Skip to main content
Log in

Research on structure state identification method of segmented pipeline based on distributed optical fiber sensing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In view of the bending failure problem of segmented buried pipelines under the condition of foundation soil settlement, this paper establishes a structural state identification method suitable for segmented buried pipelines based on distributed optical fiber sensing technology to study the structural response of segmented buried pipelines under the condition of foundation soil settlement. Based on the Ω-type bell-and-spigot joint monitoring unit, this study realizes the nondestructive monitoring of segmented pipeline structure response using distributed optical fiber sensing technology. The distributed optical fiber sensing system is used to monitor the bending strain curve of the pipe body under the action of foundation settlement based on Brillouin optical time-domain analysis (BOTDA) principle, the bending strain of the segmented buried pipeline body was determined. Through the parameter sensitivity analysis of the segmented buried pipeline-soil finite element model, it is determined that the vertical spring stiffness coefficient of the foundation soil is the main factor affecting the vertical displacement and bending strain of the segmented buried pipeline. Then, the vertical spring stiffness coefficient of the foundation soil is used as the correction term, and the bending strain monitoring value of the pipe body is used as the objective function to correct the finite element model of the segmented buried pipeline. Based on the revised pipeline finite element model, we obtain the real stiffness of the foundation soil, and invert the vertical displacement of the pipeline and the bending angle of the socket and socket of buried pipelines to realize structural status recognition for segmented buried pipelines. The effectiveness of the method is verified by full-scale experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Rahman MA, Taniyama H (2015) Analysis of a buried pipeline subjected to fault displacement: a DEM and FEM study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 71:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Karamitros DK, Bouckovalas GD, Kouretzis GP et al (2011) An analytical method for strength verification of buried steel pipelines at normal fault crossings. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(11):14521464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rakitin B, Ming X (2015) Centrifuge testing to simulate buried reinforced concrete pipe joints subjected to traffic loading. Can Geotech J 52(11):1762–1774. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maosong H, Xiancheng Z, Jian Y et al (2019) Estimating the effects of tunnelling on existing jointed pipelines based on Winkler model. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 86:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kan W, Xinming Q, Zhenyi L (2020) Experimental and numerical investigations on predictor equations for determining parameters of blasting-vibration on underground gas pipe networks-ScienceDirect. Process Saf Environ Prot 133:315–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.10.034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brachman RWI, Moore ID, Munro SM (2008) Compaction effects on strains within profiled thermoplastic pipes. Geosynth Int. 15(2):72–85. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2008.15.2.72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Masada T, Sargand SM (2007) Peaking deflections of flexible pipe during initial backfilling process. J Trans Eng. 133(2):105–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:2(105)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buco J, Emeriault F, Kastner R (2008) Full-scale experimental determination of concrete pipe joint behavior and its modeling. J of Infrastruct Sys. 14(3):230–240. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:3(230)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chenrong Z, Jinru Z, Maosong H et al (2019) Winkler load-transfer analysis for pipelines subjected to surface load. Comput Geotech 111:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trickey SA, Moore ID, Asce M (2007) Three-dimensional response of buried pipes under circular surface loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 133(2):219–223. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:2(219)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dhar A, Moore I (2002) Corrugated high-density polyethylene pipe: laboratory testing and two-dimensional analysis to develop limit states design. Trans Res Rec J Trans Res Board. 1814(1):157–163. https://doi.org/10.3141/1814-18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhar AS, Asce S, Moore ID et al (2004) Two-dimensional analyses of thermoplastic culvert deformations and strains. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 130(2):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:2(199)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng L, Kleiner Y (2013) State of the art review of inspection technologies for condition assessment of water pipes. Measurement. 46(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.05.032

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Galleher JJ, Bell G, Romer AE (2005) Comparison of two electromagnetic techniques to determine the physical condition of PCCP. Pipeline Div Spec Conf 2005. https://doi.org/10.1061/40800(180)31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kong X, Tang X, Humphrey D et al (2010) Live inspection of large diameter PCCP using a free-swimming tool. Pipeline Div Spec Conf 2010. https://doi.org/10.1061/40800(180)31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Essamin O, Holley M (2004) Great man made river authority (GMRA) the role of acoustic monitoring in the management of the worlds largest prestressed concrete cylinder pipe project. Pipeline Div Spec Congr 2004. https://doi.org/10.1061/40745(146)28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yanjun Y, Polak MA, Cascante G (2010) Nondestructive evaluation of the depth of surface-breaking cracks in concrete pipes. Tunn Undergr Space Tech Inc Trenchless Tech Res 25(6):736–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2009.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arsénio AM, Dheenathayalan P, Hanssen R et al (2015) Pipe failure predictions in drinking water systems using satellite observations. Str Infrastr Eng. 11(8):1102–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xin F, Wenjing W, Xingyu L, Xiaowei Z, Ansari F, Jing Z (2015) Experimental investigations on detecting lateral buckling for subsea pipelines with distributed fiber optic sensors. Smart Str Sys 15(1–2):245–258. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.15.2.245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xin F, Wenjing W, Dewei M, Ansari F, Jing Z (2016) Distributed monitoring method for upheaval buckling in subsea pipelines with BOTDA sensors. Adv Struct Eng 20(2):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216659990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xin F, WenJing W, Sheng Z, Tong Z, Jing Z (2016) Performance monitoring of extreme large-diameter prestressed concrete cylinder pipe with distributed fiber optic sensors. Pipelines 2016:553–564. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479957.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mirzaei A, Bahrampour AR, Taraz M et al (2013) Transient response of buried oil pipelines fiber optic leak detector based on the distributed temperature measurement. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 65(65):110–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ravet F, Lufan Z, Xiaoyi B et al (2016) Detection of buckling in steel pipeline and column by the distributed Brillouin sensor. Opt Fiber Technol 12(4):305–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2005.12.002

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yasue N, Naruse H, Hiramatsu K et al (2000) Concrete pipe strain measurement using optical fiber sensor. Tech Rep of Ieice Oft. 99(3):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/25.833000

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52079024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenjing Wu or Xin Feng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, W., Xing, G. & Feng, X. Research on structure state identification method of segmented pipeline based on distributed optical fiber sensing. J Civil Struct Health Monit 14, 255–268 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-023-00719-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-023-00719-z

Keywords

Navigation