Skip to main content
Log in

Attraction of males of the cupreous polished chafer Protaetia pryeri pryeri (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) for pollination by an epiphytic orchid Luisia teres (Asparagales: Orchidaceae)

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Applied Entomology and Zoology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Males of the cupreous polished chafer Protaetia pryeri pryeri (Janson) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) were observed to fly toward, hover around, and land on flowers of an epiphytic orchid Luisia teres (Thunberg) Blume (Orchidaceae). Female chafers were never attracted. When on a flower, a male chafer held the lip with his legs, and then inserted his head deep into the base of the flower column, where pollinia stuck onto his frons. Subsequently some P. p. pryeri males showed pseudocopulation on the lips: downward elongation of the abdomen and extrusion of the copulatory organ. When the chafer carrying pollinia visited another flower, the pollinia were found deposited on the flower stigma. Thus this chafer was considered to be an effective pollinator for this orchid. Males were also attracted to orchid flowers covered with loose cloth that eliminated their visibility, and to a solvent extract of the flower treated on a cotton ball. Therefore, we concluded that the chafer can use olfactory cues released from the orchid flower. Chemical analysis of the nectar secreted from the flower showed that sugar content was about 2–5 %. The pseudocopulation behavior by the pollinator and the presence of nectar on the flower are intriguing and may indicate an evolutionary transitional step between rewarding and rewardless species in deceptive pollination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Ames O (1937) Pollination of orchids through pseudocopulation. Bot Mus Leafl 5:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Arakaki N, Shimoji Y, Wakamura S (2009) Camphor: an attractant for the cupreous chafer, Protaetia pryeri pryeri (Janson) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Appl Entomol Zool 44:621–625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG (1991) Insects and flowers: the biology of a partnership. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, p 408

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström G (1978) Role of volatile chemicals in Ophrys-pollinator interactions. In: Harborne JB (ed) Biochemical aspects of plant and animal coevolution. Annual Proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe. Academic, London, pp 205–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman E (1932) Pollinations of Diuris pedunculata R. Br Vic Nat 49:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzolino S, Wildmer A (2005) Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception? Trends Ecol Evol 20:487–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dafni A (1984) Mimicry and deception in pollination. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endress PK (1994) Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, London, p 511

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskett AC (2011) Orchid pollination by sexual deception: pollinator perspectives. Biol Rev 86:33–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hori S (1987) Colleoptera. In: Azuma S, Hori S, Minato K, Uesugi K, Kinjo M, Murayama N (eds) Field guide to the insects of Okinawa. Okinawa Shuppan, Okinawa, pp 78–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Jersáková J, Johnson SD, Kindlmann P (2006) Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids. Biol Rev 81:219–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kullenberg B (1961) Studies in Ophrys pollination. Zool Bid Upps 34:1–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullenberg B, Bergström G (1976) Hymenoptera Aculeata males as pollinators of Ophirys orchids. Zool Scripta 5:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeuse ADJ (1973) Co-evolution of plant hosts and their parasites as a taxonomic tool. In: Heywood VH (ed) Taxonomy and ecology. Academic, London, pp 289–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson L (1992) Orchid pollination biology. Trends Ecol Evol 7:255–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ono M, Ohba H, Murata J, Nishida M (eds) (1997) Revised Makino’s illustrated flora in colour. Hokuryukan, Tokyo, p 926

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen HÆ, Watthana S, Kocyan A, Srimuang K (2013) Pollination biology of Luisia curtisii (Orchidaceae): indications of a deceptive system operated by beetles. Plant Syst Evol 299:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RD, Scaccabarozzi D, Retter BA, Hayes C, Brown GR, Dixon KW, Peakall R (2014) Caught in the act: pollination of sexually deceptive trap-flowers by fungus gnats in Pterostylis (Orchidaceae). Ann Bot 113:629–641

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai K, Fujioka M (2007) Atlas of Japanese Scarabaeidae. Phytophagous Group I, vol 2. Roppon-Ashi Entomological Books, Tokyo, p 173

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiestl FP, Ayasse M, Paulus HF, Löfstedt C, Hansson BS, Ibarra F, Francke W (1999) Orchid pollination by sexual swindle. Nature 399:421–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenfaden G (1971) Notes on the genus Luisia. Dan Bot Ark 27:1–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Stpiczyńeska M, Davies KL, Gregg A (2003) Nectary structure and nectar secretion in Maxillaria coccinea (Jacq.) LO Williams ex Hodge (Orchidaceae). Ann Bot 93:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Takashi Kuriwada of Kagoshima University for his support with statistics. Thanks are also due to S. Glushkoff for editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norio Arakaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arakaki, N., Yasuda, K., Kanayama, S. et al. Attraction of males of the cupreous polished chafer Protaetia pryeri pryeri (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) for pollination by an epiphytic orchid Luisia teres (Asparagales: Orchidaceae). Appl Entomol Zool 51, 241–246 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-016-0396-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-016-0396-5

Keywords