Abstract
With the Zebiak–Cane model, the present study investigates the role of model errors represented by the nonlinear forcing singular vector (NFSV) in the “spring predictability barrier” (SPB) phenomenon in ENSO prediction. The NFSV-related model errors are found to have the largest negative effect on the uncertainties of El Ni˜no prediction and they can be classified into two types: the first is featured with a zonal dipolar pattern of SST anomalies (SSTA), with the western poles centered in the equatorial central–western Pacific exhibiting positive anomalies and the eastern poles in the equatorial eastern Pacific exhibiting negative anomalies; and the second is characterized by a pattern almost opposite to the first type. The first type of error tends to have the worst effects on El Ni˜no growth-phase predictions, whereas the latter often yields the largest negative effects on decaying-phase predictions. The evolution of prediction errors caused by NFSVrelated errors exhibits prominent seasonality, with the fastest error growth in spring and/or summer; hence, these errors result in a significant SPB related to El Ni˜no events. The linear counterpart of NFSVs, the (linear) forcing singular vector (FSV), induces a less significant SPB because it contains smaller prediction errors. Random errors cannot generate an SPB for El Ni˜no events. These results show that the occurrence of an SPB is related to the spatial patterns of tendency errors. The NFSV tendency errors cause the most significant SPB for El Ni˜no events. In addition, NFSVs often concentrate these large value errors in a few areas within the equatorial eastern and central–western Pacific, which likely represent those areas sensitive to El Ni˜no predictions associated with model errors. Meanwhile, these areas are also exactly consistent with the sensitive areas related to initial errors determined by previous studies. This implies that additional observations in the sensitive areas would not only improve the accuracy of the initial field but also promote the reduction of model errors to greatly improve ENSO forecasts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barkmeijer, J., T. Iversen, and T. N. Palmer, 2003: Forcing singular vectors and other sensitive model structures. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 2401–2423.
Blanke, B., J. D. Neelin, and D. Gutzler, 1997: Estimating the effect of stochastic wind stress forcing on ENSO irregularity. J. Climate, 10, 1473–1486.
Blumenthal, M. B., 1991: Predictability of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate, 4, 766–784.
Chen, D. K., S. E., Zebiak, A. J. Busalacchi, et al., 1995: An improved procedure for El Niño forecasting: Implications for predictability. Science, 269, 1699–1702.
Chen, D. K., M. A. Cane, A. Kaplan, et al., 2004: Predictability of El Niño over the past 148 years. Nature, 428, 733–736.
Dommenget, D., and Y. S. Yu, 2016: The seasonally changing cloud feedbacks contribution to the ENSO seasonal phase-locking. Climate Dyn., doi: 10.1007/s00382-016-3034-6.
Dommenget, D., T., Bayr, and C. Frauen, 2013: Analysis of the non-linearity in the pattern and time evolution of El Niño–Southern Oscillation. Climate Dyn., 40, 2825–2847.
Duan Wansuo and Zhang Rui, 2010: Is model parameter error related to a significant spring predictability barrier for El Niño events? Results from a theoretical model. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 27, 1003–1013.
Duan, W. S., and C. Wei, 2012: The “spring predictability barrier” for ENSO predictions and its possible mechanism: Results from a fully coupled model. Int. J. Climatol., 33, 1280–1292, doi: 10.1002/joc.3513.
Duan, W. S., and F. F. Zhou, 2013: Non-linear forcing singular vector of a two-dimensional quasigeostrophic model. Tellus A, 65, 18452.
Duan, W. S., and P. Zhao, 2015: Revealing the most disturbing tendency error of Zebiak–Cane model associated with El Niño predictions by nonlinear forcing singular vector approach. Climate Dyn., 44, 2351–2367, doi: 10.1007/s00382-014-2369-0.
Duan, W. S., and J. Y. Hu, 2016: The initial errors that induce a significant “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events and their implications for target observation: Results from an earth system model. Climate Dyn., 46, 3599–3615, doi: 10.1007/s00382-015-2789-5.
Duan, W. S., X. C. Liu, K. Y. Zhu, et al., 2009: Exploring the initial errors that cause a significant “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events. J. Geophys. Res., 114, C04022, doi: 10.1029/2008JC004925.
Flügel, M., and P. Chang, 1998: Does the predictability of ENSO depend on the seasonal cycle? J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 3230–3243.
Gebbie, G., and E. Tziperman, 2009: Predictability of SST-modulated westerly wind bursts. J. Climate, 22, 3894–3909.
Jin, E. K., J. L. Kinter III, B. Wang, et al., 2008: Current status of ENSO prediction skill in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. Climate Dyn., 31, 647–664.
Kirtman, B. P., J. Shukla, M. Balmaseda, et al., 2002: Current status of ENSO forecast skill: A report to the climate variability and predictability (CLIVAR) Numerical Experimentation Group (NEG). CLIVAR Working Group on seasonal to interannual prediction, 31 pp. (Available online at http://www.cliver.org/publications/wgpreports/wgsip/nin o3/report.html.)
Kleeman, R., 1991: A simple model of the atmospheric response to ENSO sea surface temperature anomalies. J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 3–19.
Latif, M., D. Anderson, T. Barnett, et al., 1998: A review of the predictability and prediction of ENSO. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14375–14393.
Latif, M., T. P. Barnett, M. A. Cane, et al., 1994: A review of ENSO prediction studies. Climate Dyn., 9, 167–179.
Lau, K. M., and S. Yang, 1996: The Asian monsoon and predictability of the tropical ocean–atmosphere system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 945–957.
Levine, A. F. Z., and M. J., McPhaden, 2015: The annual cycle in ENSO growth rate as a cause of the spring predictability barrier. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 5034–5041.
Liu, Z. Y., 2002: A simple model study of ENSO suppression by external periodic forcing. J. Climate, 15, 1088–1098.
Lopez, H., and B. P. Kirtman, 2014: WWBs, ENSO predictability, the spring barrier and extreme events. J. Geophys. Res., 19, 10114–10138, doi: 10.1002/2014JD021908.
Luo, J. J., S. Masson, S. K. Behera, et al., 2008: Extended ENSO predictions using a fully coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate, 21, 84–93.
Marshall, A. G., O. Alves, and H. H. Hendon, 2009: A coupled GCM analysis of MJO activity at the onset of El Niño. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 966–983.
McCreary, J. P. Jr., and D. L. T. Anderson, 1991: An overview of coupled ocean–atmosphere models of El Niño and the Southern Oscillation. J. Geophy. Res., 96, 3125–3150.
McPhaden, M. J., 2003: Tropical Pacific Ocean heat content variations and ENSO persistence barriers. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1480, doi: 10.1029/2003GL016 872.
McPhaden, M. J., S. E. Zebiak, and M. H. Glantz, 2006: ENSO as an integrating concept in earth science. Science, 314, 1740–1745.
Moore, A. M., and R. Kleeman, 1996: The dynamics of error growth and predictability in a coupled model of ENSO. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 1405–1446.
Mu Mu, Duan Wansuo, and Wang Jiacheng, 2002: The predictability problems in numerical weather and climate prediction. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 19, 191–204.
Mu, M., W. S. Duan, and B. Wang, 2003: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation and its applications. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 10, 493–501.
Mu, M., H. Xu, and W. S. Duan, 2007a: A kind of initial errors related to “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events in Zebiak–Cane model. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L03709, doi: 10.1029/2006GL-27412.
Mu, M., W. S. Duan, and B. Wang, 2007b: Seasondependent dynamics of nonlinear optimal error growth and El Niño–Southern Oscillation predictability in a theoretical model. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10113, doi: 10.1029/2005JD006981.
Mu, M., Y. S. Yu, H. Xu, et al., 2014: Similarities between optimal precursors for ENSO events and optimally growing initial errors in El Niño predictions. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 115, 461–469. doi: 10.1007/s00704-013-0909-x.
Penland, C, and T. Magorian, 1993: Prediction of Niño 3 sea surface temperatures using linear inverse modeling. J. Climate, 6, 1067–1076.
Roads, J. O., 1987: Predictability in the extended range. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 3495–3527.
Samelson, R. M., and E. Tziperman, 2001: Instability of the chaotic ENSO: The growth-phase predictability barrier. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 3613–3625.
Stein, K., N. Schneider, A. Timmermann, et al., 2010: Seasonal synchronization of ENSO events in a linear stochastic model. J. Climate, 23, 5629–5643.
Stuecker, M. F., A. Timmermann, F. F. Jin, et al., 2013: A combination mode of the annual cycle and the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Nature Geoscience, 6, 540–544.
Stuecker, M. F., F. F. Jin, A. Timmermann, et al., 2015: Combination mode dynamics of the anomalous northwest pacific anticyclone. J. Climate, 28, 1093–1111.
Syu, H. H., and J. D. Neelin, 2000: ENSO in a hybrid coupled model. Part I: Sensitivity to physical parametrizations. Climate Dyn., 16, 19–34.
Tang, Y. M., R. Kleeman, and A. M. Moore, 2008: Comparison of information-based measures of forecast uncertainty in ensemble ENSO prediction. J. Climate, 21, 230–247.
Torrence, C., and P. J. Webster, 1998: The annual cycle of persistence in the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 1985–2004.
Webster, P. J., 1995: The annual cycle and the predictability of the tropical coupled ocean–atmosphere system. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 56, 33–55.
Webster, P. J., and S. Yang, 1992: Monsoon and ENSO: Selectively interactive systems. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 118, 877–926.
Williams, P. D., 2005: Modelling climate change: The role of unresolved processes. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 363, 2931–2946.
Wu, D. H., D. L. T. Anderson, and M. K. Davey, 1993: ENSO variability and external impacts. J. Climate, 6, 1703–1717.
Xue, Y., M. A. Cane, S. E. Zebiak, et al., 1994: On the prediction of ENSO: A study with a low-order Markov model. Tellus A, 46, 512–528.
Yu, L. S., R. A. Weller, and W. T. Liu, 2003: Case analysis of a role of ENSO in regulating the generation of westerly wind bursts in the western equatorial Pacific. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3128, doi: 10.1029/2002JC001498.
Yu, Y. S., W. S. Duan, H. Xu, et al., 2009: Dynamics of nonlinear error growth and season-dependent predictability of El Niño events in the Zebiak–Cane model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 2146–2160.
Yu, Y. S., M. Mu, and W. S. Duan, 2012a: Does model parameter error cause a significant “Spring Predictability Barrier” for El Niño events in the Zebiak–Cane Model? J. Climate, 25, 1263–1277.
Yu, Y. S., M. Mu, W. S. Duan, et al., 2012b: Contribution of the location and spatial pattern of initial error to uncertainties in El Niño predictions. J. Geophys. Res., 117, C06018, doi: 10.1029/2011JC007758.
Zavala-Garay, J., A. M. Moore, and R. Kleeman, 2004: Influence of stochastic forcing on ENSO prediction. J. Geophys. Res., 109, C11007, doi: 10.1029/2004 JC002406.
Zebiak, S. E., and M. A. Cane, 1987: A model El Niño–Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 2262–2278.
Zhang, R. H., S. E. Zebiak, R. Kleeman, et al., 2003: A new intermediate coupled model for El Niño simulation and prediction. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, doi: 10.1029/2003GL018010.
Zheng, F., and J. Zhu., 2010: Coupled assimilation for an intermediated coupled ENSO prediction model. Ocean Dynamics, 60, 1061–1073.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the China Meteorological Administration Special Public Welfare Research Fund (GYHY201306018), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41230420 and 41525017), and National Program on Global Change and Air–Sea Interactions (GASI-IPOVAI-06).
Supported by the China Meteorological Administration Special Public Welfare Research Fund (GYHY201306018), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41230420 and 41525017), and National Program on Global Change and Air–Sea Interactions (GASI-IPOVAI-06).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duan, W., Zhao, P., Hu, J. et al. The role of nonlinear forcing singular vector tendency error in causing the “spring predictability barrier” for ENSO. J Meteorol Res 30, 853–866 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-016-6011-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-016-6011-4