Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determinants of introduction success in alien mammals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mammal Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite intensive research on colonization by non-native species, ecologists still cannot accurately predict their invasive abilities and likely ecosystem impacts. This study was set out to analyze the determinants of the success of mammal introductions. We applied several types of phylogenetic linear and logistic multiple regression methods. Determinants of success were divided into external (introduction-specific) factors, principally introduction effort (measured as the number of introductions per species), and the proportion of introductions to islands/mainland; and intrinsic (species-specific) factors, including life history (litter size, body mass), ecological (diet breadth, activity breadth, trophic level), biogeographical (latitudinal range), and neuro-behavioral (brain size and sociality) traits. We found that the main determinants of introduction success are introduction-specific factors (i.e., introduction effort and island/mainland proportion) and not those of the species itself. A species’ neuro-cognitive traits are the exception, and these probably play a key role in the ability of founder individuals to recognize and utilize the resources available in novel environments and thus survive the bottleneck imposed by low initial population numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

In Supplementary Information section.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Amiel JJ, Tingley R, Shine R (2011) Smart moves: effects of relative brain size on establishment success of invasive amphibians and reptiles. PLoS ONE 6(4):e18277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bielby J, Mace GM, Bininda-Emonds OR, Cardillo M, Gittleman JL, Jones KE, ... & Purvis A (2007) The fast-slow continuum in mammalian life history: an empirical reevaluation. Am Natural 169(6):748-757

  • Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, ... & Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26(7):333-339

  • Blackburn T, Scrivens S, Heinrich S, Cassey P (2017) Patterns of selectivity inintroductions of mammal species worldwide. NeoBiota 33:33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossey B, Notzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonnative plants-a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bomford M, Kraus F, Barry SC, Lawrence E (2009) Predicting establishment success for alien reptiles and amphibians: a role for climate matching. Biol Invasions 11(3):713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger JR, George MA Jr, Leadbetter C, Shaikh F (2019) The allometry of brain size in mammals. J Mammal 100(2):276–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (2004) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front Ecol Environ 2:436–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capellini I, Baker J, Allen WL, Street SE, Venditti C (2015) The role of life history traits in mammalian invasion success. Ecol Lett 18(10):1099–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple DG, Simmonds SM, Wong BB (2012) Can behavioral and personality traits influence the success of unintentional species introductions? Trends Ecol Evol 27(1):57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin’s C (1859) On the origin of species. published on, 24

  • Davis MA (2009) Invasion biology. Oxford University Press on Demand

  • Ehrlich PR (1989) 989. Attributes of invaders and the invading process: vertebrates. Drake) A, Mooney HA, DiCasIri F, Groves RH, Kruger F], Rejmanek M, Williamson M. Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. New York: Wiley, 315–328

  • Forsyth DM, Duncan RP, Bomford M, Moore G (2004) Climatic suitability, life-history traits, introduction effort, and the establishment and spread of introduced mammals in Australia. Conserv Biol 18:557–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes KR, Barry SC (2008) Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biol Invasions 10:483–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes ND, Spatz DR, Oppel S, Tershy B, Croll DA, Keitt B et al (2019) Globally important islands where eradicating invasive mammals will benefit highly threatened vertebrates. PLoS ONE 14(3):e0212128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holway DA, Suarez AV (1999) Animal behavior: an essential component of invasion biology. Trends Ecol Evol 14(8):328–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C, Richardson DM, Landi P, Minoarivelo HO, Garnas J, Roy HE (2016) Defining invasiveness and invasibility in ecological networks. Biol Invasions 18(4):971–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives AR, Garland T Jr (2010) Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. Syst Biol 59(1):9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives AR, Helmus MR (2011) Generalized linear mixed models for phylogenetic analyses of community structure. Ecol Monogr 81(3):511–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives AR, & Garland T (2014) Phylogenetic regression for binary dependent variables. In Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology (pp. 231–261). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer

  • Jeschke JM (2008) Across islands and continents, mammals are more successful invaders than birds. Divers Distrib 14(6):913–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeschke JM, Debille S, & Lortie CJ (2018) Biotic resistance and island susceptibility hypotheses. Invasion biology hypothesis and evidence, 60–70

  • Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17(4):164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumschick S, Gaertner M, Vilà M, Essl F, Jm Jeschke P, Pyšek A, Ricciardi S, Bacher TM, Blackburn JTA, Dick T, Evans PE, Hulme I, Kühn A, Mrugała J, Pergl W, Rabitsch DM, Richardson A, Sendek MW (2015) Ecological impacts of alien species: quantification, Scope, Caveats, and recommendations. Bioscience 65:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L, Whittle P, Lascaris E, Finkelstein A (1997) Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Anim Behav 53:549–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM (1993) Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 8:133–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long JL (2003) Introduced Mammals of the World: Their History, Distribution and Influence. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ludsin SA, Wolfe AD (2001) Biological invasion theory: Darwin’s contributions from The Origin of Species. Bioscience 51(9):780–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukas D, Clutton-Brock TH (2013) The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science 341(6145):526–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luque GM, Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Bonnaud E, Genovesi P, Simberloff D, Courchamp F (2014) The 100th of the world’s worst invasive alien species. Biol Invasions 16(5):981–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins EP, Hansen TF (1997) Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am Nat 149(4):646–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundry R (2014) Statistical issues and assumptions of phylogenetic generalized least squares. In Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology (pp. 131–153). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer

  • Paradis E, Claude J (2002) Analysis of comparative data using generalized estimating equations. J Theor Biol 218:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm S (1991) The Balance of Nature? Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddiex B, Forsyth DM, McDonald-Madden E, Einoder LD, Griffioen PA, Chick RR, Robley AJ (2007) Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia I Patterns of control and monitoring. Wildl Res 33(8):691–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2013) Invasive species: what everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Bacher S, Reader SM, Lefebvre L (2008) Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel environments. Am Nat 172(S1):S63–S71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Maspons J, Vall-Llosera M, Bartomeus I, García-Peña GE, Piñol J, Freckleton RP (2012) Unraveling the life history of successful invaders. Science 337(6094):580–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson MH, Fitter A (1996) The characters of successful invaders. Biol Cons 78(1–2):163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, de la Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W (2014) EltonTraits 1.0: Species‐level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals: Ecological Archives E095‐178. Ecology 95(7):2027–2027

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Blackburn, A. Zimmermann, I. Capellini, P. Wasowicz and J.R. Burger for their kind responses to our requests for information about their databases and publications.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratorio de Biología del Comportamiento, IBYME-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Obligado, 2490, 1429, Argentina

    Aurelia Labaronnie & Marcelo H. Cassini

Authors
  1. Aurelia Labaronnie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcelo H. Cassini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo H. Cassini.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Additional declarations for articles in life science journals that report the results of studies involving humans and/or animals

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Andrzej Zalewski

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 60 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Labaronnie, A., Cassini, M.H. Determinants of introduction success in alien mammals. Mamm Res 67, 231–237 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-021-00599-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-021-00599-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation