Increasing the Upper Mass/Charge Limit of a Quadrupole Ion Trap for Ion/Ion Reaction Product Analysis via Waveform Switching

Abstract

Quadrupole ion traps (QITs) are versatile platforms for performing experiments with gas-phase ions due to their abilities to store ions of both polarities and to conduct MSn experiments. The QIT is particularly useful as a reaction cell for ion/ion reactions. In the case of an ion/ion reaction experiment in a QIT, multiply charged reactant ions may initially be of relatively low m/z (e.g., m/z < 1000) whereas the product ions can be one or more orders of magnitude higher in m/z (e.g., m/z > 100,000). Several factors can limit the m/z range over which an ion/ion reaction experiment can be conducted. These include (1) the efficiency of the detector, (2) the m/z range over which oppositely charged ions can be mutually stored, and (3) the m/z range over which ions can be mass selectively ejected into an external detector. High-frequency waveforms provide larger m/z trapping ranges for mutual storage of oppositely charged ions whereas low-frequency waveforms provide better trapping for very high m/z product ions. Presented here is a method that switches from a high-frequency sine wave prior to and during an ion/ion reaction to a low-frequency square wave to eject low m/z reagent ions and improves confinement of the product ions before mass-selective ejection by scanning the frequency of the square wave. This approach addresses the third issue, which is the primary limiting factor with QITs operated at high RF (e.g., > 900 MHz).

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Quadrupole ion traps (QITs) [1], both 3-D and linear, are widely used in mass spectrometry (MS) in part due to their small size and versatility in executing multi-stage mass spectrometry experiments (i.e., MSn), albeit with moderate-to-low resolution at usual scan rates [2]. Ion traps are particularly useful as vessels for ionic reactions due to their ability to trap ions of both polarities simultaneously over relatively wide ranges of mass-to-charge (m/z). This capability has enabled the development of tandem-in-time experiments [3] involving, for example, collisional activation [4], photodissociation [5,6,7], and ion/molecule reactions [8]. The coupling of electrospray ionization (ESI) [9, 10], with its propensity for generating multiply charged ions from relatively large molecules, with ion traps [11] has enabled the study of the reactions of oppositely charged ions [12,13,14]. Ion/ion reactions, inter alia, have proven to be robust means for charge state manipulation of high-mass ions and have been used to facilitate protein mixture analysis [15], concentration of multiple charge states into a single lower charge state [16], product ion mass determination following a dissociation reaction [17], and inversion of ions from one polarity to another [18].

Electrospray ionization, due to the multiple-charging effect, tends to generate ions over a relatively narrow m/z range. For proteins under denaturing conditions, for example, it is common to observe charge states over a range of m/z 500–2000 [19]. Under “native MS” conditions, protein and protein complex ions can exceed m/z 10,000 [20], although for a given protein or protein complex, the charge state distribution tends to be narrow. In any case, ion/ion proton transfer reactions convert lower m/z ions to higher m/z ions. In the case of MSn experiments, it is desirable to generate and transfer ions over a relatively narrow m/z range, thereby minimizing mass discrimination effects in the interface and ion transport devices and the capturing of ions injected into the trap. It is of interest to maximize MSn-1 performance as well as to optimize the final MS step after ions have been reduced in charge to give high m/z ions. Expanding the m/z range over which the QIT can be used for mass analysis is desirable for the application of ion/ion reactions to large proteins and protein complexes. The main factors that can limit the upper m/z in an ion trap ion/ion reaction experiment using mass-selective instability [21] for mass analysis are (1) external detector response, (2) the difference in m/z ratios of the reagent ions and product ions as well as the range over which both can be stored simultaneously, and (3) the m/z range associated with the mass analysis step. In this work, we describe a novel approach to maintain MSn-1 performance while improving upon the final MS step by switching from a high-frequency sine-wave used for ion accumulation and ion/ion reaction to a low-frequency square wave for mass analysis in order to address limitations associated with the third potential limitation mentioned above.

Experimental

Materials

Perfluoromethyldecalin (PMD, 512 Da) was purchased from Oakwood Chemical (Estill, SC). Acetic acid was purchased from Avantor (Radnor, PA). LC/MS grade water was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Hampton, NH). Bovine serum albumin (BSA, 66.4 kDa) and human immunoglobulin G (IgG, 150 kDa) were purchased from MilliporeSigma (St. Louis, MO). Solutions (1 mg/mL) of denatured BSA and IgG were prepared by dissolving them in 99:1 (v/v) water/acetic acid. PMD was placed in a small glass vial, and vapors from the open vial were sampled into the atmospheric sampling glow discharge ionization (ASGDI) source [22].

Mass Spectrometry

This work demonstrates a method to analyze high m/z ions in a QIT that are initially present at relatively low m/z and are transformed into lower z via ion/ion reactions. Nano-electrospray ionization (nESI) was used to introduce highly charged protein cations into the QIT. Subsequent introduction of and mutual storage with oppositely charged reagent ions reduce the charges of the protein ions. Switching the drive RF from a high-frequency sine wave to a low-frequency square wave simultaneously ejects the reagent anions and creates better trapping conditions for the high m/z product ions. A frequency scan of the square wave ejects the product ions according to m/z for mass analysis.

To operate the QIT with two different types of waveforms, custom software was developed, and an instrument controller was made. Figure 1 is a schematic of the instrumental setup. All functions were performed by the Hitex Shieldbuddy TC275 (Hitex UK Ltd.) development board. The Shieldbuddy was programmed with the Arduino IDE to understand instructions given to it from a custom Python console program. The instrument controller provided TTL outputs to switch voltages on lenses such that either positive ions from the ESI source or negative ions from the ASGDI source would be transported to the QIT and to trigger detection events. The controller also provided a – 10- to 10-V analog output as a reference value for a custom-built sine-wave generator. A clock input of 1.008 MHz dictated the frequency of the sine wave. The generated sine wave was amplified with a tank circuit and connected to the ring electrode of the QIT. Within the controller circuit board, the Shieldbuddy was connected to a direct digital synthesizer (DDS) circuit. The output of the DDS was used as a trigger to a custom-built high-voltage pulse generator that was supplied with + 200 and − 200 V. The output of the pulse generator was connected to both end cap electrodes of the QIT. Samples of denatured BSA and IgG were introduced to the instrument with nESI using + 1000 to + 1500 V applied to a wire inserted into the back of the emitter capillary [23]. PMD vapor was introduced through tubing into the glow discharge region. Typically, − 400 to − 500 V was applied to the front plate to create the discharge.

Figure 1
figure1

Schematic of the instrumental setup for waveform switching experiments. A high-frequency sine wave is applied to the ring electrode during ion injection and mutual storage to provide adequate trapping of low m/z reagent and analyte ions and high m/z product ions. A low-frequency square wave is applied to the end cap electrodes during mass analysis to provide better confinement of very high m/z product ions prior to mass selective ejection

Figure 2 illustrates a typical scan function. The protein was first introduced to the QIT followed by PMD anions while the sine wave was applied to the ring electrode. After a determined amount of time for the ion/ion reaction (typically hundreds of ms), the resulting post-ion/ion reaction spectrum was obtained either via resonance ejection (sine wave) or via frequency scanning (square wave). In the case of resonance ejection, a short RF-amplitude ramp from 3000 to 5050 V was applied directly after the ion/ion reaction period to eject residual PMD anions. The RF amplitude was then reduced to as low as 550 V and scanned up to roughly 5050 V while simultaneously applying a resonance ejection signal to the end cap electrodes. In the case of the digital ion trap (DIT) frequency scan, the low-frequency square wave was applied to the end cap electrodes while the sine wave was still on. After at least 10 ms, the sine wave was turned off. Without this overlap of the two trapping waveforms, a significant ion loss was observed. The frequency was scanned down (according to the inverse of the frequency squared) to eject product ions in increasing m/z order, linearly. Ions leaving the trap were accelerated to a detector consisting of a conversion dynode and electron multiplier. Because the low-frequency waveforms applied to the end caps interfered with the detected signal, the signal was filtered with a low-pass RC circuit before being measured. Peaks from collected time spectra were manually fit according to the range of frequencies used and relative peak spacings to determine their m/z values, and the time spectra were converted to mass spectra.

Figure 2
figure2

Typical scan function for waveform switching experiment. A high-frequency sine wave traps analyte and reagent ions during injection and mutual storage. At the end of the mutual storage step, a low-frequency square wave is applied to provide better trapping of high m/z product ions. The sine wave is then turned off, and mass analysis is accomplished with a frequency scan of the square wave

Comparison spectra were measured using resonance ejection. Circuitry and scan functions for resonance ejection experiments are not represented. In the case of the resonance ejection scan using low frequencies, the sampling rate of the detection electronics was sufficiently fast to observe individual ion packets that appear as equally spaced peaks with a period corresponding to the ejection frequency.

Results and Discussion

A traditional sine wave–driven QIT stores ions that simultaneously fall within stability boundaries in the radial and axial dimensions and in regions where the pseudopotential well depth [24] is sufficiently deep to avoid ion evaporation from the trap. The dimensionless Mathieu parameters for sine-wave 3-D ion traps are given as [1]

$$ {a}_z=\frac{8 eU}{\left(m/z\right){\varOmega}^2{r}_0^2}\kern4em {a}_r=\frac{-4 eU}{\left(m/z\right){\varOmega}^2{r}_0^2} $$
$$ {q}_z=\frac{-4 eV}{\left(m/z\right){\varOmega}^2{r}_0^2}\kern4em {q}_r=\frac{2 eV}{\left(m/z\right){\varOmega}^2{r}_0^2} $$

where U and V are the DC offset and AC amplitude of the applied waveform, respectively, Ω is the frequency of the waveform, r0 is the radius of the trap, and m/z is the mass-to-charge ratio of the ion of interest. Stable solutions are typically represented on a plot of “a vs. q”. This stability diagram predicts if an ion of a particular m/z will have stable periodic motion in a trap with a given radius and drive frequency. Most QITs are operated by holding “a” is equal to zero at all times (i.e., the DC component of the quadrupolar field is 0 V). A useful parameter for estimating the effective trapping potential is the so-called potential well-depth approximation, Du, which for a sine wave–driven ion trap is given by [25, 26]

$$ {D}_u=0.125{q}_uV $$

where u represents r or z and when the condition qu < 0.4 is satisfied. In the absence of a quadrupolar DC voltage, the upper m/z limit for ion storage in a 3-D QIT is determined by Du. The upper m/z limit for mass analysis, on the other hand, might be further limited by a practical constraint, such as the accessible amplitude of the drive RF. For example, a mass-selective instability scan using boundary ejection from a sine-wave QIT requires sufficient RF voltage amplitude to bring an ion to qz = 0.908. This possible limitation, however, has been circumvented by ejecting ions at much lower q values using resonance ejection [27]. A mass spectrum can be obtained by scanning the RF amplitude with a fixed supplemental frequency or by scanning the supplemental frequency at a fixed RF amplitude [28, 29]. The former approach leads to ejection at a fixed q value, which facilitates mass calibration and tuning of the resonance ejection voltage, whereas the latter varies the q value ejection point such that the Du values at the ejection point also vary during the scan. An alternative approach is to scan a DC voltage applied to the ring electrode [30] or to both end cap electrodes [31], referred to as a “down-scan,” leading to a scan of a values that cross the βz = 0 stability boundary. The down scan was shown to provide a higher achievable upper m/z limit than a resonance ejection scan on the same platform but with compromised resolution and a non-linear mass scale [28].

An alternate method of effecting a mass-selective instability scan via boundary ejection using a QIT is to ramp the RF frequency at fixed amplitude rather than scanning the amplitude at fixed frequency [32,33,34,35]. The advantage is that it is possible to generate deeper well depths for high m/z ions under readily accessible voltage conditions using lower drive frequencies. Sine-wave operation for a QIT is usually done at a fixed frequency using a tuned circuit to minimize power consumption. Frequency scanning of a QIT, however, is readily accomplished via the switching period between two high-voltage sources. Operated in this way, ion traps are often referred to as digital ion traps (DITs) [36]. In the case of a 50% duty cycle square-wave DIT, the qz value for boundary ejection is 0.712 and the well depth at qu < 0.3 is approximated by [37, 38]

$$ {D}_u=0.206{q}_uV $$

For both sine-wave and square-wave operations Dz = 2Dr under their respective conditions for which their respective approximations are valid. Thus, Dr is the limiting well depth value when operating at low q values.

The objective of this work was to explore the possibility of operating a QIT using a high-frequency sine wave for all stages of a multi-step experiment involving ion/ion reactions up to and including MSn-1 and then switching to DIT operation for the final mass analysis step. Figure 3 (a) shows the post-ion/ion reaction spectrum from the reactions of a distribution of bovine serum albumin (BSA) ions of charge 45+ to 65+ with anions derived from glow discharge ionization of PMD using a 2.2-kHz resonance ejection frequency (qz value of 0.003) combined with amplitude scanning (150–300 mV) at a fixed sine wave of 1.008 MHz over an RF-amplitude range of 550–5050 V0–p. The RF-voltage amplitude during the ion/ion reaction was 3000 V, which corresponds to a low mass cutoff of 370 Th and Dr = 0.9 V for BSA+. At the end of the ion/ion reaction period, the RF amplitude was ramped to 5050 V over a period of 30 ms to eject residual reagent anions. The insert to Figure 3 (a) shows a resonance ejection scan over the RF-amplitude range of 2050–5050 V with otherwise identical conditions. Peaks in the measured charge states show individual ion packets being ejected at the resonance ejection frequency due to the fast sampling rate of detection electronics. The main spectrum of Figure 3 (a) shows signals corresponding to BSA3+ and BSA2+ with no evidence for BSA+. The scanned m/z range corresponded to a nominal m/z range of 10,100–92,800 in 100 ms, yielding an approximate scan rate of 827 kTh/s. However, dropping the RF amplitude to 550 V to initiate the scan also reduced Dr for BSA+ to 0.03 V, which could lead to a loss of high m/z ions. By initiating the scan at 2050 V, thereby maintaining a minimum Dr value of 0.4 V for BSA+, a weak signal for BSA+ could be observed while reducing the scanned m/z range to 37,700–92,800. We found that the BSA+ signal disappeared after anions were ejected and RF amplitudes were decreased to less than 2000 V prior to scanning, which suggests that Du values of roughly 0.4 V or greater are needed to store BSA+ ions sufficiently well to be observed upon mass analysis. We note that it has been shown that the electric field associated with the presence of a population of low m/z ions can assist in the storage of much higher m/z ions of opposite polarity, which has been termed “trapping by proxy” [39]. This phenomenon may occur during the mutual storage ion/ion reaction period, but does not occur during the mass analysis step as the anions are removed prior to scanning. We anticipate that there is a range of Du values over which ion storage and ejection efficiencies increases from zero to a maximum value.

Figure 3
figure3

Product ions of the BSA and PMD ion/ion reaction measured with (a) resonance ejection and (b) waveform switching. Resonance ejection was performed using a RF ramp of 550 to 5050 V at 1.008 MHz and a dipolar waveform at 2.2 kHz with a scan length of 100 ms. The spectrum in the insert was measured starting the RF ramp at 2 kV and a scan length of 50 ms. The DIT frequency scan was performed using a ± 200-V square wave scanned linearly in m/z (nonlinearly in frequency) from 100 to 19 kHz over 50 ms

Figure 3 (b) shows the ion/ion product ion spectrum using the same mutual ion storage conditions for the ion/ion reaction as those for Figure 3 (a) using a DIT boundary ejection frequency scan of 100–19 kHz at an amplitude of ± 200 V. Because the switch to the low-frequency square wave created a high LMCO, no extra step was needed to eject residual reagent anions prior to mass analysis. The scan covered a nominal m/z range of 3200–88,600. This spectrum shows strong signals for both BSA2+ and BSA+, which indicates that the mutual storage conditions were able to trap BSA+ ions with good efficiency. The low BSA+ signal associated with the insert of Figure 3 (a) is therefore interpreted as arising from poor resonance ejection efficiency. The size of the trapped ion cloud is inversely related to well depth. We expect radial confinement of the ion cloud to be more important than axial confinement in determining ejection efficiency; therefore, the ion cloud may be radially too large to be ejected efficiently through the exit aperture of the end cap electrode with a Dr value of 1.4 V. In the case of the frequency scan, the Dr value for BSA+ was 0.7 V at 100 kHz and increased to roughly 15 V at its ejection frequency of 22.06 kHz. The factor of ten increase in Dr may account for the increase in observed signal. The increased confinement prior to ejection might also account for the noticeably narrower charge states measured by the frequency scan. Therefore, the limitation associated with the BSA experiment using resonance ejection at a low qz value is overcome by using a DIT RF frequency scan with boundary ejection at qz = 0.712.

Using DIT operation for mass analysis provided ample well depths for high m/z ions that were missing in resonance ejection scans at low qz values, which allowed us to identify the next limiting factor for high m/z performance of an ion/ion reaction in the current QIT. Figure 4 (a) shows the post-ion/ion reaction frequency scan for human IgG following a 300-ms ion/ion reaction period. Note that the IgG3+, IgG2+, and IgG+ charge states are observed. When the reaction period was extended to 500 ms, the spectrum of Figure 4 (b) was obtained. Note that while the IgG3+ signal was totally depleted and the IgG2+ ion was also largely depleted, the IgG+ absolute signal was little changed from the data obtained in Figure 4 (a). This suggests that the mutual storage conditions are marginally effective for storing both the PMD anions and singly charged IgG+ ions. The Dr value for the IgG+ ion under the mutual storage conditions was 0.4 V, which is the minimum well depth needed to store ions based on our studies with BSA.

Figure 4
figure4

Post-ion/ion reaction mass spectrum between PMD anions and human IgG using DIT frequency scanning after (a) 300-ms mutual storage time at an RF voltage of 3200 V during the reaction period and (b) 500-ms mutual storage time at the same RF voltage. Both spectra were measured using a ± 200-V square wave scanned linearly in m/z (nonlinearly in frequency) from 40 to 12 kHz

Conclusions

Gas-phase ion/ion reactions can present particularly challenging demands on the m/z range of a QIT due to the wide range of ion m/z ratios that can be relevant to a particular combination of reactants and products. The charge reduction of initially highly charged bio-ions and bio-ion complexes to ions of relatively low charge states presents such a challenge, especially when the reagent ions used for charge transfer are of low m/z ratio. The m/z range of a QIT is limited at the low end by the so-called low mass cutoff, which, in the absence of a DC field, is determined by the z-dimension exclusion limit. This is the point at which ions reach qz = 0.908 in a sine wave–driven QIT and qz = 0.712 for a square wave–driven QIT. The performance of a QIT used as a reaction vessel and analyzer for an ion/ion reaction at high m/z values using mass-selective instability can be limited by the performance of the detector, the ability to store both reactants and products simultaneously and the approach used to scan the ions from the ion trap. Resonance ejection at low qz values can minimize the RF-voltage amplitude needed for ion ejection but leads to shallow well depths that can result in ion evaporation or an ion cloud size that exceeds the dimensions of the exit aperture of the ion trap. Product ions can be ejected at lower voltages and from deeper well depths if the RF frequency is reduced. We show here an extension by a factor of 2–3 in upper m/z limit via mass-selective instability by switching from high-frequency sine-wave QIT operation to square-wave digital ion trap operation with frequency scanning for mass analysis after an ion/ion reaction period. In the present system using DIT operation for mass analysis, the mutual storage conditions during the ion/ion reaction period becomes the limiting factor in upper m/z performance.

References

  1. 1.

    March, R.E., Todd, J.F.J.: Quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Louris, J.N., Brodbelt-Lustig, J.S., Cooks, R.G., Glish, G.L., Van Berkel, G.J., McLuckey, S.A.: Sequential stages of mass spectrometry in a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 96, 117–137 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Johnson, J.V., Yost, R.A., Kelley, P.E., Bradford, D.C.: Tandem-in-space and tandem-in-time mass spectrometry: triple quadrupoles and quadrupole ion traps. Anal. Chem. 62, 2162–2172 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Louris, J.N., Cooks, R.G., Syka, J.E.P., Kelley, P.E., Stafford, G.C., Todd, J.F.J.: Instrumentation, applications, and energy deposition in quadrupole ion-trap tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 59, 1677–1685 (1987)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Brodbelt, J.S., Wilson, J.J.: Infrared multiphoton dissociation in quadrupole ion traps. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 28, 390–424 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Louris, J.N., Brodbelt, J.S., Cooks, R.G.: Photodissociation in a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer using a fiber optic interface. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 75, 345–352 (1987)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Brodbelt, J.S.: Photodissociation mass spectrometry: new tools for characterization of biological molecules. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 2757–2783 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vedel, F., Vedel, M., Brodbelt, J.S.: In: March, R.E., Todd, J.F.J. (eds.) Ion/molecule reactions, practical aspects of ion trap mass spectrometry, p. 1., Ch. 8. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fenn, J., Mann, M., Meng, C., Wong, S., Whitehouse, C.: Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science. 246, 64–71 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Smith, R.D., Loo, J.A., Edmonds, C.G., Barinaga, C.J., Udseth, H.R.: New developments in biochemical mass spectrometry: electrospray ionization. Anal. Chem. 62, 882–899 (1990)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Van Berkel, G.J., Glish, G.L., McLuckey, S.A.: Electrospray ionization combined with ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 62, 1284–1295 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    McLuckey, S.A., Stephenson Jr., J.L.: Ion/ion chemistry of high-mass multiply charged ions. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 17, 369–407 (1998)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Pitteri, S.J., McLuckey, S.A.: Recent developments in the ion/ion chemistry of high-mass multiply charged ions. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 24, 931–958 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Prentice, B.M., McLuckey, S.A.: Gas-phase ion/ion reactions of peptides and proteins: acid/base, redox, and covalent chemistries. Chem. Commun. 49, 947–965 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Stephenson Jr., J.L., McLuckey, S.A.: Ion/ion reactions for oligopeptide mixture analysis: application to mixtures comprised of 0.5-100 kDa components. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 9, 585–596 (1998)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    McLuckey, S.A., Reid, G.E., Wells, J.M.: Ion parking during ion/ion reactions in electrodynamic ion traps. Anal. Chem. 74, 336–346 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Stephenson Jr., J.L., McLuckey, S.A.: Simplification of product ion spectra derived from multiply-charged parent ions via ion/ion chemistry. Anal. Chem. 70, 3533–3544 (1998)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    He, M., Emory, J.F., McLuckey, S.A.: Reagent anions for charge inversion of polypeptide/protein cations in the gas phase. Anal. Chem. 77, 3173–3182 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Konermann, L., Ahadi, E., Rodriguez, A.D., Vahidi, S.: Unraveling the mechanism of electrospray ionization. Anal. Chem. 85, 2–9 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Leney, A.C., Heck, A.J.R.: Native mass spectrometry: what is in the name? J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 28, 5–13 (2017)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Stafford Jr., G.C., Kelley, P.E., Syka, J.E.P., Reynolds, W.E., Todd, J.F.J.: Recent improvements in and analytical applications of advanced ion trap mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 60, 85–98 (1984)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    McLuckey, S.A., Glish, G.L., Asano, K.G., Grant, B.C.: Atmospheric sampling glow discharge ionization source for the analysis of trace organics in ambient air. Anal. Chem. 60, 2220–2228 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Van Berkel, G.J., Asano, K.G., Schnier, P.D.: Electrochemical processes in a wire-in-a-capillary bulk-loaded, nano-electrospray emitter. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 12, 853–862 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Douglas, D.J., Berdnikov, A.S., Konenkov, N.V.: The effective potential for ion motion in a radio frequency quadrupole field revisited. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 377, 345–354 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wuerker, R.F., Shelton, H., Langmuir, R.V.: Electrodynamic containment of charged particles. J. Appl. Phys. 30, 342–349 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dehmelt, H.G.: Radiofrequency spectroscopy of stored ions I: storage. In: Bates, D.R. (ed.) Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics, vol. 3, pp. 53–72. Academic, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kaiser Jr., R.E., Cooks, R.G., Stafford Jr., G.C., Syka, J.E.P., Hemberger, P.H.: Operation of a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer to achieve high mass/charge ratios. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 106, 79–115 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Nie, Z., Cui, F., Chu, M., Chen, C.-H., Chang, H.-C., Cai, Y.: Calibration of a frequency-scan quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer for microparticle mass analysis. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 270, 8–15 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Snyder, D.T., Pulliam, C.J., Wiley, J.S., Duncan, J., Cooks, R.G.: Experimental characterization of secular frequency scanning in ion trap mass spectrometers. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 27, 1243–1255 (2016)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Todd, J.F.J., Penman, A.D., Smith, R.D.: Some alternative scanning methods for the ion trap mass spectrometer. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 106, 117–135 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Prentice, B.M., McLuckey, S.A.: Analysis of high m/z ions in a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer via an end-cap quadrupolar DC downscan. Anal. Chem. 84, 7562–7569 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Schlunegger, U.P., Stoeckli, M., Caprioli, R.M.: Frequency scan for the analysis of high mass ions generated by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization in a Paul trap. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 13, 1792–1796 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Landais, B., Beaugrand, C., Capron-Dukan, L., Sablier, M., Simonneau, G., Rolando, C.: Varying the radio frequency: a new scanning mode for quadrupole analyzers. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 12, 302–306 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ding, L., Sudakov, M., Kumashiro, S.: A simulation study of the digital ion trap mass spectrometer. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 221, 117–138 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ding, L., Sudakov, M., Brancia, F.L., Giles, R., Kumashiro, S.: A digital ion trap mass spectrometer coupled with atmospheric pressure ion sources. J. Mass Spectrom. 39, 471–484 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hoffman, N.M., Gotlib, Z.P., Opacic, B., Huntley, S.P., Moon, A.M., Donahoe, K.E.G., Brabeck, G.F., Reilly, P.T.A.: Digital waveform technology and the next generation of mass spectrometers. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 29, 331–341 (2018)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Brancia, F.L., Ding, L.: Rectangular waveform driven digital ion trap (DIT) mass spectrometer: theory and applications practical aspects of ion trap mass spectrometry. In: March, R.E., Todd, J.F.J. (eds.) , vol. IV., Ch. 4. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Reilly, P.T.A., Brabeck, G.F.: Mapping the pseudopotential well for all values of the Mathieu parameter q in digital and sinusoidal ion traps. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 392, 86–90 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    McLuckey, S.A., Wu, J., Bundy, J.L., Stephenson, J.L., Hurst, G.B.: Oligonucleotide mixture analysis via electrospray and ion/ion reactions in a quadrupole ion trap. Anal. Chem. 74, 976–984 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Grant GM R37-45372. Dr. Jeixun Bu and Dr. Eric Dziekonski are acknowledged for initiating our efforts with DIT technology as is the Purdue Chemistry Department’s Jonathan Amy Facility for Chemical Instrumentation for its role in developing and building the custom electronics used in this research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott A. McLuckey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K.W., Eakins, G.S., Carlsen, M.S. et al. Increasing the Upper Mass/Charge Limit of a Quadrupole Ion Trap for Ion/Ion Reaction Product Analysis via Waveform Switching. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 30, 1126–1132 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-019-02156-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Quadrupole ion trap
  • Ion/ion reactions
  • Digital ion trap
  • High-mass ion