the wild boar. Mamm Biol 84:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2017.01.007
Cahill S, Llimona F, Gràcia J (2003) Spacing and nocturnal activity of wild boar Sus scrofa in a Mediterranean metropolitan park. Wildl Biol 9(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2003.058
Caruso N, Valenzuela AEJ, Burdett CL et al (2018) Summer habitat use and activity patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa in rangelands of central Argentina. PLoS ONE 13(10):e0206513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206513
Chaikina NA, Ruckstuhl KE (2006) The effect of cattle grazing on native ungulates: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Rangelands 28(3):8–14. https://doi.org/10.2111/1551-501x(2006)28[8:teocgo]2.0.co;2
da Silva LP, Heleno RH, Costa JM et al (2019) Natural woodlands hold more diverse, abundant, and unique biota than novel anthropogenic forests: a multi-group assessment. Eur J Forest Res 138:461–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-019-01183-5
Davimes JG, Alagaili AN, Bertelsen MF et al (2017) Temporal niche switching in Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx): seasonal plasticity of 24h activity patterns in a large desert mammal. Physiol Behav 177:148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.04.014
Del-Claro K, Dirzo R (2021) Impacts of Anthropocene defaunation on plant-animal interactions. In: Del-Claro K, Torezan-Silingardi HM (eds) Plant-animal interactions. Springer, Cham, pp 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66877-8_13
Dirzo R, Young HS, Galetti M et al (2014) Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345(6195):401–406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251817
Ellis EC (2019) Evolution: biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Curr Biol 29(17):R831–R833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.073
Fonseca C, da Silva AA, Alves J et al (2011) Reproductive performance of wild boar females in Portugal. Eur J Wildl Res 57:363–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-010-0441-6
Frank SC, Ordiz A, Gosselin J et al (2017) Indirect effects of bear hunting: a review from Scandinavia. Ursus 28(2):150–164. https://doi.org/10.2192/ursu-d-16-00028.1
Gaudiano L, Pucciarelli L, Frassanito AG, Mori E, Morimando F, Silvestri FM, Sorino R, Viviano A, Corriero G (2022) Spatio-temporal behaviour of female wild boar in an agro-forestry–pastoral landscape of Southern Italy. Mamm Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-022-00617-7
Gaynor KM, Hojnowski CE, Carter NH, Brashares JS (2018) The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science 360(6394):1232–1235. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7121
Gordigiani L, Viviano A, Brivio F, Grignolio S, Lazzeri L, Marcon A, Mori E (2022) Carried away by a moonlight shadow: activity of wild boar in relation to nocturnal light intensity. Mamm Res 67:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-021-00610-6
Greco I, Fedele E, Salvatori M, Rustichelli, MG, Mercuri F, Santini G, Rovero F, Lazzaro L, Foggi B, Massolo A, De Pietro F, Zaccaroni M (2021) Guest or pest? Spatio-temporal occurrence and effects on soil and vegetation of the wild boar on Elba island. Mamm Biol 101:193–206 (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-020-00083-1
Halle S, Stenseth NC (2000) Activity patterns in small mammals: an ecological approach. Ecological Studies, Volume 141. Springer, New York
Iglesias-Trabado G, Carballeira-Tenreiro R, Folgueira-Lozano J (2009) Eucalyptus universalis: global cultivated Eucalyptus forests Map Version 1.2. In: GIT Forestry Consulting’s EUCALYPTOLOGICS: Information resource n Eucalyptus cultivation worldwide. http://www.git-forestry.com. Accessed 3 Nov 2021
IPMA (2020) Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera - Normais Climatológicas. https://www.ipma.pt/pt/oclima/normais.clima/. Accessed 3 Nov 2021
Jacobs J (1974) Quantitative measurement of food selection. A modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev’s electivity index. Oecologia 14:413–417
Jaksic FM, Iriarte JA, Jiménez JE, Martínez DR (2002) Invaders without frontiers: cross-border invasions of exotic mammals. Biol Invasions 4:157–173. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020576709964
Johann F, Handschuh M, Linderoth P, Heurich M, Dormann CF, Arnold J (2020a) Variability of daily space use in wild boar Sus scrofa. Wildl Biol:wlb.00609. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00609
Johann F, Handschuh M, Linderoth P et al (2020b) Adaptation of wild boar (Sus scrofa) activity in a human-dominated landscape. BMC Ecol 20:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-019-0271-7
Keuling O, Stier N, Roth M (2008) (2008) How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.? Eur J Wildl Res 54:729–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0204-9
Keuling O, Leus K (2019) Sus scrofa. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T41775A44141833. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013.RLTS.T41775A44141833.en. Accessed 27 Mar 2022
Larter NC, Gates CC (1994) Home-range size of wood bison: effects of age, sex, and forage availability. J Mammal 75(1):142–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382246
Lemel J, Truvé J, Söderberg B (2003) Variation in ranging and activity behaviour of European wild boar Sus scrofa in Sweden. Wildl Biol 9(Suppl. 1):29–36
Long JL (2003) Introduced mammals of the world: their history distribution and influence. CABI Publishing, Wallingford
Massei G, Kindberg J, Licoppe A et al (2015) Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Manag Sci 71(4):492–500. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3965
Mendes ES, Fonseca C, Marques SF, Maia D, Pereira MJ (2017) Bat richness and activity in heterogeneous landscapes: guild-specific and scale-dependent? Landsc Ecol 32:295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0444-0
Meredith M, Ridout M (2014) Overview of the overlap package. https://cran.cs.wwu.edu/web/packages/overlap/vignettes/overlap.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2020
Monterroso P, Alves PC, Ferreras P (2014) Plasticity in circadian activity patterns of mesocarnivores in Southwestern Europe: implications for species coexistence. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68(9):1403–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1748-1
Nakamura M, Rio-Maior H, Godinho R, Petrucci-Fonseca F, Álvares F (2021) Source-sink dynamics promote wolf persistence in human-modified landscapes: insights from long-term monitoring. Biol Conserv 256:109075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109075
Nyhus PJ (2016) Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annu Rev Environ Resour 41(1):143–171. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085634
Ohashi H, Saito M, Horie R et al (2013) Differences in the activity pattern of the wild boar Sus scrofa related to human disturbance. Eur J Wildl Res 59:167–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-012-0661-z
Oriol-Cotterill A, Valeix M, Frank LG et al (2015) Landscapes of coexistence for terrestrial carnivores: the ecological consequences of being downgraded from ultimate to penultimate predator by humans. Oikos 124:1263–1273. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02224
Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA (2007) Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1633–1644. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
Piña TEN, Carvalho WD, Rosalino LMC, Hilário RR (2019) Drivers of mammal richness, diversity and occurrence in heterogeneous landscapes composed by plantation forests and natural environments. For Ecol Manag 449:117467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117467
Podgórski T, Baś G, Jędrzejewska B et al (2013) Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: primeval forest and metropolitan area. J Mammal 94(1):109–119. https://doi.org/10.1644/12-MAMM-A-038.1
R Development Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
Ridout MS, Linkie M (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 14:322–337
Rovero F, Zimmermann F (2016) Camera trapping for wildlife research. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter
Russo L, Massei G, Genov PV (1997) Daily home range and activity of wild boar in a Mediterranean area free from hunting. Ethol Ecol Evol 9(3):287–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1997.9522888
Santos FD, Miranda P (2006) Alterações climáticas em Portugal. Cenários, impactos e medidas de adaptação - Projecto SIAM II. Gradiva, Lisboa
Scillitani L, Monaco A, Toso S (2010) Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behaviour in Italy? Some evidences and management implications. Eur J Wildl Res 56:307–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-009-0314-z
Sih A (2013) Understanding variation in behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a conceptual overview. Anim Behav 85:1077–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.017
Steffen W, Crutzen PJ, McNeill JR (2007) The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature. AMBIO 36(8):614–621. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2
Terrien J, Perret M, Aujard F (2011) Behavioral thermoregulation in mammals: a review. Front Biosci 16(4):1428–1444. https://doi.org/10.2741/3797
Thurfjell H, Spong G, Ericsson G (2013) Effects of hunting on wild boar Sus scrofa behaviour. Wildl Biol 19(1):87–93. https://doi.org/10.2981/12-027
Weyer NM, Fuller A, Haw AJ et al (2020) Increased diurnal activity is indicative of energy deficit in a nocturnal mammal, the aardvark. Front Physiol 11:637. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00637
Wiegand T, Revilla E, Moloney KA (2005) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population dynamics. Conserv Biol 19:108–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00208.x
Zanni M, Brivio F, Grignolio S, Apollonio M (2021) Estimation of spatial and temporal overlap in three ungulate species in a Mediterranean environment. Mamm Res 66:149–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-020-00548-1
Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank The Navigator Company for providing logistical support crucial to develop our study.
Funding
This work was financially supported by project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028204 (WildForests) funded by FEDER, through COMPETE2020 - Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI), and by national funds (OE) through FCT/MCTES (CESAM: UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020+ LA/P/0094/2020; cE3c: UIDB/00329/2020), and FEDER co-funding within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020; FCT/MCTES PhD Grant (SFRH/BD/131608/2017; DT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: LMR. Methodology: LMR, CC. Formal analysis and investigation: DT, CC, GC, AM, GP, CL. Writing — original draft preparation: LMR. Writing — review and editing: LMR, DT, CC, GC, AM, GP, CL, CF. Funding acquisition: LMR, CF. Resources: LMR, CF. Supervision: LMR, CF.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Camera-trapping was authorized by the Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests (ICNF) (Capture licenses 343/2019/PERTURBAÇÃO, 344/2019/PERTURBAÇÃO, 11/2020/PERTURBAÇÃO, 12/2020/PERTURBAÇÃO).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by: Rafał Kowalczyk
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: In the abstract section, the word "wet" has been corrected to "dry".
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 44 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosalino, L.M., Teixeira, D., Camarinha, C. et al. Even generalist and resilient species are affected by anthropic disturbance: evidence from wild boar activity patterns in a Mediterranean landscape. Mamm Res 67, 317–325 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-022-00632-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-022-00632-8