Characterizing Thermal Transitions of IgG with Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

Variable temperature electrospray ionization (ESI) is coupled with mass spectrometry techniques in order to investigate structural transitions of monoclonal antibody immunoglobulin G (IgG) in a 100-mM ammonium acetate (pH 7.0) solution from 26 to 70 °C. At 26 °C, the mass spectrum for intact IgG shows six charge states + 22 to + 26. Upon increasing the solution temperature, the fraction of low-charge states decreases and new, higher-charge state ions are observed. Upon analysis, it appears that heating the solution aids in desolvation of the intact IgG precursor. Above ~ 50 °C, a cleavage event between the light and heavy chains is observed. An analysis of the kinetics for these processes at different temperatures yields transition state thermochemistry of ΔH = 95 ± 10 kJ mol−1, ΔS = 8 ± 1 J mol−1 K−1, and ΔG = 92 ± 11 kJ mol−1. The mechanism for light chain dissociation appears to involve disulfide bond scrambling that ultimately results in a non-native Cys199–Cys217 disulfide bond in the light chain product. Above ~ 70 °C, we are unable to produce a stable ESI signal. The loss of signal is ascribed to aggregation that is primarily associated with the remaining portion of the antibody after having lost the light chain.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

The immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody is a ~ 147-kDa protein in the immune system that is involved in antigen recognition and binding [1]. This molecule is often visualized by the “Y”-shaped diagram shown in Scheme 1. As shown, IgG is composed of a dimer of heterodimers (the heavy and light chains). The heterodimers are linked by two disulfide bonds. The light and heavy chains of each heterodimer are bound by a single disulfide bond. Together these regions create a highly specific antigen binding pocket called the FAB portion of the molecule that is critical for immune response [2]. In recent years, numerous monoclonal antibodies with therapeutic value have been introduced [3,4,5,6]. Because of this, an understanding of the structures and stabilities of these molecules is of fundamental importance.

Scheme 1
scheme1

IgG scheme showing the light chain (red), the heavy chain (blue), the antigen binding region (FAB), and the crystallizable region (FC). Cys or disulfide bonded cysteines are shown as black lines. Cys residues discussed in the main text are labeled. Single free cysteine is shown on each light chain

Although calorimetric studies of antibodies are routinely carried out in the development and testing of new therapeutic antibodies, these methods provide information about only the stability of the ensemble average. That is, the structural change is observed as a two-state cooperative transition, and little is known about the nature of the configurations and mechanisms leading to denatured states [7, 8]. In the work presented below, we investigate the stability of IgG using a new, variable temperature electrospray ionization (vT-ESI) source coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) measurements [9, 10]. At elevated temperatures (above 50 °C), the MS measurements reveal that the light chain of IgG dissociates, through a mechanism that involves scrambling of the disulfide bonds, resulting in the formation of a light chain product that adopts non-native Cys199–Cys217 and Cys91–Cys140 disulfide bonds. From an Arrhenius analysis of the kinetics of dissociation at varying temperatures, we derive transition state thermochemistry for dissociation process. This thermochemistry is discussed.

The present work builds on a number of new MS-based measurements that are being developed with the aim of understanding structures and structural transitions of biomolecules in solution as well as the gas phase. In the last decade, “native ESI” has enabled the study of large complexes [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Analyses of biomolecular conformations from solutions of varying composition and temperature now have an extensive history [17,18,19,20]. Differences in structures found under varying solution conditions can be investigated with a range of reaction chemistries and techniques, including isotopic hydrogen-deuterium (H-D) exchange [21,22,23,24,25,26]; fast photochemical oxidation of proteins [27,28,29,30]; chemical cross-linking [31,32,33] and other residue-specific modifications [34, 35]; and ion mobility measurements [9, 36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Once ionized, an array of physical and chemical methods can be used to investigate biomolecular structure in vacuo. These include low-energy and high-energy collisions with buffer gasses [46,47,48,49,50,51] and surfaces [52,53,54]; photodissociation techniques [55,56,57,58]; measurements of collision cross-sections with many new ion mobility methods [59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]; ion-molecule reactions, including proton transfer [67,68,69,70] and H-D exchange reactions [71,72,73,74]; ion-ion reactions [75,76,77]; and electronic and vibrational spectroscopies [78,79,80,81].

Experimental

Variable Temperature Electrospray Ionization

The solution temperature of the ESI emitter is controlled using a home-built variable temperature electrospray ionization emitter [9]. This interface holds a borosilicate glass ESI emitter which has been pulled to a narrow inner diameter of ~ 1 to 5 μm using a Flaming/Brown P-97 pipette tip puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, USA). The emitter interface is made of a thermally conductive ceramic block that is resistively heated using a cartridge heater. An ESI voltage of 0.7 to 1.0 kV is applied to a platinum wire that is inserted into the back of the emitter, making electrical connection with the solution. The temperature is measured (to a precision of ± 0.5 °C) using a K-type thermocouple that is inserted into the ceramic block.

Instrumentation

Initial experiments were performed on Waters Synapt G2 and remaining kinetics experiments were performed on Waters Synapt G2S instrument. Both instruments were used with the source interlocks overridden to accommodate the vT-ESI source [9, 82]. Source pressures and voltages that minimize ion activation were used for initial studies, summarized below [83, 84]. Backing pressures were increased to ~ 8 mbar using Speedivalve (Edwards, Burgess Hill, UK). Gas control was optimized to minimize ion activation and increase ion transmission, including flow rates in the source (20.9 mL/min), trap (10 mL/min), helium cell (180 mL/min), and IMS cell (90 mL/min). We additionally optimized and used instrument settings, including sampling cone voltage (62 V), extraction cone (1.6 V), source temperature (50 °C), cone gas (10 L/h), flow gas (0.6 bar), purge gas (100 L/h), and trap collision energy (12.6 collision energy). Finally, TriWave DC voltages were also optimized: entrance voltage (3.2 V), bias (45.3 V), trap DC (1.7 V), and exit voltage (1.3 V). We note that there are different source configurations between the Synapt G2 and the Synapt G2S that can contribute to charge state shifts, presumably due to collisional activation. This may be the origin of the charge state shift between the two sets of mass spectra presented. The analysis presented below uses only the time-of-flight mass analyzer. That is, the quadrupole is fixed to transmit all ions. The data were originally acquired as nested ion mobility mass spectra; however, only the mass dimension was used for this analysis as there were no resolvable changes in drift time distributions for these species.

Analysis of the Data

Each dataset was collected by systematically increasing the temperature from 26 to 70 °C. Samples were allowed to incubate at each temperature for at least 3 min. After this time, the mass spectra recorded at low solution temperatures (26 to 45 °C) do not appear to change for an extended period, and it appears that we have reached an equilibrium (on this timescale). At higher temperatures, the antibody dissociates. Kinetics experiments of this process were carried out by increasing the temperature to a set point and then collecting a series of 3-min acquisitions until spray was lost. Unidec [85] (Oxford, UK) was used for deconvolution of native charge state distributions. Data from both experiments were exported using TWIM extract (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) and processed using Origin2018 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). Kinetic data were fit using a first-order reaction rate of formation. Measured rate constants, k, were plotted as a function of the temperature in an Arrhenius plot and fit linearly to obtain transition state chemistry.

Sample Preparation

Immunoglobulin G (IgG1, universal antibody standard, human, ≥ 90% purity) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). IgG (1 mg) was resolubilized in 100 mM ammonium acetate solution (pH 7.0, 500 μL). Sample was buffer exchanged using a spin concentrator (molecular weight cutoff = 30,000 Da, 100 to 500 μL × 3, Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA). IgG was brought to a final concentration of 80 μM in 100 mM ammonium acetate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

Results and Discussion

Changes in ESI Charge State Distribution of IgG Precursor with Temperature

Figure 1 shows representative mass spectra for intact IgG recorded upon electrospraying a 100 mM ammonium acetate solution at 28, 32, 42, and 52 °C. At low temperatures (28 to 42 °C), a narrow distribution of IgG charge states from + 22 to + 26 and centered at + 24 is observed. As the solution temperature is increased beyond this point, a new peak corresponding to the + 27 species is observed and the + 25 and + 26 species increase in relative abundance. When the peaks in the mass spectrum are examined more carefully (see the inset in Figure 1), we find that at low temperatures, peaks are broader and extend to higher masses. As the solution temperature is increased, each charge state becomes noticeably shaper and the distribution of charge states changes. From ~ 28 to 42 °C, the abundances of the lower-charge state + 22 and + 23 species decrease with increasing temperature; in this same temperature region, the populations of + 24 through + 27 also increase. Above 42 °C, the + 24 species decreases in abundance and the + 25 species is favored. This ion reaches a maximum abundance at ~ 54 °C and decreases above this temperature. The + 26 and + 27 continue to increase until ~ 70 °C, where we no longer maintain a stable ion signal. At this temperature, the clear solution becomes turbid due to the formation of insoluble aggregates [86, 87], likely originating from IgG unfolding. The slight shift in charge state observed here is similar to that seen when tetrameric concanavalin A is heated, which was coupled to a structural change [88]. While we do not observe a change in the collision cross-sections for IgG, there have been reports that IgG undergoes structural changes between 25 and 70 °C under acidic pH [89, 90]. In these cases, highly charged MS peaks emerged at elevated temperatures, indicating that the protein had unfolded. We also find that the peaks decrease in width at elevated temperatures, suggesting that IgG emerges from hot electrospray droplets with fewer species adducted.

Figure 1
figure1

Mass spectrum showing the charge state shift observed for IgG charge states 22 to 27 at 28, 32, 42, and 52 °C (left). Inset shows + 22 species at 28 and 52 °C. The relative abundance plotted as a function of temperature for charge states + 22, + 23, + 24, + 25, + 26, and + 27. Above ~ 70 °C, spray stability is lost

High-Temperature Dissociation of the Light Chain

At low temperatures, IgG remains stable for long times. We monitored the mass spectra of a solution at 45 °C for up to ~ 15 h, and it shows no measureable change. At elevated temperatures, IgG is known to dissociate by loss of the light chain [91, 92]. Figure 2 shows mass spectra acquired after incubating solutions at 65 °C for 3, 18, or 42 min. At relatively short incubation times (3 min), the mass spectrum is dominated by peaks associated with the IgG precursor. At longer times (18 min as shown in Figure 2), the relative abundances of the IgG peaks decrease and a new, well-defined set of peaks m/z < 3000 are observed. These peaks increase in magnitude with increasing incubation time. The theoretical molecular weight of the light chain species is 22,942 Da. Using this value, we determine that the major peaks correspond to + 9 through + 13 charge states of the light chain. Once the charge states are assigned, our experimental measurement yields m = 22,943 ± 1 Da, in close agreement with the theoretical value. It is interesting that we do not observe the complementary remaining IgG fragment, which should have m ~ 124 kDa, although aggregation of this species is known to occur rapidly [87, 91].

Figure 2
figure2

Mass spectrum showing formation of light chain charge states + 9 through + 13 after incubation at 65 °C for 3, 18, and 42 min

Mechanism of Light Chain Dissociation

Before describing the kinetics experiments, we first present a possible mechanism for the covalent bond cleavage leading to the release of the light chain species. Dissociation of the light chain from the heavy chain must involve cleavage of the Cys217–Cys224 disulfide bond, between the two chains (Scheme 1). It is established that during the dissociation of the light chain, disulfide bonds can scramble [91, 93, 94]. The precursor IgG antibody used in our study has a single free Cys91 residue on each of the light chains. As we think about thermodynamic considerations, we see that disulfide scrambling upon dissociation of the light chain could stabilize the products. That is, if only the native Cys224–Cys217 bond between the heavy and light chains is cleaved, three free, unbound Cys residues would be available (Cys224 on the heavy chain; Cys217 and Cys91 on the light chain). Consider one scenario. After the Cys224–Cys217 bond is cleaved, the freed light chain might refold and in doing so scramble its disulfide bonds in order to stabilize this product. For example, if the Cys199–Cys140 disulfide bond was also to cleave, we might form a non-native Cys199–Cys217 linkage. In this case, the newly freed Cys140 residue could form a second disulfide bond with the Cys91 residue and the resulting covalent Cys140–Cys91 bond would further stabilize the light chain product. With this change, the only free Cys residue is located on the heavy chain (Cys224) and the light chain is no longer covalently linked to the heavy chain. Overall, this process is a disulfide mixing [95, 96] step with nearby Cys residues both making and breaking covalent bonds, a process that has been described previously for light chain dissociation from IgG under mildly denaturing conditions [91, 97,98,99,100]. It is likely that at elevated temperatures, a similar disulfide bond scrambling will occur.

With this idea in mind, we carried out studies to identify the location of the non-native disulfide bond. After incubation at 65 °C for 90 min, we alkylated the free Cys residues with iodoacetamide. The products of antibody dissociation were then proteolytically digested and the tryptic peptides that were formed were analyzed using a combination of chromatographic separations with MS detection (see supporting information). An analysis of the cross-linked peptides provides evidence for the non-native Cys199–Cys217 disulfide bond. Although we anticipate that the Cys91–Cys140 disulfide bond should also stabilize this fragment, we did not detect this cross-linked peptide in our analysis. We note that it would be difficult for us to fragment this species with our experiment due to its size (60 amino acids); so, the dearth of experimental information does not rule it out entirely. Overall, this result supports the idea that the mechanism for light chain dissociation involves disulfide bond scrambling.

Kinetics Measurements at Varying Temperatures

We next carried out a series of kinetics experiments at specified temperatures 57, 60, 62, and 65 °C using the vT-ESI source. Because we do not observe the IgG fragment that complements the light chain, we report kinetics based on only the increase in the light chain signal and the decrease of the intact IgG precursor (see supporting information for details). As mentioned above, it is interesting that we do not observe the complementary heavy chain fragment. We suspect that this species aggregates soon after the dissociation process. At our longest times at each temperature, where the dissociation of the intact IgG precursor approaches completion, the ESI signal is lost, consistent with this idea, and the experiment is terminated.

Examples of kinetics data recorded at several temperatures (60, 62, and 65 °C) are shown in Figure 3 for the increase in the light chain abundance with increasing time (the 57 °C data are not included because the figure appears crowded; but, an example for these data can be found in the supporting information). Examination of the kinetics shows that this process follows a simple, first-order reaction rate and can be modeled with Eq. (1),

$$ {B}_t=1-{I}_0\times {e}^{- kt}, $$
(1)

where Bt is the intensity of the light chain signal at time t, I0 is the final light chain signal upon reaction completion, and k is the rate constant.

Figure 3
figure3

Light chain signal monitored over time at 60, 62, and 65 °C, as open squares, triangles, and circles, respectively. Change in light chain abundance with time is shown modeled with first-order kinetics (black lines)

Transition State Thermochemistry Associated with Formation of the Light Chain

The rate constants obtained from the kinetics experiments shown above were used to generate the Arrhenius plot in Figure 4. This plot yields a pre-exponential factor (A = 4.33 ± 0.8 × 1013 s−1) and activation energy (Ea = 96 ± 28 kJ mol−1). This value of A indicates that accessing the transition state is very efficient—occurring near the vibrational frequency that is expected for a simple bond cleavage of a small molecule. We suggest that this may indicate that the transition state involves a very localized motion associated with cleavage of the native Cys224–Cys217 bond in the intact precursor IgG. These values can be converted into transition state thermochemistry, yielding ΔG = 92 ± 11 kJ mol−1, ΔH = 95 ± 10 kJ mol−1, and ΔS = 8 ± 1 J mol−1 K−1. The large enthalpic barrier is consistent with the cleavage of a covalent disulfide bond. Furthermore, the relatively small entropy change at the transition state suggests little change in structure. Overall, this thermochemistry is consistent with a sequential process. First, the native Cys224–Cys217 bond in the IgG precursor is cleaved. Upon cleavage, the light chain fragment refolds such that at least one and possibly two new non-native disulfide bridges (the scrambled Cys217–Cys199 bond that was detected and the Cys140–Cys91 bond that we anticipate could be formed, but was not directly detected) are formed, stabilizing the light chain product. The complementary heavy chain product of dissociation, having the single reduced free Cys224, rapidly aggregates and is not detected in our experiments.

Figure 4
figure4

Arrhenius plot showing triplicate reaction rate of formation versus inverse temperature. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the triplicate analysis

Conclusions

Variable temperature ESI and mass spectrometry have been used to investigate thermal transitions in the IgG antibody. It is found that IgG dissociates through loss of the light chain, a process that involves disulfide bond scrambling. Kinetics studies at multiple temperatures were used to determine transition state thermochemistry of ΔH = 95 ± 10 kJ mol−1, ΔS = 8 ± 1 J mol−1 K−1, and ΔG = 92 ± 11 kJ mol−1.

References

  1. 1.

    Vidarsson, G., Dekkers, G., Rispens, T.: IgG subclasses and allotypes: from structure to effector functions. Front. Immunol. 5, 520 (2014)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Arnold, J.N., Wormald, M.R., Sim, R.B., Rudd, P.M., Dwek, R.A.: The impact of glycosylation on the biological function and structure of human immunoglobulins. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25, 21–50 (2007)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Weiner, L.M., Surana, R., Wang, S.: Monoclonal antibodies: versatile platforms for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 317–327 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mellman, I., Coukos, G., Dranoff, G.: Cancer immunotherapy comes of age. Nature. 480, 480–489 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sharma, P., Allison, J.P.: The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science. 348, 56–61 (2015)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pardoll, D.M.: The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 12, 1–13 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lieberman, R.L., D’aquino, J.A., Ringe, D., Petsko, G.A.: Effects of pH and iminosugar pharmacological chaperones on lysosomal glycosidase structure and stability. Biochemistry. 48, 4816–4827 (2009)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pérez, J.M.J., Renisio, J.G., Prompers, J.J., van Platerink, C.J., Cambillau, C., Darbon, H., Frenken, L.G.J.: Thermal unfolding of a llama antibody fragment: a two-state reversible process. Biochemistry. 40, 74–83 (2001)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    El-Baba, T.J., Woodall, D.W., Raab, S.A., Fuller, D.R., Laganowsky, A., Russell, D.H., Clemmer, D.E.: Melting proteins: evidence for multiple stable structures upon thermal denaturation of native ubiquitin from ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry measurements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 6306–6309 (2017)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wang, G., Abzalimov, R.R., Kaltashov, I.A.: Direct monitoring of heat-stressed biopolymers with temperature-controlled electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 83, 2870–2876 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chorev, D.S., Baker, L.A., Wu, D., Beilsten-Edmands, V., Rouse, S.L., Zeev-Ben-Mordehai, T., Jiko, C., Samsudin, F., Gerle, C., Khalid, S., Stewart, A.G., Matthews, S.J., Grünewald, K., Robinson, C.V.: Protein assemblies ejected directly from native membranes yield complexes for mass spectrometry. Science. 362, 829–834 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Liko, I., Degiacomi, M.T., Mohammed, S., Yoshikawa, S., Schmidt, C., Robinson, C.V.: Dimer interface of bovine cytochrome c oxidase is influenced by local posttranslational modifications and lipid binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 8230–8235 (2016)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhang, J., Loo, R.R.O., Loo, J.A.: Structural characterization of a thrombin-aptamer complex by high resolution native top-down mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 28, 1815–1822 (2017)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pinkse, M.W.H., Maier, C.S., Kim, J.-I., Oh, B.-H., Heck, A.J.R.: Macromolecular assembly of Helicobacter pylori urease investigated by mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 38, 315–320 (2003)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Heck, A.J.R.: Native mass spectrometry: a bridge between interactomics and structural biology. Nat. Methods. 5, 927–933 (2008)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Susa, A.C., Xia, Z., Tang, H.Y.H., Tainer, J.A., Williams, E.R.: Charging of proteins in native mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 28, 1–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chung, E.W., Henriques, D.A., Renzoni, D., Morton, C.J., Mulhern, T.D., Pitkeathly, M.C., Ladbury, J.E., Robinson, C.V.: Probing the nature of interactions in SH2 binding interfaces - evidence from electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Protein Sci. 8, 1962–1970 (1999)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hudgins, R.R., Woenckhaus, J., Jarrold, M.F.: High resolution ion mobility measurements for gas phase proteins: correlation between solution phase and gas phase conformations. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 165, 497–507 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Winger, B.E., Hofstadler, S.A., Bruce, J.E., Udseth, H.R., Smith, R.D.: High-resolution accurate mass measurements of biomolecules using a new electrospray-ionization ion-cyclotron resonance mass-spectrometer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 4, 566–577 (1993)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Li, J., Taraszka, J.A., Counterman, A.E., Clemmer, D.E.: Influence of solvent composition and capillary temperature on the conformations of electrosprayed ions: unfolding of compact ubiquitin conformers from pseudonative and denatured solutions. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 185, 37–47 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wales, T.E., Engen, J.R.: Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry for the analysis of protein dynamics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 25, 158–170 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Houde, D., Arndt, J., Domeier, W., Berkowitz, S., Engen, J.R.: Characterization of IgG1 conformation and conformational dynamics by hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 81, 2644–2651 (2009)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Houde, D., Peng, Y., Berkowitz, S.A., Engen, J.R.: Post-translational modifications differentially affect IgG1 conformation and receptor binding. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 9, 1716–1728 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Katta, V., Chait, B.T.: Hydrogen/deuterium exchange electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: a method for probing protein conformational changes in solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 6317–6321 (1993)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Konermann, L., Pan, J., Liu, Y.-H.: Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry for studying protein structure and dynamics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 1224–1234 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chalmers, M.J., Busby, S.A., Pascal, B.D., He, Y., Hendrickson, C.L., Marshall, A.G., Griffin, P.R.: Probing protein ligand interactions by automated hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 78, 1005–1014 (2006)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Li, K.S., Shi, L., Gross, M.L.: Mass spectrometry-based fast photochemical oxidation of proteins (FPOP) for higher order structure characterization. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 736–744 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jones, L.M., Sperry, B.J., Carroll, A.J., Gross, M.L.: Fast photochemical oxidation of proteins for epitope mapping. Anal. Chem. 83, 7657–7661 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gau, B.C., Sharp, J.S., Rempel, D.L., Gross, M.L.: Fast photochemical oxidation of protein footprints faster than protein unfolding. Anal. Chem. 81, 6563–6571 (2009)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chea, E.E., Jones, L.M.: Modifications generated by fast photochemical oxidation of proteins reflect the native conformations of proteins. Protein Sci. 27, 1047–1056 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Herzog, F., Kahraman, A., Boehringer, D., Mak, R., Bracher, A., Walzthoeni, T., Leitner, A., Beck, M., Hartl, F.-U., Ban, N., Malmstroem, L., Aebersold, R.: Structural probing of a protein phosphatase 2A network by chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Science. 337, 1348–1352 (2012)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Leitner, A., Walzthoeni, T., Kahraman, A., Herzog, F., Rinner, O., Beck, M., Aebersold, R.: Probing native protein structures by chemical cross-linking, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 9, 1634–1649 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lauber, M.A., Reilly, J.P.: Novel amidinating cross-linker for facilitating analyses of protein structures and interactions. Anal. Chem. 82, 7736–7743 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ji, J., Chakraborty, A., Geng, M., Zhang, X., Amini, A., Bina, M., Regnier, F.: Strategy for qualitative and quantitative analysis in proteomics based on signature peptides. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 745, 197–210 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gygi, S.P., Rist, B., Gerber, S.A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M.H., Aebersold, R.: Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 994–999 (1999)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Pierson, N.A., Chen, L., Valentine, S.J., Russell, D.H., Clemmer, D.E.: Number of solution states of bradykinin from ion mobility and mass spectrometry measurements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 13810–13813 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Shi, H., Pierson, N.A., Valentine, S.J., Clemmer, D.E.: Conformation types of ubiquitin [M+8H] 8+ions from water:methanol solutions: evidence for the N and a states in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. B. 116, 3344–3352 (2012)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Shi, H., Clemmer, D.E.: Evidence for two new solution states of ubiquitin by IMS–MS analysis. J. Phys. Chem. B. 118, 3498–3506 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shi, L., Holliday, A.E., Shi, H., Zhu, F., Ewing, M.A., Russell, D.H., Clemmer, D.E.: Characterizing intermediates along the transition from polyproline I to polyproline II using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12702–12711 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Shi, H., Atlasevich, N., Merenbloom, S.I., Clemmer, D.E.: Solution dependence of the collisional activation of ubiquitin [M + 7H]7+ ions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 25, 2000–2008 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Shi, L., Holliday, A.E., Glover, M.S., Ewing, M.A., Russell, D.H., Clemmer, D.E.: Ion mobility-mass spectrometry reveals the energetics of intermediates that guide polyproline folding. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 27, 22–30 (2015)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Clemmer, D.E., Russell, D.H., Williams, E.R.: Characterizing the conformationome: toward a structural understanding of the proteome. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 556–560 (2017)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Fuller, D.R., Conant, C.R., El-Baba, T.J., Brown, C.J., Woodall, D.W., Russell, D.H., Clemmer, D.E.: Conformationally regulated peptide bond cleavage in bradykinin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 9357–9360 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bernstein, S.L., Wyttenbach, T., Baumketner, A., Shea, J.-E., Bitan, G., Teplow, D.B., Bowers, M.T.: Amyloid β-protein: monomer structure and early aggregation states of Aβ42 and its Pro-19 alloform. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 2075–2084 (2005)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bernstein, S.L., Dupuis, N.F., Lazo, N.D., Wyttenbach, T., Condron, M.M., Bitan, G., Teplow, D.B., Shea, J.-E., Ruotolo, B.T., Robinson, C.V., Bowers, M.T.: Amyloid-β protein oligomerization and the importance of tetramers and dodecamers in the aetiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Chem. 1, 326–331 (2009)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Tian, Y., Han, L., Buckner, A.C., Ruotolo, B.T.: Collision induced unfolding of intact antibodies: rapid characterization of disulfide bonding patterns, glycosylation, and structures. Anal. Chem. 87, 151015204733009–151015204711515 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Tian, Y., Ruotolo, B.T.: Collision induced unfolding detects subtle differences in intact antibody glycoforms and associated fragments. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 425, 1–9 (2018)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Dong, S., Wagner, N.D., Russell, D.H.: Collision-induced unfolding of partially metalated metallothionein-2A: tracking unfolding reactions of gas-phase ions. Anal. Chem. 90, 11856–11862 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Martin, S.A., Biemann, K.: A comparison of keV atom bombardment mass spectra of peptides obtained with a two-sector mass spectrometer with those from a four-sector tandem mass spectrometer. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 78, 213–228 (1987)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Johnson, R.S., Martin, S.A., Biemann, K.: Collision-induced fragmentation of (M + H)+ ions of peptides. Side chain specific sequence ions. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 86, 137–154 (1988)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Koeniger, S.L., Merenbloom, S.I., Valentine, S.J., Jarrold, M.F., Udseth, H.R., Smith, R.D., Clemmer, D.E.: An IMS−IMS analogue of MS−MS. Anal. Chem. 78, 4161–4174 (2006)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Zhou, M., Jones, C.M., Wysocki, V.H.: Dissecting the large noncovalent protein complex GroEL with surface-induced dissociation and ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 85, 8262–8267 (2013)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Quintyn, R.S., Harvey, S.R., Wysocki, V.H.: Illustration of SID-IM-SID (surface-induced dissociation-ion mobility-SID) mass spectrometry: homo and hetero model protein complexes. Analyst. 140, 7012–7019 (2015)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Dongré, A.R., Somogyi, A., Wysocki, V.H.: Surface-induced dissociation: an effective tool to probe structure, energetics and fragmentation mechanisms of protonated peptides. J. Mass Spectrom. 31, 339–350 (1996)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Little, D.P., Speir, J.P., Senko, M.W., O’Connor, P.B., McLafferty, F.W.: Infrared multiphoton dissociation of large multiply charged ions for biomolecule sequencing. Anal. Chem. 66, 2809–2815 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Shaffer, C.J., Marek, A., Pepin, R., Slovakova, K., Turecek, F.: Combining UV photodissociation with electron transfer for peptide structure analysis. J. Mass Spectrom. 50, 470–475 (2015)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Wilson, J.J., Brodbelt, J.S.: MS/MS simplification by 355 nm ultraviolet photodissociation of chromophore-derivatized peptides in a quadrupole ion trap. Anal. Chem. 79, 7883–7892 (2007)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lee, S., Valentine, S.J., Reilly, J.P., Clemmer, D.E.: Analyzing a mixture of disaccharides by IMS-VUVPD-MS. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 309, 161–167 (2012)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ewing, M.A., Glover, M.S., Clemmer, D.E.: Hybrid ion mobility and mass spectrometry as a separation tool. J. Chromatogr. A. 1439, 1–23 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Liu, F.C., Ridgeway, M.E., Park, M.A., Bleiholder, C.: Tandem trapped ion mobility spectrometry. Analyst. 143, 2249–2258 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Valentine, S.J., Koeniger, S.L., Clemmer, D.E.: A split-field drift tube for separation and efficient fragmentation of biomolecular ions. Anal. Chem. 75, 6202–6208 (2003)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    May, J.C., Russell, D.H.: A mass-selective variable-temperature drift tube ion mobility-mass spectrometer for temperature dependent ion mobility studies. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 22, 1134–1145 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Donohoe, G.C., Maleki, H., Arndt, J.R., Khakinejad, M., Yi, J., McBride, C., Nurkiewicz, T.R., Valentine, S.J.: A new ion mobility-linear ion trap instrument for complex mixture analysis. Anal. Chem. 86, 8121–8128 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Fernandez-Lima, F., Kaplan, D.A., Suetering, J., Park, M.A.: Gas-phase separation using a trapped ion mobility spectrometer. Int. J. Ion Mobil. Spectrom. 14, 93–98 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Shvartsburg, A., Anderson, A.A., Smith, G.D.R.: Pushing the frontier of high-definition ion mobility spectrometry using FAIMS. Mass Spectrom. (Tokyo). 2, S0011 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Wyttenbach, T., Bushnell, J.E., Bowers, M.T.: Salt bridge structures in the absence of solvent? The case for the oligoglycines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 5098–5103 (1998)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Ogorzalek Loo, R.R., Winger, B.E., Smith, R.D.: Proton transfer reaction studies of multiply charged proteins in a high mass-to-charge ratio quadrupole mass spectrometer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 1064–1071 (1994)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Valentine, S.J., Counterman, A.E., Clemmer, D.E.: Conformer-dependent proton-transfer reactions of ubiquitin ions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 8, 954–961 (1997)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    He, F., Ramirez, J., Lebrilla, C.B.: Evidence for an intermolecular proton-transfer reaction induced by collision in gas-phase noncovalently bound complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 4726–4727 (1999)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Gross, D.S., Schnier, P.D., Rodriguez-Cruz, S.E., Fagerquist, C.K., Williams, E.R.: Conformations and folding of lysozyme ions in vacuo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93, 3143–3148 (1996)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    McLafferty, F.W., Guan, Z., Haupts, U., Wood, T.D., Kelleher, N.L.: Gaseous conformational structures of cytochrome c. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 4732–4740 (1998)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Bohrer, B.C., Atlasevich, N., Clemmer, D.E.: Transitions between elongated conformations of ubiquitin [M+11H]11+ enhance hydrogen/deuterium exchange. J. Phys. Chem. B. 115, 4509–4515 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Valentine, S.J., Clemmer, D.E.: H/D exchange levels of shape-resolved cytochrome c conformers in the gas phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 3558–3566 (1997)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Valentine, S.J., Anderson, J.G., Ellington, A.D., Clemmer, D.E.: Disulfide-intact and -reduced lysozyme in the gas phase: conformations and pathways of folding and unfolding. J. Phys. Chem. B. 101, 3891–3900 (1997)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Li, H., Nguyen, H.H., Loo, R.R.O., Campuzano, I.D.G., Loo, J.A.: An integrated native mass spectrometry and top-down proteomics method that connects sequence to structure and function of macromolecular complexes. Nat. Chem. 10, 139–148 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Loo, R.R.O., Loo, J.A.: Salt bridge rearrangement (SaBRe) explains the dissociation behavior of noncovalent complexes. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 27, 975–990 (2016)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Hogan, J.M., Pitteri, S.J., Chrisman, P.A., McLuckey, S.A.: Complementary structural information from a tryptic N-linked glycopeptide via electron transfer ion/ion reactions and collision-induced dissociation. J. Proteome Res. 4, 628–632 (2005)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Rijs, A.M., Oomens, J.: IR spectroscopic techniques to study isolated biomolecules. Top. Curr. Chem. 364, 1–42 (2015)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Forbes, M.W., Bush, M.F., Polfer, N.C., Oomens, J., Dunbar, R.C., Williams, E.R., Jockusch, R.A.: Infrared spectroscopy of arginine cation complexes: direct observation of gas-phase zwitterions. J. Phys. Chem. A. 111, 11759–11770 (2007)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Ben Faleh, A., Warnke, S., Rizzo, T.R.: Combining ultrahigh-resolution ion-mobility spectrometry with cryogenic IR spectroscopy for the analysis of glycan mixtures. Anal. Chem. 91, 4876–4882 (2019)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Banyasz, A., Douki, T., Improta, R., Gustavsson, T., Onidas, D., Vayá, I., Perron, M., Markovitsi, D.: Electronic excited states responsible for dimer formation upon UV absorption directly by thymine strands: joint experimental and theoretical study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 14834–14845 (2012)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    El-Baba, T.J., Fuller, D.R., Woodall, D.W., Raab, S.A., Conant, C.R., Dilger, J.M., Toker, Y., Williams, E.R., Russell, D.H., Clemmer, D.E.: Melting proteins confined in nanodroplets with 10.6 μm light provides clues about early steps of denaturation. Chem. Commun. 54, 3270–3273 (2018)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Ruotolo, B.T., Benesch, J.L.P., Sandercock, A.M., Hyung, S.-J., Robinson, C.V.: Ion mobility–mass spectrometry analysis of large protein complexes. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1139–1152 (2008)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Sobott, F., Hernández, H., McCammon, M.G., Tito, M.A., Robinson, A.C.V.: A tandem mass spectrometer for improved transmission and analysis of large macromolecular assemblies. Anal. Chem. 74, 1402–1407 (2002)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Marty, M.T., Baldwin, A.J., Marklund, E.G., Hochberg, G.K.A., Benesch, J.L.P., Robinson, C.V.: Bayesian deconvolution of mass and ion mobility spectra: from binary interactions to polydisperse ensembles. Anal. Chem. 87, 4370–4376 (2015)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Chennamsetty, N., Voynov, V., Kayser, V., Helk, B., Trout, B.L.: Design of therapeutic proteins with enhanced stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 11937–11942 (2009)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Vermeer, A.W.P., Norde, W.: The thermal stability of immunoglobulin: unfolding and aggregation of a multi-domain protein. Biophys. J. 78, 394–404 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    El-Baba, T.J., Clemmer, D.E.: Solution thermochemistry of concanavalin A tetramer conformers measured by variable-temperature ESI-IMS-MS. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 443, 93–100 (2019)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Brader, M.L., Estey, T., Bai, S., Alston, R.W., Lucas, K.K., Lantz, S., Landsman, P., Maloney, K.M.: Examination of thermal unfolding and aggregation profiles of a series of developable therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Mol. Pharm. 12, 1005–1017 (2015)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Wang, G., Bondarenko, P.V., Kaltashov, I.A.: Multi-step conformational transitions in heat-treated protein therapeutics can be monitored in real time with temperature-controlled electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Analyst. 143, 670–677 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Brody, T.: Multistep denaturation and hierarchy of disulfide bond cleavage of a monoclonal antibody. Anal. Biochem. 247, 247–256 (1997)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Kamerzell, T.J., Li, M., Arora, S., Ji, J.A., Wang, Y.J.: The relative rate of immunoglobulin gamma 1 fragmentation. J. Pharm. Sci. 100, 1341–1349 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Lakbub, J.C., Shipman, J.T., Desaire, H.: Recent mass spectrometry-based techniques and considerations for disulfide bond characterization in proteins. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 410, 2467–2484 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Wang, Y., Lu, Q., Wu, S.L., Karger, B.L., Hancock, W.S.: Characterization and comparison of disulfide linkages and scrambling patterns in therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: using LC-MS with electron transfer dissociation. Anal. Chem. 83, 3133–3140 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Wang, X., Kumar, S., Singh, S.K.: Disulfide scrambling in IgG2 monoclonal antibodies: insights from molecular dynamics simulations. Pharm. Res. 28, 3128–3144 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Salas-Solano, O., Tomlinson, B., Du, S., Parker, M., Strahan, A., Ma, S.: Optimization and validation of a quantitative capillary electrophoresis sodium dodecyl sulfate method for quality control and stability monitoring of monoclonal antibodies. Anal. Chem. 78, 6583–6594 (2006)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Arosio, P., Rima, S., Morbidelli, M.: Aggregation mechanism of an IgG2 and two IgG1 monoclonal antibodies at low pH: from oligomers to larger aggregates. Pharm. Res. 30, 641–654 (2013)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Roberts, C.J.: Therapeutic protein aggregation: mechanisms, design, and control. Trends Biotechnol. 32, 372–380 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Vlasak, J., Ionescu, R.: Fragmentation of monoclonal antibodies. mAbs. 3, 253–263 (2011)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Moore, J.M., Patapoff, T.W., Cromwell, M.E.: Kinetics and thermodynamics of dimer formation and dissociation for a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor. Biochemistry. 38, 13960–13967 (1999)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part from funds from the National Institutes of Health (5R01GM117207-04 and 5R01GM121751-02).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Clemmer.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 16952 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, C.J., Woodall, D.W., El-Baba, T.J. et al. Characterizing Thermal Transitions of IgG with Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 30, 2438–2445 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-019-02292-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mass spectrometry
  • variable temperature electrospray ionization
  • antibody degradation
  • dissociation kinetics