Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Seasonal movements of migratory and resident female moose (Alces alces) in north-central British Columbia, Canada

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mammal Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ungulate habitat use and movements are highly variable among individuals, populations, and regions. Factors that influence annual and seasonal movements are important to understand for management purposes. Within some populations, moose (Alces alces) are known to migrate between seasonal ranges, generally in response to changes in the environment. A total of 45 female moose were fitted with GPS collars between March 1, 2014, and February 28, 2018, in and around the John Prince Research Forest in north-central British Columbia, Canada, to determine the prevalence and timing of migration. Using the model-based net squared displacement approach, we classified 67 (74%) annual trajectories as migratory, of which 43 (48%) were migrant and 24 (27%) were mix-migrant. We classified 22 annual trajectories (24%) as resident and one (1%) as a disperser. Moose with migratory trajectories exhibited a consistent pattern of leaving their winter range (WR) in April and returning from November to February after spending the majority of the year in their non-winter range (NWR). There was a significant negative correlation between mean monthly elevation and mean monthly snow on the ground for migratory moose. The mean distance separating migratory moose WR and NWR ranges (δ) was 32 km (SD = 30 km) but varied greatly from a minimum of 5 km to a maximum of 61 km. We discuss the potential implications of our results on surveys used to estimate moose population abundance and trends. We contend that a better understanding of moose seasonal habitat use patterns would aid moose management, help delineate important seasonal rangelands and migration corridors, inform population survey designs, and expand our understanding of moose populations in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data associated with this manuscript are part of a larger project in partnership with the Government of British Columbia.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Andersen R (1991) Habitat deterioration and the migratory behaviour of moose (Alces alces L.) in Norway. J Appl Ecol 28:102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M, McLellan B, Serrouya R (2018) Moose response to high-elevation forestry: implications for apparent competition with endangered caribou. J Wildl Manage 82:299–309

  • Ball JP et al (2001) Partial migration by large ungulates: characteristics of seasonal moose Alces alces ranges in northern Sweden. Wildl Biol 7:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg JE et al (2019) Prevalence and mechanisms of partial migration in ungulates. Front Ecol Evol 7:325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borowik T et al (2020) The level of habitat patchiness influences movement strategy of moose in Eastern Poland. PLoS ONE 15(3):e0230521. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS et al (1999) The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J Mammal 80:385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnefeld N et al (2011) A model-driven approach to quantify migration patterns: individual, regional and yearly differences. J Anim Ecol 80:466–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham and Anderson (2002) Model selection and inference: a practical information theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadsand B et al (2012) Moose density and composition in the Southern Omineca Region, winter 2011–2012. Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations, Prince George, BC.

  • Cagnacci F et al (2011) Partial migration in roe deer: migratory and resident tactics are end points of a behavioural gradient determined by ecological factors. Oikos 120:1790–1802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demarchi MW (2003) Migratory patterns and home range size of moose in the central Nass Valley. British Columbia Northwest Nat 84:135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingle H, Drake VA (2007) What is migration? Bioscience 57:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards RY, Ritcey RW (1956) The migrations of a moose herd. J Mammal 37:486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preference. Am Nat 100:611–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018). Canadian climate normals 1981–2010 station data. Downloaded from https://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html.

  • Environment and Climate Change Canada (2019). Historical data - climate. Downloaded from https://climate.weather.gc.ca/historical_data/search_historic_data_e.html.

  • Ericsson G et al (1999) Climate change, moose and their human predators. Ecol Bull 47:178–187

  • Fancy SG et al (1989) Seasonal movements of caribou in arctic Alaska as determined by satellite. Can j Zool 67:644–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fieberg J et al (2008) Understanding variation in autumn migration of northern white-tailed deer by long-term study. J Mammal 89:1529–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1925) Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd.

  • Gaidet N, Lecomte P (2013) Benefits of migration in a partially-migratory tropical ungulate. BMC Ecol 13:36–36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham MP, Parker KL (2008) Differential habitat selection by moose and elk in the Besa-Prophet area of Northern British Columbia. Alces 44:41–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatter J (1950) The moose of Central British Columbia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.

  • Hebblewhite M, Merrill EH (2009) Trade-offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate. Ecology 90:3445–3454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klaczek M, Marshall S, Batho A., Anderson M (2017) Density and composition of moose (Alces alces) within the Southern Omineca Region, central British Columbia. Winter 2016–2017. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Prince George, BC.

  • Kuzyk G (2016) Provincial population and harvest estimates of moose in British Columbia. Alces 52:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzyk G, Heard D (2014) Research design to determine factors affecting moose population change in British Columbia: testing the landscape change hypothesis. Minist For Lands Nat Resour Wildl Bull 126:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzyk G et al (2018) Determining factors affecting moose population change in British Columbia: testing the landscape change hypothesis. 2018 Progress Report: February 2012–April 2018. B.C. Minist. For., Lands and Nat. Resour. Operations and Rural Dev. Victoria, BC. Wildl. Working Rep. No. WR-126. Pp. 64.

  • Laundré JW et al (2001) Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the “landscape of fear” in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A. Can j Zool 79:1401–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leblond M et al (2010) What drives fine-scale movements of large herbivores? A case study using moose. Ecography 33:1102–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lendrum PE, Anderson CR, Monteith KL, Jenks JA, Bowyer RT, Ovadia O (2013) Migrating mule deer: effects of anthropogenically altered landscapes. PLoS ONE 8(5):e64548

  • Lendrum PE et al (2014) Relating the movement of a rapidly migrating ungulate to spatiotemporal patterns of forage quality. Mamm Biol 79:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundmark C, Ball JP (2008) Living in snowy environments: quantifying the influence of snow on moose behavior. Arct Antarct Alp Res 40:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meidinger D, Pojar J (Eds.) (1991) Ecosystems of British Columbia. Special Report Series 6, Victoria, BC. B.C. Ministry of Forests and Range Research Branch.

  • Meisingset EL et al (2018) Spatial mismatch between management units and movement ecology of a partially migratory ungulate. J Appl Ecol 55:745–753

  • Merkle JA et al (2016) Large herbivores surf waves of green-up during spring. Proc. R. Soc. B.28320160456.

  • Mose VN et al (2013) Modelling the dynamics of migrations for large herbivore populations in the Amboseli National Park. Kenya Ecol Model 254:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller et al (2011) How landscape dynamics link individual- to population-level movement patterns: a multispecies comparison of ungulate relocation data. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:683–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A (2013) Ungulate migration, plant phenology, and large carnivores: the times they are a-changin’. Ecology 94:1257–1261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson KL et al (2016) Modeling caribou movements: seasonal ranges and migration routes of the Central Arctic herd. PLoS ONE 11:e0150333–e0150333

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker KL et al (1984) Energy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elk. J Wildl Manag 48:474–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycuick L (1975) Movements of the migratory wildebeest population in the Serengeti area between 1960 and 1973. Afr j Ecol 13:65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters W et al (2019) Large herbivore migration plasticity along environmental gradients in Europe: life-history traits modulate forage effects. Oikos 128:416–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole KG et al (2007) Moose calving strategies in interior montane ecosystems. J Mammal 88:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole KG, Stuart-Smith K (2006) Winter habitat selection by female moose in western interior montane forests. Can j Zool 84:1823–1832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea RV et al (2019) Scat analysis as a preliminary assessment of moose calf consumption by bears (Ursus spp.) in north–central British Columbia. Anim Biodivers Conserv 42(2):369–377. https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2019.42.0369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivrud IM et al (2019) Future suitability of habitat in a migratory ungulate under climate change. Proc R Soc 286:1899. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolandsen CM et al (2017) On fitness and partial migration in a large herbivore – migratory moose have higher reproductive performance than residents. Oikos 126:547–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safronov VM (2009) Regional populations and migration of moose in Northern Yakutia, Russia. Alces 45:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Santomauro D et al (2012) Historical-ecological evaluation of the long-term distribution of woodland caribou and moose in central British Columbia. Ecosphere 3:37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer H et al (2016) The extra mile: ungulate migration distance alters the use of seasonal range and exposure to anthropogenic risk. Ecosphere 7:e01534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnorbus M et al (2012) Impacts of climate change in three hydrologic regimes in British Columbia. Canada Hydrol Process 28:1170–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrouya R, McLellan BN, van Oort H, Mowat G, Boutin S (2017) Experimental moose reduction lowers wolf density and stops decline of endangered caribou. PeerJ 5:e3736. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3736

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha R et al (2012) Modelling spatial and temporal variability of hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Fraser River basin, British Columbia. Canada Hydrol Process 26:1840–1860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh NJ et al (2010) Tracking greenery across a latitudinal gradient in central Asia – the migration of the saiga antelope. Divers Distrib 16:663–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh NJ et al (2012) From migration to nomadism: movement variability in a northern ungulate across its latitudinal range. Ecol Appl 22:2007–2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh NJ et al (2016) Quantifying migration behaviour using net squared displacement approach: clarifications and caveats. PLoS ONE 11:e0149594

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spitz D, Hebblewhite M, Stephenson T (2017) ‘MigrateR’ extending model driven methods for classifying and quantifying animal movement behavior. Ecography 40:788–799

  • Sweanor PY, Sandegren F (1989) Winter-range philopatry of seasonally migratory moose. J Appl Ecol 26:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Moorter B et al (2016) Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection. J Anim Ecol 85:21–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White PJ et al (2007) Partial migration and philopatry of Yellowstone pronghorn. Biol Conserv 135:502–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White KS et al (2014) Benefits of migration in relation to nutritional condition and predation risk in a partially migratory moose population. Ecology 95:225–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull 1:80–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Tl’azt’en Nation and Nak’azdli Whut’en Nation for their support for the project. Thanks to Douglas Heard, Gerald Kuzyk, Glen Watts, Ralph Pierre, Beverly John, and Fred Sam for help getting the project started. We thank Glen Watts, Greg Altoft, David Argument, Brad Culling, Mike Klazek, Rob Altoft, and Bryan Macbeth for capture assistance.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Government of British Columbia, John Prince Research Forest, Tanizul Timber Ltd, TransCanada Corp, Spectra Energy, and Cliffs Natural Resources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dexter P. Hodder.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Research ethics and capture permit were obtained under the British Columbia Wildlife Act (#PG13-92390).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Rafał Kowalczyk

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 30 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chisholm, J.D., Hodder, D.P., Crowley, S.M. et al. Seasonal movements of migratory and resident female moose (Alces alces) in north-central British Columbia, Canada. Mamm Res 66, 419–427 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-021-00575-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-021-00575-6

Keywords

Navigation