Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Bayesian models for the genetic evaluation of oocytes and embryo counts in Dairy Gir cattle

  • Animal Genetics • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Count traits are usually explored in livestock breeding programs, and they usually do not fit into normal distribution, requiring alternatives to adjust the phenotype to estimate accurate genetic parameters and breeding values. Alternatively, distribution such as Poisson can be used to evaluate count traits. This study aimed to compare and discuss the genetic evaluation for oocyte and embryo counts considering Gaussian (untransformed variable — LIN; transformed by logarithm — LOG; transformed by Anscombe — ANS) and Poisson (POI) distributions. The data comprised 11,343 total oocytes (TO), viable oocytes (VO), cleaved embryos (CE), and viable embryo (VE) records of ovum pick-up from 1740 Dairy Gir heifers and cows. The genetic parameters and breeding values were estimated by the MCMCglmm package of the R software. The posterior means of heritability varied from 0.40 (LIN) to 0.49 (POI) for TO, 0.39 (LIN) to 0.49 (POI) for VO, 0.30 (LOG) to 0.41 (POI) for cleaved embryos, and 0.19 (LIN) to 0.32 (POI) for viable embryos. The posterior means of repeatability varied from 0.56 (LIN) to 0.65 (POI) for TO, 0.53 (LOG) to 0.63 (POI) for VO, 0.44 (LOG) to 0.60 (POI) for CE, and 0.36 (LOG) to 0.56 (POI) for VE. Deviance information criterion and mean squared residuals indicated that POI model should be used for the genetic evaluation of embryo and oocyte count traits. Spearman’s rank correlation between estimated breeding value (EBV) for embryo and oocyte count traits computed by POI, LOG, and ANS models was high (ranging from 0.77 to 0.99), indicating little reranking among the best animals. The POI model is the most adequate for genetic evaluation, resulting in more reliable EBV of oocyte and embryo count traits for Dairy Gir cattle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the request of the data provider.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Fazendas do Basa for kindly providing the data for this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES; Finance Code 001), Brazil, which partially funded this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Giovani Luis Feltes: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, software, writing — original draft, visualization. Gabriel Soares Campos: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, software, visualization. Fernanda Santos Silva Raidan: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, writing — review and editing. Luiz Fernando Rodrigues Feres: methodology, investigation, data curation, visualization. Virgínia Mara Pereira Ribeiro: investigation, data curation, visualization. Jaime Araujo Cobuci: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, investigation, writing — review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime Araújo Cobuci.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This is an observational study. The Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul — UFRGS Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by: Maciej Szydlowski

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feltes, G.L., Campos, G.S., Raidan, F.S.S. et al. Comparing Bayesian models for the genetic evaluation of oocytes and embryo counts in Dairy Gir cattle. J Appl Genetics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-024-00862-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-024-00862-3

Keywords

Navigation