Swiss Journal of Palaeontology

, Volume 135, Issue 2, pp 315–325 | Cite as

On the taxonomy and osteology of the Early Eocene North American Geranoididae (Aves, Gruoidea)

Original Article

Abstract

Whereas our knowledge of small arboreal Paleogene birds has greatly increased in the past years, that of the larger birds coexisting with them is far less detailed. Particularly poorly known and, hence, widely ignored are the North American Geranoididae, of which six species were described from the Early Eocene Willwood Formation. The published material of all of these consists only of incomplete leg elements, and previous descriptions and comparisons mainly focused on selected bones. Here, a revision of some geranoidids from the Willwood Formation is undertaken, and it is concluded that the taxon Geranoides Wetmore, 1933, the type genus of the Geranoididae, is a junior synonym of Palaeophasianus Shufeldt, 1913. Eogeranoides campivagus Cracraft, 1969 is poorly differentiated from Paragrus prentici (Loomis, 1906), and a synonymy of both species also seems likely. Complete leg bones of a large Eogeranoides/Paragrus-like species are reported, which constitute the most substantial record of a geranoidid from the Willwood Formation. It is detailed that geranoidids are likely to be stem group representatives of the Gruoidea, the clade including trumpeters, cranes, and allies, and the potential occurrence of geranoidids in the Eocene of Europe is discussed.

Keywords

Fossil birds Willwood formation Wasatchian Palaeophasianus 

References

  1. Bourdon, E., Mourer-Chauviré, C., & Laurent, Y. (2016). Early Eocene birds from La Borie, southern France. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 61, 175–190.Google Scholar
  2. Clarke, J. A., Norell, M. A., & Dashzeveg, D. (2005). New avian remains from the Eocene of Mongolia and the phylogenetic position of the Eogruidae (Aves, Gruoidea). American Museum Novitates, 3494, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cracraft, J. (1968). Reallocation of the Eocene Fossil Palaeophasianus meleagroides Shufeldt. The Wilson Bulletin, 80, 281–285.Google Scholar
  4. Cracraft, J. (1969). Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (Class, Aves). 1, The Eocene family Geranoididae and the early history of the Gruiformes. American Museum Novitates, 2388, 1–41.Google Scholar
  5. Cracraft, J. (1973). Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (Class Aves). 3. Phylogeny of the suborder Grues. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 151, 1–127.Google Scholar
  6. Ericson, P. G. P., Anderson, C. L., Britton, T., Elzanowski, A., Johansson, U. S., Källersjö, M., et al. (2006). Diversification of Neoaves: Integration of molecular sequence data and fossils. Biology Letters, 2, 543–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gingerich, P. D. (1987). Early Eocene bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera) and other vertebrates in freshwater limestones of the Willwood Formation, Clark’s Fork Basin, Wyoming. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 27, 275–320.Google Scholar
  8. Karhu, A. (1997). A new species of Urmiornis (Gruiformes: Ergilornithidae) from the early Miocene of western Kazakhstan. Paleontological Journal, 31, 102–107.Google Scholar
  9. Kurochkin, E. N. (1981). New representatives and evolution of two archaic gruiform families in Eurasia. Trudy Sovmestnaja Sovetsko-Mongolskaja Paleontologicheskaja Ekspeditsija, 15, 59–85. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  10. Loomis, F. B. (1906). A fossil bird from the Wasatch. American Journal of Science, 22, series 4, 481–482.Google Scholar
  11. Mayr, G. (2009). Paleogene fossil birds. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mayr, G. (2013). Parvigruidae (Aves, core-Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayr, G. (2015). The middle Eocene European “ratite” Palaeotis (Aves, Palaeognathae) restudied once more. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 89, 503–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayr, G. (2016). Variations in the hypotarsus morphology of birds and their evolutionary significance. Acta Zoologica, 97, 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mlíkovský, J. (2002). Cenozoic birds of the world. Part 1: Europe. Praha: Ninox Press.Google Scholar
  16. Olson, S. L. (1985). The fossil record of birds. In D. S. Farner, J. R. King, & K. C. Parkes (Eds.), Avian biology (Vol. 8, pp. 79–238). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Portis, A. (1884). Contribuzioni alla ornitolitologia italiana. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, 36, 361–384.Google Scholar
  18. Prum, R. O., Berv, J. S., Dornburg, A., Field, D. J., Townsend, J. P., Moriarty Lemmon, E., & Lemmon, A. R. (2015). A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature, 526, 569–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shufeldt, R. W. (1913). Further studies of fossil birds with descriptions of new and extinct species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 32, 285–306.Google Scholar
  20. Wetmore, A. (1933). Fossil bird remains from the Eocene of Wyoming. Condor, 35, 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wetmore, A. (1934). Fossil birds from Mongolia and China. American Museum Novitates, 711, 1–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akademie der Naturwissenschaften Schweiz (SCNAT) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ornithological SectionSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum FrankfurtFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations