Abstract
Indicator traits of sexual precocity are widely used as selection criteria for the genetic improvement of beef cattle; however, the impact of selection for these traits on resistance to endoparasites and ectoparasites is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the genetic and phenotypic parameters for indicator traits of sexual precocity and parasite resistance in Nellore cattle. The sexual precocity traits evaluated were probability of first calving (PFC) and scrotal circumference at 12 and 18 months of age (SC12 and SC18). The resistance-related traits included tick (TC), gastrointestinal nematode egg (NEC), and Eimeria spp. oocyst (EOC) counts. (Co)variance components were estimated by Bayesian inference using multitrait animal models. The mean heritabilities for PFC, SC12, SC18, TC, NEC, and EOC were 0.23, 0.38, 0.42, 0.14, 0.16, and 0.06, respectively, and suggest that selection will change the mean values of these traits over time. The genetic and phenotypic correlations for most pairs formed by a precocity and a resistance trait were not different from zero, suggesting that selection for sexual precocity traits will not result in changes in resistance traits. Thus, selection for indicator traits of sexual precocity does not elicit unfavorable correlated responses in resistance to endoparasites and ectoparasites, and joint selection aimed at improving these traits can be performed using multitrait selection methods, when necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this study is available from the corresponding author on request.
References
Alexander J, Stimson WH (1988) Sexual effects on parasite infection. Parasitol Today 4:186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4758(88)90075-0
Almería S, Serrano-Pérez B, López-Gatius F (2017) Immune response in bovine neosporosis: protection or contribution to the pathogenesis of abortion. Microb Pathog 109:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.05.042
Ayres DR, Pereira RJ, Boligon AA et al (2013) Linear and Poisson models for genetic evaluation of tick resistance in cross-bred Hereford x Nellore cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 130:417–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12036
Bessa AF de O, Duarte INH, Rola LD, et al (2021) Genetic evaluation for reproductive and productive traits in Brahman cattle. Theriogenology 173:261–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.08.008
Biegelmeyer P, Gulias-Gomes CC, Mozaquatro Roso V et al (2017) Tick resistance genetic parameters and its correlations with production traits in Hereford and Braford cattle. Livest Sci 202:96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.05.019
Boldt RJ, Speidel SE, Thomas MG, Enns RM (2018) Genetic parameters for fertility and production traits in Red Angus cattle. J Anim Sci 96:4100–4111. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky294
Buzanskas ME, Pires PS, Chud TCS et al (2017) Parameter estimates for reproductive and carcass traits in Nelore beef cattle. Theriogenology 92:204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.09.057
Cardoso FF, Gomes CCG, Sollero BP et al (2015) Genomic prediction for tick resistance in Braford and Hereford cattle1. J Anim Sci 93:2693–2705. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8832
Carvalho Filho I, Marques DBD, Campos CF et al (2020) Genetic parameters for fertility traits in Nellore bulls. Reprod Domest Anim 55:38–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13578
Costa EV, Ventura HT, Veroneze R et al (2019) Bayesian linear-threshold censored models for genetic evaluation of age at first calving and stayability in Nellore cattle. Livest Sci 230:103833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.103833
Day ML, Nogueira GP (2013) Management of age at puberty in beef heifers to optimize efficiency of beef production. Anim Front 3:6–11. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2013-0027
de Araujo Neto FR, Pegolo NT, Aspilcueta-Borquis RR et al (2018) Study of the effect of genotype-environment interaction on age at first calving and production traits in Nellore cattle using multi-trait reaction norms and Bayesian inference. Anim Sci J 89:939–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12994
de Camargo GMF, Porto-Neto LR, Kelly MJ et al (2015) Non-synonymous mutations mapped to chromosome X associated with andrological and growth traits in beef cattle. BMC Genomics 16:384. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1595-0
de Paula Freitas A, Santana Júnior ML, Schenkel FS et al (2021) Different selection practices affect the environmental sensitivity of beef cattle. PLOS ONE 16:e0248186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248186
De Graef J, Claerebout E, Geldhof P (2013) Anthelmintic resistance of gastrointestinal cattle nematodes. Vlaams Diergeneeskd Tijdschr. 82:113–123. https://doi.org/10.21825/vdt.v82i3.16703
Decristophoris PMA, von Hardenberg A, McElligott AG (2007) Testosterone is positively related to the output of nematode eggs in male alpine ibex (Capra ibex) faeces. https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-714
Doekes HP, Veerkamp RF, Bijma P et al (2019) Inbreeding depression due to recent and ancient inbreeding in Dutch Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Genet Sel Evol 51:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0497-z
Domingues R, Wohlres-Viana S, Reis DRL et al (2014) Expression of immune response genes in peripheral blood of cattle infested with Rhipicephalus microplus. Genet Mol Res 13:4013–4021. https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.May.23.12
Evans MR, Goldsmith AR, Norris SRA (2000) The effects of testosterone on antibody production and plumage coloration in male house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:156–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050006
Ezenwa VO, Stefan Ekernas L, Creel S (2012) Unravelling complex associations between testosterone and parasite infection in the wild: Testosterone and parasite infection. Funct Ecol 26:123–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01919.x
Fernandes Júnior GA, Silva DA, Mota LFM et al (2022) Sustainable intensification of beef production in the tropics: the role of genetically improving sexual precocity of heifers. Animals 12:174. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020174
Gianola D, Foulley J (1983) Sire evaluation for ordered categorical data with a threshold model. Genet Sel Evol 15:201. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-15-2-201
Grossman CJ (1985) Interactions between the gonadal steroids and the immune system. Science 227:257–261. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3871252
Guarini AR, Neves HHR, Schenkel FS et al (2015) Genetic relationship among reproductive traits in Nellore cattle. Animal 9:760–765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114003103
Ibelli AMG, Nakata LC, Andréo R et al (2011) mRNA profile of Nellore calves after primary infection with Haemonchus placei. Vet Parasitol 176:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.013
Ives AR (2015) For testing the significance of regression coefficients, go ahead and log-transform count data. Methods Ecol Evol 6:828–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12386
Kim I-H, Jeong J-K, Kang H-G (2022) Factors affecting reproductive outcomes in lactating dairy cows that undergo presynchronization-Ovsynch and successive resynchronization programs. Theriogenology 187:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.04.017
Loaiza-Echeverri AM, Toral FLB, Bergmann JAG et al (2013) Selection criteria for sexual precocity in Guzerat bulls raised under grazing conditions1. J Anim Sci 91:4633–4640. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6330
Lunstra DD, Ford JJ, Echternkamp SE (1978) Puberty in beef bulls: hormone concentrations, growth, testicular development, sperm production and sexual aggressiveness in bulls of different breeds1. J Anim Sci 46:1054–1062. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.4641054x
MacNeil MD, Buchanan JW, Spangler ML, Hay EH (2021) Effects of management decisions on genetic evaluation of simulated calving records using random regression. Transl Anim Sci 5:txab078. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab078
Martin LC, Brinks JS, Bourdon RM, Cundiff LV (1992) Genetic effects on beef heifer puberty and subsequent reproduction. J Anim Sci 70:4006–4017. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70124006x
Misztal I, Lourenco D, Aguilar I, Legarra A, Vitezica Z (2022) Manual for BLUPF90 family of programs. Publishing University of Georgia. http://nce.ads.uga.edu/wiki/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=blupf90_all8.pdf. Accessed 02 Nov 2022
Moreira HL, Buzanskas ME, Munari DP et al (2015) Reproductive traits selection in Nelore beef cattle. Ciênc E Agrotecnologia 39:355–362. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542015000400006
Passafaro TL, Carrera JPB, dos Santos LL et al (2015) Genetic analysis of resistance to ticks, gastrointestinal nematodes and Eimeria spp. in Nellore cattle. Vet Parasitol 210:224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.03.017
Passafaro TL, Lopes FB, Murphy TW et al (2021) Assessment of alternative models for genetic analysis of worm and tick infestation in nellore cattle. Livest Sci 244:104276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104276
Paterno FM, Buzanskas ME, Koury Filho W et al (2017) Genetic analysis of visual assessment and body weight traits and their relationships with reproductive traits in Nellore cattle. J Agric Sci 155:679–687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859617000028
Piper EK, Jackson LA, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H et al (2010) Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle. Int J Parasitol 40:431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.09.009
Pollak EJ, Quaas RL (1981) Monte Carlo study of genetic evaluations using sequentially selected records. J Anim Sci 52:257–264. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1981.522257x
Porto-Neto LR, Reverter A, Prayaga KC et al (2014) The genetic architecture of climatic adaptation of tropical cattle. PLoS ONE 9:e113284. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113284
Prayaga KC, Henshall JM (2005) Adaptability in tropical beef cattle: genetic parameters of growth, adaptive and temperament traits in a crossbred population. Aust J Exp Agric 45:971. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05045
Prayaga KC, Corbet NJ, Johnston DJ et al (2009) Genetics of adaptive traits in heifers and their relationship to growth, pubertal and carcass traits in two tropical beef cattle genotypes. Anim Prod Sci 49:413. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08247
Ribeiro VMP, Gouveia GC, de Moraes MM et al (2021) Genes underlying genetic correlation between growth, reproductive and parasite burden traits in beef cattle. Livest Sci 244:104332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104332
Rivier C, Rivest S (1991) Effect of stress on the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis: peripheral and central mechanisms1. Biol Reprod 45:523–532. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod45.4.523
Rizzo ECA, Neto FRA, Diaz IDPS et al (2015) Genetic association of productive and reproductive traits with stayability in Nellore cattle: analysis using Bayesian models. Genet Mol Res 14:14956–14966. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.November.24.3
Roberts JA (1968) Resistance of cattle to the tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). I. Development of Ticks on Bos taurus. J Parasitol 54:663. https://doi.org/10.2307/3277015
Schaeffer LR, Schenkel FS, Fries LA (1997) Selection bias on animal model evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 6th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol 25. Armidale, NSW, Australia, pp 501–508
Schleger A, Bean K (1973) The melanocyte system of cattle skin II. Melanotic melanocytes of epidermis and dermis. Aust J Biol Sci 26:985. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9730985
Schmidt PI, Campos GS, Roso VM et al (2019) Genetic analysis of female reproductive efficiency, scrotal circumference and growth traits in Nelore cattle. Theriogenology 128:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.01.032
Selye H (1939) The effect of adaptation to various damaging agents on the female sex organs in the rat. Endocrinology 25:615–624. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-25-4-615
St-Pierre AP, Shikon V, Schneider DC (2018) Count data in biology—data transformation or model reformation? Ecol Evol 8:3077–3085. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3807
Tabor AE, Ali A, Rehman G et al (2017) Cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus—host interface: a review of resistant and susceptible host responses. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00506
Toral FLB, Merlo FA, Raidan FSS et al (2019) Statistical models for the analysis of longitudinal traits in beef cattle under sequential selection. Livest Sci 230:103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.103830
Turner JW (1980) Genetic and biological aspects of zebu adaptability. J Anim Sci 50:1201–1205. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1980.5061201x
Ueno H, Gonçalves PC (1998) Manual para diagnóstico das helmintoses de ruminantes. 4ed. Japan International Cooperation Agency, Tokyo
Utsunomiya YT, Fortunato AAAD, Milanesi M et al (2022) Bos taurus haplotypes segregating in Nellore (Bos indicus) cattle. Anim Genet 53:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.13164
Wang And LA. Goonewardene Z (2004) The use of MIXED models in the analysis of animal experiments with repeated measures data. Can J Anim Sci. 84:1–11. https://doi.org/10.4141/A03-123
Wharton RH, Utech KBW (1970) The relation between engorgement and dropping of boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Ixodidae) to the assessment of tick numbers on cattle. Aust J Entomol 9:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.1970.tb00788.x
Wolf MJ, Yin T, Neumann GB et al (2021) Genome-wide association study using whole-genome sequence data for fertility, health indicator, and endoparasite infection traits in German Black Pied Cattle. Genes 12:1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081163
Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/16.2.97
Yamada PH, Codognoto VM, Rydygier de Ruediger F et al (2021) A comparison of immunological, chemical and surgical castration of Nelore bulls. Theriogenology 169:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.03.021
Zhang Q, Cui Y, Yu S et al (2022) Immunohistochemical analysis of the thymus in newborn and adult yaks (Bos grunniens). Folia Histochem Cytobiol 60:136–145. https://doi.org/10.5603/FHC.a2022.0017
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Daniel Resende Gonçalves for support the access to the farm and the dataset.
Funding
The study was financially supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Ensino de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG, PPM-00456–11, and APQ-00759–18), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, 475265/2010–6, 307939/2012–0 and 308775/2018–0).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) (Protocol 255/2010).
Conflict of interest
The author Eduardo Penteado Cardoso is the owner of Mundo Novo Farm, where the data were collected. The other authors declare this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Maciej Szydlowski.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Moraes, M.M., Gouveia, G.C., Ribeiro, V.M.P. et al. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for sexual precocity and parasite resistance traits in Nellore cattle. J Appl Genetics 64, 797–807 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-023-00781-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-023-00781-9