Skip to main content
Log in

Differential selection of North American and Scandinavian conifer browse by northwestern moose (Alces alces andersoni) in winter

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scandinavian moose (Alces alces) eat Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) in winter. Although North American moose are known to eat conifers such as true firs (Abies spp.) in winter, substantial consumption of pine by moose in North America has not been documented. Here, we document short-term winter preferences of human-habituated northwestern moose (Alces alces andersoni) for branches of mature North American and European conifer species as determined by a cafeteria-style feeding trial. Moose selected for species such as Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii; from which they took the smallest bite diameters) while avoiding species such as lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta; from which they took the largest bites) and hybrid white spruce (Picea glauca × engelmanii). The amount of species-specific biomass consumed by moose was negatively correlated with bite diameters taken from branches of those species and did not appear to be significantly influenced by differences in twig morphology between species. Our trial suggests that northwestern moose readily consume conifers in winter and, from the species we tested, prefer Douglas fir. While no clear preference existed between Scots pine and lodgepole pine, moose avoided lodgepole pine, but not Scots pine, relative to Douglas fir. Our trial suggests that northwestern moose are more likely to feed on the branches of Douglas fir than pine, which may be of interest to foresters managing conifers within the North American range of moose, particularly where Scots pine are being considered for planting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrén H, Angelstam P (1993) Moose browsing on Scots pine in relation to stand size and distance to forest edge. J Appl Ecol 30:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball JP, Dahlgren J (2002) Browsing damage on pine (Pinus sylvestris and P. contorta) by a migrating moose (Alces alces) population in winter: relation to habitat composition and road barriers. Scand J For Res 17:427–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky GE (1981) Food plant selection by a generalist herbivore: the moose. Ecology 62:1020–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergerud AT, Manuel F (1968) Moose damage to Balsam fir-white birch forests in central Newfoundland. J Wildl Manag 32:729–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist J, Örlander G (1996) Browsing deterrent and phytotoxic effects of roe deer repellents on Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies seedlings. Scand J For Res 11:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergström R, Hjeljord O (1987) Moose and vegetation interactions in northwestern Europe and Poland. Swed Wildl Res 1(Suppl):213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Augner M, Abbot DK (1997) A behavior mechanism for incorporating an unpalatable food in the diet of a generalist herbivore (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J Insect Behav 10:841–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkowska A, Konopko A (1994) Moose browsing on pine and willow in the Biebrza Valley, Poland. Acta Theriol 39:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant JP, Kuropat PJ (1980) Selection of winter forage by sub-arctic browsing vertebrates—the role of plant chemistry. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:261–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson AW, Rea RV, Fredeen AL (2009) Compensatory shoot growth in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) in response to simulated browsing. Alces 45:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederlund G, Ljungqvist H, Markgren G, Stælfelt F (1980) Foods of moose and roe-deer at Grimsö in central Sweden. Results of rumen content analysis. Swed Wildl Res 11:169–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrosciewicz Z (1986) Foliar moisture content variations in four coniferous tree species of central Alberta. Can J For Res 16:157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover MR, Kania GS (1988) Browsing preference of white-tailed deer for different ornamental species. Wildl Soc Bull 16:175–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Danell K, Bergström R (1989) Winter browsing by moose on two birch species: impact on food resources. Oikos 54:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danell K, Huss-Danell K, Bergström R (1985) Interactions between browsing moose and two species of birch in Sweden. Ecology 66:1867–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danell K, Niemelä P, Varvikko T, Vuorisalo T (1991) Moose browsing on Scots Pine along a gradient of plant productivity. Ecology 72:1624–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson AB (1989) Soils of the Prince George-McLeod Lake area. Report No. 23. British Columbia Soil Survey, 231p

  • Edenius L (1991) The effect of resource depletion on the feeding behaviour of a browser: winter foraging by moose on Scots pine. J Appl Ecol 28:318–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfvinga B, Ericsson T, Rosvall O (2001) The introduction of lodgepole pine for wood production in Sweden—a review. For Ecol Manag 141:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2010) Canadian climate normals 1971–2000. http://climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_normals/. Accessed Apr 2010

  • Faber WE, Edenius L (1998) Bark stripping by moose in commercial forests of Fennoscandia—a review. Alces 34:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Faison EK, Motzkin G, Foster DR, McDonald JE (2010) Moose foraging in the temperate forests of southern New England. Northeast Nat 17:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM (2004) A primer of ecological statistics. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross JE, Shipley LA, Hobbs NT, Spalinger DE, Wunder BA (1993) Functional response of herbivores in food-concentrated patches: tests of a mechanistic model. Ecology 74:778–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen Y (1983) Moose winter browsing in Norway (Viltrapport 26). Direktoratet for vilt og ferskvannsfisk, Trondheim (In Norwegian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä R, Härkönen S (2000) Thinning residues as a source of browse for moose in managed forests in Finland. Alces 36:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä R, Hokkanen P, Kooiman M, Ayguney N, Bassoulet C (2003) The impact of moose browsing on tree species composition in Finland. Alces 39:203–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder DP, Rea RV, Crowley S (2013) Diet content and overlap of sympatric mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), moose (Alces alces), and elk (Cervus elaphus) during a deep snow winter in north-central British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Wildlife Biology and Management 2:43–50

  • Jalkanen A (2001) The probability of moose damage at the stand level in southern Finland. Silva Fennica 35:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia JB, Niemelä P, Rousi M, Härkönen S (1997) Selective browsing of moose (Alces alces) on birch (Betula pendula) clones. Scand J For Res 12:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langvatn R, Hanley TA (1993) Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency. Oecologia 95:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lautenschlager RA, Crawford HS, Stokes MR, Stone TL (1997) Forest disturbance type differentially affects seasonal moose forage. Alces 33:49–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykke J (2005) Selective harvest management of a Norwegian moose population. Alces 41:9–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken GA, Johnson DE (1984) Analysis of messy data: volume I. Designed experiments. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä P, Danell K (1988) Comparison of moose browsing on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and lodgepole pine (P. contorta). J Appl Ecol 25:761–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randveer T, Heikkilä R (1996) Damage caused by moose (Alces alces L.) by bark stripping of Picea abies. Scand J For Res 11:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea RV, Hodder DP, Hjeljord O, Langen A (2010) Paper birch (Betula papyrifera) shoot selection by moose (Alces alces) following a forest-cleaning experiment. Scand J For Res 25:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renecker LA, Schwartz CC (1998) Food habits and feeding behavior. In: Franzmann AW, Schwartz CS (eds) Ecology and management of the North American moose. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 403–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Andersen R (1990) Resource limitation in a generalist herbivore, the moose Alces alces: ecological constraints on behavioural decisions. Can J Zool 68:993–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvesen S (1929) The moose and red deer in Norway. J Mammal 10:59–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley LA, Blomquist S, Danell K (1998) Diet choices made by free-ranging moose in northern Sweden in relation to plant distribution, chemistry and morphology. Can J Zool 76:1722–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley LA, Illius AW, Danell K, Hobbs NT, Spalinger DE (1999) Predicting bite size selection of mammalian herbivores: a test of a general model of diet optimization. Oikos 84:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siipilehto J, Heikkilä R (2005) The effect of moose browsing on the height structure of Scots pine saplings in a mixed stand. For Ecol Manag 205:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg K, Danell K (2001) Introduction of lodgepole pine in Sweden—ecological relevance for vertebrates. For Ecol Manag 141:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statsoft (2009) Statistica for Windows, version 9.0

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education, Boston, MA

  • Thomas DC (1990) Moose diet and use of successional forests in the Canadian taiga. Alces 26:24–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay J-P (2005) Long-term decline in white-tailed deer browse supply: can lichens and litterfall act as alternative food sources that preclude density-dependent feedbacks. Can J Zool 83:1087–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker RE, Majak W, Parkinson PD, McLean A (1976) Palatability of Douglas-fir foliage to mule deer in relation to chemical and spatial factors. J Range Manag 29:486–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ullrey DE, Youatt WG, Johnson HE, Fay LD, Brent BE (1967) Digestibility of cedar and jack pine browse for the white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manag 31:448–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Beest FM, Gundersen H, Mathisen KM, Milner JM, Skarpe C (2010) Long-term browsing impact around diversionary feeding stations of moose in southern Norway. For Ecol Manag 259:1900–1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivås HJ, Sæther B-E, Andersen R (1991) Optimal twig-size selection of a generalist herbivore, the moose Alces alces: implications for plant-herbivore interactions. J Anim Ecol 60:395–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Alexis Arada and Jenna and Caslin Rea for long hours of measuring twig morphometrics and determining bite diameters from each twig of each branch bitten by moose. None of this work would be possible if it were not for the dedication of Peter and Angelika Langen who own and operate the Northern Lights Wildlife Shelter in Smithers, British Columbia and for the loving care they give to bottle raise moose and deer as well as many other animals at the shelter each year. Thanks to Mike Jull and staff at the Aleza Lake Research Forest for providing branches, to Carolin Gallert, Emily Sawyer, Annette Zimolong, and Jenna Rea for help with the feeding trials, and to Amy von der Gönna for reviewing an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Ethical standards

The experiments described above comply with the current laws of Canada.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roy V. Rea.

Additional information

Communicated by: Kris Hundertmark

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rea, R.V., Hjeljord, O. & Härkönen, S. Differential selection of North American and Scandinavian conifer browse by northwestern moose (Alces alces andersoni) in winter. Acta Theriol 59, 353–360 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-013-0170-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-013-0170-9

Keywords

Navigation