Novel Selectivity-Based Forensic Toxicological Validation of a Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry Method for the Quantitative Determination of Eight Amphetamines in Whole Blood
- 229 Downloads
Paper spray tandem mass spectrometry is used to identify and quantify eight individual amphetamines in whole blood in 1.3 min. The method has been optimized and fully validated according to forensic toxicology guidelines, for the quantification of amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine (MDMA), 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-ethylamphetamine (MDEA), para-methoxyamphetamine (PMA), para-methoxymethamphetamine (PMMA), and 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA). Additionally, a new concept of intrinsic and application-based selectivity is discussed, featuring increased confidence in the power to discriminate the amphetamines from other chemically similar compounds when applying an ambient mass spectrometric method without chromatographic separation. Accuracy was within ±15% and average precision was better than 15%, and better than 20% at the LLOQ. Detection limits between 15 and 50 ng/mL were obtained using only 12 μL of whole blood.
KeywordsForensic toxicology Amphetamines Whole blood Paper spray mass spectrometry Validation Selectivity
- 9.Maher, S., Jjunju, F., Damon, D., Gorton, H., Maher, Y., Syed, S., Heeren, R., Young, I., Taylor, S., Badu-Tawiah, A.: Direct analysis and quantification of metaldehyde in water using reactive paper spray mass spectrometry. Sci. Rep. 6, 35643 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35643
- 25.United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report. 2016. Vienna, United Nations publication. http://www.unodc.org/ (2016) Accessed May 2016
- 36.Bjork, M., Simonsen, K., Andersen, D., Dalsgaard, P., Siguroardottir, S., Linnet, K., Rasmussen, B.: Quantification of 31 illicit and medicinal drugs and metabolites in whole blood by fully automated solid-phase extraction and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405, 2607–2617 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar