Skip to main content
Log in

Impacts of spectral nudging on the sensitivity of a regional climate model to convective parameterizations in East Asia

  • Published:
Acta Meteorologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sensitivity of a regional climate model (RCM) to cumulus parameterization (CUPA) schemes in modeling summer precipitation over East Asia has been investigated by using the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University-National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model (PSU-NCAR MM5). The feasibility of physical ensemble and the effect of interior (spectral) nudging are also assessed. The RCM simulations are evaluated against the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data and NCEP/CPC precipitation data for three summers (JJA) in 1991, 1998, and 2003. The results show that the RCM is highly sensitive to CUPA schemes. Different CUPA schemes cause distinctive characteristics in the modeling of JJA precipitation and the intraseasonal (daily) variability of regional precipitation. The sensitivity of the RCM simulations to the CUPA schemes is reduced by adopting the spectral nudging technique, which enables the RCM to reproduce more realistic large-scale circulations at the upper levels of the atmosphere as well as near the surface, and better precipitation simulation in the selected experiments. The ensemble simulations using different CUPA schemes show higher skills than individual members for both control runs and spectral nudging runs. The physical ensemble adopting the spectral nudging technique shows the highest downscaling skill in capturing the general circulation patterns for all experiments and improved temporal distributions of precipitation in some regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthes, R. A., 1983: Regional models of the atmosphere in middle latitudes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 111, 1306–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antic, S., R. Laprise, B. Denis, and de El’a R., 2004: Testing the downscaling ability of a one-way nested regional climate model in regions of complex topography. Clim. Dyn., 23, 473–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa, A., 2004: The cumulus parameterization problem: past, present, and future. J. Climate, 17, 2493–2525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, A. K., and M. J. Miller, 1986: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II: Single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, ATEX and Arctic airmass data sets. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 693–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briegleb, B. P., 1992: Delta-Eddington approximation for solar radiation in the NCAR community climate model. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 7603–7612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, C. L., R. A. Pielke Sr., and G. Leoncini, 2005: Dynamical downscaling: Assessment of value retained and added using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). J. Geophys. Res., 110, D05, 108, doi:10.1029/2004JD004,721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, —, and J. O. Adegoke, 2007a: Investigation of the summer climate of the contiguous U.S. and Mexico using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). Part I: Model climatology (1950–2002). J. Climate, 20, 3844–3865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, —, J. Adegoke, S. D. Schubert, and P. J. Pegion, 2007b: Investigation of the summer climate of the contiguous U.S. and Mexico using the Regional AtmosphericModeling System (RAMS). Part II:Model climate variability. J. Climate, 20, 3866–3887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F., and J. Dudhia, 2001: Coupling and advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 569–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J., and O. Christensen, 2003: Severe summertime flooding in Europe. Nature, 421, 805–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis, B., R. Laprise, D. Caya, and J. Côté, 2002: Downscaling ability of one-way nested regional climate models: The big brother experiment. Clim. Dyn., 18, 627–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudhia, J., and Coauthors, 2001: PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Modeling System Tutorial Class Notes and Users’ Guide (MM5 Modeling System Version 3). http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5/mm5v3/tutorial/teachyourself.html.

  • Emanuel, K. A., and D. J. Raymond, 1993: The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models. Meteor. Monogr., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 46, 246 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feser, F., 2006: Enhanced detectability of added value in limited-area model results separated into different spatial scales. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2180–2190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, C. B., and Coauthors, 2005: Regional climate model intercomparison project for Asia. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. J., Z. C. Zhao, Y. H. Ding, R. H. Huang, and F. Giorgi, 2001: Climate change due to greenhouse effects in China as simulated by a regional climate model. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 18(6), 1224–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Y. Xu, Z. C. Zhao, J. S. Pal, and F. Giorgi, 2006: On the role of resolution and topography in the simulation of East Asian precipitation. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 86, 173–185, doi: 10.1007/s00704-005-0214-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Y. Shi, R. Y. Song, F. Giorgi, Y. G. Wang, and D. F. Zhang, 2008: Reduction of future monsoon precipitation over China: Comparison between a high resolution RCM simulation and the driving GCM. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 100, 73–86. doi: 10.1007/s00703-008-0296-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, F., 2006: Regional climate modeling: Status and perspectives. J. Phys. IV, 139, 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grell, G. A., 1993: Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus arameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 764–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gochis, D. J., W. J. Shuttleworth, and Z. L. Yang, 2002: Sensitivity of the modeled northern American monsoon regional climate to convective parameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1282–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S. Y., and H. L. Pan, 1996: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2322–2339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77(3), 437–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H. S., and S. Y. Hong, 2008: Sensitivity of the simulated East Asian summer monsoon climatology to four convective parameterization schemes. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15119, doi:10.1029/2007JD009692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kain, J. S., 2004: The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: An update. J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 170–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, T. R., and R. E. Tuleya, 2004: Impacts of CO2-induced warming on simulated hurricane intensities and precipitation: Sensitivity to the choice of climate model and convective parameterization. J. Climate, 17, 3477–3495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti, T. N., and Coauthors, 1999: Improved weather and seasonal climate forecasts from multimodel superensemble. Science, 285, 1548–1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. K., D. H. Cha, and S. J. Choi, 2005: A sensitivity study of regional climate simulation to convective parameterization schemes for 1998 East Asian summer monsoon. Terr. Atmos. Oeanic Sci., 16, 989–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, L. R., S. Y. Zhong, Y. Qian, et al., 2004: Evaluation of regional climate simulations of the 1998 and 1999 East Asian summer monsoon using the GAME/HUBUX observational data. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 82(6), 1695–1713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, J. C.-F., Z. L. Yang, and R. A. Pielke Sr., 2008: Assessment of three dynamical climate downscaling methods using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D09112, doi:10.1029/2007JD009216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mapes, B. E., T. T. Warner, M. Xu, and D. J. Gochis, 2004: Comparison of cumulus parameterizations and entrainment using domain-mean wind divergence in a regional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1284–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Jinsong, Zhai Guoqing, and Gao Kun, 2002: Comparisons of three convection parameterization schemes in regional climate simulations. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 26(2), 206–220. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke, R. A. Sr., 2002: Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling (2nd Ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, California., 676 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnam, J. V., and K. K. Kumar, 2005: Sensitivity of the simulated monsoons of 1987 and 1988 to convective parameterization schemes in MM5. J. Climate, 18, 2724–2743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisner, G., E. A. Werner, and F. D. Fischer, 1998: Micromechanical modeling of martensitc transformation in random microstructures. Int. J. Solids Structures, 35, 2457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, R. W., and T. M. Smith, 1995: A high resolution global sea surface temperature climatology. J. Climate, 8, 1571–1583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, J., and coauthors, 2000: Dynamical seasonal prediction. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 2493–2606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Storch, H., 1995: Inconsistencies at the interface of climate impact studies and global climate research. Meteor. Z., 4, 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1999: On the use of “inflation” in downscaling. J. Climate, 12, 3505–3506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, and F. Feser, 2000: A spectral nudging technique for dynamical downscaling purposes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 3664–3673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, K. M., J. Paegle, and J. D. Horel, 1996: Sensitivity of a spectrally filtered and nudged limited-area model to outer model options. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 529–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., I. S. Kang, and J. Y. Lee, 2004: Ensemble simulations of Asian-Australian monsoon variability by 11 AGCMs. J. Climate, 17, 803–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., and N. L. Seaman, 1997: A comparison study of convective parameterization schemes in a mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125(2), 252–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, P. P., A. Yatagai, M. Y. Chen, T. Hayasaka, Y. Fukushima, C. M. Liu, and S. Yang, 2007: A gaugebased analysis of daily precipitation over East Asia. J. Hydrometeor., 8(3), 607–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianping Tang  (汤剑平).

Additional information

Supported by the “973” National Basic Research Program of China under Grant Nos. 2011CB952004 and 2006CB400500, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 40705029 and 40830639.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, S., Tang, J. & Chen, X. Impacts of spectral nudging on the sensitivity of a regional climate model to convective parameterizations in East Asia. Acta Meteorol Sin 25, 63–77 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-011-0005-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-011-0005-z

Key words

Navigation