Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Validation of Column-Averaged Dry-Air Mole Fraction of CO2 Retrieved from OCO-2 Using Ground-Based FTS Measurements

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Meteorological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to correctly use the column-averaged atmospheric CO2 dry-air mole fraction (XCO2) data in the CO2 flux studies, XCO2 measurements retrieved from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) in 2015 were compared with those obtained from the global ground-based high-resolution Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) participating in the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON). The XCO2 retrieved from three observing modes adopted by OCO-2, i.e., nadir, target, and glint, were separately validated by the FTS measurements at up to eight TCCON stations located in different areas. These comparisons show that OCO-2 glint mode yields the best qualitative estimations of CO2 concentration among the three operational approaches. The overall results regarding the glint mode show no obvious systematic biases. These facts may indicate that the glint concept is appropriate for not only oceans but also land regions. Negative systematic biases in nadir and target modes have been found at most TCCON sites. The standard deviations of XCO2 retrieved from target and nadir modes within the observation period are similar, and larger than those from glint mode. We also used the FTS site in Beijing, China, to assess the OCO-2 XCO2 in 2016. This site is located in a typical urban area, which has been absent in previous studies. Overall, OCO-2 XCO2 agrees well with that from FTS at this site. Such a study will benefit the validation of the newly launched TanSat products in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bi Y. M., Z. D. Yang, S. Y. Gu, et al., 2014: Impacts of aerosol and albedo on TanSat CO2 retrieval using the near infrared CO2 bands. Proceedings Volume 9259, Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere, Clouds, and Precipitation V, 925915 (8 November 2014), SPIE Asia–Pacific Remote Sensing Conference, Beijing, China, doi: 10.1117/12.2066123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bösch H., G. C. Toon, B. Sen, et al., 2006: Space-based near-infrared CO2 measurements: Testing the Orbiting Carbon Observatory retrieval algorithm and validation concept using SCIAMACHY observations over Park Falls, Wisconsin. J. Geophys. Res., 111, D23302, doi: 10.1029/2006JD007080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp D., 2015: Measuring atmospheric carbon dioxide from space with the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2). Proceedings Volume 9607, Earth Observing Systems XX, 960702 (8 September 2015), SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications Conference, San Diego, California, USA, doi: 10. 1117/12.2187291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp D., R. M. Atlas, F.-M. Breon, et al., 2004: The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) mission. Adv. Space Res., 34, 700–709, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2003.08.062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith D. W. T., Hurst D. F., Jiménez R., et al., 2010: Calibration of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network using aircraft profile data. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1351–1362, doi: 10.5194/amt-3-1351-2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo L. J., L. P. Lei, and Z. C. Zeng, 2013: Spatiotemporal correlation analysis of satellite-observed CO2: Case studies in China and USA. 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 21–26 July, IEEE, 1835–1838, doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2013.6723158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerling D. M., A. M. Michalak, C. O’Dell, et al., 2012: Global CO2 distributions over land from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT). Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L08804, doi: 10.1029/2012GL051203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hase F., J. W. Hannigan, M. T. Coffey, et al., 2004: Intercomparison of retrieval codes used for the analysis of high-resolution, ground-based FTIR measurements. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf., 87, 25–52, doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2003.12.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandrake L., O’Dell C. W., Wunch, et al., 2015: Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) Warn Level, Bias Correction, and Lite File Product Description, Tech. Rep., Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. 44 pp. Available at https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/information/ documents?title=OCO-2%20Documents. Accessed on 10 December 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrelli A., R. Bennartz, C. W. O’Dell, et al., 2015: Estimating bias in the OCO-2 retrieval algorithm caused by 3-D radiation scattering from unresolved boundary layer clouds. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1641–1656, doi: 10.5194/amt-8-1641-2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller C. E., D. Crisp, P. L. De Cola, et al., 2007: Precision requirements for space-based XCO2 data. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10314, doi: 10.1029/2006JD007659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morino I., O. Uchino, M. Inoue, et al., 2011: Preliminary validation of column-averaged volume mixing ratios of carbon dioxide and methane retrieved from GOSAT short-wavelength infrared spectra. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1061–1076, doi: 10.5194/amt-4-1061-2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natraj V., H. Boesch, R. J. D. Spurr, et al., 2008: Retrieval of XCO2 from simulated Orbiting Carbon Observatory measurements using the fast linearized R-2OS radiative transfer model. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11212, doi: 10.1029/2007JD009017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell C. W., B. Connor, H. Bösch, et al., 2012: The ACOS CO2 retrieval algorithm—Part 1: Description and validation against synthetic observations. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 99–121, doi: 10.5194/amt-5-99-2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterman G., B. Fisher, D. Wunch, et al., 2015a: OCO-2 observation and validation overview: Observations data modes and target observations taken during the first 15 months of operations. AGU Fall Meeting, San Franciso, 14–18 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman G., A. Eldering, C. Avis, et al., 2015b: Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) Data Product User’s Guide, Operational L1 and L2 Data Versions 7 and 7R. Tech. Rep., Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. 73 pp. Available at https://disc.gsfc. nasa.gov/information/documents?title=OCO-2%20Documents. Accessed on 10 December 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter M., H. Bovensmann, M. Buchwitz, et al., 2011: Retrieval of atmospheric CO2 with enhanced accuracy and precision from SCIAMACHY: Validation with FTS measurements and comparison with model results. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D04301, doi: 10.1029/2010JD015047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadić J. M., X. Qiu, V. Yadav, et al., 2015: Mapping of satellite Earth observations using moving window block kriging. Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3311–3319, doi: 10.5194/gmd-8-3311-2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadić J. M., X. M. Qiu, S. Miller, et al., 2017: Spatio-temporal approach to moving window block kriging of satellite data v1.0. Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 709–720, doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-709-2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wargan K., and L. Coy, 2016: Strengthening of the tropopause inversion layer during the 2009 sudden stratospheric warming: A MERRA-2 study. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 1871–1887, doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0333.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washenfelder R. A., G. C. Toon, J.-F. Blavier, et al., 2006: Carbon dioxide column abundances at the Wisconsin Tall Tower site. J. Geophys. Res., 111, D22305, doi: 10.1029/2006JD007154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden J. R., G. Doran, S. Kulawik, et al., 2017: Evaluation and attribution of OCO-2 XCO2 uncertainties. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2759–2771, doi: 10.5194/amt-10-2759-2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunch D., G. C. Toon, P. O. Wennberg, et al., 2010: Calibration of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network using aircraft profile data. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1351–1362, doi: 10.5194/amt-3-1351-2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunch D., G. C. Toon, J.-F. L. Blavier, et al., 2011: The Total Carbon Column Observing Network. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. London A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci., 369, 2087–2112, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunch D., P. O. Wennberg, G. Osterman, et al., 2017: Comparisons of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) XCO2 measurements with TCCON. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2209–2238, doi: 10.5194/amt-10-2209-2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokota T., Y. Yoshida, N. Eguchi, et al., 2009: Global concentrations of CO2 and CH4 retrieved from GOSAT: First preliminary results. SOLA, 5, 160–163, doi: 10.2151/sola.2009-041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The OCO-2 data were produced by the OCO-2 project at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, and obtained from the OCO-2 data archive maintained at the NASA Goddard Earth Science Data and Information Services Center. TCCON data were obtained from the TCCON Data Archive, hosted by the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) before September 2017 and has now been transitioned to tccon.caltech.edu. We thank S. Arnold and D. Feist from the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry in Jena, Germany, for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, 100081, China

    Yanmeng Bi, Qian Wang, Zhongdong Yang, Jie Chen & Wenguang Bai

Authors
  1. Yanmeng Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhongdong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jie Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wenguang Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongdong Yang.

Additional information

Supported by the TanSat Project (2011AA12A104) under a contract with the National Science and Technology Support Program of China.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bi, Y., Wang, Q., Yang, Z. et al. Validation of Column-Averaged Dry-Air Mole Fraction of CO2 Retrieved from OCO-2 Using Ground-Based FTS Measurements. J Meteorol Res 32, 433–443 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-018-7118-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-018-7118-6

Key words

Search

Navigation