Abstract
The sensitivity of a regional climate model (RCM) to cumulus parameterization (CUPA) schemes in modeling summer precipitation over East Asia has been investigated by using the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University-National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model (PSU-NCAR MM5). The feasibility of physical ensemble and the effect of interior (spectral) nudging are also assessed. The RCM simulations are evaluated against the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data and NCEP/CPC precipitation data for three summers (JJA) in 1991, 1998, and 2003. The results show that the RCM is highly sensitive to CUPA schemes. Different CUPA schemes cause distinctive characteristics in the modeling of JJA precipitation and the intraseasonal (daily) variability of regional precipitation. The sensitivity of the RCM simulations to the CUPA schemes is reduced by adopting the spectral nudging technique, which enables the RCM to reproduce more realistic large-scale circulations at the upper levels of the atmosphere as well as near the surface, and better precipitation simulation in the selected experiments. The ensemble simulations using different CUPA schemes show higher skills than individual members for both control runs and spectral nudging runs. The physical ensemble adopting the spectral nudging technique shows the highest downscaling skill in capturing the general circulation patterns for all experiments and improved temporal distributions of precipitation in some regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anthes, R. A., 1983: Regional models of the atmosphere in middle latitudes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 111, 1306–1335.
Antic, S., R. Laprise, B. Denis, and de El’a R., 2004: Testing the downscaling ability of a one-way nested regional climate model in regions of complex topography. Clim. Dyn., 23, 473–493.
Arakawa, A., 2004: The cumulus parameterization problem: past, present, and future. J. Climate, 17, 2493–2525.
Betts, A. K., and M. J. Miller, 1986: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II: Single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, ATEX and Arctic airmass data sets. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 693–709.
Briegleb, B. P., 1992: Delta-Eddington approximation for solar radiation in the NCAR community climate model. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 7603–7612.
Castro, C. L., R. A. Pielke Sr., and G. Leoncini, 2005: Dynamical downscaling: Assessment of value retained and added using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). J. Geophys. Res., 110, D05, 108, doi:10.1029/2004JD004,721.
—, —, and J. O. Adegoke, 2007a: Investigation of the summer climate of the contiguous U.S. and Mexico using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). Part I: Model climatology (1950–2002). J. Climate, 20, 3844–3865.
—, —, J. Adegoke, S. D. Schubert, and P. J. Pegion, 2007b: Investigation of the summer climate of the contiguous U.S. and Mexico using the Regional AtmosphericModeling System (RAMS). Part II:Model climate variability. J. Climate, 20, 3866–3887.
Chen, F., and J. Dudhia, 2001: Coupling and advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 569–585.
Christensen, J., and O. Christensen, 2003: Severe summertime flooding in Europe. Nature, 421, 805–806.
Denis, B., R. Laprise, D. Caya, and J. Côté, 2002: Downscaling ability of one-way nested regional climate models: The big brother experiment. Clim. Dyn., 18, 627–646.
Dudhia, J., and Coauthors, 2001: PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Modeling System Tutorial Class Notes and Users’ Guide (MM5 Modeling System Version 3). http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5/mm5v3/tutorial/teachyourself.html.
Emanuel, K. A., and D. J. Raymond, 1993: The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models. Meteor. Monogr., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 46, 246 pp.
Feser, F., 2006: Enhanced detectability of added value in limited-area model results separated into different spatial scales. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2180–2190.
Fu, C. B., and Coauthors, 2005: Regional climate model intercomparison project for Asia. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 257–266.
Gao, X. J., Z. C. Zhao, Y. H. Ding, R. H. Huang, and F. Giorgi, 2001: Climate change due to greenhouse effects in China as simulated by a regional climate model. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 18(6), 1224–1230.
—, Y. Xu, Z. C. Zhao, J. S. Pal, and F. Giorgi, 2006: On the role of resolution and topography in the simulation of East Asian precipitation. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 86, 173–185, doi: 10.1007/s00704-005-0214-4.
—, Y. Shi, R. Y. Song, F. Giorgi, Y. G. Wang, and D. F. Zhang, 2008: Reduction of future monsoon precipitation over China: Comparison between a high resolution RCM simulation and the driving GCM. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 100, 73–86. doi: 10.1007/s00703-008-0296-5.
Giorgi, F., 2006: Regional climate modeling: Status and perspectives. J. Phys. IV, 139, 101–118.
Grell, G. A., 1993: Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus arameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 764–787.
Gochis, D. J., W. J. Shuttleworth, and Z. L. Yang, 2002: Sensitivity of the modeled northern American monsoon regional climate to convective parameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1282–1297.
Hong, S. Y., and H. L. Pan, 1996: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2322–2339.
IPCC 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77(3), 437–471.
Kang, H. S., and S. Y. Hong, 2008: Sensitivity of the simulated East Asian summer monsoon climatology to four convective parameterization schemes. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15119, doi:10.1029/2007JD009692.
Kain, J. S., 2004: The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: An update. J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 170–181.
Knutson, T. R., and R. E. Tuleya, 2004: Impacts of CO2-induced warming on simulated hurricane intensities and precipitation: Sensitivity to the choice of climate model and convective parameterization. J. Climate, 17, 3477–3495.
Krishnamurti, T. N., and Coauthors, 1999: Improved weather and seasonal climate forecasts from multimodel superensemble. Science, 285, 1548–1550.
Lee, D. K., D. H. Cha, and S. J. Choi, 2005: A sensitivity study of regional climate simulation to convective parameterization schemes for 1998 East Asian summer monsoon. Terr. Atmos. Oeanic Sci., 16, 989–1015.
Leung, L. R., S. Y. Zhong, Y. Qian, et al., 2004: Evaluation of regional climate simulations of the 1998 and 1999 East Asian summer monsoon using the GAME/HUBUX observational data. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 82(6), 1695–1713.
Lo, J. C.-F., Z. L. Yang, and R. A. Pielke Sr., 2008: Assessment of three dynamical climate downscaling methods using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D09112, doi:10.1029/2007JD009216.
Mapes, B. E., T. T. Warner, M. Xu, and D. J. Gochis, 2004: Comparison of cumulus parameterizations and entrainment using domain-mean wind divergence in a regional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1284–1295.
Pan Jinsong, Zhai Guoqing, and Gao Kun, 2002: Comparisons of three convection parameterization schemes in regional climate simulations. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 26(2), 206–220. (in Chinese)
Pielke, R. A. Sr., 2002: Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling (2nd Ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, California., 676 pp.
Ratnam, J. V., and K. K. Kumar, 2005: Sensitivity of the simulated monsoons of 1987 and 1988 to convective parameterization schemes in MM5. J. Climate, 18, 2724–2743.
Reisner, G., E. A. Werner, and F. D. Fischer, 1998: Micromechanical modeling of martensitc transformation in random microstructures. Int. J. Solids Structures, 35, 2457.
Reynolds, R. W., and T. M. Smith, 1995: A high resolution global sea surface temperature climatology. J. Climate, 8, 1571–1583.
Shukla, J., and coauthors, 2000: Dynamical seasonal prediction. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 2493–2606.
von Storch, H., 1995: Inconsistencies at the interface of climate impact studies and global climate research. Meteor. Z., 4, 72–80.
—, 1999: On the use of “inflation” in downscaling. J. Climate, 12, 3505–3506.
—, and F. Feser, 2000: A spectral nudging technique for dynamical downscaling purposes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 3664–3673.
Waldron, K. M., J. Paegle, and J. D. Horel, 1996: Sensitivity of a spectrally filtered and nudged limited-area model to outer model options. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 529–547.
Wang, B., I. S. Kang, and J. Y. Lee, 2004: Ensemble simulations of Asian-Australian monsoon variability by 11 AGCMs. J. Climate, 17, 803–818.
Wang, W., and N. L. Seaman, 1997: A comparison study of convective parameterization schemes in a mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125(2), 252–277.
Xie, P. P., A. Yatagai, M. Y. Chen, T. Hayasaka, Y. Fukushima, C. M. Liu, and S. Yang, 2007: A gaugebased analysis of daily precipitation over East Asia. J. Hydrometeor., 8(3), 607–626.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the “973” National Basic Research Program of China under Grant Nos. 2011CB952004 and 2006CB400500, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 40705029 and 40830639.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, S., Tang, J. & Chen, X. Impacts of spectral nudging on the sensitivity of a regional climate model to convective parameterizations in East Asia. Acta Meteorol Sin 25, 63–77 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-011-0005-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-011-0005-z