Abstract
The accuracy of land surface hydrological simulations using an offline land surface model (LSM) depends largely on the quality of the atmospheric forcing data. In this study, Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) forcing data and the newly developed China Meteorological Administration Land Data Assimilation System (CLDAS) forcing data are used to drive the Noah LSM with multiple parameterizations (Noah-MP) and to explore how the newly developed CLDAS forcing data improve land surface hydrological simulations over mainland China. The monthly soil moisture (SM) and evapotranspiration (ET) simulations are then compared and evaluated against observations. The results show that the Noah-MP driven by the CLDAS forcing data (referred to as CLDAS_Noah-MP) significantly improves the simulations in most cases over mainland China and its eight river basins. CLDAS_Noah-MP increases the correlation coefficient (R) values from 0.451 to 0.534 for the SM simulations at a depth range of 0–ss10 cm in mainland China, especially in the eastern monsoon area such as the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, the southern Yangtze River basin, and the Zhujiang River basin. Moreover, the root-mean-square error is reduced from 0.078 to 0.068 m3 m−3 for the SM simulations, and from 12.9 to 11.4 mm month−1 for the ET simulations over mainland China, especially in the southern Yangtze River basin and Zhujiang River basin. This study demonstrates that, by merging more in situ and remote sensing observations in regional atmospheric forcing data, offline LSM simulations can better simulate regional-scale land surface hydrological processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albergel, C., P. de Rosnay, G. Balsamo, et al., 2012: Soil moisture analyses at ECMWF: Evaluation using global ground-based in situ observations. J. Hydrometeor., 13, 1442–1460, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-0107.1.
Beaudoing, H., and M. Rodell, 2016: GLDAS Noah Land Surface Model L4 3 hourly 0.25 × 0.25 degree V2.1. Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.
Bi, H. Y., J. W. Ma, W. J. Zheng, et al., 2016: Comparison of soil moisture in GLDAS model simulations and in situ observations over the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121, 2658–2678, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024131.
Chen, F., and J. Dudhia, 2001: Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 569–585, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2.
Chen, F., Z. Janjić, and K. Mitchell, 1997: Impact of atmospheric surface-layer parameterizations in the new land-surface scheme of the NCEP mesoscale Eta model. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 85, 391–421, doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000531001463.
Chen, J., B. Z. Chen, T. A. Black, et al., 2013: Comparison of terrestrial evapotranspiration estimates using the mass transfer and Penman-Monteith equations in land surface models. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 118, 1715–1731, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002446.
Chen, Y., J. Z. Xia, S. L. Liang, et al., 2014: Comparison of satellite-based evapotranspiration models over terrestrial ecosystems in China. Remote Sens. Environ., 140, 279–293, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.045.
Dirmeyer, P. A., X. Gao, M. Zhao, et al., 2006: GSWP-2: Multimodel analysis and implications for our perception of the land surface. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 1381–1398, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-10-1381.
Dorigo, W. A., A. Xaver, M. Vreugdenhil, et al., 2013: Global automated quality control of in situ soil moisture data from the International Soil Moisture Network. Vadose Zone J., 12, doi: https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2012.0097.
He, J., and K. Yang, 2011: China Meteorological Forcing Dataset. Cold and Arid Regions Science Data Center, Lanzhou, doi: https://doi.org/10.3972/westdc.002.2014.db.
Jia, B., J. Liu, and Z. Xie, 2015: Evaluation of a multi-satellite soil moisture product and the Community Land Model 4.5 simulation in China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 12, 5151–5186, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-5151-2015.
Jia, B. H., J. G. Liu, Z. H. Xie, et al., 2018: Interannual variations and trends in remotely sensed and modeled soil moisture in China. J. Hydrometeor., 19, 831–847, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0003.1.
Jung, M., M. Reichstein, and A. Bondeau, 2009: Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: Validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model. Biogeosciences, 6, 2001–2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2001-2009.
Jung, M., M. Reichstein, P. Ciais, et al., 2010: Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply. Nature, 467, 951–954, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09396.
Jung, M., M. Reichstein, H. A. Margolis, et al., 2011: Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 116, G00J07, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001566.
Koster, R. D., M. J. Suarez, and M. Heiser, 2000: Variance and predictability of precipitation at seasonal-to-interannual timescales. J. Hydrometeor., 1, 26–46, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0026:VAPOPA>2.0.CO;2.
Koster, R. D., P. A. Dirmeyer, Z. C. Guo, et al., 2004: Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science, 305, 1138–1140, doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100217.
Lei, H. M., and D. W. Yang, 2010: Interannual and seasonal variability in evapotranspiration and energy partitioning over an irrigated cropland in the North China Plain. Agric. For. Meteor., 150, 581–589, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.01.022.
Li, J. D., F. Chen, G. Zhang, et al., 2018: Impacts of land cover and soil texture uncertainty on land model simulations over the central Tibetan Plateau. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 10, 2121–2146, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001377.
Li, X., G. D. Cheng, S. M. Liu, et al., 2013: Heihe Watershed Allied Telemetry Experimental Research (HiWATER): Scientific objectives and experimental design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 1145–1160, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00154.1.
Liu, J. G., and Z. H. Xie, 2013: Improving simulation of soil moisture in China using a multiple meteorological forcing ensemble approach. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3355–3369, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3355-2013.
Liu, J. G., B. H. Jia, Z. H. Xie, et al., 2016: Ensemble simulation of land evapotranspiration in China based on a multi-forcing and multi-model approach. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 33, 673–684, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-5213-0.
Liu, J. G., B. H. Jia, Z. H. Xie, et al., 2018: Improving the simulation of terrestrial water storage anomalies over China using a Bayesian model averaging ensemble approach. Atmos. Oceanic Sci. Lett., 11, 322–329, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2018.1484656.
Liu, S. M., Z. W. Xu, Z. L. Zhu, et al., 2013: Measurements of evapotranspiration from eddy-covariance systems and large aperture scintillometers in the Hai River Basin, China. J. Hydrol., 487, 24–38, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.025.
Liu, Y. Y., W. A. Dorigo, R. M. Parinussa, et al., 2012: Trend-preserving blending of passive and active microwave soil moisture retrievals. Remote Sens. Environ., 123, 280–297, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.03.014.
Ma, N., Y. S. Zhang, Y. H. Guo, et al., 2015: Environmental and biophysical controls on the evapotranspiration over the highest alpine steppe. J. Hydrol., 529, 980–992, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.013.
Ma, N., G.-Y. Niu, Y. L. Xia, et al., 2017: A systematic evaluation of Noah-MP in simulating land-atmosphere energy, water, and carbon exchanges over the continental United States. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 122, 12245–12268, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027597.
Ma, N., J. Szilagyi, Y. S. Zhang, et al., 2019: Complementary-relationship-based modeling of terrestrial evapotranspiration across China during 1982–2012: Validations and spatiotemporal analyses. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 124, 4326–4351, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029850.
Ma, Y., S. Kang, L. Zhu, et al., 2008: Tibetan observation and research platform: Atmosphere-land interaction over a heterogeneous landscape. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 1487–1492, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/2008bams2545.1.
Mao, J. F., W. T. Fu, X. Y. Shi, et al., 2015: Disentangling climatic and anthropogenic controls on global terrestrial evapotranspiration trends. Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 094008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094008.
Mitchell, K. E., D. Lohmann, P. R. Houser, et al., 2004: The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 109, D07S90, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003823.
Moradkhani, H., K.-L. Hsu, H. Gupta, et al., 2005: Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter. Water Resour. Res., 41, W05012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003604.
Niu, G.-Y., Z.-L. Yang, K. E. Mitchell, et al., 2011: The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 116, D12109, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139.
Oleson, K. W., G.-Y. Niu, Z.-L. Yang, et al., 2008: Improvements to the Community Land Model and their impact on the hydrological cycle. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 113, G01021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000563.
Qian, T. T., A. G. Dai, K. E. Trenberth, et al., 2006: Simulation of global land surface conditions from 1948 to 2004. Part I: Forcing data and evaluations. J. Hydrometeor., 7, 953–975, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM540.1.
Robock, A., C. A. Schlosser, K. Y. Vinnikov, et al., 1998: Evaluation of the AMIP soil moisture simulations. Global Planet. Change, 19, 181–208, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(98)00047-2.
Robock, A., K. Y. Vinnikov, G. Srinivasan, et al., 2000: The Global Soil Moisture Data Bank. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 1281–1300, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<1281:TGSMDB>2.3.CO;2.
Rodell, M., P. R. Houser, U. Jambor, et al., 2004: The Global Land Data Assimilation System. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85, 381–394, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-85-3-381.
Sheffield, J., G. Goteti, and E. F. Wood, 2006: Development of a 50-year high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling. J. Climate, 19, 3088–3111, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3790.1.
Shen, Y., P. Zhao, Y. Pan, et al., 2014: A high spatiotemporal gauge-satellite merged precipitation analysis over China. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 3063–3075, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020686.
Shi, C. X., Z. H. Xie, H. Qian, et al., 2011: China land soil moisture EnKF data assimilation based on satellite remote sensing data. Sci. China Earth Sci., 54, 1430–1440, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-010-4160-3.
Shi, C. X., L. P. Jiang, T. Zhang, et al., 2014: Status and plans of CMA land data assimilation system (CLDAS) project. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 16, EGU2014–5671.
Shi, X. Y., J. F. Mao, P. E. Thornton, et al., 2013: Spatiotemporal patterns of evapotranspiration in response to multiple environmental factors simulated by the Community Land Model. Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 024012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024012.
Sun, S. B., B. Z. Chen, Q. Q. Shao, et al., 2017: Modeling evapotranspiration over China’s landmass from 1979 to 2012 using multiple land surface models: Evaluations and analyses. J. Hydrometeor., 18, 1185–1203, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0212.1.
Vinukollu, R. K., J. Sheffield, E. F. Wood, et al., 2012: Multimodel analysis of energy and water fluxes: Intercomparisons between operational analyses, a land surface model, and remote sensing. J. Hydrometeor., 13, 3–26, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1372.1.
Wang, A. H., and X. B. Zeng, 2011: Sensitivities of terrestrial water cycle simulations to the variations of precipitation and air temperature in China. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D02107, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014659.
Wang, A. H., X. B. Zeng, and D. L. Guo, 2016: Estimates of global surface hydrology and heat fluxes from the Community Land Model (CLM4.5) with four atmospheric forcing datasets. J. Hydrometeor., 17, 2493–2510, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0041.1.
Wang, K. C., and R. E. Dickinson, 2012: A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability. Rev. Geophys., 50, RG2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000373.
Wei, J. F., P. A. Dirmeyer, and Z. C. Guo, 2008: Sensitivities of soil wetness simulation to uncertainties in precipitation and radiation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L15703, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034494.
Xia, Y. L., K. E. Mitchell, M. B. Ek, et al., 2012: Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 2. Validation of model-simulated streamflow. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 117, D03110, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016051.
Xia, Y. L., J. Sheffield, M. B. Ek, et al., 2014: Evaluation of multi-model simulated soil moisture in NLDAS-2. J. Hydrol., 512, 107–125, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.027.
Xia, Y. L., T. W. Ford, Y. H. Wu, et al., 2015: Automated quality control of in situ soil moisture from the North American Soil Moisture Database using NLDAS-2 products. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 54, 1267–1282, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0275.1.
Xia, Y. L., B. A. Cosgrove, K. E. Mitchell, et al., 2016: Basin-scale assessment of the land surface water budget in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational and research NLDAS-2 systems. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121, 2750–2779, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023733.
Yan, C. H., W. L. Zhao, Y. Wang, et al., 2017: Effects of forest evapotranspiration on soil water budget and energy flux partitioning in a subalpine valley of China. Agric. For. Meteor., 246, 207–217, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.07.002.
Yang, F., H. Lu, K. Yang, et al., 2017: Evaluation of multiple forcing data sets for precipitation and shortwave radiation over major land areas of China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5805–5821, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5805-2017.
Yang, K., J. Qin, L. Zhao, et al., 2013: A multiscale soil moisture and freeze-thaw monitoring network on the third pole. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 1907–1916, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00203.1.
Yang, Z.-L., G.-Y. Niu, K. E. Mitchell, et al., 2011: The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 2. Evaluation over global river basins. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 116, D12110, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015140.
Yu, G. R., X. F. Wen, X. M. Sun, et al., 2006: Overview of China-FLUX and evaluation of its eddy covariance measurement. Agric. For. Meteor., 137, 125–137, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.02.011.
Zhao, P., X. D. Xu, F. Chen, et al., 2018: The third atmospheric scientific experiment for understanding the Earth-atmosphere coupled system over the Tibetan Plateau and its effects. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 99, 757–776, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0050.1.
Zhao, P., Y. Q. Li, X. L. Guo, et al., 2019: The Tibetan Plateau surface-atmosphere coupling system and its weather and climate effects: The Third Tibetan Plateau Atmospheric Science Experiment. J. Meteor. Res., 33, 375–399, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-019-8602-3.
Zheng, H., and Z.-L. Yang, 2016: Effects of soil-type datasets on regional terrestrial water cycle simulations under different climatic regimes. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121, 14387–14402, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025187.
Zreda, M., W. J. Shuttleworth, X. Zeng, et al., 2012: COSMOS: The Cosmic-ray Soil Moisture Observing System. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 4079–4099, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4079-2012.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank NOAA and CMA/NMIC for providing GLDAS and CLDAS meteorological forcing datasets, the CMA/NMIC for providing in situ SM observations, and the Max Planck Institute for providing ET product.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91437220 and 41405083), Project Fund from the Education Department of Hunan Province (14C0897), and Huaihua University Double First-Class Initiative in Applied Characteristic Discipline of Control Science and Engineering.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Shi, C., Sun, S. et al. Improving Land Surface Hydrological Simulations in China Using CLDAS Meteorological Forcing Data. J Meteorol Res 33, 1194–1206 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-019-9067-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-019-9067-0