Skip to main content
Log in

Methodological problems related to spotlight count as a census technique for Lepus europaeus in an alpine environment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Population estimations are necessary for effective conservation management. In Italy, brown hare populations are commonly censused by spotlighting, but this method does not seem to suit an alpine environment due to its vegetational and orographical complexity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the critical aspects related to spotlight census method in an alpine environment. Spotlight was carried out along two transects of a typical alpine environment. Observed animals were used to define density (number of animal seen/100 ha) and method precision (coefficient of variation (CV) applied to monthly repeated observations). Animal detectability was evaluated using half-normal function with cosine expansion (Distance 5.0®). Animal observability was evaluated by analyzing density estimates related to habitat conformation (unseen areas or full visibility). The exact surface surveyed by spotlighting was evaluated, defining the observation spotlight beam range (OTA) and the land useful sighting (LUS). In the end, LUS was classified in three patches according to hare presence: no hares, occasional hare presence, and constant hare presence. To evaluate habitat influence onto CV, we used a bootstrap simulation. The results show that spotlighting alone is not the most suitable method to apply in the alpine environment because habitat structure highly influences census results. Recommendations to improve spotlight surveys for monitoring European brown hare populations are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold GW, Steven DE, Weeldenburg JR, Smith EA (1993) Influences of remnant size, spacing pattern and connectivity on population boundaries and demography in euros Macropus robustus living in a fragmented landscape. Biol Conserv 64:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes RFW, Tapper SC (1985) A method for counting hares by spotlight. J Zool 206:273–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling. Estimating abundance of biologic populations. Oxford University Press, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkley TV (1989) Extinction in nature reserves: the effect of fragmentation and the importance of migration between fragments. Oikos 55:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G, Sinclair AR (1994) Wildlife ecology and management. Blackwell, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis ED (1982) CRC handbook of census methods for terrestrial vertebrates. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • De Battisti R, Trocchi V, Zamboni U (2002) Indagini per la definizione di un modello gestionale della lepre (Lepus europaeus) in ambiente alpino: l’esperienza della Provincia di Trento. Associazione Cacciatori della Provincia di Trento, Trento

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards GP, De Preu ND, Shakeshaft BJ, Crealy IV (2000) An evaluation of two methods of assessing feral cat and dingo abundance in central Australia. Wildl Res 27:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eltringham SK, Flux JEC (1971) Night counts of hares and other animals in East Africa. Afr J Ecol 9:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frylestam B (1981) Estimating by spotlight the population density of the European hare. Acta Theriol 26:419–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobbi G, Grimod I, Mochet AM (2001) Ricerca sull’ecologia della lepre comune Lepus europaeus in Valle d’Aosta e sugli interventi di miglioramento ambientale finalizzati alla sua conservazione. Regione Autonoma Valle d’Aosta, Aosta

  • Greig-Smith P (1957) Quantitative plant ecology. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones E, Coman BJ (1982) Ecology of the feral cat, Felis catus (L.) in south-eastern Australia. III. Home ranges and population ecology in semi-arid north-west Victoria. Aust Wildl Res 9:409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology. Longman, Menlow Park, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Langbein J, Hutchings MR, Harris S, Stoate C, Tapper SC, Wray S (1999) Techniques for assessing the abundance of brown hares Lepus europaeus. Mammal Rev 29(2):93–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon PS, Banks PB, Dickman CR (1998) Population indices for wild carnivores: a critical study in sand-dune habitat, south-western Queensland. Wildl Res 25:11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchandeau S, Gaudin JC (1994) Effets du sens du transect et de la période d’observation sur la valeur des indices kilométriques d’abondance de lapins de garenne (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Gibier Faune Sauvage 11:85–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegel M (1986) Deer Feldhasen in Beziehungsfüge seiner Um und Mitweltfaktoren. Schriften des Arbeitskreises Wildbiologie und Jagdwissenschaft an der Justus. Liebig Universität Giessen. Heft

  • R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from: http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 3 Oct 2007

  • Sharp A, Northon M, Marks A, Holmes K (2001) An evaluation of two indices of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) abundance in an arid environment. Wildl Res 28:419–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W.H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulè ME, Alberts AC, Bolger DT (1992) The effects of habitat fragmentation on chaparral plants and vertebrates. Oikos 63:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southwood R, Henderson PA (2000) Ecological methods. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Spagnesi M, Trocchi V (1993) La lepre comune. Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica. Documenti Tecnici 13, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (1996) Why census? In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Ecological census techniques: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Trocchi V, Riga F (2005) I lagomorfi in Italia. Linee guida per la conservazione e gestione. Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica. Documenti Tecnici 25, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GJ, Delahay RJ (2001) A review of methods to estimate the abundance of terrestrial carnivores using field signs and observation. Wildl Res 28:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wincentz Jensen TL (2009) Identifying causes for population decline of the brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in agricultural landscapes in Denmark. PhD Thesis. University of Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Comprensorio Alpino CN2, Valle Varaita for allowing us to gather field data and for the logistic support. Davide Bonetto, Marco Ghirardi, Omar Giordano, Livio Martino, Massimiliano Pellerino, and Andrea Rimbotti for their help in hare surveys. Jesus Pérez Jiménez who furnished useful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arianna Menzano.

Additional information

Communicated by: Karol Zub

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tizzani, P., Menzano, A., Dematteis, A. et al. Methodological problems related to spotlight count as a census technique for Lepus europaeus in an alpine environment. Acta Theriol 59, 271–276 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-013-0157-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-013-0157-6

Keywords

Navigation