Effect of Mobile Phase on Electrospray Ionization Efficiency
- 1k Downloads
Electrospray (ESI) ionization efficiencies (IE) of a set of 10 compounds differing by chemical nature, extent of ionization in solution (basicity), and by hydrophobicity (tetrapropylammonium and tetraethylammonium ion, triethylamine, 1-naphthylamine, N,N-dimethylaniline, diphenylphthalate, dimethylphtahalate, piperidine, pyrrolidine, pyridine) have been measured in seven mobile phases (three acetonitrile percentages 20%, 50%, and 80%, and three different pH-adjusting additives, 0.1% formic acid, 1 mM ammonia, pH 5.0 buffer combination) using the relative measurement method. MS parameters were optimized separately for each ion. The resulting relative IE data were converted into comparable logIE values by anchoring them to the logIE of tetrapropylammonium ion taking into account the differences of ionization in different solvents and thereby making the logIE values of the compounds comparable across solvents. The following conclusions were made from analysis of the data. The compounds with pK a values in the range of the solution pH values displayed higher IE at lower pH. The sensitivity of IE towards pH depends on hydrophobicity being very strong with pyridine, weaker with N,N-dimethylaniline, and weakest with 1-naphthylamine. IEs of tetraalkylammonium ions and triethylamine were expectedly insensitive towards solution pH. Surprisingly high IEs of phthalate esters were observed. The differences in solutions with different acetonitrile content and similar pH were smaller compared with the pH effects. These results highlight the importance of hydrophobicity in electrospray and demonstrate that high hydrophobicity can sometimes successfully compensate for low basicity.
Key wordsESI Ionization efficiency Solvent effect pH Positive mode Organic phase content
This work was supported by PUT 34 from Estonian Research Council as well as the institutional funding IUT20-14 (TLOKT14014I) from the Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia, and carried out in part at the High Performance Computing Center of the University of Tartu.
- 2.Kebarle, P., Tang, L.: From ions in solution to ions in the gas phase. Anal. Chem. 65, 972–986 (1993)Google Scholar
- 24.Girod, M., Dagancy, X., Boutou, V., Broyer, M., Antoine, R., Dugourd, P., Mordehai, A., Love, C., Werlich, M., Fjeldsted, J., Stafford, G.: Profiling an electrospray plume by laser-induced fluorescence and Fraunhofer diffraction combined to mass spectrometry: influence of size and composition of droplets on charge-state distributions of electrosprayed proteins. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 9389–9396 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Kaljurand, I., Kütt, A., Sooväli, L., Rodima, T., Mäemets, V., Leito, I., Koppel, I.: Extension of the self-consistent spectrophotometric basicity scale in acetonitrile to a full span of a 28 pK(a) units: Unification of different basicity scales. J. Org. Chem. 70, 1019–1028 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Greenspan, P., Fowler, S.: Spectrofluorometric studies of the lipid probe, nile red. J. Lipid Res. 26, 781–789 (1985)Google Scholar