Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structural performance assessment by acceleration measurements based on null space method and fast independent component analysis for the frame-shear wall structure under earthquake wave

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a novel two-stage plastic-state detection strategy is studied. In the first stage, discrete wavelet transform (DWT) is used to obtain the low-frequency response signal. The Hankel matrix is constructed with a low-frequency response signal, and singular value decomposition (SVD) is used to divide the null space and non-null space. The index degree of nonlinearity (DoN) was proposed for plasticity detection, and the corresponding limit of linearity (LLI) was constructed. In the second stage, based on DWT and fast independent component analysis, normalized source distribution vector (NSDV) was proposed to locate the structural damage. The method was verified by numerical simulation and a three-story frame test. The results show that when the structure is in an elastic state, DoN is less than LLI; when the structure enters the plastic state, DoN is larger than LLI and increases with the enhancement of plastic degree; thus, the proposed index NSDV can locate the structural damage. The proposed method can be used for structural plasticity detection and damage location, and has strong robustness and engineering practicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ni PH, Li J, Hao H et al (2020) Reliability analysis and design optimization of nonlinear structures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 198:106860

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xin Y, Hao H, Li J et al (2019) Bayesian based nonlinear model updating using instantaneous characteristics of structural dynamic responses. Eng Struct 183:459–474

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prawin J, Rao A, Lakshmi K (2021) Damage detection in nonlinear vibrating structures using model updating. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01397-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang L, Zhang Y, Song W et al (2021) A nonlinear damage constitutive model of PVC coated fabrics. Structures 30(1):368–377

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen L, Mei Y, Fu J et al (2020) Study on the sensitive factors of structural nonlinear damage based on the innovation series. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 20(10):2042011

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xin Y, Li J, Hao H (2020) Damage detection in initially nonlinear structures based on variational mode decomposition. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 20(10):2042009

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou L, Wu S, Yang J (2008) Experimental study of an adaptive extended Kalman filter for structural damage identification. J Infrastruct Syst 14(1):42–51

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goh C, Tan K, Liu DS et al (2010) A competitive and cooperative co-evolutionary approach multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm design. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):42–54

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsiavos A, Markic T, Schlatter D et al (2021) Shaking table investigation of inelastic deformation demand for a structure isolated using friction-pendulum sliding bearings. Structures 31:1041–1052

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xiang Y, Koetaka Y, Okuda N (2019) Single-story steel structure with LVEM-isolated floor: elastic seismic performance and design response spectrum. Eng Struct 196:109314

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao YL, Xu ZD (2017) Elastic-plastic time history analysis of MR damping structure based on LQG algorithm. Appl Mech Mater 858:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang X, Zheng GT (2016) Equivalent dynamic stiffness mapping technique for identifying nonlinear structural elements from frequency response functions. Mech Syst Signal Process 68–69:394–415

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang J, Wierschem N, Spencer B et al (2015) Experimental study of track nonlinear energy sinks for dynamic response reduction. Eng Struct 94:9–15

    Google Scholar 

  14. Noël JP, Kerschen G (2013) Frequency-domain subspace identification of nonlinear mechanical systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 40(2):701–717

    Google Scholar 

  15. Michael F (2014) Hilbert transform methods for nonparametric identification of nonlinear time varying vibration systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 47:66–77

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prawin J, Rao A (2018) Detection of nonlinear structural behavior using time-frequency and multivariate analysis. Smart Struct Syst 22(6):711–725

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen H, Kurt M, Lee YS et al (2014) Experimental system identification of the dynamics of a vibro-impact beam with a view towards structural health monitoring and damage detection. Mech Syst Signal Process 46:91–113

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pei JS, Masri SF (2014) Demonstration and validation of constructive initialization method for neural networks to approximate nonlinear functions in engineering mechanics applications. Nonlinear Dyn 79:2099–2119

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hadjidoukas PE, Angelikopoulos P, Papadimitriou C et al (2015) Π4U: A high performance computing framework for Bayesian uncertainty quantification of complex models. J Comput Phys 284:1–21

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hot A, Kershen G, Foltete E et al (2012) Detection and quantification of non-linear structural behavior using principal component analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 26:104–116

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prawin J, Rao ARM, Lakshmi K (2015) Nonlinear identification of structures using ambient vibration data. Comput Struct 154:116–134

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yan AM, Golinval JC (2006) Null subspace-based damage detection of structures using vibration measurements. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(3):611–626

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prawin J, Lakshmi K, Rao ARM (2020) Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions with very limited measurements. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 31(5):665–686

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chao SH, Loh CH, Tseng MH (2014) Structural damage assessment using output-only measurement: localization and quantification. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 25(9):1097–1106

    Google Scholar 

  25. Prawin J, Rao ARM, Lakshmi K (2016) Nonlinear parametric identification strategy combining reverse path and hybrid dynamic quantum particle swarm optimization. Nonlinear Dyn 84(2):797–815

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Sarmadi H, Yuen KV (2020) Early damage detection by an innovative unsupervised learning method based on kernel null space and peak‐over‐threshold. Comput Aid Civil Infrastruct Eng: 1–18.

  27. Lee NL (2021) Application of two-stage evaluation and optimization update methods for the structural damage detection of a portal beam structure. Structures 9:684–690

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li Y, Jiang R, Tapia J et al (2020) Structural damage identification based on short-time temporal coherence using free-vibration response signals. Measurement 151:107209

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mousavi AA, Zhang C, Masri SF et al (2021) Structural damage detection method based on the complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise: a model steel truss bridge case study. Struct Health Monit. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217211013535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zarzoso V, Comon P (2010) Robust independent component analysis by iterative maximization of the kurtosis contrast with algebraic optimal step size. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 21(2):248–261

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yang Y, Nagarajaiah S (2012) Time-frequency blind source separation using independent component analysis for output-only modal identification of highly damped structures. J Struct Eng 139(10):1780–1793

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yang Y, Nagarajaiah S (2014) Blind identification of damage in time-varying systems using independent component analysis with wavelet transform. Mech Syst Signal Process 47(1):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang YW, Zhang Y (2010) Fault detection of non-Gaussian processes based on modified independent component analysis. Chem Eng Sci 65(16):4630–4639

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jw E, Ye JM, He LL et al (2021) Performance analysis for complex-valued FastICA and its improvement based on the Tukey M-estimator. Digital Signal Processing 115:103077

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang SC, Lin P, Chen YM et al (2018) Mixed-signal extraction and recognition of wind turbine blade multiple-area damage Based on improved Fast-ICA. Optik Int J Light Electron Opt 179(1):1152–1159

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang G, Harichandran RS, Ramuhalli P (2011) Application of noise cancelling and damage detection algorithms in NDE of concrete bridge decks using impact signals[J]. J Nondestr Eval 30(4):259–272

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vijayarajan R, Muttan S (2015) Discrete wavelet transform based principal component averaging fusion for medical images. AEU Int J Electron Commun 69(6):896–902

    Google Scholar 

  38. China Institute of Building Standard Design and Research (2015) JGJ/T 101–2015 specification for seismic test of buildings. China Architecture and Building Press.

  39. China Academy of Building Research (2010) GB 50011–2010 code for seismic design of buildings. China Architecture & Building Press.

  40. China Institute of Building Standard Design and Research (2010) JGJ 3–2010 technical specification for concrete structures of tall building. China Architecture & Building Press.

  41. China Academy of Building Research (2010) GB 50010–2010 code for design of concrete structures. China Architecture & Building Press.

  42. Scott BD (1982) Stress–Strain behavior of concrete by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. ACI J 79(1):13–27

    Google Scholar 

  43. Filippou FC, Neuenhofer A (1997) Evaluation of nonlinear frame finite-element models. J Struct Eng 123(7):958–966

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lin X, Lu X, Miao Z et al (2009) Finite element analysis and engineering application of RC core-tube structures based on the multi-layer shell element. Chin Civil Eng J 42(3):49–54

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tausif M, Khan E, Hasan M et al (2019) SMFrWF: segmented modified fractional wavelet filter: fast low-memory discrete wavelet transform (DWT). IEEE Access 7:84448–84467

    Google Scholar 

  46. Xiong L, Zhong X, Yang CN (2020) DWT-SISA: a secure and effective discrete wavelet transform-based secret image sharing with authentication. Signal Process 173:107571

    Google Scholar 

  47. Liu Q, Yang S, Liu J et al (2020) A discrete wavelet transform and singular value decomposition-based digital video watermark method. Appl Math Model 85:273–293

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Li D, Cao M, Manoach E et al (2021) A multiscale reconstructed attractors-based method for identification of structural damage under impact excitations. J Sound Vib 495:115925

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sun W, Zhou Y, Xiang J et al (2021) Hankel matrix-based condition monitoring of rolling element bearings: an enhanced framework for time-series analysis. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3062194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ahn HS, Park SH, Ye JC (2020) Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction using annihilating filter-based low-rank Hankel matrix approach. Magn Reson Med 83(3):858–871

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang S, Zhang YD (2020) Low-rank hankel matrix completion for robust time-frequency analysis. IEEE Trans Signal Process 68:6171–6186

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. Almaz E, Akyol A (2020) Stripping of the NaI (Tl) detector response function for continuous energy photon spectrum by SVD approach. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B 474:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  53. Prasetyo H, Hsia CH, Liu CH (2020) Vulnerability attacks of SVD-based video watermarking scheme in an IoT environment. IEEE Access 8:69919–69936

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yaghmaee F, Peyvandi K (2020) Improving image inpainting quality by a new SVD-based decomposition. Multimed Tools Appl 79:13795–13809

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their appreciation for financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51808119), Open Funds of Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology and Informatization in Civil Engineering (Grant No. KF-T19006), Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (Grant No. 2020EEEVL0402) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No.2020M682101).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology and Informatization in Civil Engineering, Fuzhou, 350118, China

    Sheng-Lan Ma & Yu-Hao Liu

  2. CSCEC Strait Construction and Development Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, 350015, China

    Sheng-Lan Ma

  3. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China

    Shao-Fei Jiang

Authors
  1. Sheng-Lan Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu-Hao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shao-Fei Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shao-Fei Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no any competing interest for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, SL., Liu, YH. & Jiang, SF. Structural performance assessment by acceleration measurements based on null space method and fast independent component analysis for the frame-shear wall structure under earthquake wave. J Civil Struct Health Monit 12, 1027–1041 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-022-00575-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-022-00575-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation