Skip to main content
Log in

Bat echolocation in continental China: a systematic review and first acoustic identification key for the country

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Mammal Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 23 July 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

The development of increasingly affordable ultrasonic detectors and automatic classifiers has increasingly boosted the use of acoustic recording of echolocation calls to survey bats all over the world. Echolocation call keys are crucial to reliably classify acoustic recordings, but those are not available for many regions, such as China. In the present study, we conducted a systematic review of bat echolocation studies across continental China and developed an acoustic identification key. Based on 130 studies, published from 1999 to 2020, we obtained echolocation parameters from 64 bat species (47.4% of the total echolocating species known from the country). This review highlights the lack of echolocation references from continental China for 71 species, from which, the echolocation of 21 has never been described. Additionally, we developed the Bat Knowledge Index, an indicator that allows the identification of key priority areas for future research on bat acoustics and geographic biases in the existing studies, further highlighting the lack of studies in the northwestern regions of the country. The compiled identification key provides easy-to-follow identification steps to classify the echolocation calls of 114 species (84.5% of all Chinese echolocating species) to either species (11.4%) or phonic group level (88.6%). This key represents a useful baseline tool and a further step to increase bioacoustic studies’ suitability in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank all the people behind the Bat Monitoring Program (www.batmonitoring.org) for their involvement in this study, especially Maria Mas Navarro, for helping with the final tables and Toni Arrizabalaga, Carles Flaquer and Xavier Puig-Montserrat for their support in the study. We also want to thank Anderson Feijó for his help with the data on China’s species distribution.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The codes generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DLB, ALB and AFP conceived the ideas and designed the review; DLB wrote the manuscript with the close supervision of ALB, JCCH and AFP. The key was developed by DLB with the close supervision of ALB and JCCH. ALB and DLB came up with the Bat Knowledge Index. JCCH conducted the review in Chinese with the help of YW for the references. DLB conducted the review in English and developed all the figures with the help of ALB and AFP. LG and YW provided relevant feedback on the development of the review and the manuscript. All authors commented on the drafts and gave their final approval for the publication. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David López-Bosch or Luke Gibson.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Teaser text

The present review compiles the current knowledge on bat echolocation in mainland China and determines knowledge gaps in this field via a Bat Knowledge Index. Also, the first known acoustic identification key of the species from continental China is provided, allowing for the acoustic identification of 114 of 135 known echolocating bat species.

Additional information

Communicated by: Zuzanna Hałat

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The data on Figure 5 was captured as part of the article text and should have has been removed. The article has been updated.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary data SD1 List of papers obtained from the literature review.

Table S1

Information extracted from each study obtained from the literature review. The species name corresponds to the latest accepted scientific name, while the one found in the reference literature is specified in the third column. The different parameters are pulse duration (Dur), frequency of maximum energy (FME), highest frequency (HF), lowest frequency (LF), start frequency (SF), end frequency (EF) and bandwidth (BW). Of these parameters, we show the mean ± standard deviation and minimum-maximum in parenthesis. Information on the detector used, the author (corresponding to the references listed in Supplementary data SD1), the publishing journal, the language in which the reference was written, the sex of the animal (if provided), the recording method, whether the reference was used for the identification key and the region where the animal was recorded is also provided. (XLSX 57 kb)

Table S2

Information extracted from each reference included in the echolocation key from outside continental China. The species name corresponds to the latest accepted scientific name, while the one found in the reference literature is specified in the second column. The different parameters are pulse duration (Dur), frequency of maximum energy (FME), highest frequency (HF), lowest frequency (LF), start frequency (SF), end frequency (EF) and bandwidth (BW). Of these parameters, we show the mean ± standard deviation and minimum-maximum in parenthesis. Information on the detector used, the author (corresponding to the references listed in Supplementary data SD1), the title of the publication, the publishing journal, the recording method and the country where the animal was recorded is also provided. (XLSX 23 kb)

Table S3

For each region, number of publications found, number of species covered by the publications, number of species known for the region and BKI score. (XLSX 11 kb)

Table S4

Number of publications from continental China for each species recorded. Bold coloured species refer to species with no reference calls published (XLSX 11 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

López-Bosch, D., Huang, J.CC., Wang, Y. et al. Bat echolocation in continental China: a systematic review and first acoustic identification key for the country. Mamm Res 66, 405–416 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-021-00570-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-021-00570-x

Keywords

Navigation