Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Detection probabilities of the native Eurasian otter and the invasive American mink are independent of their co-occurrence

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mammal Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detection probability is an important input when studying and managing species. It reduces the miscalculations of the estimates of occupancy, population abundances and their trends inherent to the imperfect detection during sampling. However, detection probability may vary in relation to environmental and biological factors, such as the presence of other species of similar ecological niche. We used a two-species single-season occupancy model to analyse the detection probability of the native Eurasian otter Lutra lutra and the invasive American mink Neovison vison in the northeast of the Iberian Peninsula and to test for potential differences in their detection when co-occurring and when not. Despite the known behavioural change of American mink towards a more terrestrial diet and a more diurnal activity pattern in the presence of Eurasian otter, their detectability did not vary when both species co-occurred versus when they did not. However, we observed seasonal differences in the probability of detection. Specifically, the probability of detection was higher in winter for both species. Furthermore, Eurasian otter was more often detected in sites with clay substrate, whereas American mink in sites with clay and rocks. These results indicate that the effectiveness of monitoring of Eurasian otter and American mink remains independent of the species co-occurrence. Yet, seasonal variations in the detection should be taken into account when monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey LL, Reid JA, Forsman ED, Nichols JD (2009) Modeling co-occurrence of northern spotted and barred owls: accounting for detection probability differences. Biol Conserv 142:2983–2989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balestrieri A, Remonti L, Prigioni C (2011) Detectability of the Eurasian otter by standard surveys: an approach using marking intensity to estimate false negative rates. Naturwissenschaften 98:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0737-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa AM, Real R, Olivero J, Vargas JM (2003) Otter (Lutra lutra) distribution modeling at two resolution scales suited to conservation planning in the Iberian Peninsula. Biol Conserv 114:377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00066-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonesi L, Chanin P, Macdonald D (2004) Competition between Eurasian otter Lutra lutra and American mink Mustela vison probed by niche shift. Oikos 106:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12763.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonesi L, Macdonald DW (2004) Evaluation of sign surveys as a way to estimate the relative abundance of American mink (Mustela vison). J Zool 262:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836903004448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonesi L, Palazón S (2007) The American mink in Europe: status, impacts, and control. Biol Conserv 134:470–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryce R, Oliver MK, Davies L, Gray H, Urquhart J, Lambin X (2011) Turning back the tide of American mink invasion at an unprecedented scale through community participation and adaptive management. Biol Conserv 144:575–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.013

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi- model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavero M, Francisco B-G, Ruiz-Olmo J (2003) Guía de los indicios de los mamíferos: Nutria Paleártica Lutra lutra (Linnaeus, 1758). Galemys 15:49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Delibes M (1990) La Nutria (Lutra lutra) en España. ICONA. Serie Técnica, Madrid

  • Dunstone N (1993) The mink. UK, T. & A. D. Poyser, London

  • Erlinge S (1967) Home range of the otter Lutra lutra L. in southern Sweden. Oikos 18(2):186–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris Z, Kelly MJ, Karpanty S, Ratelolahy F (2015) Patterns of spatial co-occurrence among native and exotic carnivores in north-eastern. Anim Conserv 19(2):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12233

  • Fusillo R, Marcelli M, Boitani L (2007) Survey of an otter Lutra lutra population in Southern Italy: site occupancy and influence of sampling season on species detection. Acta Theriol 52:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant D, Vasseur L, Bérubé CH (2008) Evaluating bridge survey ability to detect river otter Lontra canadensis presence: a comparative study. Wildl Biol 14:61–69. https://doi.org/10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[61:EBSATD]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu W, Swihart RK (2004) Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife – habitat models. Biol Conserv 116:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00190-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington LA, Harrington AL, Macdonald DW (2008) Estimating the relative abundance of American mink Mustela vison on lowland rivers: evaluation and comparison of two techniques. Eur J Wildlife Res 54(1):79–87

  • Harrington LA, Harrington AL, Yamaguchi N, Thom MD, Ferreras P, Windham TR, Macdonald DW (2009) The impact of native competitors on an alien invasive: temporal niche shifts to avoid interspecific aggression? Ecology 90:1207–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heggberget TM, Christensen H (1994) Reproductive timing in Eurasian otters on the coast of Norway. Ecography 17(4):339–348

  • Hines JE (2006) PRESENCE - software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters. USGS-PWRC. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.html

  • Holland AM, Schauber EM, Nielsen CK, Hellgren EC (2018) Stream community richness predicts apex predator occupancy dynamics in riparian systems. Oikos 127:1422–1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland AM, Schauber EM, Nielsen CK, Hellgren EC (2019) River otter and mink occupancy dynamics in riparian systems. J Wildl Manage 83(7):1552–1564. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooder D, Larsen K, Crowley S (2017) The role of environmental variables and sympatric meso-carnivores on the detection and occupancy of American mink during winter. Hystrix. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-28.1-11437

  • Jeffress MR, Paukert CP, Sandercock BK, Gipson PS (2011) Factors affecting detectability of river otters during sign surveys. J Wildl Manag 75:144–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.l2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk H (1995) Wild otters. Predation and populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Lazenby BT, Dickman CR (2013) Patterns of detection and capture are associated with cohabiting predators and prey. PLoS One 8:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie DI, Bailey LL, Nichols JD (2004) Investigating species co-occurrence patterns when species are detected imperfectly. J Anim Ecol 73:546–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00828.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Royle JA, Pollock KH, Baily LL, Hines JE (2006) Occupancy estimation and modeling. Elsevier, San Diego

  • Melero Y, Palazón S (2011) Visón americano - Neovison vison (Schreber,1777). In: Enciclopedia Virtual de los Vertebrados Españoles. 29 p

  • Melero Y, Palazón S, Bonesi L, Gosalbez J (2010) Relative abundance of culled and not culled American mink populations in Northeast Spain and their potential distribution: are culling campaigns effective? Biol Invasions 12:3877–3885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9778-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melero Y, Palazón S, Bonesi L, Gosàlbez J (2008) Feeding habits of three sympatric mammals in NE Spain: the American mink, the spotted genet, and the Eurasian otter. Acta Theriol 53:263–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03193123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melero Y, Palazón S, Gosàlbez J, Martelo J, Bonesi L (2013) Is the standard Eurasian otter Lutra lutra survey strategy suitable for surveying the American mink Neovison vison? Acta Theriol 58:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-012-0116-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver MK, Piertney SB, Zalewski A, Melero Y, Lambin X (2016) The compensatory potential of increased immigration following intensive American mink population control is diluted by male-biased dispersal. Biol Invasions 18:3047–3061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1199-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Palazón S (2017) Estat actual i evolució de la distribució de la llúdriga euroasiàtica (Lutra lutra) a Catalunya i Andorra. Generalitat de Catalunya. 76 pp.

  • Palazón S, Ruiz-Olmo J (1998) El visón europeo (Mustela lutreola) y el visón americano (Mustela vison) en España. ICONA, Madrid

  • Palazón S, Melero Y, Plaza M, García K, Ruiz-Olmo J, Pifarré M, Minobis B, Gosálbez J (2016) Situation of feral American mink (Neovison vison) in Catalonia: expansion, distribution, ecology and population control. Butll Inst Catalana Hist Nat 80:145–154

  • Reynolds JC, Porteus TA, Richardson SM, Leigh RJ, Short MJ (2010) Detectability of American mink using rafts to solicit field signs in a population control context. J Wildl Manag 74:1601–1606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Olmo J, Gosálbez J (1997) Observations on the sprainting behaviour of the otter Lutra lutra in the NE Spain. Acta Theriol 42:259–270. https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.97-28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Olmo J, Palazón S (1997) The diet of the European otter (Lutra lutra L., 1758) in Mediterranean freshwater habitats. J Wildl Res 2:171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Olmo J, Jiménez J (2008) Diet diversity and breeding of top predators are determined by habitat stability and structure: a case study with the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra L.). Eur J Wildl Res 55:133–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0226-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Olmo J, Munilla I, Romero R (1997) Distribution, status and colonization of the American mink Mustela vison in Spain. J Wildl Res 2:30–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Olmo J, López-Martín JM, Palazón S (2001) The influence of fish abundance on the otter (Lutra lutra) populations in Iberian Mediterranean habitats. J Zool 254:325–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836901000838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Olmo J, Olmo-Vidal JM, Mañas S, Batet A (2002) The influence of resource seasonality on the breeding patterns of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) in Mediterranean habitats. Can J Zool 2189:2178–2189. https://doi.org/10.1139/Z02-186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santulli G, Palazón S, Melero Y, Gosálbez J, Lambin X (2014) Multi-season occupancy analysis reveals large scale competitive exclusion of the critically endangered European mink by the invasive non-native American mink in Spain. Biol Conserv 176:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.002

  • Schooley RL, Cotner LA, Ahlers AA, Heske EJ, Levengood JM (2012) Monitoring site occupancy for American mink in its native range. J Wildl Manag 76:824–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.294

  • Tyrrell CL, Christy MT, Rodda GH, Amy A. Yackel Adams, Ellingson AR, Savidge JA, Dean-Bradley K, Bischof R (2009) Evaluation of trap capture in a geographically closed population of brown tree snakes on Guam. J Appl Ecol 46:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01591.x

  • Yamaguchi N, Sarno RJ, Johnson WE, O’Brien SJ, MacDonald DW (2004) Multiple paternity and reproductive tactics of free-ranging American minks, Mustela vison. J Mammal 85:432–439

  • Young J, Morgan T (2007) Animal tracking basics. Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank James Hines for his advises in relation to the setting of the models in Program PRESENCE. We also thank the language service at the University of Barcelona for revising the English, and Konrad Górski for their valuable comments on the draft manuscript.

Funding

K.G. was funded by a “Becas Chile-CONICYT” Ph.D. studentship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, University of Barcelona, 08028, Barcelona, Spain

    Karla García, Santiago Palazón & Joaquim Gosálbez

  2. Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias y Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Ambientes Sustentables (CIBAS), Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile

    Karla García

  3. Fauna and Flora Service, Department of Territory and Sustainability, Government of Catalonia, 08017, Barcelona, Spain

    Santiago Palazón

  4. CREAF, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain

    Yolanda Melero

Authors
  1. Karla García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Santiago Palazón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joaquim Gosálbez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yolanda Melero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karla García.

Additional information

Communicated by: Andrzej Zalewski

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 29 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García, K., Palazón, S., Gosálbez, J. et al. Detection probabilities of the native Eurasian otter and the invasive American mink are independent of their co-occurrence. Mamm Res 65, 459–467 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-020-00483-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-020-00483-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation