Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Historical range expansion and biological changes of Sus scrofa corresponding to domestication and feralization

Mammal Research volume 66, pages 1–12 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Globally, Sus scrofa is one of the most widely recognized species inhabiting earth alongside humans. Known by many names (wild boar, domestic swine, feral pig), S. scrofa is both an ecosystem engineer and an important agricultural species. Originating in Southeast Asia 5 million years ago, S. scrofa naturally expanded throughout Eurasia and into North Africa but now inhabits every continent, except Antarctica. The worldwide distribution of S. scrofa can be attributed largely to human-mediated transport occurring over the course of the past 500 years particularly during the European age of exploration. Biologically, the differences between wild, domestic, and feral populations can be traced to these historical events, which resulted in a marked increase in reproductive rates and growth rates among domestic populations that have generally been shown to regress when these populations become feral. Given the importance of this species ecologically and the great deal of available research describing it, this review summarizes existing literature on the global expansion and corresponding biological changes of S. scrofa within a historical and genetic context to allow for better understanding of the species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Ahmad E, Brooks JE, Hussain I, Khan MH (1995) Reproduction in Eurasian wild boar in Central Punjab, Pakistan. Acta Theriol 40:163–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander N, Massei G, Wint, W (2015) The European distribution of Sus scrofa. Model outputs from the project described within the poster - where are all the boars? An attempt to gain a continents perspective. Figshare Data. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1502662.v1

  • Alexandri P, Megens HJ, Crooijmans RP et al (2017) Distinguishing migration events of different timing for wild boar in the Balkans. J Biogeogr 44:259–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali T (1994) A manual for the primary animal health care worker. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen MS, Matisoo-Smith E, Horsburgh A (2001) Pacific ‘babes’: issues in the origins and dispersal of Pacific pigs and the potential of mitochondrial DNA analysis. Int J Osteoarchaeol 11:4–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves PC, Pinheiro I, Godinho R, Vicente J, Gortazar C, Scandura M (2010) Genetic diversity of wild boar populations and domestic pig breeds (Sus scrofa) in South-Western Europe. Biol J Linn Soc 101:797–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen IL, Nævdal E, Bøe KE (2011) Maternal investment, sibling competition, and offspring survival with increasing litter size and parity in pigs (Sus scrofa). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1159–1167

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aravena P, Skewes O, Gouin N (2015) Mitochondrial DNA diversity of feral pigs from Karukinka Natural Park, Tierra del Fuego Island, Chile. Genet Mol Res 14:4245–4257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ballari SA, Barrios-García MN (2014) A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges. Mammal Rev 44:124–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios-Garcia MN, Ballari SA (2012) Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biol Inv 14:2283–2300

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter E, Rutherford K, D’eath R et al (2013) The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig II: management factors. Anim Welf 22:219–238

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie V, O’Connell N, Moss B (2000) Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs. Livest Sci 65:71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench RM, MacDonald KC (2006) The origins and development of African livestock: archaeology, genetics, linguistics and ethnography. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosse M, Megens HJ, Madsen O, Frantz LAF, Paudel Y, Crooijmans R, Groenen MAM (2014) Untangling the hybrid nature of modern pig genomes: a mosaic derived from biogeographically distinct and highly divergent Sus scrofa populations. Mol Ecol 23:4089–4102

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bosse M, Madsen O, Megens HJ, Frantz LAF, Paudel Y, Crooijmans R, Groenen MAM (2015) Hybrid origin of European commercial pigs examined by an in-depth haplotype analysis on chromosome 1. Front Genet 5:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook RK, van Beest FM (2014) Feral wild boar distribution and perceptions of risk on the Central Canadian prairies. Wildl Soc Bull 38:486–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Burney DA, James HF, Burney LP et al (2001) Fossil evidence for a diverse biota from Kaua’i and its transformation since human arrival. Ecol Monogr 71:615–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Bywater KA, Apollonio M, Cappai N, Stephens PA (2010) Litter size and latitude in a large mammal: the wild boar Sus scrofa. Mammal Rev 40:212–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliebe A, Nebel A, Makarewicz C, Krawczak M, Krause-Kyora B (2017) Insights into early pig domestication provided by ancient DNA analysis. Sci Rep 7:e44550

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell TA, Long DB (2009) Feral swine damage and damage management in forested ecosystems. Forest Ecol Manag 257:2319–2326

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon J, Morgan J, Schmidt G et al (1996) Growth and fresh meat quality characteristics of pigs supplemented with vitamin E. J Anim Sci 74:98–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi SK, Lee JE, Kim YJ, Min MS, Voloshina I, Myslenkov A, Oh J, Kim TH, Markov N, Seryodkin I, Ishiguro N, Yu L, Zhang YP, Lee H, Kim K (2014) Genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations from East Asia based on microsatellite loci analyses. BMC Genet 15:85

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke CMH, Dzieciolowski RM (1991) Feral pigs in the northern South Island, New Zealand. 2. Breed composition of present populations. J Royal Soc NZ 21:249–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby AW (2004) Ecological imperialism: the biological expansion of Europe 900–1900, 2nd edn. Cambridge University, Cambride

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas MF, Novillo A, Campos C, Dacar MA, Ojeda RA (2010) Food habits and impact of rooting behaviour of the invasive wild boar, Sus scrofa, in a protected area of the Monte Desert, Argentina. J Arid Environ 74:1582–1585

    Google Scholar 

  • Danilov PI, Panchenko DV (2012) Expansion and some ecological features of the wild boar beyond the northern boundary of its historical range in European Russia. Russ J Ecol 43:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Acevedo J, Zamorano A, DeYoung RW, Campbell TA, Hewitt DG, Long DB (2010) Promiscuous mating in feral pigs (Sus scrofa) from Texas, USA. Wildl Res 37:539–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirbas Y, Ozkan Koca A, Pamukoglu N, Sert H, Suchentrunk F (2016) Mitochondrial DNA control region variability of wild boar Sus scrofa with various external phenotypes in Turkey. Turk J Zool 40:957–971

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter N (2003) The influence of pasture distribution, and temperature on adult body weight of feral pigs in a semi-arid environment. Wildl Res 30:75–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding N, Guo Y, Knorr C, Ma J, Mao H, Lan L, Xiao S, Ai H, Haley CS, Brenig B, Huang L (2009) Genome-wide QTL mapping for three traits related to teat number in a White Duroc x Erhualian pig resource population. BMC Genet 10:6

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Diong CH (1982) Population biology and management of the feral pig (Sus scrofa) in Kipahulu Valley, Maui. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobney K, Cucchi T, Larson G (2009) The pigs of island Southeast Asia and the Pacific: new evidence for taxonomic status and human-mediated dispersal. Asian Persp 47:59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye TS, Pantaleo J (2010) Age of the O18 site, Hawaii. Archae Oceania 45:113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Evin A, Cucchi T, Cardini A, Vidarsdottir US, Larson G, Dobney K (2013) The long and winding road: identifying pig domestication through molar size and shape. J Archaeol Sci 40:735–743

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2009) Farmer’s hand book on pig production. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez A, Alves E, Ovilo C, Rodríguez M, Silió L (2011) Divergence time estimates of east Asian and European pigs based on multiple near complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Anim Genet 42:86–88

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Llario P, Carranza J (2000) Reproductive performance of the wild boar in a Mediterranean ecosystem under drought conditions. Ethol Ecol Evo 12:335–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Llario P, Mateos-Quesada P (1998) Body size and reproductive parameters in the wild boar Sus scrofa. Acta Theriol 43:439–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Llario P, Mateos-Quesada P (2003) Population structure of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) in two Mediterranean habitats in the western Iberian Peninsula. Folia Zool 52:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Llario P, Mateos-Quesada P (2005) Influence of rainfall on the breeding biology of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Folia Zool 54:240–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Field JS, Graves MW (2008) A new chronology for Pololu Valley, Hawaii Island: occupational history and agricultural development. Radiocarbon 50:205–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca C, Da Silva AA, Alves J, Vingada J, Soares AM (2011) Reproductive performance of wild boar females in Portugal European. J Wildl Res 57:363–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantz AC, Zachos FE, Kirschning J, Cellina S, Bertouille S, Mamuris Z, Koutsogiannouli EA, Burke T (2013a) Genetic evidence for introgression between domestic pigs and wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Belgium and Luxembourg: a comparative approach with multiple marker systems. Biol J Linn Soc 110:104–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantz LA, Schraiber JG, Madsen O et al (2013b) Genome sequencing reveals fine scale diversification and reticulation history during speciation in Sus. Genome Biol 14:R107

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frantz LA, Meijaard E, Gongora J, Haile J, Groenen MAM, Larson G (2016) The evolution of Suidae. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 4:61–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fulgione D, Rippa D, Buglione M, Trapanese M, Petrelli S, Maselli V (2016) Unexpected but welcome. Artificially selected traits may increase fitness in wild boar. Evol Appl 9:769–776

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fulgione D, Trapanese M, Buglione M, Rippa D, Polese G, Maresca V, Maselli V (2017) Pre-birth sense of smell in the wild boar: the ontogeny of the olfactory mucosa. Zool 123:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamelon M, Besnard A, Gaillard JM, Servanty S, Baubet E, Brandt S, Gimenez O (2011) High hunting pressure selects for earlier birth date: wild boar as a case study. Evol 65:3100–3112

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamelon M, Focardi S, Baubet E, Brandt S, Franzetti B, Ronchi F, Venner S, Sæther BE, Gaillard JM (2017) Reproductive allocation in pulsed-resource environments: a comparative study in two populations of wild boar. Oeceol 183:1065–1076

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia G, Vergara J, Lombardi R (2011) Genetic characterization and phylogeography of the wild boar Sus scrofa introduced into Uruguay. Genet Mol Biol 34:329–U315

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Geisser H, Reyer HU (2005) The influence of food and temperature on population density of wild boar Sus scrofa in the Thurgau (Switzerland). J Zool 267:89–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Giffin JG (1978) Ecology of the feral pig on the island of Hawaii. Dept Land Nat Res, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuffra E, Kijas JMH, Amarger V, Carlborg O, Jeon JT, Andersson L (2000) The origin of the domestic pig: independent domestication and subsequent introgression. Genet 154:1785–1791

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gongora J, Fleming P, Spencer PBS, Mason R, Garkavenko O, Meyer JN, Droegemueller C, Lee JH, Moran C (2004) Phylogenetic relationships of Australian and New Zealand feral pigs assessed by mitochondrial control region sequence and nuclear GPIP genotype. Mol Phylogenet Evol 33:339–348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graves H (1984) Behavior and ecology of wild and feral swine (Sus scrofa). J Anim Sci 58:482–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray SM, Roloff GJ, Montgomery RA, Beasley JC, Pepin KM (2019) Wild pig spatial ecology and behavior. In: VerCauteren KC, Beasley JC, Ditchkoff SS, Mayer JJ, Roloff GJ, Strickland BK (eds) Invasive wild pigs in North America: ecology, impacts, and management. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 33–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenen MAM, Archibold AL, Uenishi H et al (2012) Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature 491:393–398

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez S, Abbas M, Khan ZH, Rehman EU (2011) Preliminary analysis of the diet of wild boar (Sus scrofa L., 1758) in Islamabad, Pakistan. Turk J Zool 35:115–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen D, Kephart K (1980) Reproduction in domestic and feral swine. I. Comparison of ovulatory rate and litter size. Biol Reprod 22:550–552

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton JO, Pluske JR, Spencer PBS (2004a) A preliminary genetic study of the social biology of feral pigs in South-Western Australia and the implications for management. Wildl Res 31:375–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton JO, Spencer PBS, Alpers DL et al (2004b) Molecular techniques, wildlife management and the importance of genetic population structure and dispersal: a case study with feral pigs. J Appl Ecol 41:735–743

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel CGZ, de Santos LR, Pichorim M, Marini MÂ (2019) Wild pig (Sus scrofa L.) occupancy patterns in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biota Neotrop 19:e20180719

  • Herrero J, Couto S, Rosell C, Arias P (2004) Preliminary data on the diet of wild boar living in a Mediterranean coastal wetland. Galemys 16:115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess SC (2016) A tour de force by Hawaii’s invasive mammals: establishment, takeover, and ecosystem restoration through eradication. Mammal Study 41:47–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess SC, Jeffrey JJ, Ball DL, Babich L (2006) Efficacy of feral pig removals at Hakalau forest national wildlife refuge, Hawaii. Trans Western Sect Wildl Soc 42:53–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess SC, Wehr NH, Litton CM (2019) Wild pigs in the Pacific Islands. In: VerCauteren KC, Beasley JC, Ditchkoff SS, Mayer JJ, Roloff GJ, Strickland BK (eds) Invasive wild pigs in North America: ecology, impacts, and management. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 403–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Hongo H, Ishiguro N, Watanobe T, Shigehara N, Anezaki T, The Long V, Vu Binh D, Tien NT, Nam NH (2002) Variation in mitochondrial DNA of Vietnamese pigs: relationships with Asian domestic pigs and Ryukyu wild boars. Zool Sci 19:1329–1335

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iacolina L, Scandura M, Bongi P, Apollonio M (2009) Nonkin associations in wild boar social units. J Mammal 90:666–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacolina L, Pertoldi C, Amills M, Kusza S, Megens HJ, Bâlteanu VA, Bakan J, Cubric-Curik V, Oja R, Saarma U, Scandura M, Šprem N, Stronen AV (2018) Hotspots of recent hybridization between pigs and wild boars in Europe. Sci Rep 8:17372

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ickes K (2001) Hyper-abundance of native wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in a lowland dipterocarp rain forest of peninsular Malaysia 1. Biotrop 33:682–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AK, McGlone JJ (2011) Behaviour genetics of the domestic pig. In: In: Rothschild MF, Ruvinsky a (eds) The genetics of the pig, 2nd edn. CABI, Oxfordshire, pp 200–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiter DA, Mayer JJ, Beasley JC (2016) What is in a “common” name? A call for consistent terminology for nonnative Sus scrofa. Wildl Soc Bull 40:384–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalilzadeh P, Rezaei HR, Fadakar D, Serati M, Aliabadian M, Haile J, Goshtasb H (2016) Contact zone of Asian and European wild boar at north west of Iran. PLoS One 11:e0159499

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Khederzadeh S, Kusza S, Huang CP, Markov N, Scandura M, Babaev E, Šprem N, Seryodkin IV, Paule L, Esmailizadeh A, Xie HB, Zhang YP (2019) Maternal genomic cariability of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) reveals the uniqueness of east-Caucasian and central Italian populations. Ecol Evol 9:9467–9478

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch PV (2011) When did the Polynesians settle Hawai’i? A review of 150 years of scholarly inquiry and a tentative answer. Hawaiian Archaeology 12:3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirilyuk VE, Obyazov VA, Tkachuk TE, Kirilyuk OK (2012) Influence of climate change on vegetation and wildlife in the Daurian eco-region. In: van Staalduinen MA (ed) Weger MJA. Eurasian steppes. ecological problems and livelihoods in a changing world. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 397–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusza S, Podgorski T, Scandura M et al (2014) Contemporary genetic structure, phylogeography and past demographic processes of wild boar Sus scrofa population in central and Eastern Europe. PLoS One 9:e0091401

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson G, Dobney K, Albarella U et al (2005) Worldwide phylogeography of wild boar reveals multiple centers of pig domestication. Sci 307:1618–1621

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larson G, Cucchi T, Fujita M, Matisoo-Smith E, Robins J, Anderson A, Rolett B, Spriggs M, Dolman G, Kim TH, Thuy NTD, Randi E, Doherty M, Due RA, Bollt R, Djubiantono T, Griffin B, Intoh M, Keane E, Kirch P, Li KT, Morwood M, Pedrina LM, Piper PJ, Rabett RJ, Shooter P, van den Bergh G, West E, Wickler S, Yuan J, Cooper A, Dobney K (2007) Phylogeny and ancient DNA of Sus provides insights into neolithic expansion in island Southeast Asia and Oceania. PNAS 104:4834–4839

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lega C, Raia P, Rook L, Fulgione D (2016) Size matters: a comparative analysis of pig domestication. Holocene 26:327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JS, Farnsworth ML, Burdett CL, Theobald DM, Gray M, Miller RS (2017) Biotic and abiotic factors predicting the global distribution and population density of an invasive large mammal. Sci Rep 7:44152

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Tian S, Yeung CK et al (2014) Whole-genome sequencing of Berkshire (European native pig) provides insights into its origin and domestication. Sci Rep 4:4678

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Linderholm A, Spencer D, Battista V, Frantz L, Barnett R, Fleischer RC, James HF, Duffy D, Sparks JP, Clements DR, Andersson L, Dobney K, Leonard JA, Larson G (2016) A novel MC1R allele for black coat colour reveals the Polynesian ancestry and hybridization patterns of Hawaiian feral pigs. Royal Soc Open Sci 3:160304

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Bosse M, Megens HJ, Frantz LAF, Lee YL, Irving-Pease EK, Narayan G, Groenen MAM, Madsen O (2019) Genomic analysis on pygmy hog reveals extensive interbreeding during wild boar expansion. Nature Comm 10:1992

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long JL (2003) Introduced mammals of the world: their history, distribution and influence. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton

    Google Scholar 

  • Markov N, Pankova N, Filippov I (2019) Wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in the north of western Siberia: history of expansion and modern distribution. Mamm Res 64:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins FI, Mourão GM, Campos Z, Pellegrin A, Silva VS (2019) Activity pattern and habitat selection by invasive wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Brazilian agroecosystems. Mastozool Neotrop 26:129–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Maselli V, Rippa D, Russo G et al (2014) Wild boars’ social structure in the Mediterranean habitat. Hystrix 81:610–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Massei G, Genov PV, Staines BW (1996) Diet, food availability and reproduction of wild boar in a Mediterranean coastal area. Acta Theriol 41:307–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauget R (1981) The welfare of pigs. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Maximov A, Vasilenko V, Maximov G, Svinarev I (2019) Determining genotypes of 3-breed pig hybrids by marker genes and their interrelation with meat productivity. Bulgar J Agri Sci 25:782–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer JJ, Smyser TJ, Piaggio AJ, Zervanos SM (2019) Wilf pig taxonomy, morphology, genetics, and physiology. In: VerCauteren KC, Beasley JC, Ditchkoff SS, Mayer JJ, Roloff GJ, Strickland BK (eds) Invasive wild pigs in North America: ecology, impacts, and management. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 7–32

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann BE, Malek MJ, Newman RA, Schmit BS, Swafford SR, Sweitzer RA, Simmons RB (2014) Mitochondrial diversity supports multiple origins for invasive pigs. J Wildl Manag 78:202–213

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann BE, Smyser TJ, Schmit BS et al (2018) Molecular population structure for feral swine in the United States. J Wildl Manag 82:821–832

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure ML, Burdett CL, Farnsworth ML et al (2015) Modeling and mapping the probability of occurrence of invasive wild pigs across the contiguous United States. PLoS One 10:e0133771

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McIlroy J (1989) Aspects of the ecology of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in the Murchison area, New Zealand. NZ J Ecol 12:11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan BN, Fraser D, Kramer DL (2001) Birth weight variation in the domestic pig: effects on offspring survival, weight gain and suckling behaviour. App Anim Behav Sci 73:179–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizelle B (2011) Pig. Reaktion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Morelle K, Podgórski T, Prévot C, Keuling O, Lehaire F, Lejeune P (2015) Towards understanding wild boar Sus scrofa movement: a synthetic movement ecology approach. Mammal Rev 45:15–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Morelle K, Fattebert J, Mengal C, Lejeune P (2016) Invading or recolonizing? Patterns and drivers of wild boar population expansion into Belgian agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 222:267–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti M (2014) Biometric data and growth rates of a mountain population of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.), Ticino, Switzerland. J Mount Ecol 3:56–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikitin SV, Knyazev SP, Shatkhin KS (2014) Miniature pigs of ICG as a model object for morphogenetic research. Russ J Genet 4:511–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Novillo A, Ojeda RA (2008) The exotic mammals of Argentina. Biol Inv 10:1333–1344

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostindjer M, Bolhuis JE, Simon K, van den Brand H, Kemp B (2011) Perinatal flavour learning and adaptation to being weaned: all the pig needs is smell. PLoS One 6:e25318

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ottoni C, Flink LG, Evin A et al (2012) Pig domestication and human-mediated dispersal in western Eurasia revealed through ancient DNA and geometric morphometrics. Molec Biol Evol 30:824–832

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes JP, Easdale TA, Williamson WM, Forsyth DM (2015) Causes and consequences of ground disturbance by feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a lowland New Zealand conifer-angiosperm forest. NZ J Ecol 39:34–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedone P, Mattioli S, Mattioli L (2014) Body size and growth patterns in wild boars of Tuscany, Central Italy. J Mount Ecol 3:66–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Podgórski T, Baś G, Jędrzejewska B, Sönnichsen L, Śnieżko S, Jędrzejewski W, Okarma H (2013) Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: primeval forest and metropolitan area. J Mammal 94:109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Podgórski T, Lusseau D, Scandura M, Sönnichsen L, Jędrzejewska B (2014) Long-lasting, kin-directed female interactions in a spatially structured wild boar social network. PLoS One 9:e99875

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao R, Li X, Han X, Wang K, Lv G, Ren G, Li X (2019) Population structure and genetic diversity of four Henan pig populations. Anim Genet 50:262–265

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez O, Ojeda A, Tomas A, Gallardo D, Huang LS, Folch JM, Clop A, Sanchez A, Badaoui B, Hanotte O, Galman-Omitogun O, Makuza SM, Soto H, Cadillo J, Kelly L, Cho IC, Yeghoyan S, Perez-Enciso M, Amills M (2009) Integrating Y-chromosome, mitochondrial, and autosomal data to analyze the origin of pig breeds. Mol Biol Evol 26:2061–2072

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Onsins S, Burgos-Paz W, Manunza A, Amills M (2014) Mining the pig genome to investigate the domestication process. Heredity 113:471–484

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Risch, DR (2019) Quantifying the impact of wild pigs on global biodiversity and the spatiotemporal ecology of feral pigs on Maui, Hawaii. Thesis, University of Hawaii at Manoa

  • Rubin CJ, Megens HJ, Barrio AM, Maqbool K, Sayyab S, Schwochow D, Wang C, Carlborg O, Jern P, Jorgensen CB, Archibald AL, Fredholm M, Groenen MAM, Andersson L (2012) Strong signatures of selection in the domestic pig genome. PNAS 109:19529–19536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford K, Baxter E, D’Eath R et al (2013) The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig I: biological factors. Anim Welf 22:199–218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruvinsky A, Rothschild MF (1998) Systematics and evolution of the pig. In: Rothschild MF, Ruvinsky A (eds) The genetics of the pig, 1st edn. CABI, Oxfordshire, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders G (1993) The demography of feral pigs (Sus Scrofa) in Kosciusko National Park, New South Wales. Wildl Res 20:559–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders G, Kay B (1991) Movements of feral pigs (Sus Scrofa) at sunny corner, New South Wales. Wildl Res 18:49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura M, Iacolina L, Crestanello B et al (2008) Ancient vs. recent processes as factors shaping the genetic variation of the European wild boar: are the effects of the last glaciation still detectable? Mol Ecol 17:1745–1762

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scandura M, Iacolina L, Appolonio M (2011) Genetic diversity in the European wild boar Sus scrofa: phylogeography, population structure and wild x domestic hybridization. Mamm Rev 41:125–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler PY, Pratt LW, Foote D, Magnacca KN (2012) A preliminary study of effects of feral pig density on native Hawaiian montane rainforest vegetation. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Schley L, Roper TJ (2003) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal Rev 33:43–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Serenius T, Stalder K (2004) Genetics of length of productive life and lifetime prolificacy in the Finnish landrace and large White pig populations. J Anim Sci 82:3111–3117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Servanty S, Gaillard JM, Toigo C, Brandt S, Baubet E (2009) Pulsed resources and climate-induced variation in the reproductive traits of wild boar under high hunting pressure. J Anim Ecol 78:1278–1290

    Google Scholar 

  • Servanty S, Gaillard JM, Ronchi F, Focardi S, Baubet E, Gimenez O (2011) Influence of harvesting pressure on demographic tactics: implications for wildlife management. J Appl Ecol 48:835–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra C (2001) The feral pig (Sus scrofa, Suidae) in Cocos Island, Costa Rica: composition of its diet, reproductive state and genetics. Rev Biol Trop 49:1147–1157

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snow NP, Jarzyna MA, VerCauteren KC (2017) Interpreting and predicting the spread of invasive wild pigs. J Appl Ecol 54:2022–2032

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow NP, Miller RS, Beasley JC, Pepin KM (2019) Wild pig population dynamics. In: VerCauteren KC, Beasley JC, Ditchkoff SS, Mayer JJ, Roloff GJ, Strickland BK (eds) Invasive wild pigs in North America: ecology, impacts, and management. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 57–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Soria-Boix C, Donat-Torres MP, Urios V (2017) Contacts in the last 90,000 years over the strait of Gibraltar evidenced by genetic analysis of wild boar (Sus scrofa). PLoS One 12:e0181929

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sparklin BD, Mitchell MS, Hanson LB, Jolley DB, Ditchkoff SS (2009) Territoriality of feral pigs in a highly persecuted population on fort Benning, Georgia. J Wildl Manag 73:497–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer PBS, Hampton JO (2005) Illegal translocation and genetic structure of feral pigs in Western Australia. J Wildl Manag 69:377–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer PBS, Hampton JO, Lapidge SJ, Mitchell J, Lee J, Pluske JR (2006) An assessment of the genetic diversity and structure within and among populations of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) from Australia and Papua New Guinea. J Genet 85:63–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RB, Hellgren EC, Gabor TM, Ilse LM (1998) Reproduction of feral pigs in southern Texas. J Mammal 79:1325–1331

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchernov E, Horwitz LK (1991) Body size diminution under domestication: unconscious selection in primeval domesticates. J Anthrop Archae 10:54–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomich PQ (1986) Mammals in Hawaii: a synopsis and notational bibliography. Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Barneveld R (2003) Modern pork production - balancing efficient growth and feed conversion with product quality requirements and consumer demands. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 12:S31

    Google Scholar 

  • Velickovic N, Djan M, Ferreira E, Stergar M, Obreht D, Maletic V, Fonseca C (2015) From north to south and back: the role of the Balkans and other southern peninsulas in the recolonization of Europe by wild boar. J Biogeogr 42:716–728

    Google Scholar 

  • VerCauteren KC, Beasley JC, Ditchkoff SS, Mayer JJ, Roloff GJ, Strickland BK (2019) Invasive wild pigs in North America: ecology, impacts, and management. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilaca ST, Biosa D, Zachos FE et al (2014) Mitochondrial phylogeography of the European wild boar: the effect of climate on genetic diversity and spatial lineage sorting across Europe. J Biogeogr 41:987–998

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanobe T, Ishiguro N, Nakano M (2003) Phylogeography and population structure of the Japanese wild boar Sus scrofa leucomystax: mitochondrial DNA variation. Zoo Sci 20:1477–1489

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wehr NH, Hess SC, Litton CM (2018) Biology and impacts of Pacific Islands invasive species. 14. Sus scrofa, the feral pig (Artiodactyla: Suidae). Pac Sci 72:177–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehr NH, Kinney KM, Nguyen NH, Giardina CP, Litton CM (2019) Changes in soil bacterial community diversity following the removal of invasive feral pigs from a Hawaiian tropical montane wet forest. Sci Rep 9:14681

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wehr NH, Litton CM, Lincoln NK, Hess SC (2020) Relationships between soil macroinvertebrates and nonnative feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in Hawaiian tropical montane wet forests. Biol Inv 22:577–586

    Google Scholar 

  • White S (2011) From globalized pig breeds to capitalist pigs: a study in animal cultures and evolutionary history. Environ Hist 16:94–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox JT, Van Vuren DH (2009) Wild pigs as predators in oak woodlands of California. J Mammal 90:114–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DE, Reeder DM (2005) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. JHU Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu GS, Yao YG, Qu KX et al (2007) Population phylogenomic analysis of mitochondrial DNA in wild boars and domestic pigs revealed multiple domestication events in East Asia. Genome Biol 8:R245

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wurster CM, Robertson J, Westcott DA, Dryden B, Zazzo A, Bird MI (2012) Utilization of sugarcane habitat by feral pig (Sus scrofa) in northern tropical Queensland: evidence from the stable isotope composition of hair. PLoS One 7:e43538

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yang SL, Zhang H, Mao HM et al (2011) The local origin of the Tibetan pig and additional insights into the origin of Asian pigs. PLoS One 6:e0028215

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeman J, Heroldova M, Svobodova P, Kamler J (2016) Importance of sugar beet in the diet of wild boar (Sus scrofa) and damage to this crop. Listy Cukrov Repar 132:227–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JX, Jiao T, Zhao SG (2016) Genetic diversity in the mitochondrial DNA D-loop region of global swine (Sus scrofa) populations. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 473:814–820

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A special thanks is being extended to Nanea Babila, Dr. Steven Hess, Dr. Melissa Price, Dr. Daniel Rubinoff, Dr. Timothy Smyser, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback in the production of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources at the University of Hawai’i at Mānoa via the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Program (HAW01127H) and McIntyre Stennis Program (HAW01123M) awarded to Dr. Creighton Litton.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Nathaniel H. Wehr

    Present address: Global Wildlife Conservation Center, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Dr., Illick Hall 244, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, 1910 East West Rd., Sherman Laboratory 101, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA

    Nathaniel H. Wehr

Authors
  1. Nathaniel H. Wehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathaniel H. Wehr.

Additional information

Communicated by: Cino Pertoldi

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wehr, N.H. Historical range expansion and biological changes of Sus scrofa corresponding to domestication and feralization. Mamm Res 66, 1–12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-020-00534-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-020-00534-7

Keywords

search

Navigation