Journal of Meteorological Research

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 386–400 | Cite as

Model analysis of radar echo split observed in an artificial cloud seeding experiment



An artificial cloud seeding experiment was performed over the Japan Sea in winter to show how massive seeding could be effective to mitigate heavy snowfall damage. The results showed that 20 min after cloud seeding, a portion of the radar echo beneath the seeding track was weakened to divide the radar echo into two parts. In order to analyze the results, a numerical simulation was conducted by using the Weather Research and Forecasting model verion 3.5.1. In this simulation, the seeding effects were represented as phenomena capable of changing rain particles by accreting cloud ice and snow to form graupel particles and by changing cloud liquid water to snow particles. The graupel particles fell rapidly, thus temporarily intensifying the rainfall, which subsequently decreased. Therefore, the weakened radar echo in the field experiment is deemed to have been caused by the increase in rapidly falling graupel particles.

Key words

heavy snowfall artificial cloud seeding numerical experiment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alberta Research Council, 1986: Research and operations 1980–1985: Weather modification in Alberta. Summary report and recommendations.Google Scholar
  2. Byers, H. R., 1965: Elements of Cloud Physics. The University of Chicago Press, 191 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Ćurić, M., D. Janc, and V. Vućković, 2007: Cloud seeding impact on precipitation as revealed by cloudresolving mesoscale model. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 95, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guo, X. L., G. G. Zheng, and D. Z. Jin, 2006: A numerical comparison study of cloud seeding by silver iodide and liquid carbon dioxide. Atmos. Res., 79, 183–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guo Xueliang, Fu Danhong, Li Xingyu, et al., 2015: Advances in cloud physics and weather modification in China. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 32, 230–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hashino, T., and G. J. Tripoli, 2007: The spectral ice habit prediction system (SHIPS). Part I: Model description and simulation of the vapor deposition process. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2210–2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hobbs, P. V., and M. K. Politovich, 1980: The structures of summer convective clouds in eastern Montana. II: Effects of artificial seeding. J. Appl. Meteor., 19, 664–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holroyd, E. W., and J. E. Jiusto, 1971: Snowfall from a heavily seeded cloud. J. Appl. Meteor., 10, 266–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ikawa, M., H. Mizuno, T. Matsuo, et al., 1991: Numerical modeling of the convective snow cloud over the sea of Japan. Precipitation mechanism and sensitivity to ice crystal nucleation rates. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 69, 641–667.Google Scholar
  10. Kova·cević, N., and M. ćurić, 2014: Sensitivity study of the influence of cloud droplet concentration on hail suppression effectiveness. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 123, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marwitz, J. D., and R. E. Stewart, 1981: Some seeding signatures in Sierra storms. J. Appl. Meteor., 20, 1129–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Milivoj, B. G., S. B. Marković, M. Zorn, et al., 2013: Is hail suppression useful in Serbia?—General review and new results. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 53, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller, J. R., Jr., E. I. Boyd, R. A. Schleusener, et al., 1975: Hail suppression data from western North Dakota, 1969–1972. J. Appl. Meteor., 14, 755–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mlawer, E. J., S. J. Taubman, P. D. Brown, et al., 1997: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16663–16682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosenfeld, D., and W. L. Woodley, 1989: Effects of cloud seeding in West Texas. J. Appl. Meteor., 28, 1050–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Seto, J., K. Tomine, K. Wakimizu, et al., 2011: Artificial cloud seeding using liquid carbon dioxide: Comparisons of experimental data and numerical analyses. J. Appl. Meteor., 50, 1417–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thompson, G., P. R. Field, R. M. Rasmussen, et al., 2008: Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: Implementation of a new snow parameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 5095–5115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tomine, K., S. Masaki, W. Kenji, et al., 2015: An example of canal formation in a thick cloud induced by massive seeding using liquid carbon dioxide. J. Meteor. Res., 29, 682–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Woodley, W. L., J. Jordan, A. Barnston, et al., 1982: Rainfall results of the Florida area cumulus experiment, 1970–76. J. Appl. Meteor., 21, 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Xue, L. L., A. Hashimoto, M. Murakami, et al., 2013: Implementation of a silver iodide cloud-seeding parameterization in WRF. Part I: Model description and idealized 2D sensitivity tests. J. Appl. Meteor., 52, 1433–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Meteorological Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth and Ocean SciencesNational Defense AcademyYokosukaJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringKyushu UniversityMotooka, Nishiku, FukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations