Skip to main content
Log in

Use of structural health monitoring to extend the service life of the Diefenbaker Bridge

  • Application based
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A structural health monitoring system was installed on the 60-year-old Diefenbaker Bridge, located in Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada, to investigate in-situ bridge behaviours, such as the degree of composite action, lateral load distribution, and dynamic load influence. The 304 m long, seven span bridge consists of two separate fracture critical superstructures, each comprising a cast-in-place concrete deck supported by two non-composite welded wide flange girders. Previous studies, based solely on a structural analysis, concluded that the connection of the lateral bracing to the girder web had less than 5 years of remaining fatigue life. Due to the uncertainty involved in this calculation, the data acquired from 6 months of field monitoring were used to define the structure’s response to live loading, and to calibrate a finite element model that was used to characterize the three-dimensional stress state at that connection. It was found that unexpected composite action, increased load sharing between the girders, and minimal dynamic load influence exist in the bridge. Results were compared with those obtained using the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CAN/CSA S6–14). Based on the monitoring results, it was concluded that costly improvements to the connection detail were not required, since the remaining fatigue life was estimated to be at least 52 years. In addition, it was found that the exterior girders are more heavily loaded than the interior girders, and the northbound structure is more heavily loaded than the southbound, permitting the location of the most critical connection for fatigue life to be identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stantec consulting (2015) Diefenbaker Bridge management plan, City of Prince Albert, Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada

  2. ISL Engineering and land services (2016) Diefenbaker assessment and evaluation report, Saskatchewan ministry of highways and infrastructure, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

  3. Zhou Y (2006) Assessment of bridge remaining fatigue life through field strain measurement. J Bridge Eng 11(6):737–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fasl J. (2013) Estimating the remaining fatigue life of steel bridges using field measurements, Ph.D. dissertation, the university of Texas at Austin

  5. AASHTO (2018) The manual for bridge evaluation, 2nd edn. American association of state highway and transportation officials, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Connor R, Fisher J (2006) Identifying effective and ineffective retrofits for distortion fatigue cracking in steel bridges using field instrumentation. J Bridge Eng 11(6):745–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher J, Mertz D, Zhong A (1983) Steel bridge members under variable amplitude long life fatigue loading. Transportation research board national research council, Washington, D.C., USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. AASHTO (2017) LRFD bridge design specification, 8th edn. American association of state highway and transportation officials, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  9. Swenson K, Frank K (1984) The application of cumulative damage fatigue theory to highway bridge fatigue design. Center for transportation research, Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leander J, Andersson A, Karoumi R (2010) Monitoring and enhanced fatigue evaluation of a steel railway bridge. Eng Struct 32:854–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stantec Consulting (2013) Prince albert area second bridge river crossing study, City of Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada

  12. CAN/CSA S6-14 (2014) Canadian highway bridge design code, Canadian standards association, Rexdale, Ontario, Canada

  13. National cooperative highway research program (1990) Distortion induced fatigue cracking in steel bridges, NCHRP Report 335. Transportation research board, national research council, Washington, DC, USA

  14. Beer F, Johnston E, Dewolf J, Mazurek D (2009) Mechanics of materials, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  15. ASTM E1049-85 (2011) Standard practices for cycle counting in fatigue analysis, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA

  16. CSI (2019) SAP 2000 integrated software for structural analysis and design. Computers and structures Inc., Berkeley, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  17. ANSYS Inc. (2019) ANSYS simulation software, version 19, Delaware, USA

  18. Ontario ministry of transportation (2008) Ontario structure inspection manual. Toronto, ON, Canada

  19. Feldman L, Jackson K, Sparling B, Sparks G (2011) Comparison of load rating techniques for the red deer river bridge. Can J Civ Eng 38(10):1072–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miner M (1945) Cumulative damage in fatigue. J Appl Mech 12:A159–A164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moses F, Schilling C, Raju K (1987) Fatigue evaluation procedures for steel bridges. Transportation research board, national research council, Washington, D.C. USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. D. Wegner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. This manuscript has no associated data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morgan, C.J., Sparling, B.F. & Wegner, L.D. Use of structural health monitoring to extend the service life of the Diefenbaker Bridge. J Civil Struct Health Monit 12, 913–929 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-022-00585-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-022-00585-1

Keywords

Navigation